Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection induces pathological changes via chronic inflammation and virulence factors, thereby increasing the risk of gastric cancer development. Compared with invasive examination methods, H. pylori-related serum indicators are cost-effective and valuable for the early detection of gastric cancer (GC); however, large-scale clinical validation and sufficient understanding of the specific molecular mechanisms involved are lacking. Therefore, a comprehensive review and analysis of recent advances in this field is necessary. In this review, we systematically analyze the relationship between H. pylori and GC and discuss the application of new molecular biomarkers in GC screening. We also summarize the screening potential and application of anti-H. pylori immunoglobulin G and virulence factor-related serum antibodies for identifying GC risk. These indicators provide early warning of infection and enhance screening accuracy. Additionally, we discuss the potential combination of multiple screening indicators for the comprehensive analysis and development of emerging testing methods to improve the accuracy and efficiency of GC screening. Although this review may lack sufficient evidence due to limitations in existing studies, including small sample sizes, regional variations, and inconsistent testing methods, it contributes to advancing personalized precision medicine in high-risk populations and developing GC screening strategies.

The operation sequence of bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia varies among endoscopists, which interferes with clinical procedure. The study aimed to investigate the influence of different operation sequences on the outcomes of quality indicators and improve bidirectional endoscopy performance.

A randomized trial was conducted at the affiliated hospital of a medical university in China. Outpatients who initially underwent bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia were enrolled. Eligible patients were randomized to either the colonoscopy-first group or the esophagogastroduodenoscopy-first group. Dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage and oxybuprocaine hydrochloride gel were administered for topical anesthesia. After finishing the previous process, the subsequent one was performed immediately. Quality indicators of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were compared between the groups.

Analyzing 395 combined procedures, the cecal intubation rate, discomfort score during esophagogastroduodenoscopy, examination score of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and colorectal polyp detection rate were similar between the two groups. The colonoscopy-first group had lower colonic spasm incidence (66.0% vs. 30.3%, p < 0.001), shorter median cecal intubation time (254 s vs. 211 s, p < 0.001), and higher colonoscopy comfort rate (72.5% vs. 85.6%, p < 0.001) compared with the esophagogastroduodenoscopy-first group. Operation sequence significantly affected the incidence of colonic spasm (OR 4.739, 95%CI 3.054-7.352, p = 0.000), which correlated with cecal intubation time (r = 0.196, p < 0.001) and patient discomfort score (r = 0.136, p = 0.007).

In bidirectional endoscopy with topical anesthesia, performing colonoscopy first may improve colonoscopy performance without affecting esophagogastroduodenoscopy examination. The study was registered prior to conducting the research in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( https://www.chictr.org.cn ) on November 7, 2023 with the trial identification number ChiCTR2300077408.

Endoscopy is vital for detecting and diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases. Systematic examination protocols are key to enhancing detection, particularly for the early identification of premalignant conditions. Publicly available endoscopy image databases are crucial for machine learning research, yet challenges persist, particularly in identifying upper gastrointestinal anatomical landmarks to ensure effective and precise endoscopic procedures. However, many existing datasets have inconsistent labeling and limited accessibility, leading to biased models and reduced generalizability. This paper introduces GastroHUN, an open dataset documenting stomach screening procedures based on a systematic protocol. GastroHUN includes 8,834 images from 387 patients and 4,729 labeled video sequences, all annotated by four experts. The dataset covers 22 anatomical landmarks in the stomach and includes an additional category for unqualified images, making it a valuable resource for AI model development. By providing a robust public dataset and baseline deep learning models for image and sequence classification, GastroHUN serves as a benchmark for future research and aids in the development of more effective algorithms.

Gastric cancer (GC) represents one of the most lethal forms of cancer. When identified at an early stage, conventional treatment can be curative. The key to identifying GC at an early stage is high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). This has led to an increased focus on quality standards in EGD to improve the detection rates of early GC and its premalignant lesions (PMLs), such as atrophic gastritis. In Asia, the routine use of antiperistaltic (antispasmodic) agents is advocated to improve the quality of mucosal visualization during diagnostic EGD. The rationale is that the cessation of peristalsis should yield a more stable intragastric visual field to enhance the detection of early GC. Hyoscine and glucagon are commonly used as antiperistaltic agents. Both, however, must be given either intravenously or via intramuscular injection. They both also have potentially serious systemic side effects, which can limit their routine use, particularly in the elderly or co-morbid patients. As a result of these side effects, there is growing interest in using peppermint oil or L-menthol topically as anti-peristaltic agents. As these agents are applied topically (either via direct spraying during the EGD or consumed as a premedication before the EGD), they are associated with fewer adverse events than systemically applied agents. This study aimed to synthesize, for the first time, the available data on the use of topically applied anti-peristaltic agents to decrease or stop peristalsis during diagnostic EGDs. This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Its reporting is per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. This study was registered prospectively with the PROSPERO register, registration number CRD42024601488. This systematic review and meta-analysis encompassed five high-quality randomized controlled trials with a low risk of bias. All included studies were conducted in Asian countries between 2011 and 2022. They comprised 538 patients, with a mean age of 62.7. Four of the included studies look at topically applied L-menthol at 160 mg, while one study looked at the role of 160 mg of phloroglucinol administered as a 20 mL oral premedication liquid 15 minutes before the EGD. All included trials involved diagnostic EGDs and reported their primary outcomes using the same scoring systems. The primary outcome of interest for this study was the efficacy of the antiperistaltic agents at stopping peristalsis for the duration of a diagnostic EGD. We found an odds ratio of 4.22 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 2.47 to 7.21, favoring the antiperistaltic agents in terms of attaining a peristalsis score of 1 after administration.  This systematic review and meta-analysis represent the most up-to-date review on topical antiperistaltic agents during diagnostic EGD. We found that topical antiperistaltic agents effectively decrease or stop peristalsis during an EGD, and these effects persist for the duration of the EGD. Larger-scale studies will be required to determine whether their routine use translates into increased detection rates of early GC and its PMLs.

Most gastric neoplastic lesions appear in patients with gastric premalignant conditions. Here, we present the case of a 75-year-old woman with no prior history of Helicobacter pylori infection, with a big gastric adenoma resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection. Histopathological examination revealed high-grade foveolar dysplasia. Interestingly, surrounding mucosa was normal, without signs of H. pylori infection or gastric preneoplastic conditions. The presented case emphasizes that high-risk gastric lesions may be present within a normal stomach without endoscopic signs of H. pylori infection or premalignant conditions. This underscores the importance of careful examination in regular practice of esophagogastroduodenoscopy, even in low-risk patients.

Endoscopic resection (ER)-a minimal invasive procedure, compared to surgical gastrectomy, with the advantage of preserving the entire stomach and maintaining the patient's quality of life-is a widely used curative treatment for early gastric cancers (EGCs). Despite its advantages, such as the preservation of the whole stomach, a large area of the gastric mucosa with histologic changes such as atrophy and intestinal metaplasia remains after ER, and so does the risk of metachronous gastric cancers (MGCs). Therefore, regular surveillance endoscopy after curative ER of EGCs is important so that MGCs are detected early and so minimally invasive ER remains a treatment option. To date, the optimal interval for surveillance endoscopy after curative ER of EGCs has not been established. Therefore, this review summarizes the results of the published studies on this topic with the aim of establishing the optimal surveillance interval for early identification of MGCs. Based on my review, the median timing of MGC occurrence is within 3 years, and reports suggest biannual endoscopy during the first 3 years; however, the evidence suggests that individual patient characteristics may influence the risk of MGCs. Therefore, stratified endoscopic strategies for surveillance based on patient characteristics, such as age, family history of gastric cancer, synchronous gastric lesions, and corpus intestinal metaplasia, should be applied.

We aimed to identify quality indicator for esophagogastroduodenoscopy for detecting upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer. Data from 43,526 consecutive health checkups from August 2012 to January 2022 were retrospectively collected. The study ultimately analyzed 42,387 examinations by 12 endoscopists who performed more than 1000 examinations, including all cancers detected. These endoscopists were classified either into fast/slow group based on their mean examination time for a normal finding of esophagogastroduodenoscopy during their first year of the examination, or small/large group based on number of endoscopic images, respectively. The association between UGI cancer detection rate and examination time or the number of images was analyzed, using 5 minutes or 50 images as cutoff values. The detection rate of overall (8 pharyngeal, 39 esophageal, 69 gastric) cancers in the fast, slow, small, and large groups were 0.17%, 0.32%, 0.21%, and 0.31%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, endoscopists in the fast group or the small group were less likely to detect overall UGI cancer (OR: 0.596, 95% CI: 0.373-0.952, P = .030; OR: 0.652, 95% CI: 0.434-0.979, P = .039). Additionally, repeated endoscopy within 2 years had a higher overall cancer detection rate, compared with repeated screening after 2 years. In a sub-analysis, a significant negative relationship was found between the detection rate of gastric cancer and the number of gastric images < 35 (OR: 0.305, 95% CI: 0.189-0.492, P = .000). There was also a negative correlation trend between the detection rate of pharyngeal and esophageal cancers and the number of esophageal images < 11 (OR: 0.395, 95% CI: 0.156-1.001, P = .050). The optimal number of images and screening 2-year interval are considered useful quality indicators for detecting UGI cancer. This study also suggests that a total of 50 images, or 35 images of the stomach are suitable for detecting UGI cancer, or gastric cancer, during screening endoscopy.

Recognizing Helicobacter pylori infection during endoscopy is important because it can lead to the performance of confirmatory testing. Linked color imaging (LCI) is an image enhancement technique that can improve the detection of gastrointestinal lesions. The purpose of this study was to compare LCI to conventional white light imaging (WLI) in the endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. All studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of LCI or WLI in the endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori were eligible. Studies on magnifying endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and artificial intelligence were excluded.

Thirty-four studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 32 reported the performance of WLI and eight reported the performance of LCI in diagnosing H. pylori infection. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of WLI in the diagnosis of H. pylori infection were 0.528 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.517 to 0.540) and 0.821 (95% CI, 0.811 to 0.830), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of LCI in the diagnosis of H. pylori were 0.816 (95% CI, 0.790 to 0.841) and 0.868 (95% CI, 0.850 to 0.884), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratios of WLI and LCI were 15.447 (95% CI, 8.225 to 29.013) and 31.838 (95% CI, 15.576 to 65.078), respectively. The areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves of WLI and LCI were 0.870 and 0.911, respectively.

LCI showed higher sensitivity in the endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori infection than standard WLI.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an endoscopic examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract that requires insufflation with gas, leading to intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH). There is evidence suggesting that IAH positively correlates with intracranial pressure (ICP) and possibly with intraocular pressure (IOP). The aim of this study was to examine the effect of a routine screening EGD on the IOP.

In this observational study, 25 patients were recruited; 15 males with a mean age of 50 ± 18 years and 10 females with a mean age of 45 ± 14 years. EGD was conducted under sedation in 21 subjects. Both eyes' IOP measurements were performed using Tonopen Avia in the sitting and left lateral decubitus positions before sedation and the start of EGD, and subsequently in the left lateral decubitus position when the endoscope reached the duodenum (D2) and at the end of the procedure. The final measurement was performed in the sitting position 10 min after the end of the procedure.

The mean IOP in the sitting position was 15.16 ± 2.27 mmHg, and in the left lateral decubitus position, 15.68 ± 2.82 mmHg. When the gastroscope entered the D2, it was 21.84 ± 6.55 mmHg, at the end of the procedure, 15.80 ± 3.25 mmHg, and 10 min later, 13.12 ± 3.63 mmHg. There was a statistically significant IOP increase when the gastroscope entered the duodenum (p < 0.01). At the end of the gastroscopy, the IOP significantly decreased compared to the one registered when the gastroscope entered the D2 (p < 0.001) and it became similar to the values measured before the EGD, in the same left lateral decubitus position (p > 0.05).

Significant changes in IOP were observed during the EGD. IOP fluctuations during EGD should be taken into account, especially in patients that need repeated EGDs during their life or in patients with glaucoma. Further studies are needed to better understand the short-effect and long-effect influence of an IOP increase in these patients.

Current studies have shown that longer observation time can improve neoplastic detection rate. This study aimed to clarify whether endoscopists with longer observation times can detect more focal lesions.

Based on the mean examination time for Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) without biopsy, endoscopists were divided into fast and slow groups, and the detection rate of focal lesions was compared between the two groups. Univariate analysis, multivariate analysis and restricted cubic spline were used to explore the factors of focal lesion detection rate.

Mean examination time of EGD without biopsy was 4.5 min. The cut-off times used were 5 min. 17 endoscopists were classified into the fast (4.7 ± 3.6 min), and 16 into the slow (7.11 ± 4.6 min) groups. Compared with fast endoscopists, slow endoscopists had a higher detection rate of focal lesions (47.2% vs. 51.4%, P < 0.001), especially in the detection of gastric lesions (29.7% vs. 35.9%, P < 0.001). In univariate and multivariate analyses, observation time, patient age and gender, expert, biopsy rate, and number of images were factors in FDR. There is a nonlinear relationship between observation time and FDR.

Longer examination time improves the detection rate of focal lesions. Observation time is an important quality indicator of the EGD examination.

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) screening is being implemented in countries with a high incidence of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancer. High-quality EGD screening ensures the yield of early diagnosis and prevents suffering from advanced UGI cancer and minimal operational-related discomfort. However, performance varied dramatically among endoscopists, and quality control for EGD screening remains suboptimal. Guidelines have recommended potential measures for endoscopy quality improvement and research has been conducted for evidence. Moreover, artificial intelligence offers a promising solution for computer-aided diagnosis and quality control during EGD examinations. In this review, we summarized the key points for quality assurance in EGD screening based on current guidelines and evidence. We also outline the latest evidence, limitations, and future prospects of the emerging role of artificial intelligence in EGD quality control, aiming to provide a foundation for improving the quality of EGD screening.

Early detection and management of gastric adenoma are important for preventing gastric cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate the predictors of missed gastric adenoma on screening endoscopy in Korea and identify the risk factors associated with interval precancerous gastric lesions.

All cases of gastric adenomas diagnosed via screening endoscopy between 2007 and 2019 were reviewed. Among them, those who had undergone endoscopy within 3 years were included in the present study. Missed gastric adenoma was defined as gastric adenoma diagnosed within 3 years after negative screening endoscopy.

In total, 295 cases of gastric adenoma were identified. Of these, 95 (32.2%) were missed gastric adenoma cases (mean age, 60.6 years; average interval between final and index endoscopies, 12.6 months); the remaining 200 (67.8%) were newly detected adenoma cases. Univariate analysis revealed that male sex, endoscopist experience, observation time, and presence of gastric intestinal metaplasia (pathologically proven) were associated with missed gastric adenoma. Multivariate analysis revealed that gastric intestinal metaplasia (odds ratio [OR], 2.736; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.320-5.667; P = 0.007) and shorter observation time of the index screening endoscopy (B, -0.011; OR, 0.990; 95% CI, 0.986-0.993; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for missed gastric adenoma. The optimal cut-off for the observation time for detecting gastric adenoma was 3.53 minutes (area under curve, 0.738; 95% CI, 0.677-0.799; P < 0.001).

Gastric intestinal metaplasia is an indication of missed gastric adenoma. Therefore, careful inspection of gastric mucosa with gastric intestinal metaplasia and proper observation time can lower the possibility of missing the gastric adenoma during screening.

The documented variation in gastric cancer (GC) detection among endoscopists has often been dismissed as a coincidental artefact of the low incidence of gastric neoplasms; it is not considered associated with differences in physicians' performance of the esophagogastroduodenoscopy procedure. This study is to confirm whether significant variations among endoscopists in early GC detection suggest the individual performance of the upper endoscopy.

A retrospective observational study at a single centre in Japan assessed the results of 218 early GCs detected during 25 688 routine esophagogastroduodenoscopies by 12 endoscopists. The main outcome was the rate of early GC detection for each endoscopist under the same circumstances. Other measures included the major diameters and locations of the lesions, Helicobacter pylori infection status, and baseline patient characteristics that could affect the prevalence of GC.

The early GC detection rates exhibited wide variation among endoscopists (0.09%-2.87%) despite performing routine esophagogastroduodenoscopies in a population with a similar background. Endoscopists were assigned to a low-detection group (n=6; detection rate: 0.47% (range: 0.09%-0.55%)) and a high-detection group (n=5; detection rate: 0.83% (range: 0.63%-1.12%)), with the single highest detector analysed separately due to his distinct detection rate (2.87%). Endoscopists in the high-detection group had better detection rates for minute (major diameter ≤5 mm) and small (major diameter 6-10 mm) GCs than the low-detection group (0.19%/0.23% vs 0.085%/0.098%). These differences were significant (p<0.01), although there were no significant differences in detection of larger tumours (major diameter ≥11 mm; 0.40% vs 0.28%; p=0.13). The tumour location and H. pylori status were similar in the low-detection group, high-detection group and for the highest detector.

Significant variation in the detection of hard-to-find, smaller GCs may reflect individual performance of the examination.

The depth-predicting score (DPS) was proposed based on conventional white-light imaging (C-WLI) endoscopic features of early gastric cancer (EGC) to determine the invasion depth of the neoplasm. However, the effect of DPS on training endoscopists remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of short-term DPS training on improving the diagnostic ability of EGC invasion depth and compare the training effect among non-expert endoscopists at different levels.

In the training session, the definitions and scoring rules of DPS were instructed, and classic C-WLI endoscopic example graphics were exhibited to the participants. Another C-WLI endoscopic images of 88 cases of histologically proven differentiated EGC were selected as an independent test dataset for evaluating the training effect. Each participant was tested, and the diagnostic accuracy rate of invasion depth was calculated differently one week before the training and after the completion of training.

A total of 16 participants were enrolled and completed the training. Participants were divided into a trainee group and a junior endoscopist group according to the total number of C-WLI endoscopies performed. The total number of C-WLI endoscopies performed showed a significant difference between the trainee group and junior endoscopist group (350 vs. 2500, P = 0.001). No significant difference between the trainee group and junior endoscopist group was observed for pre-training accuracy. The overall diagnostic accuracy of invasion depth was improved significantly after completing DPS training compared with before (68.75 ± 5.71% vs. 61.58 ± 9.61%, P = 0.009). In the subgroup analysis, the post-training accuracy was higher than the pre-training accuracy, but significant improvement was observed only in the trainee group (61.65 ± 7.33% vs. 68.32 ± 5.71%, P = 0.034). In addition, no significant difference in post-training accuracy between the two groups was observed.

Short-term DPS training can improve the diagnostic ability of the invasion depth of EGC and homogenize the diagnostic ability of non-expert endoscopists at different levels. The depth-predicting score was convenient and effective for endoscopist training.

Gastric cancer is an aggressive disease with low long-term survival rates. An early diagnosis is essential to offer a better prognosis and curative treatment. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is the main tool for the screening and diagnosis of patients with gastric pre-neoplastic conditions and early lesions. Image-enhanced techniques such as conventional chromoendoscopy, virtual chromoendoscopy, magnifying imaging, and artificial intelligence improve the diagnosis and the characterization of early neoplastic lesions. In this review, we provide a summary of the currently available recommendations for the screening, surveillance, and diagnosis of gastric cancer, focusing on novel endoscopy imaging technologies.