1
|
Kassavin M, Chang KJ. Computed Tomography Colonography: 2025 Update. Radiol Clin North Am 2025; 63:405-417. [PMID: 40221183 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2024.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/14/2025]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Most cases arise from polyps, which can be detected and removed before becoming cancerous. Computed tomography colonography (CTC), also known as virtual colonoscopy, was first introduced in 1994 as a minimally invasive method for CRC screening and diagnosis. This 2025 update on CTC will focus on (1) techniques and dose reduction strategies, (2) image display methods, (3) reporting and classification systems, (4) tumor staging capabilities, (5) integration of advanced imaging techniques, and (6) cost-effectiveness and reimbursement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Kassavin
- Department of Radiology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Radiology- FGH 3, 820 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Kevin J Chang
- Department of Radiology, Boston University Chobanian and Avedisian School of Medicine, Radiology- FGH 3, 820 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Grosu S, Fabritius MP, Winkelmann M, Puhr-Westerheide D, Ingenerf M, Maurus S, Graser A, Schulz C, Knösel T, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Kazmierczak PM, Ingrisch M, Wesp P. Effect of artificial intelligence-aided differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. Eur Radiol 2025:10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0. [PMID: 39862248 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-025-11371-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2024] [Revised: 12/01/2024] [Accepted: 12/22/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Adenomatous colorectal polyps require endoscopic resection, as opposed to non-adenomatous hyperplastic colorectal polyps. This study aims to evaluate the effect of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted differentiation of adenomatous and non-adenomatous colorectal polyps at CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five board-certified radiologists evaluated CT colonography images with colorectal polyps of all sizes and morphologies retrospectively and decided whether the depicted polyps required endoscopic resection. After a primary unassisted reading based on current guidelines, a second reading with access to the classification of a radiomics-based random-forest AI-model labelling each polyp as "non-adenomatous" or "adenomatous" was performed. Performance was evaluated using polyp histopathology as the reference standard. RESULTS 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp image series (47% supine position, 53% prone position) were evaluated unassisted and AI-assisted by five independent board-certified radiologists, resulting in a total of 1180 readings (subsequent polypectomy: yes or no). AI-assisted readings had higher accuracy (76% +/- 1% vs. 84% +/- 1%), sensitivity (78% +/- 6% vs. 85% +/- 1%), and specificity (73% +/- 8% vs. 82% +/- 2%) in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy (p < 0.001). Inter-reader agreement was improved in the AI-assisted readings (Fleiss' kappa 0.69 vs. 0.92). CONCLUSION AI-based characterisation of colorectal polyps at CT colonography as a second reader might enable a more precise selection of polyps eligible for subsequent endoscopic resection. However, further studies are needed to confirm this finding and histopathologic polyp evaluation is still mandatory. KEY POINTS Question This is the first study evaluating the impact of AI-based polyp classification in CT colonography on radiologists' therapy management. Findings Compared with unassisted reading, AI-assisted reading had higher accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in selecting polyps eligible for polypectomy. Clinical relevance Integrating an AI tool for colorectal polyp classification in CT colonography could further improve radiologists' therapy recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Grosu
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias P Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Winkelmann
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Puhr-Westerheide
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Ingenerf
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Maurus
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Klinikum Kempten, Robert-Weixler-Straße 50, 87439, Kempten, Germany
| | - Anno Graser
- Gemeinschaftspraxis Radiologie München, Burgstraße 7, 80331, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Knösel
- Department of Pathology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp M Kazmierczak
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Wesp
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
- Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, 80539, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu KS, George R, Shin C, Xiong JQ, Jamali T, Liu Y, Roy P, Singh S, Ma S, El-Serag HB, Tan MC. Interval Advanced Adenomas and Neoplasia in Patients with Negative Colonoscopy Following Positive Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Test. Dig Dis Sci 2025; 70:350-359. [PMID: 39581897 PMCID: PMC11854550 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08748-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 11/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and fecal immunohistochemical test (FIT) are used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, when no adenomas are found following a positive FOBT/FIT, the future risk of advanced adenomas or colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. We determined the incidence and determinants of advanced adenomas or CRC after a negative index colonoscopy following a positive FOBT/FIT. METHODS We identified patients in the Harris Health System (Houston, Texas) who underwent a colonoscopy following a positive FOBT/FIT from 01/2010 to 01/2013. We compared the incidence rates of advanced adenomas (≥ 1 cm, villous histopathology, or high-grade dysplasia) or CRC through 12/2023 for patients without polyps on index colonoscopy (negative colonoscopy) to patients with polyps (positive colonoscopy). We examined risk factors for incident adenomas using Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 2096 patients, 1293 (61.7%) had negative index colonoscopy and 803 (38.3%) had positive index colonoscopy. Overall, 411 patients (19.6%) underwent subsequent colonoscopy with incident adenomas in 241 patients and no incident CRC over mean 12.5 years. The incidence rate of advanced adenomas was 2.08 per 100 person-years after positive index colonoscopy compared to 0.65 per 100 person-years after negative index colonoscopy (age-adjusted incidence rate ratio 3.08, 95% CI 1.27-7.48). Non-Hispanic white race was the strongest risk factor for incident adenomas among patients with negative index colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS We found a low likelihood of advanced adenomas and no interval CRC following negative index colonoscopy after positive FOBT/FIT. Non-Hispanic white race was a risk factor for incident adenomas, and these patients may warrant closer surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle S Liu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Rollin George
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 285, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caleb Shin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, HCA Medical City Denton, Denton, TX, USA
| | - Jia Q Xiong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Taher Jamali
- Divison of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 285, Houston, TX, USA
- Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Roy
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 285, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sonia Singh
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 285, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samuel Ma
- School of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hashem B El-Serag
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 285, Houston, TX, USA
- Houston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mimi C Tan
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, MS: BCM 285, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bigliardi R, Morici M, Messere G, Ortiz G, Fernandez J, Varela A, Vidal J, Diaz F, Salas J, Riccheri MC. Colorectal adenocarcinoma in children and adolescents. REVISTA DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA DE MEXICO (ENGLISH) 2024:S2255-534X(24)00077-X. [PMID: 39353787 DOI: 10.1016/j.rgmxen.2024.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal adenocarcinoma is rare in children and adolescents and tends to present with nonspecific signs and symptoms, leading to late diagnoses. OBJECTIVES Our aim was to describe the clinical presentation and progression in children and adolescents with colorectal adenocarcinoma treated at our hospital and detect possible predisposing conditions of this disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eight patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were followed at the Hospital Posadas within the time frame of January 2000 and December 2021. We searched for diseases predisposing to this cancer. RESULTS The mean patient age was 16 years (between 11 and 17 years of age). Clinical presentation was abdominal pain in the 8 patients; 4 of them had pain in the right hypochondrium, 3 had abdominal tumor, 4 had rectal bleeding, and 3 had weight loss. Mean symptom duration was 9 weeks (range: 1-24 weeks). None of the patients showed predisposing illnesses. One patient presented with polyposis, with no cases in any other family member. Histology showed mucinous adenocarcinoma in all the patients, 4 of whom had the signet ring cell subtype. The primary tumor was located in the right colon in 6 patients. At diagnosis, staging according to the modified Dukes classification was: I: one patient; IIb: one patient; IIIb: one patient; IIIc: one patient; and IV: 4 patients. All patients except 2 received chemotherapy and one patient received radiotherapy. Overall survival at 3 years was 25%. CONCLUSIONS All patients presented with mucinous adenocarcinoma, no predisposing diseases were found, and the children with colorectal cancer had a very poor prognosis. Colorectal cancer diagnosis should be considered in children presenting with acute abdominal pain, abdominal tumor, or lower gastrointestinal bleeding, especially if there is weight loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bigliardi
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - M Morici
- Servicio de Hematooncología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - G Messere
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - G Ortiz
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Fernandez
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - A Varela
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Vidal
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - F Diaz
- Servicio de Cirugía Infantil, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - J Salas
- Servicio de Anatomía Patológica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - M C Riccheri
- Servicio de Hematooncología Pediátrica, Hospital Nacional Prof. A. Posadas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Min L, Bu F, Meng J, Liu X, Guo Q, Zhao L, Li Z, Li X, Zhu S, Zhang S. Circulating small extracellular vesicle RNA profiling for the detection of T1a stage colorectal cancer and precancerous advanced adenoma. eLife 2024; 12:RP88675. [PMID: 39121006 PMCID: PMC11315448 DOI: 10.7554/elife.88675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2024] Open
Abstract
It takes more than 20 years for normal colorectal mucosa to develop into metastatic carcinoma. The long time window provides a golden opportunity for early detection to terminate the malignant progression. Here, we aim to enable liquid biopsy of T1a stage colorectal cancer (CRC) and precancerous advanced adenoma (AA) by profiling circulating small extracellular vesicle (sEV)-derived RNAs. We exhibited a full RNA landscape for the circulating sEVs isolated from 60 participants. A total of 58,333 annotated RNAs were detected from plasma sEVs, among which 1,615 and 888 sEV-RNAs were found differentially expressed in plasma from T1a stage CRC and AA compared to normal controls (NC). Then we further categorized these sEV-RNAs into six modules by a weighted gene coexpression network analysis and constructed a 60-gene t-SNE model consisting of the top 10 RNAs of each module that could well distinguish T1a stage CRC/AA from NC samples. Some sEV-RNAs were also identified as indicators of specific endoscopic and morphological features of different colorectal lesions. The top-ranked biomarkers were further verified by RT-qPCR, proving that these candidate sEV-RNAs successfully identified T1a stage CRC/AA from NC in another cohort of 124 participants. Finally, we adopted different algorithms to improve the performance of RT-qPCR-based models and successfully constructed an optimized classifier with 79.3% specificity and 99.0% sensitivity. In conclusion, circulating sEVs of T1a stage CRC and AA patients have distinct RNA profiles, which successfully enable the detection of both T1a stage CRC and AA via liquid biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Min
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive DiseaseBeijingChina
- Key Laboratory of Bio-inspired Materials and Interfacial Science, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
| | - Fanqin Bu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive DiseaseBeijingChina
| | - Jingxin Meng
- Key Laboratory of Bio-inspired Materials and Interfacial Science, Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
| | | | - Qingdong Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive DiseaseBeijingChina
| | | | - Zhi Li
- Echo Biotech Co., LtdBeijingChina
| | - Xiangji Li
- Department of Retroperitoneal Tumor Surgery, International Hospital, Peking UniversityBeijingChina
| | - Shengtao Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive DiseaseBeijingChina
| | - Shutian Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Health, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive DiseaseBeijingChina
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Loomans-Kropp HA. The utility of liquid biopsy-based methylation biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1351514. [PMID: 38595823 PMCID: PMC11002156 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1351514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancers and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. It is also one of the few cancers with established screening guidelines, however these methods have significant patient burden (e.g., time, invasive). In recent years, the development of liquid biopsy-based screening methods for biomarker detection have emerged as alternatives to traditional screening. Methylation biomarkers are of particular interest, and these markers can be identified and measured on circulating tumor and cell-free DNA. This perspective summarizes the current state of CRC screening and the potential integration of DNA methylation markers into liquid biopsy-based techniques. Finally, I discuss limitations to these methods and strategies for improvement. The continued development and implementation of liquid biopsy-based cancer screening approaches may provide an acceptable alternative to individuals unwilling to be screened by traditional methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holli A. Loomans-Kropp
- Cancer Control Program, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chervenkov L, Sirakov N, Georgiev A, Miteva D, Gulinac M, Peshevska-Sekulovska M, Sekulovski M, Velikova T. High Concordance of CT Colonography and Colonoscopy Allows for the Distinguishing and Diagnosing of Intestinal Diseases. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1906. [PMID: 37763309 PMCID: PMC10532908 DOI: 10.3390/life13091906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Although new imaging methods for examining the GIT with high diagnostic capabilities were introduced, the improvement and implementation of safe, efficient, and cost-effective approaches continue, and GIT diseases are still challenging to diagnose; (2) Methods: We aim to show the possibilities of computed tomography (CT) colonography for early diagnosis of colon diseases using a multidetector 32-channel CT scanner after appropriate preparation; (3) Results: After a colonoscopy was performed earlier, 140 patients were examined with CT colonography. Complete colonoscopy was performed in 80 patients (57.1%) out of 140 who underwent CT colonography. Incomplete colonoscopy was observed in 52 patients (37.2%); in 5 patients (3.6%), it was contraindicated, and in 3 patients (2.1%), it was not performed because of patients' refusal. We determined that in cases of complete FCS in 95% of patients, CT colonography established the same clinical diagnosis as FCS. In cases of incomplete, refused, or contraindicated FCS in 32.7% (17 patients), FCS failed to diagnose correctly. The main reasons for incomplete colonoscopy were: intraluminal obturation of tumor nature-17 patients (33%), extraluminal obturation (compression) from a tumor formation-4 patients (8%), stenotic changes of non-tumor nature-11 patients (21%), congenital diseases with changes in the length of the lumen of the intestinal loops-7 patients (13%), and subjective factors (pain, poor preparation, contraindications) in 13 patients (25%); (4) Conclusions: Our results confirmed that CT colonography is a method of choice in cases of negative FCS results accompanied by clinical data for the neoplastic process and in cases of incomplete and contraindicated FCS. Also, the insufflation system we developed optimizes the method by improving the quality of the obtained images and ensuring good patient tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyubomir Chervenkov
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical University Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; (L.C.); (A.G.)
- Research Complex for Translational Neuroscience, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria;
| | - Nikolay Sirakov
- Research Complex for Translational Neuroscience, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria;
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Dental Allergology and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Medical University Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Aleksander Georgiev
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Medical University Plovdiv, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; (L.C.); (A.G.)
| | - Dimitrina Miteva
- Department of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, 8 Dragan Tzankov Str., 1164 Sofia, Bulgaria;
- Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, 1 Kozyak Str., 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria; (M.G.); (M.P.-S.); (M.S.)
| | - Milena Gulinac
- Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, 1 Kozyak Str., 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria; (M.G.); (M.P.-S.); (M.S.)
- Department of General and Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Plovdiv, Bul. Vasil Aprilov 15A, 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Monika Peshevska-Sekulovska
- Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, 1 Kozyak Str., 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria; (M.G.); (M.P.-S.); (M.S.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Lozenetz, 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Metodija Sekulovski
- Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, 1 Kozyak Str., 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria; (M.G.); (M.P.-S.); (M.S.)
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Lozenetz, 1 Kozyak Str., 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Tsvetelina Velikova
- Medical Faculty, Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, 1 Kozyak Str., 1407 Sofia, Bulgaria; (M.G.); (M.P.-S.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
El-Sheikh NM, Abulsoud AI, Fawzy A, Wasfey EF, Hamdy NM. LncRNA NNT-AS1/hsa-miR-485-5p/HSP90 axis in-silico and clinical prospect correlated-to histologic grades-based CRC stratification: A step toward ncRNA Precision. Pathol Res Pract 2023; 247:154570. [PMID: 37244051 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
The oncogenic effects of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) Nicotinamide Nucleotide Transhydrogenase-antisense RNA1 (NNT-AS1) role in colorectal cancer (CRC) hasn't been sufficiently inspected in relation to the Homo sapiens (hsa)-microRNA (miR)- 485-5p/ heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) axis, clinically. qRT-PCR was performed to detect lncRNA NNT-AS1 and hsa-miR-485-5p expression levels in 60 Egyptian patients' sera. HSP90 serum level was quantified using Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The relative expression level of the studied non-coding RNAs as well as the HSP90 ELISA concentration were correlated with patients clinicopathological characteristics and correlated to each other. The axis diagnostic utility in comparison with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) tumor markers (TMs) was studied by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The relative lncRNA NNT-AS1 expression level fold change 56.7 (13.5-112) and HSP90 protein ELISA level 6.68 (5.14-8.77) (ng/mL) were elevated, while, for hsa-miR-485-5p 0.0474 (0.0236-0.135) expression fold change was repressed in CRC Egyptian patients' cohort sera, being compared to 28 apparently healthy control subjects. LncRNA NNT-AS1 specificity is 96.4% and a sensitivity of 91.7%, hsa-miR-485-5p showed 96.4% specificity, 90% sensitivity, and for HSP90 89.3%, 70% specificity and sensitivity, respectively. Those specificities and sensitivities were superior to the classical CRC TMs. A significant negative correlation was found between hsa-miR-485-5p with lncRNA NNT-AS1 (r = -0.933) expression fold change or with HSP90 protein blood level (r = -0.997), but, significant positive correlation was there between lncRNA NNT-AS1 and HSP90 (r = 0.927). LncRNA NNT-AS1/hsa-miR-485-5p/HSP90 axis could be a prospect for CRC development as well as diagnosis. Being correlated and related to CRC histologic grades 1-3, therefore, lncRNA NNT-AS1/hsa-miR-485-5p/HSP90 axis (not individually) expression approved clinically and in silico, could aid treatment precision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nada M El-Sheikh
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Heliopolis University, El Salam City, 11785 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Ahmed I Abulsoud
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Heliopolis University, El Salam City, 11785 Cairo, Egypt; Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy (Boy's Branch), Al-Azhar University, Nasr City, 11884 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amal Fawzy
- Department of Clinical and Chemical Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, 11796 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Eman F Wasfey
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Abassia, 11566 Cairo, Egypt
| | - Nadia M Hamdy
- Biochemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Abassia, 11566 Cairo, Egypt.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Depciuch J, Jakubczyk P, Paja W, Pancerz K, Wosiak A, Kula-Maximenko M, Yaylım İ, Gültekin Gİ, Tarhan N, Hakan MT, Sönmez D, Sarıbal D, Arıkan S, Guleken Z. Correlation between human colon cancer specific antigens and Raman spectra. Attempting to use Raman spectroscopy in the determination of tumor markers for colon cancer. NANOMEDICINE : NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOLOGY, AND MEDICINE 2023; 48:102657. [PMID: 36646194 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2023.102657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. To follow up on the progression of the disease, tumor markers are commonly used. Here, we report serum analysis based on Raman spectroscopy to provide a rapid cancer diagnosis with tumor markers and two new cell adhesion molecules measured using the ELİSA method. Raman spectra showed higher Raman intensities at 1447 cm-1 1560 cm-1, 1665 cm-1, and 1769 cm-1, which originated from CH2 proteins and lipids, amide II and amide I, and CO lipids vibrations. Furthermore, the correlation test showed, that only the CEA colon cancer marker correlated with the Raman spectra. Importantly, machine learning methods showed, that the accuracy of the Raman method in the detection of colon cancer was around 95 %. Obtained results suggest, that Raman shifts at 1302 cm-1 and 1306 cm-1 can be used as spectroscopy markers of colon cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Depciuch
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Science, 31-342 Krakow, Poland.
| | | | - Wiesław Paja
- Institute of Computer Science, University of Rzeszow, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Pancerz
- Institute of Philosophy, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Wosiak
- Institute of Information Technology, Lodz University of Technology, Poland
| | - Monika Kula-Maximenko
- The Franciszek Górski Institute of Plant Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Niezapominajek 21, 30-239 Kraków, Poland
| | - İlhan Yaylım
- Istanbul University, Aziz Sancar Institute of Molecular Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | | | | | - Dilara Sönmez
- Istanbul University, Aziz Sancar Institute of Molecular Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Devrim Sarıbal
- Department of Biophysics, Cerrahpaşa Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Soykan Arıkan
- Istanbul Education and Research Hospital, Department of General Surgery, Istanbul, Turkey; Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zozan Guleken
- Uskudar University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physiology, Istanbul, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Heterogeneity in the Utilization of Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Migrants and Non-Migrants in Austria: Results of the Austrian Health Interview Survey. GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/gidisord5010004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Many European studies report lower participation in colorectal cancer screening among migrants than non-migrants. A major limitation of these studies is that usually, the heterogeneity of migrants cannot be accounted for. The aim of this investigation was to examine differences in the utilization of fecal occult blood testing and colonoscopy between non-migrants and the five largest migrant groups residing in Austria using data from the Austrian Health Interview Survey 2019. The two outcomes were compared between non-migrants and migrants using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for socioeconomic and health variables. Migrants from a Yugoslav successor state (OR = 0.61; 95%-CI: 0.44–0.83), Turkish (OR = 0.35; 95%-CI: 0.22–0.55), Hungarian (OR = 0.37; 95%-CI: 0.16–0.82) and German migrants (OR = 0.70; 95%-CI: 0.51–0.98) were less likely to have used a fecal occult blood test compared to non-migrants. Participation in colonoscopy was lower among Turkish migrants (OR = 0.42; 95%-CI: 0.27–0.67) and migrants from a Yugoslav successor state (OR = 0.56; 95%-CI: 0.42–0.75) than among non-migrants. The findings are consistent with studies from other countries and highlight barriers migrants face in accessing the health care system. To address these barriers, the heterogeneity of the population must be taken into account when developing educational materials in order to promote informed decisions about whether or not to participate in colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
|
11
|
Yaghoobi M, Mehraban Far P, Mbuagbaw L, Yuan Y, Armstrong D, Thabane L, Moayyedi P. Head-to-Head Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis of Colonoscopy and Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia. Middle East J Dig Dis 2023; 15:5-11. [PMID: 37547158 PMCID: PMC10404074 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2023.313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Studies on the use of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in colorectal screening have long assumed perfect accuracy for colonoscopy. No study to date has directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of colonoscopy and FIT to detect advanced neoplasia (AN) in a head-to-head diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was performed for a head-to-head comparison of FIT and colonoscopy using a third acceptable reference standard in asymptomatic adults. Cochrane methodology was used to perform a head-to-head diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis. Quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Results: Two studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall sensitivity and specificity were 98.5 (95% CI 96.3-100%) and 100% (99.9-100%) for colonoscopy and 16.4% (10.3-22.6%) and 95.4% (94.3-96.4%) for FIT. Colonoscopy was significantly better than FIT (P < 0.0001). The positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) were 1.75 (1.57-1.96) and 0.03 (0.01-0.08) for colonoscopy and 3.02 (2.01-4.55) and 0.88 (0.82-0.95) for FIT, respectively. Conclusion: Colonoscopy provides significantly better diagnostic accuracy to detect AN compared with FIT (GRADE: ⨁⨁◯◯). Our study provided precise sensitivity and specificity of both colonoscopy and FIT and a revision in screening policies based on an updated cost-effectiveness analysis considering the results of the head-to-head analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Yaghoobi
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Cochrane GUT, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Parsa Mehraban Far
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit/The Research Institute, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Cochrane GUT, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Armstrong
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit/The Research Institute, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Anesthesia/Pediatrics; Schools of Nursing/Rehabilitation Sciences, Master University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Moayyedi
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Cochrane GUT, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tanaka S, Omori J, Hoshimoto A, Nishimoto T, Akimoto N, Tatsuguchi A, Fujimori S, Iwakiri K. Comparison of Linked Color Imaging and White Light Imaging Colonoscopy for Detection of Colorectal Adenoma Requiring Endoscopic Treatment: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial. J NIPPON MED SCH 2023; 90:111-120. [PMID: 36908124 DOI: 10.1272/jnms.jnms.2023_90-117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Linked color imaging (LCI) improves detection of colorectal neoplastic lesions during colonoscopy. However, polyps <5 mm in diameter often do not require resection, and the benefits of LCI are unclear for detection of colorectal polyps ≥5 mm that are indicated for endoscopic resection in clinical practice. This randomized controlled trial compared rates of detection of adenoma polyps, stratified by size, for LCI and white light imaging (WLI). METHODS We compared ADR (5 mm-) and PDR (5 mm-), which were defined as the proportion of patients with at least one adenoma or polyp with a diameter of 5 mm or larger in the LCI and WLI groups. Moreover, we estimated ADR and PDR for diameters between 5 and 10 mm (ADR (5-9 mm), PDR (5-9 mm) ) and for diameters larger than 10 mm (ADR (10 mm-), PDR (10 mm-) ). RESULTS Data from 594 patients (LCI, n=305; WLI, n=289) were analyzed. ADR (5 mm-) and PDR (5 mm-) were significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group (ADR (5 mm-): P=0.016, PDR (5 mm-): P=0.020). In the assessment of adenoma and polyp size, ADR (5-9 mm) and PDR (5-9 mm) were significantly higher in the LCI group than in the WLI group, although no significant differences were seen in ADR (10 mm-) and PDR (10 mm-) between these groups. CONCLUSIONS Polyps ≥5 mm, which are indicated for endoscopic treatment, were more easily visualized with LCI mode than with WLI mode. The improvement in detection rate was obvious for polyps <10 mm, which are easier to miss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital
| | - Jun Omori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | | | | | - Naohiko Akimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Hospital
| | | | - Shunji Fujimori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School Chiba Hokusoh Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grosu S, Wiemker R, An C, Obmann MM, Wong E, Yee J, Yeh BM. Comparison of the performance of conventional and spectral-based tagged stool cleansing algorithms at CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:7936-7945. [PMID: 35486170 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-08831-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the performance of conventional versus spectral-based electronic stool cleansing for iodine-tagged CT colonography (CTC) using a dual-layer spectral detector scanner. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated iodine contrast stool-tagged CTC scans of 30 consecutive patients (mean age: 69 ± 8 years) undergoing colorectal cancer screening obtained on a dual-layer spectral detector CT scanner. One reader identified locations of electronic cleansing artifacts (n = 229) on conventional and spectral cleansed images. Three additional independent readers evaluated these locations using a conventional cleansing algorithm (Intellispace Portal) and two experimental spectral cleansing algorithms (i.e., fully transparent and translucent tagged stool). For each cleansed image set, readers recorded the severity of over- and under-cleansing artifacts on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none to 4 = severe) and readability compared to uncleansed images. Wilcoxon's signed-rank tests were used to assess artifact severity, type, and readability (worse, unchanged, or better). RESULTS Compared with conventional cleansing (66% score ≥ 2), the severity of overall cleansing artifacts was lower in transparent (60% score ≥ 2, p = 0.011) and translucent (50% score ≥ 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing. Under-cleansing artifact severity was lower in transparent (49% score ≥ 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (39% score ≥ 2, p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (60% score ≥ 2). Over-cleansing artifact severity was worse in transparent (17% score ≥ 2, p < 0.001) and translucent (14% score ≥ 2, p = 0.023) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing (9% score ≥ 2). Overall readability was significantly improved in transparent (p < 0.001) and translucent (p < 0.001) spectral cleansing compared with conventional cleansing. CONCLUSIONS Spectral cleansing provided more robust electronic stool cleansing of iodine-tagged stool at CTC than conventional cleansing. KEY POINTS • Spectral-based electronic cleansing of tagged stool at CT colonography provides higher quality images with less perception of artifacts than does conventional cleansing. • Spectral-based electronic cleansing could potentially advance minimally cathartic approach for CT colonography. Further clinical trials are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Grosu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Rafael Wiemker
- Philips Research Laboratories Hamburg, Röntgenstraße 24, 22335, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Chansik An
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Markus M Obmann
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Imaging, University Hospital Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH - 4051, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Eddy Wong
- CT/AMI Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, 100 Park Avenue, Orange Village, OH, 44122, USA
| | - Judy Yee
- Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 111 E 210th Street, Bronx, NY, 10467-2401, USA
| | - Benjamin M Yeh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yaghoobi M, Mehraban Far P, Mbuagbaw L, Yuan Y, Armstrong D, Thabane L, Moayyedi P. Potential Modifiers and Different Cut-offs in Diagnostic Accuracy of Fecal Immunochemical Test in Detecting Advanced Colon Neoplasia: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis. Middle East J Dig Dis 2022; 14:382-395. [PMID: 37547494 PMCID: PMC10404105 DOI: 10.34172/mejdd.2022.299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Fecal immunoglobulin test (FIT) has been advocated as the first line of screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) in several jurisdictions. Most studies have focused on CRC as the outcome of interest. Our goal was to quantify the diagnostic accuracy of different thresholds of FIT as compared with colonoscopy for detection of advanced colonic neoplasia and potential modifiers using proper Cochrane methodology. Methods: A comprehensive electronic search was performed for studies on FIT using colonoscopy as the reference standard to detect advanced neoplasia. Cochrane methodology was used to perform a diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) meta-analysis. Diagnostic accuracy of different cut-offs of FIT, including 25, 50, 75, 100, 150, and 200 ng/mL, were calculated separately. Meta-regression analysis was also performed to detect potential a priori modifiers, including age, location of the tumor, and time from FIT to colonoscopy. Results: Twenty-four studies were included with no evidence of publication bias. The sensitivity of FIT did not decrease with lowering the cut-off, although specificity increased in higher cut-offs. Commonly used cut-offs of 50 ng/mL, 75 ng/mL, and 100 ng/mL for FIT provided sensitivity of 39%, 36%, 27% and specificity of 92%, 94%, 96%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT did not significantly differ in proximal versus distal lesions or in individuals below or over the age of 50 years. The results remained robust in a meta-regression of the location of the study, time from FIT to colonoscopy, and methodological quality. Conclusion: The sensitivity of FIT might have been overestimated in previous studies focusing on CRC, and it seems to be independent of age, location of neoplasia, or cut-offs, contrary to some previous studies. Lowering the cut-off will reduce the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) by increasing specificity but without any effect on sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Yaghoobi
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Cochrane GUT, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Parsa Mehraban Far
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lawrence Mbuagbaw
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit/The Research Institute, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Cochrane GUT, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Armstrong
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit/The Research Institute, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Departments of Anesthesia/Pediatrics; Schools of Nursing/Rehabilitation Sciences, Master University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Moayyedi
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Cochrane GUT, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- The Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grobbee EJ, Wisse PHA, Schreuders EH, van Roon A, van Dam L, Zauber AG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Bramer W, Berhane S, Deeks JJ, Steyerberg EW, van Leerdam ME, Spaander MC, Kuipers EJ. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022; 6:CD009276. [PMID: 35665911 PMCID: PMC9169237 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009276.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, many countries have adopted colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes, often based on faecal occult blood tests (FOBTs). CRC screening aims to detect advanced neoplasia (AN), which is defined as CRC or advanced adenomas. FOBTs fall into two categories based on detection technique and the detected blood component: qualitative guaiac-based FOBTs (gFOBTs) and faecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which can be qualitative and quantitative. Screening with gFOBTs reduces CRC-related mortality. OBJECTIVES To compare the diagnostic test accuracy of gFOBT and FIT screening for detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia in average-risk individuals. SEARCH METHODS We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, BIOSIS Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Google Scholar. We searched the reference lists and PubMed-related articles of included studies to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included prospective and retrospective studies that provided the number of true positives, false positives, false negatives, and true negatives for gFOBTs, FITs, or both, with colonoscopy as reference standard. We excluded case-control studies. We included studies in which all participants underwent both index test and reference standard ("reference standard: all"), and studies in which only participants with a positive index test underwent the reference standard while participants with a negative test were followed for at least one year for development of interval carcinomas ("reference standard: positive"). The target population consisted of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals undergoing CRC screening. The target conditions were CRC and advanced neoplasia (advanced adenomas and CRC combined). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently screened and selected studies for inclusion. In case of disagreement, a third review author made the final decision. We used the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model to explore differences between tests and identify potential sources of heterogeneity, and the bivariate hierarchical model to estimate sensitivity and specificity at common thresholds: 10 µg haemoglobin (Hb)/g faeces and 20 µg Hb/g faeces. We performed indirect comparisons of the accuracy of the two tests and direct comparisons when both index tests were evaluated in the same population. MAIN RESULTS We ran the initial search on 25 June 2019, which yielded 63 studies for inclusion. We ran a top-up search on 14 September 2021, which yielded one potentially eligible study, currently awaiting classification. We included a total of 33 "reference standard: all" published articles involving 104,640 participants. Six studies evaluated only gFOBTs, 23 studies evaluated only FITs, and four studies included both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 2.4 μg and 50 µg Hb/g faeces. For each Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS)-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability than gFOBTs for AN (P < 0.001) and CRC (P = 0.004). For the detection of AN, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs was 15% (95% confidence interval (CI) 12% to 20%), which was significantly lower than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs with summary sensitivities of 33% (95% CI 27% to 40%; P < 0.001) and 26% (95% CI 21% to 31%, P = 0.002), respectively. Results were simulated in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 screening participants with 1% CRC prevalence and 10% AN prevalence. Out of 1000 participants with AN, gFOBTs missed 850, while FITs missed 670 (10 μg Hb/g cut-off) and 740 (20 μg Hb/g cut-off). No significant differences in summary specificity for AN detection were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 92% to 96%), and FITs at 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (93%; 95% CI 90% to 95%) and at 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (97%; 95% CI 95% to 98%). So, among 9000 participants without AN, 540 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 630 (10 μg Hb/g) and 270 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. Similarly, for the detection of CRC, the summary sensitivity of gFOBTs, 39% (95% CI 25% to 55%), was significantly lower than FITs at 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 76% (95% CI 57% to 88%: P = 0.001) and 65% (95% CI 46% to 80%; P = 0.035), respectively. So, out of 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 61, and FITs missed 24 (10 μg Hb/g) and 35 (20 μg Hb/g). No significant differences in summary specificity for CRC were found between gFOBTs (94%; 95% CI 91% to 96%), and FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off (94%; 95% CI 87% to 97%) and 20 μg Hb/g cut-off (96%; 95% CI 91% to 98%). So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 594 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs versus 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 396 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. In five studies that compared FITs and gFOBTs in the same population, FITs showed a higher discriminative ability for AN than gFOBTs (P = 0.003). We included a total of 30 "reference standard: positive" studies involving 3,664,934 participants. Of these, eight were gFOBT-only studies, 18 were FIT-only studies, and four studies combined both gFOBTs and FITs. The cut-off for positivity of FITs varied between 5 µg to 250 µg Hb/g faeces. For each QUADAS-2 domain, we assessed risk of bias as high in less than 20% of studies. The summary curve showed that FITs had a higher discriminative ability for detecting CRC than gFOBTs (P < 0.001). The summary sensitivity for CRC of gFOBTs, 59% (95% CI 55% to 64%), was significantly lower than FITs at the 10 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 80% to 95%; P < 0.001) and the 20 μg Hb/g cut-off, 89% (95% CI 85% to 92%; P < 0.001). So, in the hypothetical cohort with 100 participants with CRC, gFOBTs missed 41, while FITs missed 11 (10 μg Hb/g) and 11 (20 μg Hb/g). The summary specificity of gFOBTs was 98% (95% CI 98% to 99%), which was higher than FITs at both 10 μg and 20 μg Hb/g cut-offs: 94% (95% CI 92% to 95%; P < 0.001) and 95% (95% CI 94% to 96%; P < 0.001), respectively. So, out of 9900 participants without CRC, 198 were offered (unnecessary) colonoscopy with gFOBTs compared to 594 (10 μg Hb/g) and 495 (20 μg Hb/g) with FITs. At a specificity of 90% and 95%, FITs had a higher sensitivity than gFOBTs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS FITs are superior to gFOBTs in detecting AN and CRC in average-risk individuals. Specificity of both tests was similar in "reference standard: all" studies, whereas specificity was significantly higher for gFOBTs than FITs in "reference standard: positive" studies. However, at pre-specified specificities, the sensitivity of FITs was significantly higher than gFOBTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmée J Grobbee
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter HA Wisse
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline H Schreuders
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Aafke van Roon
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leonie van Dam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ann G Zauber
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Wichor Bramer
- Medical Library , Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sarah Berhane
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jonathan J Deeks
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Manon Cw Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shu T, Wu K, Guo Y, He Q, Song X, Shan J, Wu L, Liu J, Wang Z, Liu L, Sun X. Evaluation of fecal SYPL1 as a diagnostic biomarker in colorectal cancer. Clin Biochem 2022; 103:8-15. [PMID: 35218739 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2022.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2021] [Revised: 02/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At present, there is still no ideal non-invasive biomarker for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Previously, we foundserum synaptophysin like 1 (SYPL1) served as a potential biomarker for CRC diagnosis. However, whether fecal SYPL1 (fSYPL1) are more sensitive and specific for CRC remains unclear. METHODS We analyzed fSYPL1 in controls (n = 70), adenoma patients (n = 80), CRC patients (n = 150) and postoperative CRC patients (n = 25) by ELISA. RESULTS SYPL1 was stable in feces. The fSYPL1 levels were significantly higher in CRC patients than in either controls or adenoma patients (P < 0.0001). ROC curves showed that fSYPL1 performed superbly in distinguishing CRC patients from controls (AUC = 0.947; 95% CI: 0.920-0.974, P < 0.0001, sensitivity: 80.67%, specificity: 100.00%), which showed much stronger performance than the traditional biomarkers (FOBT, CEA and CA19-9). Meanwhile, the fSYPL1 level positively correlated with tumor size, tumor invasion, lymph node invasion and clinical stage (P < 0.05). In addition, the detection rate of fSYPL1 was high in early CRC (75.00% in stage I and II). The fSYPL1 levels in CRC patients declined substantially after surgery (P = 0.0002). By means of a lower cut off level, 73.58% of high-risk adenomas were detected. The combination of fSYPL1 and FOBT performed better than the combination of plasma SYPL1, CEA and CA199 in distinguishing CRC patients from controls. CONCLUSION The fSYPL1 might be a potential biomarker for CRC screening, early diagnosis, prognosis prediction and therapeutic effect monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Shu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, China
| | - Kaiwen Wu
- School of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Yuanbiao Guo
- Medical Research Center, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Chengdu Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Qiao He
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Xiaoyu Song
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Jing Shan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Chengdu Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Liping Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Chengdu Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Jia Liu
- School of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Zhiming Wang
- School of Medicine, Southwest Jiaotong University, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Medical Research Center, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Chengdu Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China.
| | - Xiaobin Sun
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan 646000, China; Department of Gastroenterology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Jiaotong University, The Second Chengdu Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chini A, Manigrasso M, Cantore G, Maione R, Milone M, Maione F, De Palma GD. Can Computed Tomography Colonography Replace Optical Colonoscopy in Detecting Colorectal Lesions?: State of the Art. Clin Endosc 2022; 55:183-190. [PMID: 35196831 PMCID: PMC8995982 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2021.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Optical colonoscopy (OC) is widely accepted as the reference standard for the screening of colorectal polyps and cancers, and computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a valid alternative to OC. The purpose of this review was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of OC and CTC for colorectal lesions. A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, and 18 articles were included. CTC has emerged in recent years as a potential screening examination with high accuracy for the detection of colorectal lesions. However, the clinical application of CTC as a screening technique is limited because it is highly dependent on the size of the lesions and has poor performance in detecting individual lesions <5 mm or flat lesions, which, although rarely, can have a malignant potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessia Chini
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Grazia Cantore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Rosa Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wesp P, Grosu S, Graser A, Maurus S, Schulz C, Knösel T, Fabritius MP, Schachtner B, Yeh BM, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Kazmierczak PM, Ingrisch M. Deep learning in CT colonography: differentiating premalignant from benign colorectal polyps. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:4749-4759. [PMID: 35083528 PMCID: PMC9213389 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08532-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the differentiation of premalignant from benign colorectal polyps detected by CT colonography using deep learning. Methods In this retrospective analysis of an average risk colorectal cancer screening sample, polyps of all size categories and morphologies were manually segmented on supine and prone CT colonography images and classified as premalignant (adenoma) or benign (hyperplastic polyp or regular mucosa) according to histopathology. Two deep learning models SEG and noSEG were trained on 3D CT colonography image subvolumes to predict polyp class, and model SEG was additionally trained with polyp segmentation masks. Diagnostic performance was validated in an independent external multicentre test sample. Predictions were analysed with the visualisation technique Grad-CAM++. Results The training set consisted of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age: 63 ± 8 years, 40 men) comprising 169 polyp segmentations. The external test set included 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 polyp segmentations. Model SEG achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.83 and 80% sensitivity at 69% specificity for differentiating premalignant from benign polyps. Model noSEG yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.75, 80% sensitivity at 44% specificity, and an average Grad-CAM++ heatmap score of ≥ 0.25 in 90% of polyp tissue. Conclusions In this proof-of-concept study, deep learning enabled the differentiation of premalignant from benign colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography and the visualisation of image regions important for predictions. The approach did not require polyp segmentation and thus has the potential to facilitate the identification of high-risk polyps as an automated second reader. Key Points • Non-invasive deep learning image analysis may differentiate premalignant from benign colorectal polyps found in CT colonography scans. • Deep learning autonomously learned to focus on polyp tissue for predictions without the need for prior polyp segmentation by experts. • Deep learning potentially improves the diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening by allowing for a more precise selection of patients who would benefit from endoscopic polypectomy, especially for patients with polyps of 6–9 mm size. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00330-021-08532-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Wesp
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sergio Grosu
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Anno Graser
- Radiologie München, Burgstraße 7, 80331, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Maurus
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Knösel
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias P Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Balthasar Schachtner
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,Comprehensive Pneumology Center (CPC-M), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Max-Lebsche-Platz 31, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Benjamin M Yeh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94117, USA
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp M Kazmierczak
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Zhang L, Dong L, Lu C, Huang W, Yang C, Wang Q, Wang Q, Lei R, Sun R, Wan K, Li T, Sun F, Gan T, Lin J, Yin L. Methylation of SDC2/ TFPI2 and Its Diagnostic Value in Colorectal Tumorous Lesions. Front Mol Biosci 2022; 8:706754. [PMID: 35004840 PMCID: PMC8729808 DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.706754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background:SDC2 methylation is a feasible biomarker for colorectal cancer detection. Its specificity for colorectal cancer is higher than 90%, but the sensitivity is normally lower than 90%. This study aims to improve the sensitivity of SDC2 detection through finding a high positive target from the false-negative samples of SDC2 detection based on analysis of the bowel subsite difference in methylation. Methods: Hypermethylated TFPI2 was identified in SDC2 hypomethylated colorectal cancer samples retrieved from TCGA database with the methylation level lower than 0.2. The methylation-specific PCR assay was developed and then evaluated using tissue samples (184 cancer and 54 healthy control samples) and stool samples (289 cancer, 190 adenoma, and 217 healthy control samples). Results:TFPI2 was hypermethylated in most SDC2 hypomethylated colorectal cancer samples. When the SDC2/TFPI2-combined PCR assay was performed in stool specimens, the AUC value of cancer vs. control was 0.98, with the specificity of 96.40% and sensitivity of 96.60%, and the AUC value of adenoma vs. control was 0.87, with the specificity of 95.70% and the sensitivity of 80.00%. The improvement in sensitivity was the most momentous in the left colon. As the detection index, the Ct value was better in improving the sensitivity of detection than the methylation level based on the 2−ΔΔCt value. Conclusion:TFPI2 can improve the sensitivity of SDC2 methylation–specific detection of colorectal tumorous lesions while maintaining high specificity, in particular reducing the missed detection of left colon cancer and adenoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianglu Zhang
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China.,Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.,The Hubei Clinical Center and Key Laboratory of Intestinal and Colorectal Diseases, Wuhan, China
| | - Lanlan Dong
- Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
| | - Changming Lu
- Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
| | - Wenxian Huang
- Department of Pathology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Cuiping Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Colorectal and Anal Surgery, The Eighth Hospital of Wuhan, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Qian Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ruixue Lei
- Department of Pathology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology (Anyang Tumor Hospital), Anyang, China
| | - Rui Sun
- Department of Oncology, Wuhan Fourth Hospital (Puai Hospital), Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Kangkang Wan
- Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
| | - Tingting Li
- Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
| | - Fan Sun
- Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
| | - Tian Gan
- Wuhan Ammunition Life-tech Company, Ltd., Wuhan, China
| | - Jun Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Lei Yin
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Validation of Urinary Charged Metabolite Profiles in Colorectal Cancer Using Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry. Metabolites 2022; 12:metabo12010059. [PMID: 35050180 PMCID: PMC8779129 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12010059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to validate and reanalyze urinary biomarkers for detecting colorectal cancers (CRCs). We previously conducted urinary metabolomic analyses using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry and found a significant difference in various metabolites, especially polyamines, between patients with CRC and healthy controls (HC). We analyzed additional samples and confirmed consistency between the newly and previously analyzed data. In total, we included 36 HC, 34 adenoma (AD), and 214 CRC samples, which were used for subsequent analyses. Among the 132 quantified metabolites, 16 exhibited consistent differences in both datasets, which included polyamines, etc. Pathway analyses of the integrated data revealed significant differences in many metabolites, such as glutamine, and metabolites of the TCA (tricarboxylic acid cycle) and urea cycles. The discrimination ability of the combination of multiple metabolites among the three groups was evaluated, which yielded higher sensitivity than tumor markers. The Mann–Whitney test was employed to evaluate the prognosis predictivity of the assessed metabolites and the difference between the patients with or without recurrence, which yielded 16 significantly different metabolites. Among these 16 metabolites, 11 presented significant prognosis predictivity. These data indicated the potential of metabolite-based discrimination of patients with CRC and AD from HC and prognosis predictivity of the monitored metabolites.
Collapse
|
21
|
Ismail MS, Semenov S, Sihag S, Manoharan T, Douglas AR, Reill P, Kelly M, Boran G, O’Connor A, Breslin N, O’Donnell S, Ryan B, McNamara D. Colon capsule endoscopy is a viable alternative to colonoscopy for the investigation of intermediate- and low-risk patients with gastrointestinal symptoms: results of a pilot study. Endosc Int Open 2021; 9:E965-E970. [PMID: 34079884 PMCID: PMC8159609 DOI: 10.1055/a-1401-9528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a recommended viable alternative to colonoscopy for colonic visualisation in a variety of clinical settings with proven efficacy in polyp detection, surveillance, screening and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) assessment. CCE efficacy in an unselected average risk symptomatic cohort has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of CCE imaging assessment in average risk symptomatic patients as an alternative to colonoscopy with and without additional biomarker assessment. Patients and methods This was a prospective, single-center comparison study of colonoscopy, CCE and biomarker assessment. Results Of 77 invited subjects, 66 underwent both a CCE and colonoscopy. A fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and fecal calprotectin (FC) were available in 56 and 59 subjects. In all 64 % (n = 42) had any positive finding with 16 (24 %) found to have significant disease (high-risk adenomas, IBD) on colonoscopy. The CCE completion rate was 76 %, five (8 %) had an inadequate preparation, the CCE polyp detection rate was high at 35 %. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of CCE for significant disease were 81 %, 98 %, 93 % and 94 % respectively. In addition, three (5 %) significant small bowel diagnoses were made on CCE. FC and FIT were frequently elevated in patients with both colitis (5/7, 71 %) and high-risk adenomas (4/7 57 %). While both had a low positive predictive value for clinically significant disease, FIT 32 % and FC 26 %. Conclusions CCE is a safe and effective alternative to colonoscopy in symptomatic average risk patients with or without the addition of biomarker screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Syafiq Ismail
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- TAGG Research Centre, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Serhiy Semenov
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- TAGG Research Centre, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sandeep Sihag
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | - Phyllis Reill
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael Kelly
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Gerard Boran
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anthony O’Connor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- TAGG Research Centre, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Niall Breslin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Sarah O’Donnell
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barbara Ryan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- TAGG Research Centre, School of Medicine, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lin JS, Perdue LA, Henrikson NB, Bean SI, Blasi PR. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2021; 325:1978-1998. [PMID: 34003220 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 332] [Impact Index Per Article: 83.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the US. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the effectiveness, test accuracy, and harms of screening for CRC to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for relevant studies published from January 1, 2015, to December 4, 2019; surveillance through March 26, 2021. STUDY SELECTION English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations at general risk of CRC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant study data from fair- or good-quality studies. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, test accuracy in detecting cancers or adenomas, and serious adverse events. RESULTS The review included 33 studies (n = 10 776 276) on the effectiveness of screening, 59 (n = 3 491 045) on the test performance of screening tests, and 131 (n = 26 987 366) on the harms of screening. In randomized clinical trials (4 trials, n = 458 002), intention to screen with 1- or 2-time flexible sigmoidoscopy vs no screening was associated with a decrease in CRC-specific mortality (incidence rate ratio, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.68-0.80]). Annual or biennial guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) vs no screening (5 trials, n = 419 966) was associated with a reduction of CRC-specific mortality after 2 to 9 rounds of screening (relative risk at 19.5 years, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.84-0.98]; relative risk at 30 years, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65-0.93]). In observational studies, receipt of screening colonoscopy (2 studies, n = 436 927) or fecal immunochemical test (FIT) (1 study, n = 5.4 million) vs no screening was associated with lower risk of CRC incidence or mortality. Nine studies (n = 6497) evaluated the test accuracy of screening computed tomography (CT) colonography, 4 of which also reported the test accuracy of colonoscopy; pooled sensitivity to detect adenomas 6 mm or larger was similar between CT colonography with bowel prep (0.86) and colonoscopy (0.89). In pooled values, commonly evaluated FITs (14 studies, n = 45 403) (sensitivity, 0.74; specificity, 0.94) and stool DNA with FIT (4 studies, n = 12 424) (sensitivity, 0.93; specificity, 0.85) performed better than high-sensitivity gFOBT (2 studies, n = 3503) (sensitivity, 0.50-0.75; specificity, 0.96-0.98) to detect cancers. Serious harms of screening colonoscopy included perforations (3.1/10 000 procedures) and major bleeding (14.6/10 000 procedures). CT colonography may have harms resulting from low-dose ionizing radiation. It is unclear if detection of extracolonic findings on CT colonography is a net benefit or harm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE There are several options to screen for colorectal cancer, each with a different level of evidence demonstrating its ability to reduce cancer mortality, its ability to detect cancer or precursor lesions, and its risk of harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer S Lin
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Leslie A Perdue
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Nora B Henrikson
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Sarah I Bean
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Paula R Blasi
- Kaiser Permanente Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Fatty Acid Unsaturation Degree of Plasma Exosomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Promising Biomarker. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22105060. [PMID: 34064646 PMCID: PMC8151919 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Even though colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most preventable cancers, it is currently one of the deadliest. Worryingly, incidence in people <50 years has increased unexpectedly, and for unknown causes, despite the successful implementation of screening programs in the population aged >50 years. Thus, there is a need to improve early diagnosis detection strategies by identifying more precise biomarkers. In this scenario, the analysis of exosomes is given considerable attention. Previously, we demonstrated the exosome lipidome was able to classify CRC cell lines according to their malignancy. Herein, we investigated the use of the lipidome of plasma extracellular vesicles as a potential source of non-invasive biomarkers for CRC. A plasma exosome-enriched fraction was analyzed from patients undergoing colonoscopic procedure. Patients were divided into a healthy group and four pathological groups (patients with hyperplastic polyps; adenomatous polyps; invasive neoplasia (CRC patients); or hereditary non-polyposis CRC. The results showed a shift from 34:1- to 38:4-containing species in the pathological groups. We demonstrate that the ratio Σ34:1-containing species/Σ38:4-containing species has the potential to discriminate between healthy and pathological patients. Altogether, the results reinforce the utility of plasma exosome lipid fingerprint to provide new non-invasive biomarkers in a clinical context.
Collapse
|
24
|
Vinchhi P, Patel MM. Triumph against cancer: invading colorectal cancer with nanotechnology. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2021; 18:1169-1192. [PMID: 33567909 DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2021.1889512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent statistics have reported colorectal cancer (CRC) as the second leading cause of cancer-associated deaths in the world. Early diagnosis of CRC may help to reduce the mortality and associated complications. However, the conventional diagnostic techniques often lead to misdiagnosis, fail to differentiate benign from malignant tissue or diagnose only at an advanced stage. For the treatment of CRC, surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy have been employed. However, the quality of living of the CRC patients is highly compromised after employing current therapeutic approaches owing to the toxicity issues and relapse. AREA COVERED This review accentuates the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis, stages of CRC, conventional approaches for diagnosis and therapy of CRC and the issues confronted thereby. It provides an outlook on the advantages of employing nanotechnology-based approaches for prevention, early diagnosis, and treatment of CRC. EXPERT OPINION Employing nanotechnology-based approaches has demonstrated promising outcomes in the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CRC. Nanotechnology-based approaches can surmount the major drawbacks of traditional diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Nanotechnology bestows the advantage of early detection of CRC which helps to undertake instant steps for offering efficient therapy and reducing the mortality rates. For the treatment of CRC, nanocarriers offer the benefit of achieving controlled drug release, improved drug bioavailability, enhanced tumor targetability and reduced adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preksha Vinchhi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Mayur M Patel
- Department of Pharmaceutics, Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
PPV and Detection Rate of mt-sDNA Testing, FIT, and CT Colonography for Advanced Neoplasia: A Hierarchic Bayesian Meta-Analysis of the Noninvasive Colorectal Screening Tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 217:817-830. [PMID: 33703913 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.25416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND. Noninvasive tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and prevention limit the need for invasive colonoscopy to follow up positive test results. However, the relative performance characteristics of available noninvasive tests have not yet been adequately compared. OBJECTIVE. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the diagnostic performance of the available noninvasive CRC screening tests, including multitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) testing, fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), and CT colonography (CTC), with an emphasis on comparison of PPV and detection rate (DR) for advanced neoplasia (AN; encompassing cases of advanced adenomas and CRC). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. After systematic searches of MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases, 10 mt-sDNA, 27 CTC, and 88 FIT published screening studies involving 25,132, 33,493, and 2,355,958 asymptomatic adults, respectively, were included. Meta-analysis with hierarchic Bayesian modeling was conducted in accordance with Cochrane Collaboration and PRISMA guidelines to determine test positivity rates (TPRs) leading to optical colonoscopy, as well as PPVs and DRs for both AN and CRC. Different positivity thresholds were considered for FIT and CTC. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Point estimates (with 95% credible intervals) from pooled Bayesian meta-analysis combining all thresholds for FIT and stratifying CTC results by a polyp size threshold of 6 mm or larger (CTC6) and 10 mm or larger (CTC10) were calculated. TPR was 13.5% (10.9-16.6%) for mt-sDNA testing, 6.4% (5.8-7.2%) for FIT, 13.4% (11.4-15.6%) for CTC6, and 6.6% (5.2-7.7%) for CTC10. AN PPV was 26.9% (95% credible interval, 21.8-33.2%) for mt-sDNA testing, 31.8% (29.3-34.5%) for FIT, 34.4% (27.2-41.0%) for CTC6, and 61.0% (54.0-70.0%) for CTC10. CRC PPV was 2.4% (1.5-3.9%) for mt-sDNA testing, 4.9% (4.3-5.3%) for FIT, 3.5% (2.5-4.8%) for CTC6, and 6.0% (4.3-8.0%) for CTC10. The DR for AN was 3.4% (95% credible interval, 2.5-4.8%) for mt-SDNA, 2.0% (1.8-2.3%) for FIT, 4.8% (4.0-6.5%) for CTC6, and 4.0% (3.0-4.6%) for CTC10. When FIT is restricted to a lower threshold (< 10 μg Hb/g feces), its performance profile is similar to that of mt-sDNA testing, although available data are limited. AN PPV odds ratios (relative to CTC10 as the reference) were 0.24 (95% credible interval, 0.17-0.33) for mt-sDNA testing, 0.30 (0.24-0.45) for FIT, and 0.33 (0.25-0.47) for CTC6. CONCLUSION. Among noninvasive CRC screening tests, CTC with a polyp size threshold of 10 mm or larger most effectively targets AN, preserving detection while also decreasing unnecessary colonoscopies compared with mt-sDNA testing and FIT. CLINICAL IMPACT. CTC performed with a polyp size threshold for colonoscopy referral set at 10 mm or larger represents the most effective and efficient noninvasive screening test for CRC prevention and detection.
Collapse
|
26
|
Grosu S, Wesp P, Graser A, Maurus S, Schulz C, Knösel T, Cyran CC, Ricke J, Ingrisch M, Kazmierczak PM. Machine Learning-based Differentiation of Benign and Premalignant Colorectal Polyps Detected with CT Colonography in an Asymptomatic Screening Population: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Radiology 2021; 299:326-335. [PMID: 33620287 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021202363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Background CT colonography does not enable definite differentiation between benign and premalignant colorectal polyps. Purpose To perform machine learning-based differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps detected with CT colonography in an average-risk asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening sample with external validation using radiomics. Materials and Methods In this secondary analysis of a prospective trial, colorectal polyps of all size categories and morphologies were manually segmented on CT colonographic images and were classified as benign (hyperplastic polyp or regular mucosa) or premalignant (adenoma) according to the histopathologic reference standard. Quantitative image features characterizing shape (n = 14), gray level histogram statistics (n = 18), and image texture (n = 68) were extracted from segmentations after applying 22 image filters, resulting in 1906 feature-filter combinations. Based on these features, a random forest classification algorithm was trained to predict the individual polyp character. Diagnostic performance was validated in an external test set. Results The random forest model was fitted using a training set consisting of 107 colorectal polyps in 63 patients (mean age, 63 years ± 8 [standard deviation]; 40 men) comprising 169 segmentations on CT colonographic images. The external test set included 77 polyps in 59 patients comprising 118 segmentations. Random forest analysis yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.96), a sensitivity of 82% (65 of 79) (95% CI: 74%, 91%), and a specificity of 85% (33 of 39) (95% CI: 72%, 95%) in the external test set. In two subgroup analyses of the external test set, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.87 in the size category of 6-9 mm and 0.90 in the size category of 10 mm or larger. The most important image feature for decision making (relative importance of 3.7%) was quantifying first-order gray level histogram statistics. Conclusion In this proof-of-concept study, machine learning-based image analysis enabled noninvasive differentiation of benign and premalignant colorectal polyps with CT colonography. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Grosu
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Philipp Wesp
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Anno Graser
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Stefan Maurus
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Christian Schulz
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Thomas Knösel
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Clemens C Cyran
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Jens Ricke
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Michael Ingrisch
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| | - Philipp M Kazmierczak
- From the Department of Radiology (S.G., P.W., S.M., C.C.C., J.R., M.I., P.M.K.), Department of Medicine II (C.S.), and Department of Pathology (T.K.), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr 15, 81377 Munich, Germany; and Radiologie München, Munich, Germany (A.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cao Y, Zhao G, Yuan M, Liu X, Ma Y, Cao Y, Miao B, Zhao S, Li D, Xiong S, Zheng M, Fei S. KCNQ5 and C9orf50 Methylation in Stool DNA for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:621295. [PMID: 33585248 PMCID: PMC7878552 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.621295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Aberrant DNA methylation has emerged as a class of promising biomarkers for early colorectal cancer (CRC) detection, but the performance of methylated C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 in stool DNA has never been evaluated. Methods Methylation specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays for methylated C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 were developed. The methylation levels of C9orf50 and KCNQ5 in 198 CRC patients, 20 advanced adenoma (AA) patients, 101 small polyp (SP) patients, and 141 no evidence of disease (NED) subjects were analyzed. Results The methylation levels of both KCNQ5 and C9orf50 genes were significantly higher in CRC and AA groups than those in SP and NED groups, but showed no significant difference among different stages of CRC. The sensitivities of methylated KCNQ5 and methylated C9orf50 for CRC detection were 77.3% (95% CI: 70.7–82.8%) and 85.9% (95% CI: 80.0–90.2%) with specificities of 91.5% (95% CI: 85.3–95.3%) and 95.0% (95% CI: 89.7–97.8%), respectively. When C9orf50 and methylated KCNQ5 were combined, the clinical performance for CRC detection was similar to that of methylated C9orf50 alone. Conclusions Stool DNA based methylated C9orf50 test has the potential to become an alternative approach for CRC screening and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaping Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Guodong Zhao
- Zhejiang University Kunshan Biotechnology Laboratory, Zhejiang University Kunshan Innovation Institute, Kunshan, China.,State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.,Department of R&D, Suzhou VersaBio Technologies Co. Ltd., Kunshan, China
| | - Mufa Yuan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Xiaoyu Liu
- Zhejiang University Kunshan Biotechnology Laboratory, Zhejiang University Kunshan Innovation Institute, Kunshan, China
| | - Yong Ma
- Zhejiang University Kunshan Biotechnology Laboratory, Zhejiang University Kunshan Innovation Institute, Kunshan, China.,Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China
| | - Yang Cao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Bei Miao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Shuyan Zhao
- Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Danning Li
- Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| | - Shangmin Xiong
- Zhejiang University Kunshan Biotechnology Laboratory, Zhejiang University Kunshan Innovation Institute, Kunshan, China.,Department of R&D, Suzhou VersaBio Technologies Co. Ltd., Kunshan, China
| | - Minxue Zheng
- Zhejiang University Kunshan Biotechnology Laboratory, Zhejiang University Kunshan Innovation Institute, Kunshan, China.,Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China
| | - Sujuan Fei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China.,Institute of Digestive Diseases, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Niedermaier T, Tikk K, Gies A, Bieck S, Brenner H. Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Detection Differs According to Stage and Location. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2920-2928.e6. [PMID: 31988043 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.01.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are widely used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. FITs detect most CRCs. Although detection of CRC at early stages is most relevant for reducing CRC mortality, there is limited evidence for the stage-specific sensitivity of the FIT in CRC detection. We estimated stage- and location-specific sensitivities of a quantitative FIT in a large cohort of patients with CRC. METHODS Fecal samples were collected before treatment from 435 patients with newly diagnosed CRC. Sensitivities of a quantitative FIT (FOB Gold, Sentinel Diagnostics; Milano, Italy) for tumors of different T stages and overall TNM stages (according to Union for International Cancer Control) were calculated at the cutoff recommended by the manufacturer (17 μg/g feces) and at alternative cutoffs, ranging from 10 to 40 μg/g feces, overall and stratified by tumor location. RESULTS At the cutoff recommended by the manufacturer, the FIT detected T1 tumors with 52% sensitivity (95% CI, 37%-67%), T2 tumors with 79% sensitivity (95% CI, 68%-88%), T3 tumors with 93% sensitivity (95% CI, 89%-95%), and T4 tumors with 84% sensitivity (95% CI, 72%-92%) (Ptrend < .0001). The FIT detected stage I cancers with 68% sensitivity (95% CI, 57%-78%), stage II cancers with 92% sensitivity (95% CI, 87%-96%), stage III cancers with 82% sensitivity (95% CI, 73%-89%), and stage IV cancers with 89% sensitivity (95% CI, 80%-95%) (Ptrend 0.01). The FIT detected T1 colorectal tumors with sensitivity values that were 22%-52% lower than for tumors of other T stages and stage I CRC with sensitivity values that were 11%-33% lower than for later-stage CRCs, at any of the evaluated cutoff values. The FIT detected T1 and stage I CRCs in the distal colon with sensitivity values of 32% and 52%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Although the FIT identifies patients with CRC with overall high sensitivity, it can miss approximately one-third of stage I CRCs. Studies are needed to increase noninvasive detection of early-stage CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Niedermaier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Kaja Tikk
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Bieck
- Division of General and Visceral Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum, Kirchheimbolanden, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sekiguchi M, Matsuda T. Limited usefulness of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels for gastrointestinal and whole-body cancer screening. Sci Rep 2020; 10:18202. [PMID: 33097814 PMCID: PMC7585432 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75319-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The diagnostic performance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels for multiple-organ cancer screening has not been fully elucidated. However, they are widely used for real-world opportunistic screening of multiple-organ cancers. This study aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of these serum markers in multiple-organ cancer screening. Data from asymptomatic individuals subjected to opportunistic cancer screening were analyzed. The diagnostic performance of CEA and CA 19-9 was assessed for (A) upper/lower gastrointestinal cancers and (B) whole-body cancers (including both gastrointestinal and other organ cancers) using the results of upper/lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and whole-body imaging as reference. Data from 12,349 and 7616 screened individuals were used to assess the diagnostic performance of CEA and CA 19-9 for (A) and (B), respectively. For (A), the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) of CEA (cut-off: 5 ng/mL) were 7.8% and 3.7%, respectively; those of CA19-9 (cut-off: 37 U/mL) were 7.4% and 2.7%, respectively. For (B), the sensitivity and PPV of CEA were 6.6% and 4.1%, respectively, and those of CA19-9 were 10.8% and 5.8%, respectively. Considering even multiple cancers, the sensitivity and PPV of CEA and CA 19-9 were low, thus confirming their limited usefulness in multiple-organ cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masau Sekiguchi
- Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. .,Division of Screening Technology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan. .,Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Takahisa Matsuda
- Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.,Division of Screening Technology, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.,Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hong YR, Xie Z, Turner K, Datta S, Bishnoi R, Shah C. Utilization Pattern of Computed Tomographic Colonography in the United States: Analysis of the U.S. National Health Interview Survey. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2020; 14:113-122. [DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-20-0175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
31
|
Sammarco G, Gallo G, Vescio G, Picciariello A, De Paola G, Trompetto M, Currò G, Ammendola M. Mast Cells, microRNAs and Others: The Role of Translational Research on Colorectal Cancer in the Forthcoming Era of Precision Medicine. J Clin Med 2020; 9:2852. [PMID: 32899322 PMCID: PMC7564551 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9092852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 08/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a heterogeneous disease, molecularly and anatomically, that develops in a multi-step process requiring the accumulation of several genetic or epigenetic mutations that lead to the gradual transformation of normal mucosa into cancer. In fact, tumorigenesis is extremely complex, with many immunologic and non-immunologic factors present in the tumor microenvironment that can influence tumorigenesis. In the last few years, a role for mast cells (MCs), microRNAs (miRNAs), Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B (BRAF) in cancer development and progression has been suggested, and numerous efforts have been made to thoroughly assess their correlation with CRC to improve patient survival and quality of life. The identification of easily measurable, non-invasive and cost-effective biomarkers, the so-called "ideal biomarkers", for CRC screening and treatment remains a high priority. The aim of this review is to discuss the emerging role of mast cells (MCs), microRNAs (miRNAs), KRAS and BRAF as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for CRC, evaluating their influence as potential therapy targets in the forthcoming era of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Sammarco
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (G.S.); (G.C.); (M.A.)
| | - Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (G.V.); (G.D.P.)
| | - Giuseppina Vescio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (G.V.); (G.D.P.)
| | - Arcangelo Picciariello
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University “Aldo Moro” of Bari, Piazza G Cesare, 11, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Gilda De Paola
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (G.V.); (G.D.P.)
| | - Mario Trompetto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, 13100 Vercelli, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Currò
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (G.S.); (G.C.); (M.A.)
| | - Michele Ammendola
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro, Viale Europa, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy; (G.S.); (G.C.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pickhardt PJ, Graffy PM, Weigman B, Deiss-Yehiely N, Hassan C, Weiss JM. Diagnostic Performance of Multitarget Stool DNA and CT Colonography for Noninvasive Colorectal Cancer Screening. Radiology 2020; 297:120-129. [PMID: 32779997 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2020201018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BackgroundMultitarget stool DNA (mt-sDNA) screening has increased rapidly since simultaneous approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2014, whereas CT colonography screening remains underused and is not covered by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.PurposeTo report postapproval clinical experience with mt-sDNA screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) and compare results with CT colonography screening at the same center.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, asymptomatic adults underwent clinical mt-sDNA screening during a 5-year interval (2014-2019). Electronic medical records were searched to verify test results and document subsequent optical colonoscopy and histopathologic findings. A similar analysis was performed for CT colonography screening during a 15-year interval (2004-2019), with consideration of thresholds for positivity of both 6-mm and 10-mm polyp sizes. χ2 or two-sample t tests were used for group comparisons.ResultsA total of 3987 asymptomatic adult patients (mean age, 64 years ± 9 [standard deviation]; 2567 women) underwent mt-sDNA screening and 9656 patients (mean age, 57 years ± 8; 5200 women) underwent CT colonography. Test-positive rates for mt-sDNA and for 6-mm- and 10-mm-threshold CT colonography were 15.2%, 16.4%, and 6.7%, respectively. Optical colonoscopy follow-up rates for positive results of mt-sDNA and 6-mm- and 10-mm-threshold CT colonography were 13.1%, 12.3%, and 5.9%, respectively. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for any neoplasm 6 mm or greater, advanced neoplasia, and CRC for mt-sDNA were 54.2%, 22.7%, and 1.9% respectively; for 6-mm-threshold CT colonography, PPVs were 76.8%, 44.3%, and 2.7%; for 10-mm-threshold CT colonography, PPVs were 84.5%, 75.2%, and 5.2%, respectively (P < .001 for mt-sDNA vs CT colonography for all except 6-mm CRC at CT colonography). For mt-sDNA versus 6-mm-threshold CT colonography, overall detection rates for advanced neoplasia were 2.7% and 5.0%, respectively (P < .001); corresponding detection rates for CRC were 0.23% and 0.31%, respectively (P = .43).ConclusionThe detection rates of advanced neoplasia at CT colonography screening were greater than those of multitarget stool DNA. Detection rates were similar for colorectal cancer.© RSNA, 2020See also the editorial by Yee in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Perry J Pickhardt
- From the Department of Radiology (P.J.P., P.M.G., B.W.) and the Department of Medicine (N.D.Y., J.M.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Peter M Graffy
- From the Department of Radiology (P.J.P., P.M.G., B.W.) and the Department of Medicine (N.D.Y., J.M.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Benjamin Weigman
- From the Department of Radiology (P.J.P., P.M.G., B.W.) and the Department of Medicine (N.D.Y., J.M.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Nimrod Deiss-Yehiely
- From the Department of Radiology (P.J.P., P.M.G., B.W.) and the Department of Medicine (N.D.Y., J.M.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Cesare Hassan
- From the Department of Radiology (P.J.P., P.M.G., B.W.) and the Department of Medicine (N.D.Y., J.M.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (C.H.)
| | - Jennifer M Weiss
- From the Department of Radiology (P.J.P., P.M.G., B.W.) and the Department of Medicine (N.D.Y., J.M.W.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine & Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252; and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy (C.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rethinking prostate cancer screening: could MRI be an alternative screening test? Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:526-539. [PMID: 32694594 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0356-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In the past decade rigorous debate has taken place about population-based screening for prostate cancer. Although screening by serum PSA levels can reduce prostate cancer-specific mortality, it is unclear whether the benefits outweigh the risks of false-positive results and overdiagnosis of insignificant prostate cancer, and it is not recommended for population-based screening. MRI screening for prostate cancer has the potential to be analogous to mammography for breast cancer or low-dose CT for lung cancer. A number of potential barriers and technical challenges need to be overcome in order to implement such a programme. We discuss different approaches to MRI screening that could address these challenges, including abbreviated MRI protocols, targeted MRI screening, longer rescreening intervals and a multi-modal screening pathway. These approaches need further investigation, and we propose a phased stepwise research framework to ensure proper evaluation of the use of a fast MRI examination as a screening test for prostate cancer.
Collapse
|
34
|
Update on Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, Computed Tomographic Colonography, and Capsule Colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2020; 30:569-583. [PMID: 32439089 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2020.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews alternative colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests, including flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), computed tomography (CT) colonography, and colon capsule endoscopy. FS has abundant and convincing evidence supporting its use for CRC screening and is a commonly used CRC test worldwide. CT colonography has demonstrated convincing results for CRC screening, but concerns regarding cost, accuracy for flat or sessile neoplasia, reproducibility, extracolonic findings, and lack of coverage have limited its use and development. Colon capsule endoscopy has demonstrated encouraging results for polyp detection in average-risk individuals, but is not approved for CRC screening at the current time.
Collapse
|
35
|
Li X, Chen R, Li Z, Luo B, Geng W, Wu X. Diagnostic Value of Combining miRNAs, CEA Measurement and the FOBT in Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:2549-2557. [PMID: 32346309 PMCID: PMC7167282 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s238492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common illnesses that seriously threatens human health; many papers have reported that microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising biomarkers for cancer detection. However, miRNAs have not been used in clinical practice even though they are superior to the currently used screening tools, such as the fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement. Methods In this study, we focused on the usefulness of a panel of miRNAs and the combination of miRNAs with the FOBT and CEA measurement, the currently used general diagnosis methods, to improve the accuracy of CRC diagnosis. Results The results showed that the miRNA panel has great potential value as a diagnostic biomarker with high specificity and sensitivity, and further analysis demonstrated that the miRNA panel had higher sensitivity and specificity than the FOBT and CEA measurement, even when these methods were combined. More importantly, although the miRNA panel is superior to the FOBT and CEA measurement, it cannot replace them. Conclusions In this research, we investigated whether complementarity exists between the miRNA panel and the FOBT and CEA measurement for CRC diagnosis. Interestingly, the results indicated that the FOBT and CEA measurement could improve the positivity rate of the miRNA panel as a biomarker and vice versa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaodan Li
- Clinical Laboratory, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People's Republic of China
| | - Rong Chen
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhifa Li
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing Luo
- Clinical Laboratory, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People's Republic of China
| | - Wenyan Geng
- Clinical Laboratory, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaobing Wu
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of the Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510150, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Geographic Dispersion and Rural Versus Urban Utilization of CT Colonography in the United States. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:475-483. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2019] [Revised: 10/01/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
37
|
Berry E, Miller S, Koch M, Balasubramanian B, Argenbright K, Gupta S. Lower Abnormal Fecal Immunochemical Test Cut-Off Values Improve Detection of Colorectal Cancer in System-Level Screens. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:647-653. [PMID: 31085338 PMCID: PMC7731666 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.04.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Revised: 04/24/2019] [Accepted: 04/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Noninvasive tests used in colorectal cancer screening, such as the fecal immunochemical test (FIT), are more acceptable but detect neoplasias with lower levels of sensitivity than colonoscopy. We investigated whether lowering the cut-off concentration of hemoglobin for designation as an abnormal FIT result increased the detection of advanced neoplasia in a mailed outreach program. METHODS We performed a prospective study of 17,017 uninsured patients, age 50 to 64 years, who were not current with screening and enrolled in a safety-net system in Texas. We reduced the cut-off value for an abnormal FIT result from 20 or more to 10 or more μg hemoglobin/g feces a priori. All patients with abnormal FIT results were offered no-cost diagnostic colonoscopy. We compared proportions of patients with abnormal FIT results and neoplasia yield for standard vs lower cut-off values, as well as absolute hemoglobin concentration distribution among 5838 persons who completed the FIT. Our primary aim was to determine the effects of implementing a lower hemoglobin concentration cut-off value on colonoscopy demand and yield, specifically colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced neoplasia detection, compared with the standard, higher, hemoglobin concentration cut-off value. RESULTS The proportions of patients with abnormal FIT results were 12.3% at the 10 or more μg hemoglobin/g feces and 6.6% at the standard 20 or more μg hemoglobin/g feces cut-off value (P = .0013). Detection rates for the lower vs the standard threshold were 10.2% vs 12.7% for advanced neoplasia (P = .12) and 0.9% vs 1.2% for CRC (P = .718). The positive predictive values were 18.9% for the lower threshold vs 24.4% for the standard threshold for advanced neoplasia (P = .053), and 1.7% vs 2.4% for CRC (P = .659). The number needed to screen to detect 1 case with advanced neoplasia was 45 at the lower threshold compared with 58 at the standard threshold; the number needed to scope to detect 1 case with advanced neoplasia increased from 4 to 5. Most patients with CRC (72.7%) or advanced adenoma (67.3%) had hemoglobin concentrations of 20 or more μg/g feces. In the group with 10 to 19 μg hemoglobin/g feces, there were 3 patients with CRC (3 of 11; 27.3%) and 36 with advanced adenoma (36 of 110; 32.7%) who would not have been detected at the standard positive threshold (advanced neoplasia Pcomparison < .001). The proportion of patients found to have no neoplasia after an abnormal FIT result (false positives) was not significantly higher with the lower cut-off value (44.4%) than the standard cut-off value (39.1%) (P = .1103). CONCLUSIONS In a prospective study of 17,017 uninsured patients, we found that reducing the abnormal FIT result cut-off value (to ≥10 μg hemoglobin/g feces) might increase detection of advanced neoplasia, but doubled the proportion of patients requiring a diagnostic colonoscopy. If colonoscopy capacity permits, health systems that use quantitative FITs should consider lowering the abnormal cut-off value to optimize CRC detection and prevention. (ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01946282.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Berry
- Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas.
| | | | - Mark Koch
- Department of Family Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Bijal Balasubramanian
- Department of Epidemiology, Genetics, and Environmental Science, University of Texas School of Public Health Dallas Regional Campus, Dallas, Texas
| | - Keith Argenbright
- Moncrief Cancer Institute, Fort Worth, Texas; Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Samir Gupta
- San Diego Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Diego, California; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Zhong GC, Sun WP, Wan L, Hu JJ, Hao FB. Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:684-697.e15. [PMID: 31790657 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) and colonoscopy are the most commonly used strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening worldwide. We aimed to compare their efficacy and cost-effectiveness in CRC screening in an average-risk population. METHODS PubMed, Embase, and National Health Services Economic Evaluation Database were searched. Risk ratio (RR) was used to evaluate the differences in detection rates of colorectal neoplasia between FIT and colonoscopy groups. A random-effects model was used to pool RRs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of FIT versus colonoscopy. RESULTS Six randomized controlled trials and 17 cost-effectiveness studies were included. The participation rate in the FIT group was higher than that in the colonoscopy group (41.6% vs 21.9%). In the intention-to-treat analysis, FIT had a detection rate of CRC comparable with colonoscopy (RR, .73; 95% confidence interval, .37-1.42) and lower detection rates of any adenoma and advanced adenoma than 1-time colonoscopy. Most included cost-effectiveness studies showed that annual (13/15) or biennial (5/6) FIT was cost-saving (ICER < $0) or very cost-effective ($0 < ICER ≤ $25000/quality-adjusted life-year) compared with colonoscopy every 10 years. CONCLUSIONS FIT may be similar to 1-time colonoscopy in the detection rate of CRC, although it has lower detection rates of any adenoma and advanced adenoma than 1-time colonoscopy. Furthermore, annual or biennial FIT appears to be very cost-effective or cost-saving compared with colonoscopy every 10 years. These findings indicate, at least partly, that FIT is noninferior to colonoscopy in CRC screening in an average-risk population. Our findings should be treated with caution and need to be further confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guo-Chao Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Wei-Ping Sun
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Lun Wan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the People's Hospital of Dazu district, Chongqing, China
| | - Jie-Jun Hu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Fa-Bao Hao
- Pediatric Surgery Center, Qingdao Women and Children's Hospital, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Specific microRNA (miRNA) signatures in biological fluids can facilitate earlier detection of the tumors being then minimally invasive diagnostic biomarkers. Circulating miRNAs have also emerged as promising diagnostic biomarkers for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In this study, we investigated the performance of a specific signature of miRNA in plasma samples to design a robust predictive model that can distinguish healthy individuals from those with CRC or advanced adenomas (AA) diseases. METHODS Case control study of 297 patients from 8 Spanish centers including 100 healthy individuals, 101 diagnosed with AA, and 96 CRC cases. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription was used to quantify a signature of miRNA (miRNA19a, miRNA19b, miRNA15b, miRNA29a, miRNA335, and miRNA18a) in plasma samples. Binary classifiers (Support Vector Machine [SVM] linear, SVM radial, and SVM polynomial) were built for the best predictive model. RESULTS Area under receiving operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% confidence interval 0.871-0.962) was obtained retrieving a model with a sensitivity of 0.85 and specificity of 0.90, positive predictive value of 0.94, and negative predictive value of 0.76 when advanced neoplasms (CRC and AA) were compared with healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS We identified and validated a signature of 6 miRNAs (miRNA19a, miRNA19b, miRNA15b, miRNA29a, miRNA335, and miRNA18a) as predictors that can differentiate significantly patients with CRC and AA from those who are healthy. However, large-scale validation studies in asymptomatic screening participants should be conducted.
Collapse
|
40
|
Schonberger M, Lefere P, Dachman AH. Pearls and Pitfalls of Interpretation in CT Colonography. Can Assoc Radiol J 2020; 71:140-148. [PMID: 32063002 DOI: 10.1177/0846537119892881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
The accuracy of computed tomography (CT) colonography (CTC) requires that the radiologist be well trained in the recognition of pitfalls of interpretation. In order to achieve a high sensitivity and specificity, the interpreting radiologist must be well versed in the causes of both false-positive and false-negative results. In this article, we review the common and uncommon pitfalls of interpretation in CTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schonberger
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Philippe Lefere
- Department of Radiology, Stedelijk Ziekenhuis, Roeselare, Belgium
| | - Abraham H Dachman
- Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kooyker AI, Toes-Zoutendijk E, Opstal-van Winden AWJ, Spaander MCW, Buskermolen M, van Vuuren HJ, Kuipers EJ, van Kemenade FJ, Ramakers C, Thomeer MGJ, Dekker E, Nagtegaal ID, de Koning HJ, van Leerdam ME, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I. The second round of the Dutch colorectal cancer screening program: Impact of an increased fecal immunochemical test cut-off level on yield of screening. Int J Cancer 2020; 147:1098-1106. [PMID: 31853977 PMCID: PMC7383838 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program started in 2014, inviting the target population biennially to perform a fecal immunochemical test (FIT). We obtained prospectively collected data from the national screening information‐system to present the results of the second round (2016) and evaluate the impact of increasing the FIT cut‐off halfway through the first round from 15 to 47 μg Hb/g feces on outcomes in the second round. Second round screening was done with a 47 μg Hb/g feces FIT cut‐off. Participants were classified based on first round participation status as either FIT (15,47) or FIT (47,47) participants, and previous nonparticipants. In total, 348,891 (75.9%) out of 459,740 invitees participated in the second round. Participation rates were 93.4% among previous participants and 21.0% among previous non‐participants. FIT(47,47) participants had a significantly higher detection rate of AN (15.3 vs. 10.4 per 1,000 participants) compared to FIT(15,47) participants in the second round, while their cumulative detection rate of AN over two rounds was significantly lower (45.6 vs. 52.6 per 1,000 participants). Our results showed that participation in the Dutch CRC screening program was consistently high and that second round detection rates depended on the first round FIT cut‐off. The cumulative detection over two rounds was higher among FIT(15,47) participants. These findings suggest that a substantial part of, but not all the missed findings in the first round due to the increased FIT cut‐off were detected in the subsequent round. What's new? In 2014, the Netherlands implemented colorectal cancer (CRC) screening based on non‐invasive fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), which offers a practical approach for population‐based CRC detection. In the Dutch program's first round, to match local resources, FIT cut‐off was increased, resulting in reduced positivity rates and reduced colonoscopy referrals, at the cost of missing advanced neoplasias. The current study shows that many of these missed advanced neoplasias were detected in subsequent screening, suggesting that increased FIT cut‐off had marginal impact on screening outcome. The findings could benefit other CRC screening programs in establishing effective FIT cut‐offs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur I Kooyker
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike Buskermolen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst J Kuipers
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Chris Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten G J Thomeer
- Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastroenterology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Stage-Specific Sensitivity of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Detecting Colorectal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115:56-69. [PMID: 31850933 PMCID: PMC6946106 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) detect the majority of colorectal cancers (CRCs), but evidence for variation in sensitivity according to the CRC stage is sparse and has not yet been systematically synthesized. Thus, our objective was to systematically review and summarize evidence on the stage-specific sensitivity of FITs. METHODS We screened PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to June 14, 2019, for English-language articles reporting on the stage-specific sensitivity of FIT for CRC detection using colonoscopy as a reference standard. Studies reporting stage-specific sensitivities and the specificity of FIT for CRC detection were included. Summary estimates of sensitivity according to the CRC stage and study setting (screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies) were derived from bivariate meta-analysis. RESULTS Forty-four studies (92,447 participants including 3,034 CRC cases) were included. Pooled stage-specific sensitivities were overall very similar but suffered from high levels of imprecision because of small case numbers when calculated separately for screening cohorts, symptomatic/diagnostic cohorts, and case-control studies. Pooled sensitivities (95% confidence intervals) for all studies combined were 73% (65%-79%) for stage-I-CRCs and 80% (74%-84%), 82% (77%-87%), and 79% (70%-86%) for the detection of CRC stages II, III, and IV, respectively. Even substantially larger variation was seen in sensitivity by T-stage, with summary estimates ranging from 40% (21%-64%) for T1 to 83% (68%-91%) for T3-CRC. DISCUSSION Although FITs detect 4 of 5 CRCs at stages II-IV, the substantially lower sensitivity for stage-I-CRC and, in particular, T1 CRC indicates both need and potential for further improvement in performance for the early detection of CRC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Selby K, Levine EH, Doan C, Gies A, Brenner H, Quesenberry C, Lee JK, Corley DA. Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:1494-1505. [PMID: 31472152 PMCID: PMC6878177 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Revised: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 08/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Quantitative fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for hemoglobin are commonly used for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to quantify the change in CRC and advanced adenoma detection and number of positive test results at different positivity thresholds and by sex and age. METHODS We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE, selecting articles of FIT for CRC detection in asymptomatic adults undergoing screening. We calculated sensitivity and specificity, as well as detected number of cancers, advanced adenomas, and positive test results at positivity thresholds ≤10 μg hemoglobin/g feces, 10 to ≤20 μg/g, 20 to ≤30 μg/g, and >30 μg/g. We also analyzed results from stratified by patient sex, age, and reference standard. RESULTS Our meta-analysis comprised 46 studies with 2.4 million participants and 6478 detected cancers. Sensitivity for detection of CRC increased from 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 63%-75%) at thresholds >10 μg/g and ≤20 μg/g to 80% (95% CI, 76%-83%) at thresholds ≤10 μg/g. At these threshold values, sensitivity for detection of advanced adenomas increased from 21% (95% CI, 18%-25%) to 31% (95% CI, 27%-35%), whereas specificity decreased from 94% (95% CI, 93%-96%) to 91% (95% CI, 89%-93%). In 3 studies stratified by sex, sensitivity of CRC detection was 77% in men (95% CI, 75%-79%) and 81% in women (95% CI, 60%-100%) (P = .68). In 3 studies stratified by age groups, sensitivity of CRC detection was 85% for ages 50-59 years (95% CI, 71%-99%) and 73% for ages 60-69 years (95% CI, 71%-75%) (P = .10). All studies with colonoscopy follow-up had similar sensitivity levels for detection of CRC to studies that analyzed 2-year registry follow-up data (74%; 95% CI, 68%-78% vs 75%; 95% CI, 73%-77%). CONCLUSIONS In a meta-analysis of studies that analyzed detection of CRC and advanced adenomas at different FIT positivity thresholds, we found the sensitivity and specificity of detection to vary with positive cutoff value. It might be possible to decrease positive threshold values for centers with sufficient follow-up colonoscopy resources. More research is needed to precisely establish FIT thresholds for each sex and age subgroup. PROTOCOL PROSPERO CRD42017068760.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Selby
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California; Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Emma H Levine
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Cecilia Doan
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | - Anton Gies
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Faculty Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Brenner
- Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jeffrey K Lee
- Kaiser Permanente Division of Research, Oakland, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Lu M, Luo X, Li N, Chen H, Dai M. Diagnostic Accuracy Of Fecal Occult Blood Tests For Detecting Proximal Versus Distal Colorectal Neoplasia: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis. Clin Epidemiol 2019; 11:943-954. [PMID: 31695506 PMCID: PMC6821070 DOI: 10.2147/clep.s213677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at evaluating the differences of diagnostic performance of fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs) in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasms located in the proximal versus distal colorectum. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible articles published before August 17, 2018. Two independent reviewers conducted study assessment and data extraction. Diagnosis-related indicators of FOBT for detecting proximal and distal colorectal neoplasms were summarized, and further stratified by the type of FOBT (guaiac-based FOBT (gFOBT) and immunochemical FOBT (iFOBT)). Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated using a random effect model. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted and area under the curves were calculated. Results Overall, 31 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in this review. For gFOBT, we found no site-specific difference (proximally vs distally located) of pooled sensitivities observed in the colorectal cancer (CRC), advanced adenomas, and advanced neoplasms groups. As for iFOBT, pooled sensitivities for detecting CRC located in the distal colon/rectum were comparable with that in the proximal colon (proximal vs distal, 0.67, 95% CI 0.62-0.72 vs 0.72, 95% CI 0.68-0.75), while higher pooled sensitivities for detecting advanced adenomas and advanced neoplasms located in the distal colon/rectum than for detecting those in the proximal colon were observed for iFOBT with the values of 0.24 (95% CI 0.22-0.25) vs 0.32 (95% CI 0.30-0.34) and 0.25 (95% CI 0.23-0.28) vs 0.38 (95% CI 0.36-0.40), respectively. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed similar patterns for both types of FOBT regarding the diagnostic accuracy for detecting colorectal neoplasms according to the anatomical sites of the colorectum. Conclusion iFOBT had higher sensitivity for detecting advanced adenomas and advanced neoplasia located in the distal colon/rectum than that for those in the proximal colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Lu
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohu Luo
- Department of Toxicant Occupational Disease Testing Laboratory, Xuzhou Cancer Hospital, Xuzhou 221000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ni Li
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongda Chen
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| | - Min Dai
- National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
CLINICAL PROBLEM Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Most colorectal cancers derive from benign precursor lesions, so-called adenomatous polyps, over a long period of time. Colorectal cancer screening is based on the detection of precancerous polyps and early stage CRC in asymptomatic individuals to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. The protective effect of screening programs can be improved by increasing the screening rates. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS Apart from the established examinations, CT colonography (CTC) has been proposed as an optional test for colorectal cancer screening. The detection rates of CTC for large polyps and cancer are similar to the ones of colonoscopy and superior to stool-based tests. CTC is therefore the radiological test of choice for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. It has replaced double contrast barium enema for almost all indications. As a minimally invasive procedure, CTC has a high safety profile and good patient acceptance. The evaluation of extracolonic organs in addition to the colon can increase examination efficacy. The option to choose CTC as a CRC screening test has the potential to increase the overall screening rates.
Collapse
|
46
|
Kim J, Kim HG, Kim KO, Kim HW, Park J, Byeon JS, Hwang SW, Shin HD, Shin JE, Yang HJ, Lee HS, Jung Y, Cho YS, Joo YE, Myung DS, Huh KC, Ahn EM. Clinical comparison of low-volume agents (oral sulfate solution and sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate) for bowel preparation: the EASE study. Intest Res 2019; 17:413-418. [PMID: 30959582 PMCID: PMC6667374 DOI: 10.5217/ir.2018.00156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS This study compared the efficacy, compliance, and safety of bowel preparation between sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) and oral sulfate solution (OSS). METHODS A prospective randomized multicenter study was performed. Split preparation methods were performed in both groups; the SPMC group, 2 sachets on the day before, and 1 sachet on the day of the procedure, the OSS group, half of the OSS with 1 L of water on both the day before and the day of the procedure. The adenoma detection rate (ADR), adequacy of bowel preparation using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) score, patient satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS), and safety were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS This study analyzed 229 patients (121 in the SPMC group and 108 in the OSS group). ADR showed no differences between 2 groups (51.7% vs. 41.7%, P> 0.05). The mean total BBPS score (7.95 vs. 8.11, P> 0.05) and adequate bowel preparation rate (94.9% vs. 96.3%, P> 0.05) were similar between the 2 groups. The mean VAS score for taste (7.62 vs. 6.87, P=0.006) was significantly higher in the SPMC group than in the OSS group. There were no significant differences in any other safety variables between the 2 groups except nausea symptom (36.1% vs. 20.3%, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS Bowel preparation for colonoscopy using low volume OSS and SPMC yielded similar ADRs and levels of efficacy. SPMC had higher levels of satisfaction for taste and feeling than did OSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeeyeon Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Gun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyeong Ok Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyung Wook Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jongha Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Jeong-Sik Byeon
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Wook Hwang
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Deok Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Hyo-Joon Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yunho Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea
| | - Young-Seok Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Eun Joo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Dae-Seong Myung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Kyu Chan Huh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Eu Mi Ahn
- Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Utano K, Takayanagi D, Nagata K, Aizawa M, Endo S, Nemoto T, Nemoto D, Isohata N, Lefor AK, Togashi K. A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:5236-5246. [PMID: 30903329 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06127-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of bowel preparation using a hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid, PEG + Asc) for CT colonography (CTC) and to examine the volume limit of laxative. METHODS In one institution, patients who met the indications for CTC were enrolled and randomly assigned to CTC with regimen A (800 ml PEG + Asc), B (600 ml PEG + Asc), or C (400 ml PEG + Asc). Sodium diatrizoate was given orally for fecal tagging. On the previous day, patients ate low-residue meals and took the assigned lavage solution after dinner. A reader blinded to the preparation graded residual stool/fluid and fecal tagging quality in six segments of the colorectum. The primary outcome was a proportion of colon segments without stool. One hundred twenty segments in 20 patients with each regimen were needed to show a non-inferiority margin of 15%, assuming 85% of no stool. RESULTS A total of 360 segments in 60 patients were analyzed. There were 83% of segments with no stool in regimen A, 89% in regimen B, and 88% in regimen C. Using the delta method, the 95% confidence interval of the risk difference (6.7%) between regimens A and B was - 2.2% to 15.6%, and the risk difference (5.0%) between regimens A and C was - 4.1% to 14%, both within the non-inferiority margin. Residual fluid and fecal tagging quality were also within the non-inferiority margin. No adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS A novel CTC regimen using hypertonic laxative demonstrated optimal colon cleansing effectiveness even with the lowest volume of laxative (UMIN000022851). KEY POINTS • A novel CTC regimen using a hypertonic laxative is feasible. • The lowest volume of laxative provides excellent colon imaging. • However, the lowest volume of laxative did not improve patient acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenichi Utano
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Daisuke Takayanagi
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Koichi Nagata
- Division of Screening Technology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masato Aizawa
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Shungo Endo
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Tetsutaro Nemoto
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Daiki Nemoto
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Isohata
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan
| | - Alan Kawarai Lefor
- Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazutomo Togashi
- Department of Coloproctology, Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima Medical University, 21-2 Maeda, Tanisawa, Kawahigashi, Aizuwakamatsu City, Fukushima, 969-3492, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Salerno S, Lo Re G, Bellini D, Rengo M, Marrale M, Terranova MC, Scopelliti L, Laghi A. Patient centring and scan length: how inaccurate practice impacts on radiation dose in CT colonography (CTC). Radiol Med 2019; 124:762-767. [PMID: 30848421 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-019-01021-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to acknowledge errors in patients positioning in CT colonography (CTC) and their effect in radiation exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS CTC studies of a total of 199 patients coming from two different referral hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Two parameters have been considered for the analysis: patient position in relation to gantry isocentre and scan length related to the area of interest. CTDI vol and DLP were extracted for each patient. In order to evaluate the estimated effective total dose and the dose to various organs, we used the CT-EXPO® software version 2.2. This software provides estimates of effective dose and doses to the other various organs. RESULTS Average value of the patients' position is found to be below the isocentre for 48 ± 25 mm and 29 ± 27 mm in the prone and supine position. It was observed that the increase in CTDI and DLP values for patients in Group 1, due to the inaccurate positioning, was estimated at about 30% and 20% for prone and supine position, respectively, while in Group 2, a decrease in CTDI and DLP values was estimated at about 16% and 18% for prone and supine position, respectively, due to an average position above isocentre. A dose increase ranging from 4 up to 13% was calculated with increasing the over-scanned region below anal orifice. CONCLUSION Radiographers and radiologists need to be aware of dose variation and noise effects on vertical positioning and over-scanning. More accurate training need to be achieved even so when examination protocol varies from general practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Salerno
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Palermo, Policlinico Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Lo Re
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Palermo, Policlinico Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Davide Bellini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Oncologiche e Anatomo-Patologiche, "Sapienza" - Università di Roma Diagnostica per Immagini - Ospedale I.C.O.T, Via Franco Faggiana n.1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, School of Medicine and Psychology, "Sapienza" - University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Maurizio Marrale
- Dipartimento di Fisica e Chimica, Viale delle Scienze Ed. 17, 90128, Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Chiara Terranova
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Palermo, Policlinico Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Laura Scopelliti
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Palermo, Policlinico Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza-University of Rome, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, 00189, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Imperiale TF, Gruber RN, Stump TE, Emmett TW, Monahan PO. Performance Characteristics of Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer and Advanced Adenomatous Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2019; 170:319-329. [PMID: 30802902 DOI: 10.7326/m18-2390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 148] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies report inconsistent performance of fecal immunochemical tests (FITs) for colorectal cancer (CRC) and advanced adenomas. PURPOSE To summarize performance characteristics of FITs for CRC and advanced adenomas in average-risk persons undergoing screening colonoscopy (reference standard) and to identify factors affecting these characteristics. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception through October 2018; reference lists of studies and reviews. STUDY SELECTION Two reviewers independently screened records to identify published English-language prospective or retrospective observational studies that evaluated FIT sensitivity and specificity for colonoscopic findings in asymptomatic, average-risk adults. DATA EXTRACTION Two authors independently extracted data and evaluated study quality. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty-one studies (120 255 participants; 18 FITs) were included; all were judged to have low to moderate risk of bias. Performance characteristics depended on the threshold for a positive result. A threshold of 10 µg/g resulted in sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84 to 0.95) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.10 (CI, 0.06 to 0.19) for CRC, whereas a threshold of greater than 20 µg/g resulted in specificity of 0.95 (CI, 0.94 to 0.96) and a positive likelihood ratio of 15.49 (CI, 9.82 to 22.39). For advanced adenomas, sensitivity was 0.40 (CI, 0.33 to 0.47) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.67 (CI, 0.57 to 0.78) at 10 µg/g, and specificity was 0.95 (CI, 0.94 to 0.96) and the positive likelihood ratio was 5.86 (CI, 3.77 to 8.97) at greater than 20 µg/g. Studies had low to high heterogeneity, depending on the threshold. Although several FITs had adequate performance, sensitivity and specificity for CRC for 1 qualitative FIT were 0.90 and 0.91, respectively, at its single threshold of 10 µg/g; positive and negative likelihood ratios were 10.13 and 0.11, respectively. Comparison of 3 FITs at 3 thresholds was inconclusive: CIs overlapped, and the comparisons were across rather than within studies. LIMITATIONS Only English-language studies were included. Incomplete reporting limited quality assessment of some evidence. Performance characteristics are for 1-time rather than serial testing. CONCLUSION Single-application FITs have moderate to high sensitivity and specificity for CRC, depending on the positivity threshold. Sensitivity of 1-time testing for advanced adenomas is low, regardless of the threshold. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Imperiale
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, and Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana (T.F.I.)
| | | | - Timothy E Stump
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (T.E.S., P.O.M.)
| | | | - Patrick O Monahan
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (T.E.S., P.O.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Moreno C, Kim DH, Bartel TB, Cash BD, Chang KJ, Feig BW, Fowler KJ, Garcia EM, Kambadakone AR, Lambert DL, Levy AD, Marin D, Peterson CM, Scheirey CD, Smith MP, Weinstein S, Carucci LR. ACR Appropriateness Criteria ® Colorectal Cancer Screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2019; 15:S56-S68. [PMID: 29724427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
This review summarizes the relevant literature regarding colorectal screening with imaging. For individuals at average or moderate risk for colorectal cancer, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening. After positive results on a fecal occult blood test or immunohistochemical test, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer detection. For individuals at high risk for colorectal cancer (eg, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, ulcerative colitis, or Crohn colitis), optical colonoscopy is preferred because of its ability to obtain biopsies to detect dysplasia. After incomplete colonoscopy, CT colonography is usually appropriate for colorectal cancer screening for individuals at average, moderate, or high risk. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - David H Kim
- Co-author and Panel Chair, University of Wisconsin Hospital & Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Brooks D Cash
- University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama; American Gastroenterological Association
| | | | - Barry W Feig
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; American College of Surgeons
| | | | - Evelyn M Garcia
- Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, Virginia
| | | | - Drew L Lambert
- University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Angela D Levy
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia
| | - Daniele Marin
- Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - Martin P Smith
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Laura R Carucci
- Specialty Chair, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|