1
|
Levi A, Blais E, Davelaar J, Ebia MI, Minasyan A, Nikravesh N, Gresham G, Zheng L, Chuy JW, Shroff RT, Wadlow RC, DeArbeloa P, Matrisian LM, Petricoin E, Pishvaian MJ, Gong J, Hendifar AE, Osipov A. Clinical outcomes and molecular characteristics of lung-only and liver-only metastatic pancreatic cancer: results from a real-world evidence database. Oncologist 2025; 30:oyaf007. [PMID: 40079530 PMCID: PMC11904785 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyaf007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 03/15/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research demonstrates longer survival for patients with lung-only metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) compared to liver-only mPDAC. The objective of this study is to understand the survival differences, impact of chemotherapy, and associated genomic features of mPDAC that is isolated to either the liver or lung. PATIENTS AND METHODS Longitudinal clinical outcomes and molecular sequencing data were retrospectively analyzed across 831 patients with PDAC across all stages whose tumors first metastasized to the liver or lung. Survival differences were evaluated using Cox regression. Mutational frequency differences were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Median overall survival (mOS) was shorter in patients with liver-only metastasis (1.3y [1.2-1.4], n = 689) compared to lung-only metastasis (2.1y [1.9-2.5], n = 142) (P = .000000588, HR = 2.00 [1.53-2.63]. Survival differences were observed regardless of choice of 1st-line standard-of-care therapy. For 5-fluorouracil-based therapies, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.4y [1.3-1.6] (n = 211) compared to 2.1y [1.8-3.3] for lung-only mPDAC (n = 175) (P = .008113, HR = 1.75 [1.16-2.65]). For gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy, mOS for liver-only mPDAC was 1.2y [1.1-1.5] (n = 175) compared to 2.1y [1.6-3.4] for lung-only disease (n = 32) (P = .01863, HR = 1.84 [1.11-3.06]). PDAC tumors with liver-only metastases were modestly enriched (unadjustable P < .05) for: TP53 mutations, MYC amplifications, inactivating CDK2NA alterations, inactivating SMAD alterations, and SWI/SWF pathway mutations. PDAC tumors with lung-only metastases were enriched for: STK11 mutations, CCND1 amplifications, and GNAS alterations. CONCLUSION Patients with lung-only mPDAC demonstrate an improved prognosis relative to those with liver-only mPDAC. Responses to chemotherapy do not explain these differences. Organotropic metastatic tumor diversity is mirrored at the molecular level in PDAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abrahm Levi
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Edik Blais
- Perthera Inc., McLean, VA, United States
| | - John Davelaar
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Matthew I Ebia
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Nima Nikravesh
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Lei Zheng
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Hematology and Oncology, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | | | - Rachna T Shroff
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | | | | | | | | | - Michael J Pishvaian
- University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, Hematology and Oncology, San Antonio, TX, United States
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jun Gong
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Arsen Osipov
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mullen KM, Hong J, Attiyeh MA, Hayashi A, Sakamoto H, Kohutek ZA, McIntyre CA, Zhang H, Makohon-Moore AP, Zucker A, Wood LD, Myers MA, Arnold BJ, Zaccaria S, Chou JF, Capanu M, Socci ND, Raphael BJ, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA. The Evolutionary Forest of Pancreatic Cancer. Cancer Discov 2025; 15:329-345. [PMID: 39378050 PMCID: PMC11803399 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-23-1541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 10/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/08/2025]
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE Although the pancreatic cancer genome has been described, it has not been explored with respect to stages of diagnosis or treatment bottlenecks. We now describe and quantify the genomic features of PDAC in the context of evolutionary metrics and in doing so have identified a novel prognostic biomarker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katelyn M. Mullen
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jungeui Hong
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marc A. Attiyeh
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Akimasa Hayashi
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hitomi Sakamoto
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Zachary A. Kohutek
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Caitlin A. McIntyre
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Haochen Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Amanda Zucker
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Laura D. Wood
- Division of Gastrointestinal Pathology, Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew A. Myers
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Brian J. Arnold
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Simone Zaccaria
- Department of Computer Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
| | - Joanne F. Chou
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marinela Capanu
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nicholas D. Socci
- Bioinformatics Core, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- The David M. Rubenstein Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang J, Yang J, Narang A, He J, Wolfgang C, Li K, Zheng L. Consensus, debate, and prospective on pancreatic cancer treatments. J Hematol Oncol 2024; 17:92. [PMID: 39390609 PMCID: PMC11468220 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-024-01613-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive solid tumors. As a systemic disease, despite the improvement of multi-modality treatment strategies, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer was not improved dramatically. For resectable or borderline resectable patients, the surgical strategy centered on improving R0 resection rate is consensus; however, the role of neoadjuvant therapy in resectable patients and the optimal neoadjuvant therapy of chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy in borderline resectable patients were debated. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy of gemcitabine/capecitabine or mFOLFIRINOX is recommended regardless of the margin status. Chemotherapy as the first-line treatment strategy for advanced or metastatic patients included FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX regimens whereas 5-FU plus liposomal irinotecan was the only standard of care second-line therapy. Immunotherapy is an innovative therapy although anti-PD-1 antibody is currently the only agent approved by for MSI-H, dMMR, or TMB-high solid tumors, which represent a very small subset of pancreatic cancers. Combination strategies to increase the immunogenicity and to overcome the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment may sensitize pancreatic cancer to immunotherapy. Targeted therapies represented by PARP and KRAS inhibitors are also under investigation, showing benefits in improving progression-free survival and objective response rate. This review discusses the current treatment modalities and highlights innovative therapies for pancreatic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junke Wang
- Division of Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
- Department of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Jie Yang
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
- Department of Biotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Amol Narang
- Department of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Jin He
- Department of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- The Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Christopher Wolfgang
- Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine and NYU-Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Keyu Li
- Division of Pancreatic Surgery, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37 Guoxue Alley, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
- Department of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oncology and the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1650 Orleans St, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- The Pancreatic Cancer Precision Medicine Center of Excellence Program, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- The Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
- The Multidisciplinary Gastrointestinal Cancer Laboratories Program, the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bilreiro C, Andrade L, Santiago I, Marques RM, Matos C. Imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma - An update for all stages of patient management. Eur J Radiol Open 2024; 12:100553. [PMID: 38357385 PMCID: PMC10864763 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a common and lethal cancer. From diagnosis to disease staging, response to neoadjuvant therapy assessment and patient surveillance after resection, imaging plays a central role, guiding the multidisciplinary team in decision-planning. Review aims and findings This review discusses the most up-to-date imaging recommendations, typical and atypical findings, and issues related to each step of patient management. Example cases for each relevant condition are presented, and a structured report for disease staging is suggested. Conclusion Despite current issues in PDAC imaging at different stages of patient management, the radiologist is essential in the multidisciplinary team, as the conveyor of relevant imaging findings crucial for patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Bilreiro
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Luísa Andrade
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Inês Santiago
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rui Mateus Marques
- Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
- Radiology Department, Hospital de S. José, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Celso Matos
- Radiology Department, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
- Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huguet F, Riou O, Pasquier D, Modesto A, Quéro L, Michalet M, Bordron A, Schipman B, Orthuon A, Lisbona A, Vendrely V, Jaksic N. Radiation therapy of the primary tumour and/or metastases of digestive metastatic cancers. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:66-74. [PMID: 37806823 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic gastrointestinal cancer is not an uncommon situation, especially for pancreatic, gastric, and colorectal cancers. In this setting, few data are available on the impact of the treatment of the primary tumour. Oligometastatic disease is associated with longer survival in comparison with more advanced disease. Metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiotherapy, seems related to better outcomes, but the level of evidence is low. In most tumour locations, prospective data are very scarce and inclusion in ongoing trials is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Huguet
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, DMU Orphé, Sorbonne université, Paris, France; Laboratory of Cancer Biology and Therapeutics, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, U938, Inserm, Paris, France.
| | - O Riou
- Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, U1194, Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, ICM, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - D Pasquier
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France; Université de Lille, CNRS, école centrale de Lille, UMR 9189 - CRIStAL, Lille, France
| | - A Modesto
- Département de radiothérapie, institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Centre de recherche du cancer de Toulouse, UMR 1037, Inserm, université Toulouse-III Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - L Quéro
- Service de cancérologie-radiothérapie, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP Nord, DMU Icare, Paris, France; Université Paris Cité, U1160, Inserm, Paris, France
| | - M Michalet
- Institut de recherche en cancérologie de Montpellier, U1194, Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France; Fédération universitaire d'oncologie radiothérapie d'Occitanie Méditerranée, ICM, institut régional du cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - A Bordron
- Département de radiothérapie, centre hospitalier universitaire de Brest, Brest, France
| | - B Schipman
- Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - A Orthuon
- Institut de cancérologie de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
| | - A Lisbona
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - V Vendrely
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, hôpital Haut-Lévêque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France
| | - N Jaksic
- Institut de cancérologie et radiothérapie Brétillien, Saint-Malo, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Boag KF, Britton E, Knight SR, Coe PO, Chan B, Blencowe NS, Pathak S. Definition and management of intra-abdominal metachronous oligometastatic pancreatic cancer: a systematic review. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad338. [PMID: 37930661 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Katie F Boag
- Department of Abdominal Medicine and Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Emily Britton
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Stephen R Knight
- Centre for Medical Informatics, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Peter O Coe
- Department of Abdominal Medicine and Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Benjamin Chan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Natalie S Blencowe
- Department of Abdominal Medicine and Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
- Bristol Centre for Surgical Research, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK
| | - Samir Pathak
- Department of Abdominal Medicine and Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Del Chiaro M, Sugawara T, Karam SD, Messersmith WA. Advances in the management of pancreatic cancer. BMJ 2023; 383:e073995. [PMID: 38164628 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073995] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer remains among the malignancies with the worst outcomes. Survival has been improving, but at a slower rate than other cancers. Multimodal treatment, including chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy, has been under investigation for many years. Because of the anatomical characteristics of the pancreas, more emphasis on treatment selection has been placed on local extension into major vessels. Recently, the development of more effective treatment regimens has opened up new treatment strategies, but urgent research questions have also become apparent. This review outlines the current management of pancreatic cancer, and the recent advances in its treatment. The review discusses future treatment pathways aimed at integrating novel findings of translational and clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Del Chiaro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Toshitaka Sugawara
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sana D Karam
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Wells A Messersmith
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frountzas M, Schizas D, Kykalos S, Toutouzas KG. "Oligometastatic pancreatic cancer" definition: The first step. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2023; 22:645-647. [PMID: 35853803 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Maximos Frountzas
- First Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippocration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.
| | - Dimitrios Schizas
- First Department of Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Stylianos Kykalos
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Laikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos G Toutouzas
- First Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, Hippocration General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Garajová I, Peroni M, Gelsomino F, Leonardi F. A Simple Overview of Pancreatic Cancer Treatment for Clinical Oncologists. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:9587-9601. [PMID: 37999114 PMCID: PMC10669959 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30110694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer (PDAC) is one of the most aggressive solid tumors and is showing increasing incidence. The aim of our review is to provide practical help for all clinical oncologists and to summarize the current management of PDAC using a simple "ABC method" (A-anatomical resectability, B-biological resectability and C-clinical conditions). For anatomically resectable PDAC without any high-risk factors (biological or conditional), the actual standard of care is represented by surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The remaining PDAC patients should all be treated with initial systemic therapy, though the intent for each is different: for borderline resectable patients, the intent is neoadjuvant; for locally advanced patients, the intent is conversion; and for metastatic PDAC patients, the intent remains just palliative. The actual standard of care in first-line therapy is represented by two regimens: FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. Recently, NALIRIFOX showed positive results over gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. There are limited data for maintenance therapy after first-line treatment, though 5-FU or FOLFIRI after initial FOLFIRINOX, and gemcitabine, after initial gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel, might be considered. We also dedicate space to special rare conditions, such as PDAC with germline BRCA mutations, pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas, with few clinically relevant remarks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Garajová
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy; (M.P.)
| | - Marianna Peroni
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy; (M.P.)
| | - Fabio Gelsomino
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, 41124 Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Leonardi
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, 43125 Parma, Italy; (M.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhong JJ, Ye YQ. Construction and validation of a nomogram model for predicting early death in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma based on SEER database. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2023; 31:577-588. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v31.i14.577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is a highly aggressive malignancy that presents a considerable risk of early death (survival time ≤ 3 mo). As such, it is of great significance to develop an effective nomogram for predicting the likelihood of early death in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
AIM To construct and validate a predictive nomogram model for early death in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocar-cinoma.
METHODS We extracted data from the SEER database of 18603 eligible patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2015, and randomly divided them into training and validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed on the training cohort to identify the risk factors for early death, based on which a nomogram was constructed. The performance of the nomogram was verified by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calibration curve analyses in both the training and validation cohorts. The clinical practicability of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).
RESULTS Age, sex, primary site, grade, T stage, N stage, brain metastasis, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were identified as independent risk factors for early death in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Based on these variables, a nomogram was constructed. The areas under the ROC curves of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts were 0.810 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.802-0.811) and 0.802 (95%CI: 0.790-0.813), respectively, indicating good discrimination. The calibration curves showed good calibration degrees in both cohorts, and the DCA results demonstrated that the nomogram had better clinical net benefit in predicting early mortality compared with TNM stage.
CONCLUSION The constructed nomogram has good predictive ability for early death in patients with metastatic pancreatic adeno-carcinoma. This will help clinicians develop individualized treatment plans for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Jun Zhong
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yan-Qing Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou 341000, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Husarova T, MacCuaig WM, Dennahy IS, Sanderson EJ, Edil BH, Jain A, Bonds MM, McNally MW, Menclova K, Pudil J, Zaruba P, Pohnan R, Henson CE, Grizzle WE, McNally LR. Intraoperative Imaging in Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3694. [PMID: 37509355 PMCID: PMC10377919 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15143694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery belongs to one of the most complex fields of general surgery. An intricate and vital anatomy is accompanied by difficult distinctions of tumors from fibrosis and inflammation; the identification of precise tumor margins; or small, even disappearing, lesions on currently available imaging. The routine implementation of ultrasound use shifted the possibilities in the operating room, yet more precision is necessary to achieve negative resection margins. Modalities utilizing fluorescent-compatible dyes have proven their role in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery, although this is not yet a routine practice, as there are many limitations. Modalities, such as photoacoustic imaging or 3D holograms, are emerging but are mostly limited to preclinical settings. There is a need to identify and develop an ideal contrast agent capable of differentiating between malignant and benign tissue and to report on the prognostic benefits of implemented intraoperative imaging in order to navigate clinical translation. This review focuses on existing and developing imaging modalities for intraoperative use, tailored to the needs of hepatopancreatobiliary cancers. We will also cover the application of these imaging techniques to theranostics to achieve combined diagnostic and therapeutic potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tereza Husarova
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, 16902 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - William M. MacCuaig
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Isabel S. Dennahy
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Emma J. Sanderson
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Barish H. Edil
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Ajay Jain
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Morgan M. Bonds
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Molly W. McNally
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Katerina Menclova
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, 16902 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Pudil
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, 16902 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Pavel Zaruba
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, 16902 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Radek Pohnan
- Department of Surgery, Military University Hospital Prague, 16902 Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Christina E. Henson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - William E. Grizzle
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Lacey R. McNally
- Department of Surgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Yoon YS, Lee JS, Lee B, Cubisino A, Panaro F, Troisi RI. Role of neoadjuvant therapy for nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer: Current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2023; 15:911-924. [PMID: 37389109 PMCID: PMC10302990 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i6.911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most common and lethal human cancers worldwide. Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy offers the best chance of a long-term survival for patients with PDAC, although only approximately 20% of the patients have resectable tumors when diagnosed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is recommended for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Several studies have investigated the role of NACT in treating resectable tumors based on the recent advances in PDAC biology, as NACT provides the potential benefit of selecting patients with favorable tumor biology and controls potential micro-metastases in high-risk patients with resectable PDAC. In such challenging cases, new potential tools, such as ct-DNA and molecular targeted therapy, are emerging as novel therapeutic options that may improve old paradigms. This review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the role of NACT in treating non-metastatic pancreatic cancer while focusing on future perspectives in light of recent evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive HPB Surgery and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples 80131, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seongnam 13620, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea
| | - Antonio Cubisino
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy 92110, France
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier 34100, France
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive HPB Surgery and Transplantation Service, Federico II University Hospital, Naples 80131, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Frigerio I, Malleo G, de Pastena M, Deiro G, Surci N, Scopelliti F, Esposito A, Regi P, Giardino A, Allegrini V, Bassi C, Girelli R, Salvia R, Butturini G. Prognostic Factors After Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer Initially Metastatic to the Liver. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:8503-8510. [PMID: 35976466 PMCID: PMC9383677 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12385-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background Resection of initially oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) following response to first-line chemotherapy is controversial. We herein updated a previous case series to investigate the oncologic outcomes and preoperative factors that could drive the decision-making process. Methods This retrospective analysis was limited to patients with liver-only synchronous metastases who experienced complete regression of the metastatic component and underwent pancreatectomy between October 2008 and July 2020 at two high-volume institutions. Clinical-pathologic variables were captured, and inflammation-based prognostic scores were calculated. Recurrence and survival analyses were performed using standard statistical methods. Results Overall, 52 patients were included. FOLFIRINOX was the most employed chemotherapy regimen (63.5%). Post-treatment tumor size, serum carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were significantly decreased relative to baseline evaluation. The median time from diagnosis to pancreatectomy was 10.2 months, while the median time from chemotherapy completion to pancreatectomy was 2 months. Major postoperative complications occurred in 26.9% of patients, while postoperative mortality was nil. The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) from pancreatectomy were 16.5 and 23.0 months, respectively, and the median OS from diagnosis was 37.2 months. At multivariable analysis, vascular resection, operative time, prognostic nutrition index (PNI) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with OS. Operative time, platelet × neutrophil/lymphocyte count (SII), and PNI were associated with DFS. Conclusions We confirm promising outcomes of selected patients who underwent pancreatectomy following downstaging of liver metastases. The absence of vascular involvement of the primary tumor, good nutritional status, and low inflammatory index scores could be useful to select candidates for resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Frigerio
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Malleo
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo de Pastena
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giacomo Deiro
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Niccolò Surci
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy.,Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Filippo Scopelliti
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Regi
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giardino
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Allegrini
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Girelli
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| | - Roberto Salvia
- Unit of Pancreatic Surgery, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Butturini
- Pancreatic Surgical Unit, Department of General and Vascular Surgery, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heinrich S, Theurer J, Lang H. [Liver metastases-Non-colorectal, non-endocrine]. CHIRURGIE (HEIDELBERG, GERMANY) 2022; 93:667-675. [PMID: 35731282 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01658-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
In contrast to colorectal and neuroendocrine liver metastases, liver surgery has not yet gained the same status for non-colorectal non-endocrine (NCNE) liver metastases. The main explanation is a different tumor biology but is also due to the lack of effective systemic treatment options for some tumor entities in the past. Even selected chemotherapy-naive patients with NCNE liver metastases can benefit from liver resection. Due to the sometimes dramatic improvements in systemic treatment in recent years, multimodality treatment concepts should be increasingly considered for several diseases in which modern liver surgery will become an integral part.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Heinrich
- Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Juliane Theurer
- Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Hauke Lang
- Allgemein‑, Viszeral- u. Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hamad A, Underhill J, Ansari A, Thayaparan V, Cloyd JM, Li Y, Pawlik TM, Tsung A, Abushahin L, Ejaz A. Surgical treatment of hepatic oligometastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Database. Surgery 2022; 171:1464-1470. [PMID: 35115154 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with liver-only metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma have traditionally been offered palliative chemotherapy alone. Recent studies have explored the role of surgical resection among patients with limited metastatic disease. National practice patterns and the impact of surgery among these patients remains unknown. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for all patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 2010 and 2015. The primary outcome was overall survival from the time of diagnosis. Patients with liver-only metastatic disease were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to determine the association of patient, hospital, and regional factors with receipt of surgical resection. A propensity score-matched cohort (1:1) was generated by matching patient- and tumor-related factors (age, sex, race, comorbidity burden, primary tumor site, primary tumor size) among patients with liver-only stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received chemotherapy alone compared to those who received chemotherapy and underwent pancreatectomy and liver metastatectomy. RESULTS Among 312,426 patients who met the study criteria, one half (n = 140,043, 50.4%) had stage IV disease; metastatic sites included bone (n = 5493, 3.1%), brain (n = 620, 0.4%), lung (n = 16,580, 9.5%), and liver (n = 62,444, 35.7%). Patients with stage IV disease were more likely to be younger (odds ratio: 1.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.2; P = .03) and have poorly (odds ratio: 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.8-2.5; P < .001) or undifferentiated (odds ratio: 3.1, 95% confidence interval: 2.3-4.1; P < .001) tumors. Among stage IV patients with liver-only disease (n = 47,785, 14.9%), 891 patients (1.9%) underwent pancreatic resection. Patients who underwent resection were more likely to be younger (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.8; P = .03) and treated at an academic/research center (odds ratio 2.1, 95% confidence interval: 1.2-3.5; P = .006). Median overall survival among patients who underwent resection was 10.74 months versus 3.4 months among patients who did not undergo resection. After controlling for patient and disease-related factors, patients who underwent surgical resection had a lower risk of death versus patients who did not undergo surgery (hazard ratio: 0.5, 95% confidence interval: 0.4-0.6; P < .001). After propensity score matching, patients who received multimodality treatment for liver-only metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (surgery, chemotherapy) had a longer median overall survival (15.6 months vs 8.1 months) compared to those who received chemotherapy alone (P < .001). CONCLUSION This study suggests that pancreatic resection in patients with liver metastases, in combination with chemotherapy and/or chemoradiation, may be associated with improved survival in well-selected patients. However, attempts at an aggressive surgical approach for patients with liver-only stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients should only be performed only under a well-designed prospective clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Hamad
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. http://www.twitter.com/ahmadhamad4
| | - Jennifer Underhill
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. http://www.twitter.com/Jenn_Underhill
| | - Aliya Ansari
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Varna Thayaparan
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. http://www.twitter.com/jcloydmd
| | - Yaming Li
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. http://www.twitter.com/timpawlik
| | - Allan Tsung
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. http://www.twitter.com/allantsung
| | - Laith Abushahin
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Besselink MG. Improved survival after pancreatic and hepatic resection in metastasized pancreatic cancer: Selection, association, or causation? Surgery 2022; 171:1471-1472. [PMID: 35466004 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chakrabarti S, Kamgar M, Mahipal A. Systemic Therapy of Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Current Status, Challenges, and Opportunities. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2588. [PMID: 35681565 PMCID: PMC9179239 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive malignancy characterized by nonspecific presenting symptoms, lack of a screening test, rapidly progressive clinical course, and presentation with an advanced-stage disease in the majority of patients. PDAC is essentially a systemic disease irrespective of the initial stage, as most patients with non-metastatic PDAC undergoing curative-intent treatment eventually experience metastatic relapse. Currently, cytotoxic chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment in patients with advanced disease. However, the current standard treatment with multiagent chemotherapy has modest efficacy and results in median overall survival (OS) of less than a year and a 5-year OS of about 10%. The pathobiology of PDAC poses many challenges, including a unique tumor microenvironment interfering with drug delivery, intratumoral heterogeneity, and a strongly immunosuppressive microenvironment that supports cancer growth. Recent research is exploring a wide range of novel therapeutic targets, including genomic alterations, tumor microenvironment, and tumor metabolism. The rapid evolution of tumor genome sequencing technologies paves the way for personalized, targeted therapies. The present review summarizes the current chemotherapeutic treatment paradigm of advanced PDAC and discusses the evolving novel targets that are being investigated in a myriad of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sakti Chakrabarti
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.C.); (M.K.)
| | - Mandana Kamgar
- Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Milwaukee, WI 53226, USA; (S.C.); (M.K.)
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Petrelli F, Ghidini A, Ghidini M, Bukovec R, Trevisan F, Turati L, Indini A, Seghezzi S, Lonati V, Moleri G, Tomasello G, Zaniboni A. Better survival of patients with oligo- compared with polymetastatic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 173 studies. F1000Res 2022; 10:423. [PMID: 35602670 PMCID: PMC9106994 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.52546.4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The modern concept of oligometastatic (OM) state has been initially developed to describe patients with a low burden of disease and with a potential for cure with local ablative treatments. We systematically assessed the risk of death and relapse of oligometastatic (OM) cancers compared to cancers with more diffuse metastatic spread, through a meta-analysis of published data. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting prognosis of patients with OM solid tumors. Risk of death and relapse were extracted and pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (HR 95%CI). The primary outcome of the study refers to overall mortality in OM vs. polymetastatic (PM) patients. Results. Mortality and relapse associated with OM state in patients with cancer were evaluated among 104,234 participants (n=173 studies). Progression-free survival was better in patients with OM disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.57–0.68; P <.001; n=69 studies). Also, OM cancers were associated with a better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68; P<.01; n=161 studies). In colorectal (CRC), breast, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the reduction in the risk of death for OM patients were 35, 38, 30 and 42%, respectively. Biliary tract and cervical cancer do not significantly better in OM stage likely for paucity of data. Conclusions. Patients with OM cancers have a significantly better prognosis than those with more widespread stage IV tumors. In OM cancer patients a personalized approach should be pursued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Luca Turati
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Seghezzi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | | | - Giovanna Moleri
- Direzione socio sanitaria, Centro servizi, ASST Bergamo ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Incidence and Contemporary Management of Delayed Bleeding Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2022; 46:1161-1171. [PMID: 35084554 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06451-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed bleeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a life-threatening complication. However, the optimal management remains unclear. We summarize our experience of the management of delayed bleeding after PD and define the outcomes associated with different types of management. METHODS All patients who underwent a PD between January 1987 and June 2020 at Johns Hopkins University were retrospectively reviewed. Delayed bleeding was defined as bleeding on or after postoperative day 5 following PD. Incidence, outcomes, and trends were reported. RESULTS Among the 6201 patients that underwent PD, delayed bleeding occurred in 130 (2.1%) at a median of 12 days (IQR: 9, 24) postoperation. The pattern of bleeding was classified as intraluminal (51.5%), extraluminal (40.8%), and mixed (7.7%). A clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula and an intraabdominal abscess preceded the delayed bleeding in 43.1% and 31.5% of cases, respectively. Arterial pseudoaneurysm or bleeding from peripancreatic vessels was the most common reason (54.6%) with the gastroduodenal artery being the most common source (18.5%). Endoscopy, angiography, and reoperation were performed as a first-line approach in 35.4%, 52.3%, and 6.2% of patients, respectively. The overall mortality was 16.2% and decreased over the study period (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Delayed bleeding following PD remains a life-threatening complication. The most common location of delayed bleeding is from the gastroduodenal artery. Angiography with embolization should be the initial approach for urgent bleeding with surgical re-exploration reserved for unstable patients or failed control of bleeding after interventional angiography or endoscopy.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhang Z, Pu J, Zhang H. Development and Validation of a Simple-to-Use Nomogram to Predict Early Death in Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:729175. [PMID: 34568061 PMCID: PMC8458811 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.729175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PCa) is a highly aggressive malignancy with high risk of early death (survival time ≤3 months). The present study aimed to identify associated risk factors and develop a simple-to-use nomogram to predict early death in metastatic PCa patients. Methods Patients diagnosed with metastatic PCa between 2010 and 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were collected for model construction and internal validation. An independent data set was obtained from China for external validation. Independent risk variables contributed to early death were identified by logistic regression models, which were then used to construct a nomogram. Internal and external validation was performed to evaluate the nomogram using calibration curves and the receiver operating characteristic curves. Results A total of 19,464 patients in the SEER cohort and 67 patients in the Chinese cohort were included. Patients from the SEER database were randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 13,040) and internal validation cohort (n = 6,424). Patients in the Chinese cohort were selected for the external validation cohort. Overall, 10,484 patients experienced early death in the SEER cohort and 35 in the Chinese cohort. A reliable nomogram was constructed on the basis of 11 significant risk factors. Internal validation and external validation of the nomogram showed high accuracy in predicting early death. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that this predictive nomogram had excellent and potential clinical applicability. Conclusion The nomogram provided a simple-to-use tool to distinguish early death in patients with metastatic PCa, assisting clinicians in implementing individualized treatment regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhong Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Juan Pu
- Department of Oncology, Lianshui People's Hospital, Huaian, China
| | - Haijun Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Zhongda Hospital of Southeast University, Medical School of Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Petrelli F, Ghidini A, Ghidini M, Bukovec R, Trevisan F, Turati L, Indini A, Seghezzi S, Lonati V, Moleri G, Tomasello G, Zaniboni A. Better survival of patients with oligo- compared with polymetastatic cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 173 studies. F1000Res 2021; 10:423. [PMID: 35602670 PMCID: PMC9106994 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.52546.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The modern concept of oligometastatic (OM) state has been initially developed to describe patients with a low burden of disease and with a potential for cure with local ablative treatments. We systematically assessed the risk of death and relapse of oligometastatic (OM) cancers compared to cancers with more diffuse metastatic spread, through a meta-analysis of published data. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for studies reporting prognosis of patients with OM solid tumors. Risk of death and relapse were extracted and pooled to provide an adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval (HR 95%CI). The primary outcome of the study refers to overall mortality in OM vs. polymetastatic (PM) patients. Results. Mortality and relapse associated with OM state in patients with cancer were evaluated among 104,234 participants (n=173 studies). Progression-free survival was better in patients with OM disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62, 95% CI 0.57-0.68; P <.001; n=69 studies). Also, OM cancers were associated with a better overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.62-0.68; P<.01; n=161 studies). In colorectal (CRC), breast, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) the reduction in the risk of death for OM patients were 35, 38, 30 and 42%, respectively. Biliary tract and cervical cancer do not significantly better in OM stage likely for paucity of data. Conclusions. Patients with OM cancers have a significantly better prognosis than those with more widespread stage IV tumors. In OM cancer patients a personalized approach should be pursued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michele Ghidini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Luca Turati
- Surgery Unit, ASST Bergamo ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Alice Indini
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvia Seghezzi
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, ASST Bergamo ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | | | - Giovanna Moleri
- Direzione socio sanitaria, Centro servizi, ASST Bergamo ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Gianluca Tomasello
- Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|