1
|
Kim IH, Kang SJ, Choi W, Seo AN, Eom BW, Kang B, Kim BJ, Min BH, Tae CH, Choi CI, Lee CK, An HJ, Byun HK, Im HS, Kim HD, Cho JH, Pak K, Kim JJ, Bae JS, Yu JI, Lee JW, Choi J, Kim JH, Choi M, Jung MR, Seo N, Eom SS, Ahn S, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Lim SH, Kim TH, Han HS. Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2024: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach (Update of 2022 Guideline). J Gastric Cancer 2025; 25:5-114. [PMID: 39822170 PMCID: PMC11739648 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 01/19/2025] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in both Korea and worldwide. Since 2004, the Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer have been regularly updated, with the 4th edition published in 2022. The 4th edition was the result of a collaborative work by an interdisciplinary team, including experts in gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology, and guideline development methodology. The current guideline is the 5th version, an updated version of the 4th edition. In this guideline, 6 key questions (KQs) were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group, and 7 statements were developed, or revised, or discussed based on a systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed database. Over the past 2 years, there have been significant changes in systemic treatment, leading to major updates and revisions focused on this area. Additionally, minor modifications have been made in other sections, incorporating recent research findings. The level of evidence and grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Key factors for recommendation included the level of evidence, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability. The working group reviewed and discussed the recommendations to reach a consensus. The structure of this guideline remains similar to the 2022 version. Earlier sections cover general considerations, such as screening, diagnosis, and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. In the latter sections, statements are provided for each KQ based on clinical evidence, with flowcharts supporting these statements through meta-analysis and references. This multidisciplinary, evidence-based gastric cancer guideline aims to support clinicians in providing optimal care for gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- In-Ho Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonyoung Choi
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - An Na Seo
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Bang Wool Eom
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Beodeul Kang
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Bum Jun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Byung-Hoon Min
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang In Choi
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Choong-Kun Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Jung An
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hwa Kyung Byun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yongin, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Su Im
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Hyung-Don Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jang Ho Cho
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Kyoungjune Pak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jae-Joon Kim
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jae Seok Bae
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Won Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Jungyoon Choi
- Division of Oncology/Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
| | - Jwa Hoon Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ran Jung
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Nieun Seo
- Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Soo Eom
- Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Soomin Ahn
- Department of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Hee Lim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Han Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea.
| | - Hye Sook Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ding P, Wu J, Wu H, Li T, Niu X, Yang P, Guo H, Tian Y, He J, Yang J, Gu R, Zhang L, Meng N, Li X, Guo Z, Meng L, Zhao Q. Transcriptomics-Based Liquid Biopsy for Early Detection of Recurrence in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 11:e2406276. [PMID: 39556695 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202406276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2024] [Revised: 09/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/20/2024]
Abstract
The study presents a transcriptomics-based liquid biopsy approach for early recurrence detection in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Four mRNA biomarkers (AGTR1, DNER, EPHA7, and SUSD5) linked to recurrence are identified through transcriptomic data analysis. A Risk Stratification Assessment (RSA) model combining these biomarkers with clinical features showed superior predictive accuracy for postoperative recurrence, with AUCs of 0.919 and 0.935 in surgical and liquid biopsy validation cohorts, respectively. Functional studies using human gastric cancer cell lines AGS and HGC-27 demonstrated that silencing the identified mRNA panel genes impaired cell migration, invasion, and proliferation. In vivo experiments further showed reduced tumor growth, metastasis, and lymphangiogenesis in mice, possibly mediated by the cAMP signaling pathway. This non-invasive approach offers significant potential for enhancing recurrence detection and enabling personalized treatment strategies, thereby improving patient outcomes in the management of LAGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping'an Ding
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Jiaxiang Wu
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Haotian Wu
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Tongkun Li
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Xiaoman Niu
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Peigang Yang
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Honghai Guo
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Yuan Tian
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Jinchen He
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Jiaxuan Yang
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Renjun Gu
- School of Chinese Medicine & School of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210023, China
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210002, China
| | - Lilong Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430065, China
| | - Ning Meng
- Department of General Surgery, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050050, China
| | - Xiaolong Li
- Department of General Surgery, Baoding Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei, 071030, China
| | - Zhenjiang Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Hengshui People's Hospital, Hengshui, Hebei, 053099, China
| | - Lingjiao Meng
- Research Center and Tumor Research Institute of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| | - Qun Zhao
- The Third Department of Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
- Big data analysis and mining application for precise diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Hebei Provincial Engineering Research Center, Shijiazhuang, 050011, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim SH, Chae Y, Kang BT, Lee S. Use of 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and Near-Infrared Fluorescence-Guided Imaging Surgery in the Treatment of a Gastric Tumor in a Dog. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:2917. [PMID: 39457847 PMCID: PMC11503833 DOI: 10.3390/ani14202917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Revised: 10/04/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
A 13-year-old Maltese dog with an abdominal mass underwent 18F-FDG PET/computed tomography (CT) for tumor localization and metastatic evaluation. PET/CT scans revealed a gastric mass near the esophagogastric junction and demonstrated mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) of 4.596 and 6.234, respectively, for the abdominal mass. Subsequent surgery incorporated ICG for NIR fluorescence-guided imaging, aiding in precise tumor localization and margin assessment. The excised mass was identified as a low-grade leiomyosarcoma on histopathology. The dog underwent PET/CT imaging six months postoperatively following the excision of the mass, which confirmed the absence of recurrence or residual lesions during follow-up. NIR fluorescence imaging using ICG demonstrated efficacy in real-time tumor visualization and margin assessment, a technique not previously reported in veterinary literature. The PET/CT findings complemented the diagnosis and provided valuable insights into metastasis. The absence of recurrence or complications in postoperative follow-up underscores the potential of these imaging modalities in enhancing surgical precision and improving prognosis in canine gastric tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Su-Hyeon Kim
- Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea;
- Department of Veterinary Surgery, Heamaru Referral Hospital, Seongnam 13590, Republic of Korea
| | - Yeon Chae
- Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea; (Y.C.); (B.-T.K.)
| | - Byeong-Teck Kang
- Laboratory of Veterinary Internal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea; (Y.C.); (B.-T.K.)
| | - Sungin Lee
- Department of Veterinary Surgery, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stelmach R, Apostolidis L, Kahle S, Sisic L, Nienhüser H, Weber TF, Jäger D, Haag GM. Pattern and time point of relapse in locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma after multimodal treatment: implications for a useful structured follow-up. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:14785-14796. [PMID: 37589924 PMCID: PMC10602954 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05254-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite improvements in multimodal treatment of locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma, the majority of patients still relapses. The impact of structured follow-up for early detection of recurrence is unclear and controversially discussed. METHODS Patients with locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma having received neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy followed by tumor resection between 2009 and 2021, underwent a structured follow-up including three-monthly imaging during the first 2 years, followed by semiannual and annual examinations in year 3-4 and 5, respectively. Clinical outcome including pattern and time point of relapse was analyzed. RESULTS Two hundred fifty-seven patients were included in this analysis. In 50.2% (n = 129) of patients, recurrent disease was diagnosed, with the majority (94.6%) relapsing within the first 2 years. The most common site of relapse were lymph node metastases followed by peritoneal carcinomatosis and hepatic and pulmonary metastases. 52.7% of patients presented with symptoms at the time of relapse. Cumulative risk and time point of relapse differed significantly between patient with a node-positive tumor (ypN+) after neoadjuvant treatment (high-risk group) and patients with node-negative primary tumor (ypN0) (low-risk group). High-risk patients had a significantly inferior disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) with 11.1 and 29.0 months, respectively, whereas median DFS and OS were not reached for the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS The risk of relapse differs significantly between high- and low-risk patients. Only a part of relapses is associated with clinical symptoms. An individualized follow-up strategy is recommended for high- and low-risk patients considering the individual risk of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramona Stelmach
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Leonidas Apostolidis
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Kahle
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leila Sisic
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhüser
- Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tim Frederik Weber
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dirk Jäger
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor-Immunity, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Martin Haag
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Applied Tumor-Immunity, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Choi CI, Park JK, Jeon TY, Kim DH. Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detection of recurrent gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JOURNAL OF YEUNGNAM MEDICAL SCIENCE 2023; 40:S37-S46. [PMID: 37587035 DOI: 10.12701/jyms.2023.00220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the diagnostic performance of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the detection of disease recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer. METHODS The PubMed and Embase databases, from the earliest available date of indexing through November 30, 2019, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT to detect recurrent disease after gastric cancer surgery. RESULTS Across 17 studies (1,732 patients), the pooled sensitivity for F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT was 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.88) with heterogeneity of I2=76.5 (p<0.001), and the specificity was 0.86 (95% CI, 0.78-0.91) with heterogeneity of I2=94.2 (p<0.001). Likelihood ratio (LR) tests gave an overall positive LR of 6.0 (95% CI, 3.6-9.7) and negative LR of 0.2 (95% CI, 0.14-0.31). The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 29 (95% CI, 13-63). The summary receiver operating characteristic curve indicates that the area under the curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93). CONCLUSION The current meta-analysis showed good sensitivity and specificity of F-18 FDG PET or PET/CT for detecting recurrent disease after curative resection of gastric cancer despite heterogeneity in ethnicity, recurrence rate, histology, and interpretation method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang In Choi
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jae Kyun Park
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Tae Yong Jeon
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Dae-Hwan Kim
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ho SYA, Tay KV. Systematic review of diagnostic tools for peritoneal metastasis in gastric cancer-staging laparoscopy and its alternatives. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2280-2293. [PMID: 37969710 PMCID: PMC10642463 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i10.2280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer burden and mortality, often resulting in peritoneal metastasis in advanced stages with negative survival outcomes. Staging laparoscopy has become standard practice for suspected cases before a definitive gastrectomy or palliation. This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy of other diagnostic modalities instead of staging laparoscopy as the alternatives are able to reduce cost and invasive staging procedures. Recently, a radiomic model based on computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) has also emerged as another method to predict peritoneal metastasis. AIM To determine if the efficacy of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and PET is comparable with staging laparoscopy. METHODS Articles comparing computed tomography, PET, magnetic resonance imaging, and radiomic models based on computed tomography and PET to staging laparoscopies were filtered out from the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Reference Citations Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/). In the search for studies comparing computed tomography (CT) to staging laparoscopy, five retrospective studies and three prospective studies were found. Similarly, five retrospective studies and two prospective studies were also included for papers comparing CT to PET scans. Only one retrospective study and one prospective study were found to be suitable for papers comparing CT to magnetic resonance imaging scans. RESULTS Staging laparoscopy outperformed computed tomography in all measured aspects, namely sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Magnetic resonance imaging and PET produced mixed results, with the former shown to be only marginally better than computed tomography. CT performed slightly better than PET in most measured domains, except in specificity and true negative rates. We speculate that this may be due to the limited F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in small peritoneal metastases and in linitis plastica. Radiomic modelling, in its current state, shows promise as an alternative for predicting peritoneal metastases. With further research, deep learning and radiomic modelling can be refined and potentially applied as a preoperative diagnostic tool to reduce the need for invasive staging laparoscopy. CONCLUSION Staging laparoscopy was superior in all measured aspects. However, associated risks and costs must be considered. Refinements in radiomic modelling are necessary to establish it as a reliable screening technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kon Voi Tay
- Upper GI and Bariatric Division, General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
- Upper GI and Bariatric Division, General Surgery, Woodlands Health, Singapore 768024, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li X, Ma W, Wang M, Quan Z, Zhang M, Ye J, Li G, Zhou X, Ma T, Wang J, Yang W, Nie Y, Wang J, Kang F. 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET for Surveillance of Anastomotic Recurrence in Postoperative Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: a Comparative Study with 18F-FDG PET. Mol Imaging Biol 2023; 25:857-866. [PMID: 37407745 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-023-01835-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET and 18F-FDG PET for detecting anastomotic recurrence in postoperative patients with gastrointestinal cancer, and to characterize the signal pattern over time at surgical wounds on both PET imaging. METHODS Gastrointestinal cancer patients who planned to 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for postoperative surveillance were involved. The SUVmax at surgical wounds were assessed. Endoscopic pathology confirmed anastomotic recurrence or it was ruled out by imaging and clinical follow-up. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), and accuracy of the two PET imaging in detecting anastomotic recurrence were compared. Relationships between tracer uptake at surgical wounds and postoperative time were also analyzed. RESULTS Compared with non-recurrent patients, the recurrent patients exhibited a significantly higher anastomotic SUVmax on 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET (SUVmax: 9.92 ± 4.36 vs. 2.81 ± 1.86, P = 0.002). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of detecting anastomotic recurrence were 100.0%, 87.3%, 41.7%, 100.0%, and 88.3% for 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET, and 60.0%, 81.8%, 23.1%, 95.7%, and 80.0% for 18F-FDG PET, respectively. Although 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET signal at surgical wounds showed a slight trend to decrease with time, no statistical difference was observed over months post-surgery (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Both tracers displayed high NPVs in identifying anastomotic recurrence with a higher sensitivity to 68Ga-FAPI-04. Tracer uptake at anastomotic sites does not decrease significantly over time, which results in low PPVs for both PET. Therefore, it is difficult to differentiate anastomotic recurrence from inflammation on either PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Wenhui Ma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Zhiyong Quan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Mingru Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jiajun Ye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Guiyu Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiang Zhou
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Taoqi Ma
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Junling Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Weidong Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yongzhan Nie
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Fei Kang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Altini C, Maggialetti N, Branca A, Pisani AR, Rubini D, Sardaro A, Stabile Ianora AA, Rubini G. 18F-FDG PET/CT in peritoneal tumors: a pictorial review. Clin Transl Imaging 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s40336-022-00534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
9
|
Kim TH, Kim IH, Kang SJ, Choi M, Kim BH, Eom BW, Kim BJ, Min BH, Choi CI, Shin CM, Tae CH, Gong CS, Kim DJ, Cho AEH, Gong EJ, Song GJ, Im HS, Ahn HS, Lim H, Kim HD, Kim JJ, Yu JI, Lee JW, Park JY, Kim JH, Song KD, Jung M, Jung MR, Son SY, Park SH, Kim SJ, Lee SH, Kim TY, Bae WK, Koom WS, Jee Y, Kim YM, Kwak Y, Park YS, Han HS, Nam SY, Kong SH. Korean Practice Guidelines for Gastric Cancer 2022: An Evidence-based, Multidisciplinary Approach. J Gastric Cancer 2023; 23:3-106. [PMID: 36750993 PMCID: PMC9911619 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2023.23.e11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 129] [Impact Index Per Article: 64.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers in Korea and the world. Since 2004, this is the 4th gastric cancer guideline published in Korea which is the revised version of previous evidence-based approach in 2018. Current guideline is a collaborative work of the interdisciplinary working group including experts in the field of gastric surgery, gastroenterology, endoscopy, medical oncology, abdominal radiology, pathology, nuclear medicine, radiation oncology and guideline development methodology. Total of 33 key questions were updated or proposed after a collaborative review by the working group and 40 statements were developed according to the systematic review using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and KoreaMed database. The level of evidence and the grading of recommendations were categorized according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation proposition. Evidence level, benefit, harm, and clinical applicability was considered as the significant factors for recommendation. The working group reviewed recommendations and discussed for consensus. In the earlier part, general consideration discusses screening, diagnosis and staging of endoscopy, pathology, radiology, and nuclear medicine. Flowchart is depicted with statements which is supported by meta-analysis and references. Since clinical trial and systematic review was not suitable for postoperative oncologic and nutritional follow-up, working group agreed to conduct a nationwide survey investigating the clinical practice of all tertiary or general hospitals in Korea. The purpose of this survey was to provide baseline information on follow up. Herein we present a multidisciplinary-evidence based gastric cancer guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae-Han Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, Korea
| | - In-Ho Kim
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center Seoul, Seoul, Korea
| | - Miyoung Choi
- National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (NECA), Seoul, Korea
| | - Baek-Hui Kim
- Department of Pathology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bang Wool Eom
- Center for Gastric Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Bum Jun Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Byung-Hoon Min
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang In Choi
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seungnam, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Woman's University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Sik Gong
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Eun Jeong Gong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea
| | - Geum Jong Song
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Hyeon-Su Im
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Korea
| | - Hye Seong Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, University of Hallym College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea
| | - Hyung-Don Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Joon Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jeong Il Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Won Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Ji Yeon Park
- Department of Surgery, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jwa Hoon Kim
- Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoung Doo Song
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minkyu Jung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Ran Jung
- Department of Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sang-Yong Son
- Department of Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Shin-Hoo Park
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Jin Kim
- Department of Radiology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Hospital Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Yong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Kyun Bae
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School and Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea
| | - Woong Sub Koom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeseob Jee
- Department of Surgery, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Yoo Min Kim
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoonjin Kwak
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Suk Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hye Sook Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
| | - Su Youn Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
| | - Seong-Ho Kong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University College of Medicine Cancer Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fu L, Huang S, Wu H, Dong Y, Xie F, Wu R, Zhou K, Tang G, Zhou W. Superiority of [ 68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[ 18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT to [ 18F]FDG PET/CT in delineating the primary tumor and peritoneal metastasis in initial gastric cancer. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:6281-6290. [PMID: 35380229 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08743-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT with [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of initial gastric cancer. METHODS We retrospectively compared [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT with [18F]FDG PET/CT in patients with initial gastric cancer from September 2020 to March 2021. Lesion detectability and the uptake of lesions quantified by the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were compared between the two modalities using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Mann-Whitney U test, and McNemar's chi-square test. RESULTS A total of 61 patients (37 males, aged 23-81 years) were included, of which 22 underwent radical gastrectomy. For primary lesions, higher uptake of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 was observed compared to [18F]FDG (median SUVmax, 14.60 vs 4.35, p < 0.001), resulting in higher positive detection using [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT than [18F]FDG PET/CT (95.1% vs 73.8%, p < 0.001), particularly for tumors with signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) (96.4% vs 57.1%, p < 0.001). [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT detected more positive lymph nodes than [18F]FDG PET/CT (637 vs 407). However, both modalities underestimated N staging compared to pathological N staging. [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT showed a higher sensitivity (92.3% vs 53.8%, p = 0.002) and peritoneal cancer index score (18 vs 3, p < 0.001) in peritoneum metastasis and other suspect metastases compared to [18F]FDG PET/CT. CONCLUSION Our findings indicate that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT outperformed [18F]FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of primary tumors with SRCC and peritoneum metastasis in initial gastric cancer. However, no clinically useful improvement was seen in N staging. KEY POINTS • The uptake of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 in primary tumor and metastasis was intensely higher than that of [18F]FDG (p < 0.001) in 61 patients with initial gastric cancer. • [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT had a higher sensitivity detection in primary tumors (95.1% vs 73.8%, p < 0.001) and peritoneal metastases (92.3% vs 53.8%, p = 0.002) than [18F]FDG PET/CT. • [68Ga]Ga-FAPI-04/[18F]FAPI-42 PET/CT depicted more positive lymph nodes than [18F]FDG PET/CT (637 vs 407); however, both underestimated N staging compared to pathological N staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilan Fu
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Shun Huang
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Hubing Wu
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ye Dong
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Fei Xie
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ruihe Wu
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Kemin Zhou
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ganghua Tang
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
| | - Wenlan Zhou
- Nanfang PET Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Drubay V, Nuytens F, Renaud F, Adenis A, Eveno C, Piessen G. Poorly cohesive cells gastric carcinoma including signet-ring cell cancer: Updated review of definition, classification and therapeutic management. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 14:1406-1428. [PMID: 36160745 PMCID: PMC9412924 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v14.i8.1406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
While the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in general has decreased worldwide in recent decades, the incidence of diffuse cancer historically comprising poorly cohesive cells-GC (PCC-GC) and including signet ring cell cancer is rising. Literature concerning PCC-GC is scarce and unclear, mostly due to a large variety of historically used definitions and classifications. Compared to other histological subtypes of GC, PCC-GC is nevertheless characterized by a distinct set of epidemiological, histological and clinical features which require a specific diagnostic and therapeutic approach. The aim of this review was to provide an update on the definition, classification and therapeutic strategies of PCC-GC. We focus on the updated histological definition of PCC-GC, along with its implications on future treatment strategies and study design. Also, specific considerations in the diagnostic management are discussed. Finally, the impact of some recent developments in the therapeutic management of GC in general such as the recently validated taxane-based regimens (5-Fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel), the use of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy as well as pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy and targeted therapy have been reviewed in depth for their relative importance for PCC-GC in particular.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Drubay
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Cambrai Hospital Center and Sainte Marie, Group of Hospitals of The Catholic Institute of Lille, Cambrai 59400, France
| | - Frederiek Nuytens
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, AZ Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk 8500, Belgium
| | - Florence Renaud
- Department of Pathology, University Lille Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
| | - Antoine Adenis
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, Monpellier 34000, France
- IRCM, Inserm, University of Monpellier, Monpellier 34000, France
| | - Clarisse Eveno
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
| | - Guillaume Piessen
- Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Lille, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
- CNRS, Inserm, UMR9020-U1277-CANTHER-Cancer, University Lille, CHU Lille, Lille 59000, France
- FREGAT Network, Claude Huriez University Hospital, Lille 59000, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang Z, Zheng B, Chen W, Xiong H, Jiang C. Accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary staging and diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancer: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2021; 21:164. [PMID: 33456531 PMCID: PMC7792481 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.9595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) is commonly used for staging and diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer. Recently, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET)/CT gained popularity as a diagnostic tool owing to advantages including dual functional and anatomical imaging, which may facilitate early diagnosis. The diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT has been assessed in several studies but with variable results. Therefore, the present meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT for primary TNM staging and the diagnosis of recurrent gastric cancers. A systematic search of the PubMed Central, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane and Embase databases from inception until January 2020 was performed. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Study-2 tool was used to determine the quality of the selected studies. Pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A total of 58 studies comprising 9,997 patients were included. Most studies had a low risk of bias. The sensitivity and specificity for nodal staging of gastric cancer were 49% (95% CI, 37-61%) and 92% (95% CI, 86-96%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 67% (95% CI, 57-76%) and 86% (95% CI, 81-89%) for CECT, respectively. For metastasis staging, the sensitivity and specificity were 56% (95% CI, 40-71%) and 97% (95% CI, 87-99%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. For diagnosing cancer recurrence, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 81% (95% CI, 72-88%) and 83% (95% CI, 74-89%) for 18F-FDG PET/CT, respectively, and 59% (95% CI, 41-75%) and 96% (95% CI, 83-99%) for CECT, respectively. Both 18F-FDG PET/CT and CECT were deemed highly useful for diagnosing recurrent gastric cancer due to their high sensitivities and specificities. However, these techniques cannot be used to exclude or confirm the presence of lymph node metastases or recurrent gastric cancer tumors, but can be used for the confirmation of distal metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhicheng Zhang
- Department of Radiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China
| | - Bo Zheng
- Department of Radiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China
| | - Hui Xiong
- Department of Radiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China
| | - Caiming Jiang
- Department of Radiology, The Ninth People's Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 400700, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
The use of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) is well established in the evaluation of alimentary tract malignancies. This review of the literature and demonstration of correlative images focuses on the current role of PET/CT in the diagnosis (including pathologic/clinical staging) and post-therapy follow-up of esophageal, gastric, and colorectal cancers. PET/CT provides utility in the management of esophageal cancer, including detection of distant disease prior to resection. In gastric cancer, PET/CT is useful in detecting solid organ metastases and in characterizing responders vs. non-responders after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the latter of which have poorer overall survival. In patients with GIST tumors, PET/CT also determines response to imatinib therapy with greater expedience as compared to CECT. For colorectal cancer, PET/CT has proven helpful in detecting hepatic and other distant metastases, treatment response, and differentiating post-radiation changes from tumor recurrence. Our review also highlights several pitfalls in PET/CT interpretation of alimentary tract lesions.
Collapse
|
14
|
PET in Gastrointestinal, Pancreatic, and Liver Cancers. Clin Nucl Med 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-39457-8_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
15
|
Baz AA, Hassan TA. Role of fused PET/CT compared to the standard contrast-enhanced CT in the follow-up assessment of the treated gastric malignancy. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0093-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
To investigate the use of fused positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) compared to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in the follow-up of treated gastric malignancies, all data were collected and analyzed retrospectively, enrolling 68 patients (18 females and 50 males) (their age range = 34–73 years). The patients had been referred to a private imaging center for their assessment by PET/CT.
Results
Adenocarcinoma was present in 73.5%, lymphoma was present in 23.5%, and malignant carcinoid was found in 3% of cases. All patients had received at least one treatment method including endoscopic/surgical resection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy.
By PET/CT, gastric recurrence/residual was depicted in 30 patients (47.0%) compared 46 patients (67.5%) as detected by CECT, and this was statistically significant (P value = 0.006), nodal metastasis was present in 18 patients (26.5%) compared to 26 patients (38%) as detected by CECT (P value = 0.143), and distant metastasis was present in 18 patients (26.5%) compared to 24 patients (35%) as depicted by CECT (P value = 0.265).
Conclusion
PET/CT offered a useful diagnostic modality as compared to CECT for follow-up evaluation of cases with treated gastric malignancies through a precise detection of the gastric lesions but it had rather comparable results in the detection of nodal and distant metastases.
Collapse
|
16
|
Elfattah Hassan Gadalla AA, Elmansy N, Elsayed ND, Sarhan MD, Osman MF. Diagnostic role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in recurrence detection of surgically treated gastric cancer: a cross-sectional study. THE EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE 2019. [DOI: 10.1186/s43055-019-0080-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Radical surgery of gastric cancer is considered as the only curative treatment; however, its poor long-term survival is often occurred due to its recurrence either local and/or distant metastasis. Thus, early detection of recurrence helps in improving the prognosis. Our aim is to assess the diagnostic role of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting postoperative recurrence in gastric cancer patients who have a radiological and/or clinical suspicion of recurrence.
Results
The study was carried over 31 males (62%) and 19 females (38%) pathologically proven with gastric carcinoma and underwent surgical intervention. All patients underwent PET/CT scan where the site and number of positive FDG activity analyzed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for locoregional recurrence were 75%, 81.58%, and 85% with p value 0.001; for regional lymph node recurrence were 100%, 100%, and 100% with p value < 0.001; for liver metastasis were 100%, 100%, and 100% with p value < 0.001; for peritoneum metastasis were 100%, 97.38%, and 98% with p value < 0.001; and for distant metastasis were 100%, 85.7%, and 94% with p value < 0.001.
Conclusion
With agreements to many studies, this study confirms that FDG PET/CT is a highly effective modality for postoperative surveillance detection of recurrent gastric cancer, especially in patients with clinically manifested disease, elevated tumor markers, and an indication of distant metastasis at diagnostic CT.
Collapse
|
17
|
The Utility of PET/Computed Tomography for Radiation Oncology Planning, Surveillance, and Prognosis Prediction of Gastrointestinal Tumors. PET Clin 2019; 15:77-87. [PMID: 31735304 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
At present, the strongest evidence for the use of PET/computed tomography (CT) in gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies is to rule out distant metastatic disease at diagnosis, radiation treatment planning for anal malignancies, and disease recurrence monitoring in colorectal and anal malignancies. Use of PET/CT for GI malignancies continues to evolve over time, with new studies evaluating prognostic abilities of PET/CT and with increasing sensitivity and spatial resolution of more modern PET/CT scanners. The authors encourage future applications and prospective evaluation of the use of PET/CT in the staging, prognostication, and recurrence prediction for GI malignancies.
Collapse
|
18
|
Usefulness of histologic differences and perivascular infiltration for preoperative T staging of advanced gastric cancer using computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 2019; 37:817-825. [PMID: 31625013 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-019-00887-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2019] [Accepted: 10/07/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to determine whether histologic differences and perivascular infiltration are useful for clinical T staging of advanced gastric cancer (AGC). MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 160 patients with pathologically confirmed AGC who had available preoperative stomach computed tomography (CT). Using stomach CT, they were classified according to standard T stage, histologic T stage, and perivascular T stage. Accuracy of each T stage criteria was analyzed. Perivascular infiltrations for the evaluation of prognosis were correlated with time to tumor progression by log-rank test. RESULTS There was a significant difference between the accuracies of the standard and histologic T stages (p < 0.001), whereas there was no significant difference between the standard and perivascular T stages (p = 0.07). In 121 patients who were pathologically confirmed as having T3 or T4a tumor, there was a significant difference between the standard and perivascular T stage (p < 0.001). In patients having T3 or T4a tumor, time to tumor progression of the negative perivascular infiltration subgroup was significantly longer than the positive subgroup. CONCLUSION Consideration of histologic differences and perivascular infiltration may be useful for clinical T staging of AGC.
Collapse
|
19
|
Honma Y, Terauchi T, Tateishi U, Kano D, Nagashima K, Shoji H, Iwasa S, Takashima A, Kato K, Hamaguchi T, Boku N, Shimada Y, Yamada Y. Imaging peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer with 18F-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed tomography: a proof-of-concept study. Br J Radiol 2018; 91:20180259. [PMID: 29916721 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most frequent form of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC). The sensitivity of detecting PM by pre-operative imaging modalities is low. Utility of positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F-fluodeoxyglucose (FDG) for GC is limited, because diffuse-type tumors are not FDG-avid. 18F-fluothymidine ([F-18]FLT) is a radiotracer that reflects cellular proliferation and the utility of [F-18]FLT-PET in GC has been reported. In this proof-of-concept study, we explored the ability of [F-18]FLT-PET/CT to detect PM of GC previously identified by other imaging modalities. METHODS The key eligibility criteria were as follows; (i) histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma; (ii) evident PM detected by CT performed within 4 weeks prior to registration; (iii) no prior treatment of PM within 4 weeks before registration. [F-18]FLT-PET/CT was performed at National Cancer Center Hospital, and [F-18]FLT-PET/CT images were evaluated independently by two radiologists. Safety assessments were carried out before and after [F-18]FLT-PET/CT. The primary end point was the detection sensitivity of PM. RESULTS A total of 19 eligible patients were analyzed, of which 15 (78.9%) had diffuse-type histology. Detection sensitivity of PM, primary lesion, and lymph node metastasis were 73.7% [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax): 1.697-13.21], 100% (SUVmax: 2.71-22.01), and 72.7% (SUVmax: 2.079-12.61), respectively. No patients experienced adverse events during or after [F-18]FLT-PET/CT. CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept study shows that [F-18]FLT-PET/CT is a sensitive method for detecting PM in GC, and paves the way for future studies investigating the clinical utility of this approach for the detection of clinically non-evident PM in GC. Advances in knowledge: This proof-of-concept study found that [F-18]FLT-PET/CT is a sensitive method for detecting peritoneal metastases in GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshitaka Honma
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Takashi Terauchi
- 2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Ukihide Tateishi
- 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Daisuke Kano
- 3 Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School of Medicine , Tokyo , Japan.,4 Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Center Hospital East , Kashiwa , Japan
| | - Kengo Nagashima
- 5 Department of Global Clinical Research, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University , Chiba , Japan
| | - Hirokazu Shoji
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Satoru Iwasa
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Atsuo Takashima
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Ken Kato
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Tetsuya Hamaguchi
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Shimada
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan.,6 Department of Medical Oncology, Kochi Health Sciences Center , Kouchi , Japan
| | - Yasuhide Yamada
- 1 Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology Division, National Cancer Center Hospital , Tokyo , Japan.,7 Department of Clinical Oncology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine , Hamamatsu , Japan.,8 Department of Oncology, National Center for Global Health and Medicine , Toyama , Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim JH, Heo SH, Kim JW, Shin SS, Min JJ, Kwon SY, Jeong YY, Kang HK. Evaluation of recurrence in gastric carcinoma: Comparison of contrast-enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2017; 23:6448-6456. [PMID: 29085194 PMCID: PMC5643270 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i35.6448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2017] [Revised: 07/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/25/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To compare the value of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CT) and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for detecting gastric carcinoma recurrence.
METHODS We retrospectively examined data from 2475 patients who underwent both contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and FDG PET/CT for the surveillance of gastric carcinoma curative resection. Patients had an interval of less than 1 mo between their CT and PET/CT scans. Sixty patients who had recurrence were enrolled. Among 1896 patients who did not have recurrence, 60 were selected by simple random sampling. All CT and PET/CT images were reviewed retrospectively by two reviewers blinded to all clinical and pathologic information except curative resection due to gastric carcinoma.
RESULTS The pathological stage of the recurrence group was statistically significantly higher than that of the control group (P < 0.001). In the 60 patients who had recurrence, there were 79 recurrent lesions. Forty-four patients had only one location of recurrence, 13 patients had two locations, and 3 patients had three. In the detection of patient-based overall recurrence, no statistically significant differences existed between the two modalities (P = 0.096). However, for peritoneal carcinomatosis, CT had a statistically significantly higher sensitivity compared to PET/CT (96% vs 50%, P = 0.001). Adenocarcinoma was the most common type of gastric carcinoma. On the pathology-based analysis, CT also had a statistically significantly higher sensitivity compared to PET/CT (98% vs 80%, P = 0.035).
CONCLUSION Contrast-enhanced CT was superior to PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis and pathologic type of adenocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Hyeon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| | - Suk Hee Heo
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| | - Jin Woong Kim
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| | - Sang Soo Shin
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju 501-757, South Korea
| | - Jung Jun Min
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hostpital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| | - Seong Young Kwon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hostpital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| | - Yong Yeon Jeong
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| | - Heoung Keun Kang
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Jeonnam 519-763, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Natsugoe S, Arigami T, Uenosono Y, Yanagita S. Novel surgical approach based on the sentinel node concept in patients with early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2017; 1:180-185. [PMID: 29863111 PMCID: PMC5881309 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2017] [Accepted: 06/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent prospective multicenter trials have demonstrated the clinical safety and efficacy of sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) in patients with early gastric cancer. Further, development of an intraoperative imaging system and an indocyanine green fluorescence imaging approach has been attracting attention as a novel tool for detection of the sentinel node (SN). The greatest advantage of an in vivo imaging system is that it visualizes SN and afferent lymphatic vessels from the primary tumor site more clearly than the conventional dye approach. Besides visualization of the SN, it is also essential to accurately assess the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis in the intraoperative management of SNNS. However, the clinical significance of lymph node micrometastasis (LNM) in patients with gastric cancer remains controversial. Reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) is one of the representative assays used to identify LNM. A rapid RT‐PCR assay that completes the detection of LNM within approximately 40 minutes has recently been produced and applied in the clinical management of SNNS. From the viewpoint of surgical methods, modified laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery with non‐exposed approaches has recently been highlighted as a promising technique to prevent tumor dissemination caused by surgical procedures, and is likely to be clinically applied to SNNS in the future. When carrying out SNNS as a minimally invasive surgery, it is important to consider the balance between post‐surgical quality of life and curability. Future prospective studies on SNNS will greatly contribute to furthering its establishment as a beneficial procedure for patients with early gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoji Natsugoe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery Field of Oncology Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan.,Molecular Frontier Surgery Course of Advanced Therapeutics Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan
| | - Takaaki Arigami
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery Field of Oncology Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan.,Molecular Frontier Surgery Course of Advanced Therapeutics Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan
| | - Yoshikazu Uenosono
- Molecular Frontier Surgery Course of Advanced Therapeutics Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan
| | - Shigehiro Yanagita
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Breast and Thyroid Surgery Field of Oncology Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences Kagoshima Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a disease with low survival rates and high morbidity, requiring accurate and prompt diagnosis and treatment. Although limited in the evaluation of the primary tumor as such, the metabolic information of primary tumors in an 18F-FDG PET/CT study can assist in surgical and treatment planning and differentiating gastric cancers. It detects nodal disease with good specificity and positive predictive value, thus enabling appropriate therapy for individual patients. It provides valuable information about distant metastases, altering therapy decisions. It has reasonably good performance in detecting recurrent disease and in the follow-up of patients.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
This article discusses the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines and other available Western and Eastern guidelines for the surveillance of gastric cancer following surgical resection. It reviews the literature assessing the utility of intensive surveillance strategies for gastric cancer, which fails to show an improvement in survival. The unique issues relating to follow-up of early gastric cancer and after endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer are discussed. This article also reviews the available modalities for follow-up. In addition, it briefly discusses the advancements in treatment of recurrent and metastatic disease and the implications for gastric cancer survival and surveillance strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shachar Laks
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7213, 1150 Physicians Office Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7213, USA
| | - Michael O Meyers
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7213, 1150 Physicians Office Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7213, USA
| | - Hong Jin Kim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of North Carolina, 170 Manning Drive, CB #7213, 1150 Physicians Office Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Staniuk T, Małkowski B, Śrutek E, Szlęzak P, Zegarski W. Comparison of FLT-PET/CT and CECT in gastric cancer diagnosis. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016; 41:1349-56. [PMID: 26826089 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0647-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM To date, no data are available on the use of 18-fluorothymidine positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FLT-PET/CT) for preoperative gastric cancer staging. Herein, we attempt to assess the value of FLT-PET/CT for preoperative gastric cancer staging in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MATERIALS AND METHODS In a group of 96 gastric cancer patients, 96 FLT-PET/CT, 56 abdominal cavity CECT, and 51 resective operations were done. All three (FLT-PET/CT, CECT, and resective operation) were done in 29 patients. The results of FLT-PET/CT, CECT, and histopathological examinations were used to assess the ability of FLT-PET/CT and CECT to identify primary tumors, regional nodal metastases, and distant abdominal metastases. Assessment of regional lymph nodes was based on SUVmax in FLT-PET/CT and SAD (short-axis diameter) in CECT. RESULTS In the group of 56 patients examined with FLT-PET/CT and CECT, identification of the primary tumor was possible in 56 cases (100%) and in 53 cases (94.6%), respectively, (p = 0.013). Using ROC curve, the sensitivity and specificity of FLT-PET/CT in metastatic regional lymph node assessment were higher than those of CECT (p = 0.0033). FLT-PE/CT enabled identification of a greater number of extraregional abdominal metastases than CECT (n = 56; 19 vs. 15, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.41). CONCLUSIONS The ability of FLT-PET/CT to identify primary tumors is greater than that of CECT, and thus FLT-PET/CT was better in evaluating regional nodal metastases. FLT-PET/CT enabled identification of a greater number of abdominal metastases than CECT, but the difference was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Staniuk
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
| | - Bogdan Małkowski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Oncological Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Department of Positron Emission Tomography and Molecular Diagnostics, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | - Ewa Śrutek
- Department of Cancer Pathology and Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Toruń, Poland
| | | | - Wojciech Zegarski
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Oncological Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Metabolic landscape of advanced gastric cancer according to HER2 and its prognostic implications. Gastric Cancer 2016; 19:421-430. [PMID: 26002144 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-015-0504-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/29/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In advanced gastric cancer (AGC), HER2 is a validated therapeutic target. However, the metabolic landscape of AGC based on HER2 status has not been reported. Furthermore, the prognostic value of HER2 in AGC is under debate. The purpose of this study was to determine the metabolic landscape and prognosis on the basis of HER2 status in AGC. METHODS We analyzed 866 AGC patients treated with palliative chemotherapy and whose HER2 status was evaluated. HER2 positivity was defined as HER2 IHC 3+ or HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥2. Among them, 363 patients were evaluated with (18)F FDG-PET before chemotherapy. We analyzed mSUV (maximal standardized uptake value) according to HER2 status and clinical outcomes. RESULTS Among 866 patients, 225 (26.0 %) had HER2+ GC. The mSUV of HER2+ GC was significantly higher than that of HER2- GC (12.6 vs. 8.7, p < 0.001). Increased HER2 IHC positivity was correlated with increased mSUV (IHC-: 8.1, IHC 1+: 8.2, 2+: 11.4, 3+: 13.2, p < 0.001). Excluding HER2+ patients who received HER2-targeting agents, OS of patients was not different by HER2 status (12.5 vs. 11.9 months, p = 0.688). However, according to tumor metabolism, patients with higher mSUV showed worse OS regardless of HER2 positivity (mSUV < 12.8:14.8, ≥12.8:8.6 months, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Tumor metabolism of AGC adversely influenced OS under treatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy. Tumor metabolism was higher in HER2+ AGC than HER2-. However, HER2 was not a prognostic factor in patients who received chemotherapy without HER2-targeting agents.
Collapse
|
26
|
Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate recurrent gastric cancer after surgical resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Nucl Med 2016; 30:179-87. [PMID: 26830546 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-016-1058-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Accepted: 12/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
We aimed to explore the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG PET) for detection of gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection through a systematic review and meta-analysis. "PubMed", EMBASE, Web of Knowledge and Springer, from the beginning of 2002 to Feb 2015, were searched for studies evaluating the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET in detecting recurrent gastric cancer. We calculated sensitivities, specificities, diagnostic odds ratios and likelihood ratios, and constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves. Fourteen studies (828 patients) were included. On a per-patient basis, the forest plots showed that the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio of (18)F-FDG PET or PET/CT were 0.85 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.75-0.92], 0.78 (95 % CI 0.72-0.84), 3.9 (95 % CI 2.9-5.4), 0.19 (95 % CI 0.11-0.34), and 21 (95 % CI 9-47), respectively. On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity was 0.75 (95 % CI 0.61-0.86). The area under the SROC curve of PET/CT on the basis of per-patient was 0.86. (18)F-FDG PET had great value in the detection of gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection. The sensitivities of (18)F-FDG PET were 85 and 75 %, respectively, on per-patient basis and on per-lesion basis.
Collapse
|
27
|
Zheng Z, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Li Z, Wu A, Wu X, Liu Y, Bu Z, Ji J. Nomogram for predicting lymph node metastasis rate of submucosal gastric cancer by analyzing clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis. Chin J Cancer Res 2016; 27:572-9. [PMID: 26752931 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2015.12.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To combine clinicopathological characteristics associated with lymph node metastasis for submucosal gastric cancer into a nomogram. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 262 patients with submucosal gastric cancer who underwent D2 gastrectomy between 1996 and 2012. The relationship between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological features was statistically analyzed. With multivariate logistic regression analysis, we made a nomogram to predict the possibility of lymph node metastasis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was also performed to assess the predictive value of the model. Discrimination and calibration were performed using internal validation. RESULTS A total number of 48 (18.3%) patients with submucosal gastric cancer have pathologically lymph node metastasis. For submucosal gastric carcinoma, lymph node metastasis was associated with age, tumor location, macroscopic type, size, differentiation, histology, the existence of ulcer and lymphovascular invasion in univariate analysis (all P<0.05). The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that age ≤50 years old, macroscopic type III or mixed, undifferentiated type, and presence of lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors of lymph node metastasis in submucosal gastric cancer (all P<0.05). We constructed a predicting nomogram with all these factors for lymph node metastasis in submucosal gastric cancer with good discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) =0.844]. Internal validation demonstrated a good discrimination power that the actual probability corresponds closely with the predicted probability. CONCLUSIONS We developed a nomogram to predict the rate of lymph node metastasis for submucosal gastric cancer. With good discrimination and internal validation, the nomogram improved individualized predictions for assisting clinicians to make appropriated treatment decision for submucosal gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixue Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yinan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Lianhai Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Aiwen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Xiaojiang Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yiqiang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhaode Bu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Combined fibrinogen concentration and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker of gastric cancer. Oncol Lett 2015; 11:1537-1544. [PMID: 26893776 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.4049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Certain patients with early gastric cancer succumb to recurrent disease and cancer-associated complications. The key cause of recurrence is challenging to determine, since clinical blood markers that are able to predict the tumor properties of gastric cancer are limited. The present study investigated the fibrinogen concentration and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in blood specimens from patients with gastric cancer, and assessed the clinical applicability of combining the fibrinogen concentration with the NLR (CFS-NLR) as a prognostic marker of gastric cancer. The present study consisted of 275 patients with gastric cancer, who were divided into three groups: Those possessing hyperfibrinogenemia (≥305 mg/dl) and a high NLR (≥2.34; CFS-NLR 2 group); those possessing either hyperfibrinogenemia or a high NLR (CFS-NLR 1 group); or those that possessed neither abnormality (CFS-NLR 0 group). The CFS-NLR was significantly associated with the depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis, lymphovascular invasion and tumor stage (P<0.0001). The prognostic differences among the three groups were significant (P=0.0016). Therefore, the CFS-NLR may be a potentially useful blood marker for predicting tumor progression and the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Lee JW, Lee SM, Son MW, Lee MS. Diagnostic performance of FDG PET/CT for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015; 43:881-888. [PMID: 26611426 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3249-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2015] [Accepted: 10/30/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study evaluated the diagnostic performance of 2-[(18)F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for surveillance in asymptomatic gastric cancer patients after curative surgical resection. METHODS We retrospectively recruited 190 gastric cancer patients (115 early gastric cancer patients and 75 advanced gastric cancer patients) who underwent 1-year (91 patients) or 2-year (99 patients) postoperative FDG PET/CT surveillance, along with a routine follow-up program, after curative surgical resection. All enrolled patients were asymptomatic and showed no recurrence on follow-up examinations performed before PET/CT surveillance. All PET/CT images were visually assessed and all abnormal findings on follow-up examinations including FDG PET/CT were confirmed with histopathological diagnosis or clinical follow-up. RESULTS During follow-up, 19 patients (10.0 %) developed recurrence. FDG PET/CT showed abnormal findings in 37 patients (19.5 %). Among them, 16 patients (8.4 %) were diagnosed as cancer recurrence. Of 153 patients without abnormal findings on PET/CT, three patients were false-negative and diagnosed as recurrence on other follow-up examinations. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FDG PET/CT were 84.2 %, 87.7 %, 43.2 %, and 98.0 %, respectively. Among 115 early gastric cancer patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in four patients (3.5 %) and one patient with local recurrence. Among 75 advanced gastric cancer patients, PET/CT detected recurrence in 12 patients (16.0 %), excluding two patients experiencing peritoneal recurrence. In addition, FDG PET/CT detected secondary primary cancer in six (3.2 %) out of all the patients. CONCLUSIONS Post-operative FDG PET/CT surveillance showed good diagnostic ability for detecting recurrence in gastric cancer patients. FDG PET/CT could be a useful follow-up modality for gastric cancer patients, especially those with advanced gastric cancer. However, further careful evaluation is needed because of false-positive findings on PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Won Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sang Mi Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 23-20 Byeongmyeong-dong, Dongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-do, Cheonan, Korea, 330-721.
| | - Myoung Won Son
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Moon-Soo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Cheonan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cayvarlı H, Bekiş R, Akman T, Altun D. The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastric Cancer Recurrence. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2015; 23:76-83. [PMID: 25541930 PMCID: PMC4288227 DOI: 10.4274/mirt.83803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) has been widely used for staging, re-staging and for monitoring therapy-induced changes and response to therapy in patients with various types of cancer, but its utilization for gastric cancer has been limited. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting recurrence in gastric cancer patients with radiologic or clinical suspicion of recurrence and its clinical impact on making decision. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 130 consecutive patients who underwent PET/CT scans for post-treatment surveillance of gastric cancer between January 2008 and March 2012. The mean time between the initial diagnosis of gastric cancer and PET/CT studies was 44 weeks with a median of 18 weeks. The number and site of positive FDG uptake were analyzed and correlated with the final diagnosis by calculating the diagnostic values. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT for detecting the recurrence in terms of whether or not histology had been SRC/musinous adenocarcinoma. The changes in the clinical management of patients were also evaluated according to the results of PET/CT. Results: Of all 130 patients, 91 patients were confirmed to have true recurrence. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and the accuracy of PET/CT for diagnosing true recurrence on a per-person basis were 91.2%, 61.5%, 84.6%, 75.0% and 82.3% respectively. Final diagnoses were confirmed histopathologically in 59 (45.4%) of 130 patients and by clinical and radiological follow-up in the remaining 71 (54.6%) patients. In the subgroup with SRC/mucinous adenocarcinoma differentiation of the primary tumor, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT on a per-person basis. In addition, PET/CT results changed the patients’ management in 20 (15%) cases. Conclusions: 18F-FDG PET/CT can provide useful information in discriminating true recurrence in patients with suspected gastric cancer recurrence and may have significant impact on clinical decisions/patient management in a considerable percentage of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Cayvarlı
- Ordu State Hospital, Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Ordu, Turkey. E-ma-il:
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Filik M, Kir KM, Aksel B, Soyda Ç, Özkan E, Küçük ÖN, İbiş E, Akgül H. The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the Primary Staging of Gastric Cancer. Mol Imaging Radionucl Ther 2015; 24:15-20. [PMID: 25800593 PMCID: PMC4372767 DOI: 10.4274/mirt.26349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the primary staging of gastric cancer in the comparison of ceCT as routine staging method and evaluate influencing parameters of 18F-FDG uptake. Methods: Thirty-one patients (mean age: 58.9±12.6) who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT for primary staging of gastric cancer between June 2011 and June 2012 were included to the study. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings were compared with pathological reports in patients who underwent surgery following PET/CT. 18F-FDG PET/CT findings of primary lesions, lymph nodes and adjacent organs were compared with ceCT findings and pathological reports. Since 6 patients were accepted as inoperable according to 18F-FDG PET/CT and/or ceCT and/or laparotomy and/or laparoscopy findings, pathological confirmation could not be possible. Results: In the postoperative TNM staging of patients, while 1 (4%), 1 (4%), 4 (16%), 2 (8%), 12 (48%) and 5 (20%) patients were staged as T0, Tis, T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively, 8 (32%), 6 (24%), 6 (24%) and 5 (20%) patients were N0, N1, N2 and N3 respectively. 18F-FDG PET/CT was totally normal in 2 patients. While primary tumors were FDG avid in 27 patients, in 17 and 6 patients FDG uptake was observed in perigastric lymph nodes and distant organs, respectively. Mean SUVmax of FDG avid tumors was calculated as 13.49±9.29 (3.00-44.60). However, SUVmax of lymph nodes was computed as 9.28±6.92 (2.80-29.10). According to sub-analysis of histopathological subtypes of primary tumors, SUVmax of adenocarsinomas was calculated as 15.16 (3.00-44.60), of signet ring cells as 9.90 (5.50-17.70), of adenocarcinomas with signet ring cell component as 11.27 (6.20-13.90) (p=0.721). In the comparison with histopathological examination while ceCT was TP, TN, FN in 23, 1 and 1 patients, 18F-FDG PET/CT was TP, FP, FN in 20, 1 and 4 patients, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPD and NPV of ceCT in the detection of lymph node metastasis was calculated as 83.3%, 75%, 80%, 87.5% and 66.6%, respectively. These parameters for 18F-FDG PET/CT were 64.7%, 100%, 76%, 100% and 57.1%. Conclusion: Despite lower sensitivity than ceCT, diagnostic power of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the preoperative staging of gastric cancer is acceptable. Because of its high PPV, it might be beneficial in the evaluation of patients with suspected lymph nodes. The role of 18F-FDG PET/CT seems to be limited in the early stage and signet ring cell carcinomas due to lower 18F-FDG uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa Filik
- Prof. Dr. A. İlhan Özdemir State Hospital, Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, Giresun, Turkey. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
|
33
|
Methylation of DLEC1 promoter is a predictor for recurrence in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. DISEASE MARKERS 2014; 2014:804023. [PMID: 25574068 PMCID: PMC4276360 DOI: 10.1155/2014/804023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2014] [Revised: 11/19/2014] [Accepted: 11/24/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate promoter methylation in the deleted in lung and esophageal cancer 1 (DLEC1) gene in Chinese patients with gastric cancer. METHODS A total of 227 patients with gastric cancer were enrolled. The methylations of the promoter regions of DLEC1 and ACTB were determined using quantitative methylation-specific PCR. The DLEC1 methylation was compared to the clinicopathological variables of gastric cancer. RESULTS DLEC1 methylation was not associated with the clinicopathological variables of gastric cancer. Patients with DLEC1-hypermethylated gastric cancer had significantly higher recurrence rate than those with DLEC1-hypomethylated gastric cancer (P = 0.025; hazard ratio = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS Methylation of DELC1 promoter may be a valuable predictor for recurrence in Chinese patients with gastric cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Sonoda H, Tani T. Clinical significance of molecular diagnosis for gastric cancer lymph node micrometastasis. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:13728-13733. [PMID: 25320510 PMCID: PMC4194556 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2013] [Revised: 03/14/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in molecular diagnostic tools have allowed the identification of lymph node micrometastasis (LNM), including isolated tumor cells, in cancer patients. While immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction have been used to identify LNM in patients with gastric cancer, the clinical significance of this finding remains unclear. Recently, minimally invasive treatments, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic surgery, are widely performed to help improve postsurgical quality of life (QOL). However, it is important to maintain the balance between QOL and curability when making treatments decision for patients with gastric cancer. If minimally invasive surgery based on accurate intraoperative LNM diagnosis was established, it could be performed safely. Therefore, we reviewed the clinical significance of LNM detected by molecular techniques as an important target for treatment decision making with gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
|
35
|
Donswijk ML, Hess S, Mulders T, Lam MGEH. [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography in Gastrointestinal Malignancies. PET Clin 2014; 9:421-41, v-vi. [PMID: 26050945 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2014.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
This article discusses the current state-of-the-art application of 2-deoxy-2-[(18)F]fluoro-d-glucose (FDG)-PET and FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) in the management of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Gastrointestinal malignancies include many different cell types, several common malignancies of which may be imaged by FDG-PET/CT. This review focuses on gastric carcinoma, pancreatic carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, and stroma cell tumors. The role of FDG-PET/CT in staging these malignancies is discussed, in addition to (re)staging, detection of recurrent disease, patient selection/prognostication, and response assessment, using the currently available literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten L Donswijk
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Søren Hess
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, 5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Ties Mulders
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee DY, Lee CH, Seo MJ, Lee SH, Ryu JS, Lee JJ. Performance of (18)F-FDG PET/CT as a postoperative surveillance imaging modality for asymptomatic advanced gastric cancer patients. Ann Nucl Med 2014; 28:789-95. [PMID: 24965850 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-014-0871-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2014] [Accepted: 06/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of postoperative fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) as a surveillance modality for advanced gastric cancer patients who were asymptomatic and negative by conventional follow-up. METHODS We retrospectively collected 46 advanced gastric cancer patients who received approximately 1-year-postoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT surveillance following curative resection (mean age 60.6 ± 11.5 years). (18)F-FDG PET/CT was interpreted by nuclear medicine physicians who were blind to the clinical information. Final confirmation was determined by clinical follow-up using tumor markers, conventional CT scan, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and with/without subsequent histopathologic diagnosis. RESULTS Four patients developed recurrence (8.7 %; 1 local and 3 distant recurrences). For local recurrence, (18)F-FDG PET/CT found four hypermetabolic lesions and one was local recurrence. For distant recurrence, seven hypermetabolic lesions were found in six patients and true-positive was three lesions. False-positive cases were mainly turned out to be physiologic small bowel uptake. Regardless of the recurrence site, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of (18)F-FDG PET/CT were 100 % (4/4, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 39.6-100 %), 88.1 % (37/42, 95 % CI 73.6-95.5 %), 44.4 % (4/9, 95 % CI 15.3-77.3 %) and 100 % (37/37, 95 % CI 88.3-100 %), respectively in the patient-based analysis. CONCLUSION Our study showed good specificity of postoperative surveillance (18)F-FDG PET/CT for detecting recurrence. Careful caution should be made for interpreting some false-positive hypermetabolic lesions in postoperative (18)F-FDG PET/CT, especially at the local anastomosis site.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Yun Lee
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Song HJ. [Does positron emission tomography-computed tomography maximum standardized uptake value predict survival in surgically resected gastric cancer?]. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY = TAEHAN SOHWAGI HAKHOE CHI 2014; 63:333-334. [PMID: 25097962 DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2014.63.6.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
|
38
|
Zheng Z, Liu Y, Bu Z, Zhang L, Li Z, Du H, Ji J. Prognostic role of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer. Chin J Cancer Res 2014; 26:192-9. [PMID: 24826060 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.04.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2014] [Accepted: 04/10/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To clarify the relationship between clinicopathological features and lymph node metastasis and to propose the potential indications of lymph node metastasis for prognosis in early gastric cancer (EGC) patients. METHODS We retrospectively observed 226 EGC patients with lymph node resection, and analyzed the associations between lymph node metastasis and clinicopathological parameters using the chi-square test in univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis in multivariate analysis. Overall survival analysis was determined using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test. We conducted multivariate prognosis analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS Of all the EGC patients, 7.5% (17/226) were histologically shown to have lymph node metastasis. The differentiation, lymphovascular invasion and depth of invasion were independent risk factors for lymph node metastasis in EGC. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were significantly lower in patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without and the patients also had shorter progress-free survival time. Lymph node metastasis and tumor size were independent prognostic factors for EGC. The status of the lymph nodes was a significant factor in predicting recurrence or metastasis after surgery. CONCLUSIONS The undifferentiated carcinoma and lymphovascular and/or submucosal invasion were associated with a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis in EGC patients, whom need to perform subsequent D2 lymphadenectomy or laparoscopic lymph node dissection and more rigorous follow-up or additional chemotherapy/radiation after D2 gastrectomy for poor prognosis and high recurrence/metastasis rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhixue Zheng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Yiqiang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Zhaode Bu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Lianhai Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Ziyu Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Hong Du
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| | - Jiafu Ji
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), 1 Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2 Department of Pathology, 3 Clinical Gastric Cancer Translational Research Laboratory, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wu CX, Zhu ZH. Diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer by positron emission tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:4574-4585. [PMID: 24782610 PMCID: PMC4000494 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i16.4574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2013] [Revised: 12/18/2013] [Accepted: 01/15/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. The diagnosis of gastric cancer has been significantly improved with the broad availability of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Effective technologies for accurate staging and quantitative evaluation are still in demand to merit reasonable treatment and better prognosis for the patients presented with advanced disease. Preoperative staging using conventional imaging tools, such as computed tomography (CT) and endoscopic ultrasonography, is inadequate. Positron emission tomography (PET), using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a tracer and integrating CT for anatomic localization, holds a promise to detect unsuspected metastasis and has been extensively used in a variety of malignancies. However, the value of FDG PET/CT in diagnosis and evaluation of gastric cancer is still controversial. This article reviews the current literature in diagnosis, staging, response evaluation, and relapse monitoring of gastric cancer, and discusses the current understanding, improvement, and future prospects in this area.
Collapse
|
40
|
Yun M. Imaging of Gastric Cancer Metabolism Using 18 F-FDG PET/CT. J Gastric Cancer 2014; 14:1-6. [PMID: 24765531 PMCID: PMC3996244 DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2014.14.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Revised: 12/22/2013] [Accepted: 12/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Aerobic glycolysis has been the most important hypothesis in cancer metabolism. It seems to be related to increased bioenergetic and biosynthetic needs in rapidly proliferating cancer cells. To this end, F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG), a glucose analog, became widely popular for the detection of malignancies combined with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Although the potential roles of FDG PET/CT in primary tumor detection are not fully established, it seems to have a limited sensitivity in detecting early gastric cancer and mainly signet ring or non-solid types of advanced gastric cancer. In evaluating lymph node metastases, the location of lymph nodes and the degree of FDG uptake in primary tumors appear to be important factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT. In spite of the limited sensitivity, the high specificity of PET/CT for lymph node metastases may play an important role in changing the extent of lymphadenectomy or reducing futile laparotomies. For peritoneal metastases, PET/CT seems to have a poorer sensitivity but a better specificity than CT. The roles of PET/CT in the evaluation of other distant metastases are yet to be known. Studies including primary tumors with low FDG uptake or peritoneal recurrence seem suffer from poorer diagnostic performance for the detection of recurrent gastric cancer. There are only a few reports using FDG PET/CT to predict response to neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. A complete metabolic response seems to be predictive of more favorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mijin Yun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zou H, Zhao Y. 18FDG PET-CT for detecting gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection: a meta-analysis. Surg Oncol 2013; 22:162-6. [PMID: 23747134 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2013] [Revised: 05/14/2013] [Accepted: 05/17/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the value of (18)FDG PET-CT for the detection of gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for (18)FDG PET-CT. We also constructed summary receiver operating characteristic curves for (18)FDG PET-CT. RESULTS Eight studies (500 patients) were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio of (18)FDG PET-CT were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-0.94), 0.88 (95% CI = 0.75-0.94), 17.0 (95% CI = 3.5-14.0), and 0.16 (95% CI = 0.07-0.34), respectively. Overall weighted area under the curve was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.91-0.95). CONCLUSIONS (18)FDG PET-CT has moderate sensitivity and specificity for detection of gastric cancer recurrence after surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzhi Zou
- Department of Medicine, Tumor Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, Dongming Road, Zhengzhou 450000, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Wu WG, Dong P, Wu XS, Li ML, Ding QC, Zhang L, Yang JH, Weng H, Ding Q, Tan ZJ, Lu JH, Gu J, Liu YB. Surgical management of patients with bowel obstructions secondary to gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013; 19:4559-4567. [PMID: 23901233 PMCID: PMC3725382 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i28.4559] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2013] [Revised: 05/27/2013] [Accepted: 06/04/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM: To assess whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the management of small bowel obstructions (SBOs) secondary to gastric cancer and its role in treatment strategies.
METHODS: The medical records of all of the patients who were admitted for an intestinal obstruction after curative resection for gastric cancer were retrospectively reviewed. PET/CT was performed before a clinical treatment strategy was established for each patient. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with no evidence of a tumor recurrence and patients with evidence of a tumor recurrence. Tumor recurrences included a local recurrence, peritoneal carcinomatosis or distant metastases. The primary endpoint was the 1-year survival rate, and other variables included patient demographics, the length of hospital stay, complications, and mortality.
RESULTS: The median time between a diagnosis of gastric cancer and the detection of a SBO was 1.4 years. Overall, 31 of 65 patients (47.7%) had evidence of a tumor recurrence on the PET/CT scan, which was the only factor that was associated with poor survival. Open and close surgery was the main type of surgical procedure reported for the patients with tumor recurrences. R0 resections were performed in 2 patients, including 1 who underwent combined adjacent organ resection. In the group with no evidence of a tumor recurrence on PET/CT, bowel resections were performed in 7 patients, adhesiolysis was performed in 7 patients, and a bypass was performed in 1 patient. The 1-year survival curves according to PET/CT evidence of a tumor recurrence vs no PET/CT evidence of a tumor recurrence were significantly different, and the 1-year survival rates were 8.8% vs 93.5%, respectively. There were no significant differences (P = 0.71) in the 1-year survival rates based on surgical vs nonsurgical management (0% with nonoperative treatment vs 20% after exploratory laparotomy).
CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT can be used to identify the causes of bowel obstructions in patients with a history of gastric cancer, and this method is useful for planning the surgical management of these patients.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
There is currently no consensus on the best strategy for the follow-up of patients who have undergone surgical treatment with curative intent for gastric cancer. The wide variation in recommendations for surveillance among international experts and hospital schedules clearly reflects a lack of an established body of evidence on this subject. Consequently, most of the international guidelines aimed at early detection of disease recurrence gloss over details concerning the mode, duration, and intensity of surveillance since they cannot be based on an acceptable grade of recommendation. Very few report anything other than the detection of recurrences or death as the primary endpoints, and, given the poor survival of patients with recurrent gastric cancer, the prognostic effect of early detection seems doubtful. In recent years, an increasing focus on evidence-based medicine, which has coincided with a growing concern about costs and efficiency in medicine, has caused a reevaluation of most surveillance practices. In this paper, we review and discuss the current body of evidence and follow-up practices after curative resection of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico D'Ugo
- Department of Surgery, A. Gemelli Hospital, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, IT-00167 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hallinan JTPD, Venkatesh SK. Gastric carcinoma: imaging diagnosis, staging and assessment of treatment response. Cancer Imaging 2013; 13:212-27. [PMID: 23722535 PMCID: PMC3667568 DOI: 10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the most common causes of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgical resection is the only cure available and is dependent on the GC stage at presentation, which incorporates depth of tumor invasion, extent of lymph node and distant metastases. Accurate preoperative staging is therefore essential for optimal surgical management with consideration of preoperative and/or postoperative chemotherapy. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with its ability to assess tumor depth, nodal disease and metastases is the preferred technique for staging GC. Endoscopic ultrasonography is more accurate for assessing the depth of wall invasion in early cancer, but is limited in the assessment of advanced local or stenotic cancer and detection of distant metastases. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), although useful for staging, is not proven to be effective. Positron emission tomography (PET) is most useful for detecting and characterizing distant metastases. Both MDCT and PET are useful for assessment of treatment response following preoperative chemotherapy and for detection of recurrence after surgical resection. This review article discusses the usefulness of imaging modalities for detecting, staging and assessing treatment response for GC and the potential role of newer applications including CT volumetry, virtual gastroscopy and perfusion CT in the management of GC.
Collapse
|
45
|
GRIERSON C, UPPONI S. Patterns of tumour recurrence after luminal tumour resection. IMAGING 2013. [DOI: 10.1259/imaging/73678953] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
46
|
Yun HW, Shim KN. Role of18F 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies. THE KOREAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY 2013; 61:303-6. [DOI: 10.4166/kjg.2013.61.6.303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-Won Yun
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki-Nam Shim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
18F-FDG PET-CT for detecting recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma: results from a Non-Oriental Asian population. Nucl Med Commun 2012; 33:960-6. [PMID: 22692579 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0b013e328355b694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the utility of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET-CT in the diagnosis of recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma in a Non-Oriental Asian population. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, data from 72 Non-Oriental Asian patients, who underwent 93 18F-FDG PET-CT studies, were evaluated. All patients had histopathologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma, for which they had undergone primary treatment. PET-CT was performed for suspected recurrence or for post-therapy surveillance. PET-CT findings were analysed on a per-patient and per-region basis (local/lymph node/liver/lung/bone/others). A combination of clinical follow-up (minimum 6 months; range: 6-36 months), imaging follow-up and/or histopathology (when available) was taken as the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated for PET-CT on both a per-study and per-lesion basis. RESULTS The mean patient age was 52.8 ± 11.8 years (male/female: 52/20). Out of 93 PET-CT studies, 56 (60.2%) were positive and 37 (39.8%) were negative for recurrent disease. On per-study-based analysis, 18F-FDG PET-CT has a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of 95.9, 79.5 and 88.1%, respectively. The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT was 89.2% for local recurrence, 94.6% for lymph nodes, 96.7% for liver, 96.7% for lung, 98.9% for bone and 98.9% for other sites. The accuracy of 18F-FDG PET-CT was lower for local recurrence as compared with that for liver (P=0.012) and bone (P=0.012). No significant difference was found in the diagnostic accuracies for other regions. CONCLUSION 18F-FDG PET-CT is highly sensitive and specific for detecting recurrence in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma. It shows high accuracy both on a per-patient and per-lesion basis.
Collapse
|
48
|
Yan Z, Xiong Y, Xu W, Li M, Cheng Y, Chen F, Ding S, Xu H, Zheng G. Identification of recurrence-related genes by integrating microRNA and gene expression profiling of gastric cancer. Int J Oncol 2012; 41:2166-74. [PMID: 23007704 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2012.1637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2012] [Accepted: 08/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
We previously analyzed the microRNA (miRNA) expression pattern in gastric cancer with and without recurrence and obtained 17 differentially expressed miRNAs with potential to predict recurrence risk for GC patients. In the present study, we aimed to investigate recurrence-related genes which may be regulated by the differentially expressed miRNAs identified in our prior research. Three different miRNA target gene databases (miRanda, TargetScan and PicTar) were used for searching the potential genes regulated by miRNAs. A combination was performed between miRNA target genes and recurrence-related gene expression profiling. Three bioinformatics algorithms (PAM, SVM and RF) were used to feature recurrence-related gene selection. In addition, we validated the expression levels of the genes in GC patients using real-time PCR. A total of 3,263 genes were identified as potential targets of 17 miRNAs. We identified 2,736 differential expressed genes using the SAM method based on 22K oligo microarray data which included 7 recurrence and 4 without recurrence GC samples. Combining the target genes regulated by miRNAs and the differentially expressed genes between recurrence and non-recurrence groups, we identified 228 differential genes for further study. Finally, we identified HNRPA0 and PRDM4 as risk biomarkers of GC patients, which were regulated by hsa-miR‑194 and hsa-miR-373, respectively. Our data indicated that HNRPA0 and PRDM4 may be involved in the recurrence process of GC and have potential to act as new prognostic biomarkers in predicting recurrence risk for gastric cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhi Yan
- Department of Digestive Diseases, Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Command, Wuchang, Wuhan 430070, PR China
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Hopkins S, Yang GY. FDG PET imaging in the staging and management of gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2012; 2:39-44. [PMID: 22811826 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2010.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2010] [Accepted: 08/05/2010] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Complete resection offers the only chance for permanent control, and accurate staging and evaluation of treatment response are crucial for appropriate management. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is increasingly used to complement anatomic imaging in cancer management. PET use in gastric cancer has been limited by 1) some gastric histologies are not PET avid, 2) spatial resolution limits the ability to distinguish between primary tumor and compartment I or II lymph nodes, and 3) the lack of a unified criteria in how to interpret PET for management decisions. New criteria have been proposed establishing response metrics in the utilization of PET. More study is needed to support these criteria in routine practice and establish the place of PET in the staging and management of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Hopkins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Identification of hsa-miR-335 as a prognostic signature in gastric cancer. PLoS One 2012; 7:e40037. [PMID: 22802949 PMCID: PMC3388997 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2012] [Accepted: 05/30/2012] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancy and primary cause of death in Chinese cancer patients. Recurrence is a major factor leading to treatment failure and low level of 5-year survival rate in GC patients following surgical resection. Therefore, identification of biomarkers with potential in predicting recurrence risk is the key problem of the prognosis in GC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 74 GC patients were selected for systematic analysis, consisting of 31 patients with recurrence and 43 patients without recurrence. Firstly, miRNAs microarray and bioinformatics methods were used to characterize differential expressed miRNAs from primary tumor samples. Following, we used a ROC method to select signature with best sensitivity and specificity. Finally, we validated the signature in GC samples (frozen fresh and blood samples) using quantitative PCR. RESULTS We have identified 12 differential miRNAs including 7 up-regulated and 5 down-regulated miRNAs in recurrence group. Using ROC method, we further ascertained hsa-miR-335 as a signature to recognize recurrence and non-recurrence cases in the training samples. Moreover, we validated this signature using quantitative PCR method in 64 test samples with consistent result with training set. A high frequency recurrence and poor survival were observed in GC cases with high level of hsa-miR-335 (P<0.001). In addition, we evaluated that hsa-miR-335 were involved in regulating target genes in several oncogenic signal-pathways, such as p53, MAPK, TGF-β, Wnt, ERbB, mTOR, Toll-like receptor and focal adhesion. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that the hsa-miR-335 has the potential to recognize the recurrence risk and relate to the prognosis of GC patients.
Collapse
|