EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) performed with a Franseen needle or Fork-tip needle enables greater tissue acquisition. However, it is unknown whether EUS-FNB could contribute to lymphadenopathy genomic profiling. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of EUS-FNB using a Franseen or Fork-tip needle for tissue acquisition and genomic profiling in patients with lymphadenopathy.

Patients with abdominal lymphadenopathy who underwent EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA)/EUS-FNB were included in this study. The amount of acquired tissue and its suitability for genomic profiling were compared between FNA and FNB. Specimen quality was evaluated by a widely used pathologic adequacy scoring system (0: insufficient; 1 to 2: cytologic; 3: limited histologic; 4 to 5: sufficient histologic). The criteria of FoundationOne CDx (F1CDx) and NCC Oncopanel (NOP) were used to assess the suitability for genomic profiling.

In total, 72 patients underwent EUS-FNA, and the other 20 patients underwent EUS-FNB. The pathologic adequacy score and suitability for genomic profiling based on the criteria were significantly higher for FNB than for FNA [histologic adequacy score: 5 (4 to 5) versus 3 (0 to 5), P <0.01; F1CDx: 16.7% vs. 0%, P =0.01; NOP: 66.7% vs. 7.5%, P <0.01]. In multivariate analysis, EUS-FNB was identified as the only factor that influenced the suitability for genomic profiling based on the above-mentioned criteria (odds ratio 19.5, 95% CI: 3.74-102, P <0.01).

EUS-FNB performed using Franseen or Fork-tip needles may result in greater lymphadenopathy tissue acquisition and thus enhanced suitability for genomic profiling compared with EUS-FNA.

Precision medicine is a promising therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancer. However, only a few patients are eligible for genotype-matched treatments because of the low detection rate of actionable genomic alterations, and the clinical application of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in pancreatic cancer has not been completely investigated. CGP provides considerable information, including the prognosis and eligibility of patients for genotype-matched treatments, which can guide physicians' treatment strategies. This study aimed to investigate the contribution of CGP to patient outcomes.

This single-center retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with recurrent or metastatic pancreatic cancer with adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma who underwent systemic chemotherapy between April 2018 and April 2022. We reviewed the medical records for patient characteristics, survival, and genomic information. We compared overall survival (OS) between patients who received CGP (CGP group) and those who did not (non-CGP group).

Of 111 eligible patients, 59 underwent CGP. Median OS was significantly longer in the CGP than the non-CGP group (25.2 vs. 11.8 months; hazard ratio, 0.49; P = 0.0013). Six patients (10.2%) underwent genotype-matched treatments, with a median OS of 35.5 months, compared to 17.0 months for those who did not. The CGP group demonstrated a higher transition rate to subsequent chemotherapy than did the non-CGP group (76.3% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.0030).

OS was prolonged in patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent CGP, probably due to its influence on physicians' treatment strategies. These findings highlight the importance of the proactive and timely implementation of CGP in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Pancreatic cancer has a poor prognosis despite ongoing advances in systemic and multimodal therapies. This review analyzes recent progress and future directions in pancreatic cancer clinical trials, emphasizing the evolution from traditional approaches to a more personalized and biologically-driven treatment paradigm. While improvements in overall survival have been achieved through perioperative therapies, gaps remain in our understanding of optimal treatment strategies. Key questions include selection of specific chemotherapeutic agents, duration of preoperative therapy, the role of radiotherapy, and accurate and real-time assessment of response to therapy. Historically, pancreatic cancer clinical trials have been designed based on anatomic criteria, failing to account for the inherent biologic heterogeneity of this disease. The field is now moving towards a precision oncology approach, leveraging genomic and transcriptomic data to identify predictive biomarkers and personalize treatment selection. Novel clinical trial designs, such as platform and basket trials, are accelerating the evaluation of new therapeutic strategies and facilitating efficient patient selection, particularly in the context of new emerging targeted therapies such as KRAS inhibitors. Furthermore, implementation of dynamic response assessment techniques, such as circulating tumor DNA and radiomics, may inform treatment decision-making and improve prediction of long-term outcomes. By integrating these evolving strategies, the emerging clinical trial landscape has the potential to transform the treatment of pancreatic cancer and yield meaningful improvements in patient outcomes.

Olaparib is a relatively new poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) administered to ovarian cancer (OC) patients with a complete or partial response to first-line chemotherapy. One of the metabolic side effects of olaparib is the disruption of glucose homeostasis, often resulting in hyperglycemia The study was a retrospective analysis of olaparib-induced hyperglycemia in OC patients with initial normoglycemia following the first, second, and third month of olaparib treatment METHODS: The study involved 32 OC patients, classified into three groups according to their Body Mass Index (BMI): normal BMI (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2; n = 13), overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2; n = 13), and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; n = 6). The fasting glucose (FG) concentration was evaluated after the first, second, and third cycle of olaparib treatment (a cycle is the equivalent of 28 days of treatment). The severity of the observed hyperglycemia was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5.0).

A significant increase in glycemia was observed after the first and second cycles of olaparib treatment in the group with normal BMI and after the third cycle in overweight and obese patients. There were no significant differences in glucose levels among the groups following the first, the second, and the third cycle. Grade 1 hyperglycemia with impaired fasting glucose levels (5.6-6.9 mmol/l) was found in 15 patients (normal BMI: n = 4, overweight: n = 9, and obesity: n = 2), while glycemia typical of diabetes (≥ 7.0 mmol/l) was observed in one obese patient.

Regardless of the weight of OC patients, it is essential to control glycemia during olaparib treatment.

Pancreatic cancer is a rising cause of cancer death. Therapeutic options are scarce and of limited efficacy. Up to 26% of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer could benefit from targeted therapies. We report here for the first time the case of three patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) without KRAS alteration for whom an activating mutation in exon 19 of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene was found through mainstreaming NGS. The EGFR variant was confirmed on multiple tumor samples and by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis in two patients. The three patients were treated with osimertinib with early molecular, biologic, and morpho-metabolic responses. At the last follow-up, one patient had an ongoing response after 17 months, and disease control had been maintained for 8 and 6 months in the other two. Known resistance mechanisms were observed on ctDNA analysis at progression. These observations demonstrate the benefit of osimertinib for treating EGFR-mutated PDAC and highlight the interest in investigating rare molecular alterations, especially in patients without KRAS alterations.

Olaparib exhibits antitumor effects in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with germline mutations in DNA repair genes. We previously reported that simvastatin reduced the expression of DNA repair genes in PC-3 cells. The efficacy of combination therapy using olaparib and simvastatin as "BRCAness" in castration-resistant and taxane-resistant prostate cancers was evaluated in this study.

PC-3, LNCaP, and 22Rv1 human prostate cancer cell lines were used to develop androgen-independent LNCaP cells (LNCaP-LA). mRNA and protein expression levels were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis, respectively. Cell viability was determined using the MTS assay and cell counts. All evaluations were performed on cells treated with simvastatin with or without olaparib.

The mRNA levels of BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51, FANCD2, FANCG, FANCA, BARD1, RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5, which are known DNA repair genes, were downregulated by simvastatin in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells, such as PC-3, LNCaP-LA, and 22Rv1 cells. In contrast, the expression of all these genes remained unchanged in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells following treatment with simvastatin. Furthermore, simvastatin increased the expression of above stated genes in normal prostate stromal cells (PrSC). The reduction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression following siRNA transfection increased the cytocidal effects of Olaparib in PC-3 and LNCaP-LA cells. The combination of olaparib and simvastatin further inhibited cell proliferation compared to monotherapy with either drug in PC-3, 22Rv1, and LNCaP-LA cells but not in PrSC cells. In a 22Rv1-derived mouse xenograft model, the combination of olaparib and simvastatin enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation. Moreover, we established a 22Rv1 cell line with acquired resistance to Cabazitaxel (22Rv1-CR). In 22Rv1-CR cells, simvastatin also decreased the expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and FANCA, and the combination of olaparib and simvastatin further enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation compared with treatment with either of the drugs alone.

Simvastatin altered the expression of several genes associated with DNA repair in castration-resistant and taxane-resistant prostate cancer cells. The combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and drugs that decrease DNA repair gene expression can potentially affect castration-resistant and taxane-resistant prostate cancer growth.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as critical agents for cancer therapy. By inhibiting the catalytic activity of PARP enzymes and trapping them in the DNA, PARPis disrupt DNA repair, ultimately leading to cell death, particularly in cancer cells with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, such as those harboring BRCA mutations. This review delves into the mechanisms of action of PARPis in anticancer treatments, including the inhibition of DNA repair, synthetic lethality, and replication stress. Furthermore, the clinical applications of PARPis in various cancers and their adverse effects as well as their combinations with other therapies and the mechanisms underlying resistance are summarized. This review provides comprehensive insights into the role and mechanisms of PARP and PARPis in DNA repair, with a particular focus on the potential of PARPi-based therapies in precision medicine for cancer treatment.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the deadliest cancers demanding better and more effective therapies. BARD1 or BRCA1-Associated -Ring Domain-1 plays a pivotal role in homologous recombination repair (HRR). However, its function and the underlying molecular mechanisms in PDAC are still not fully elucidated. Here, we demonstrate that BARD1 is overexpressed in PDAC and its genetic inhibition suppresses c-Myc and disrupts c-Myc dependent transcriptional program. Mechanistically, BARD1 stabilizes c-Myc through ubiquitin-proteasome system by regulating FBXW7. Importantly, targeting BARD1 using either siRNAs or CRISPR/Cas9 deletion blocks PDAC growth in vitro and in vivo, without any signs of toxicity to mice. Using a focused drug library of 477 DNA damage response compounds, we also found that BARD1 inhibition enhances therapeutic efficacy of several clinically relevant agents (fold changes ≥4), including PARPi, in HRR proficient PDAC cells. These data uncover BARD1 as an attractive therapeutic target for HRR proficient PDAC.

The RAD51-BRCA2 interaction is central to DNA repair through homologous recombination. Emerging evidence indicates RAD51 overexpression and its correlation with chemoresistance in various cancers, suggesting RAD51-BRCA2 inhibition as a compelling avenue for intervention. We previously showed that combining olaparib (a PARP inhibitor (PARPi)) with RS-35d (a BRCA2-RAD51 inhibitor) was efficient in killing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) cells. However, RS-35d impaired cell viability even when administered alone, suggesting potential off-target effects. Here, through multiple, integrated orthogonal biological approaches in different 2D and 3D PDAC cultures, we characterised RS-35d enantiomers, in terms of mode of action and single contributions. By differentially inhibiting both RAD51-BRCA2 interaction and sensor kinases ATM, ATR and DNA-PK, RS-35d enantiomers exhibit a 'within-pathway synthetic lethality' profile. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported proof-of-concept single small molecule capable of demonstrating this built-in synergism. In addition, RS-35d effect on BRCA2-mutated, olaparib-resistant PDAC cells suggests that this compound may be effective as an anticancer agent possibly capable of overcoming PARPi resistance. Our results demonstrate the potential of synthetic lethality, with its diversified applications, to propose new and concrete opportunities to effectively kill cancer cells while limiting side effects and potentially overcoming emerging drug resistance.

Putting pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) screening into perspective for high-risk individuals could significantly reduce cancer morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have profiled somatic mutations in PAAD. In contrast, the prevalence of mutations in PAAD predisposition genes has not been defined, especially in the Asian population. Using a multi-tier cohort design and whole genome/exome sequencing, we create a comprehensive germline mutation map of PAAD in 1,123 Chinese cancer patients in comparison with 11 pan-ethnic studies. For well-known pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants, Chinese patients exhibit overlapping but distinct germline mutation patterns comparing with Western cohorts, highlighted by lower mutation rates in known PAAD genes including BRCA1, BRCA2, ATM, CDKN2A, and CHEK2, and distinct mutations in CFTR, RAD51D, FANCA, ERCC2, and GNAS exclusive to Chinese patients. CFTR emerges as a top candidate gene following loss of heterozygosity analysis. Using an integrative multi-omics and functional validation paradigm, we discover that deleterious variants of uncertain significance may compromise CFTR's tumor suppressor function, and demonstrate the clinical relevance by using patient derived organoids for drug screen. Our multifaceted approach not only deepens the knowledge of population differences in PAAD germline mutations but also unveils potential avenues for targeted therapeutic interventions.

PARP inhibitors are a class of agents that have shown significant preclinical activity in models defective in homologous recombination (HR). The identification of synthetic lethality between HR defects and PARP inhibition led to several clinical trials in tumors with known HR defects (initially mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and subsequently in other genes involved in HR). These studies demonstrated significant responses in breast and ovarian cancers, which are known to have a significant proportion of patients with HR defects. Since the approval of the first PARP inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib, several other inhibitors have been developed, expanding the armamentarium available to clinicians in this setting. The positive results obtained in breast and ovarian cancer have expanded the use of PARPi in other solid tumors with HR defects, including prostate and pancreatic cancer in which these defects have been identified. The clinical trials have demonstrated responses to PARPi which are now also available for the subset of patients with prostate and pancreatic cancer with HR defects. This review summarizes the results obtained in solid tumors with PARPi and their potential use when combined with other agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors that are likely to further increase the survival of these patients which still needs a dramatic improvement.

Expression of stromal antigen 2 (STAG2), a member of the cohesin complex, is associated with aggressive tumor characteristics and worse clinical outcomes in muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. The mechanism by which STAG2 acts in a pro-oncogenic manner in bladder cancer remains unknown. Due to this elusive role of STAG2, targetable vulnerabilities based on STAG2 expression have not yet been identified. In the current study, we sought to uncover therapeutic vulnerabilities of muscle invasive bladder cancer cells based on the expression of STAG2. Using CRISPR-Cas9, we generated isogenic STAG2 wild-type (WT) and knock out (KO) cell lines and treated each cell line with a panel of 312 anti-cancer compounds. We identified 100 total drug hits and found that STAG2 KO sensitized cells to treatment with PLK1 inhibitor rigosertib, whereas STAG2 KO protected cells from treatment with MEK inhibitor TAK-733 and PI3K inhibitor PI-103. After querying drug sensitivity data of over 4500 drugs in 24 bladder cancer cell lines from the DepMap database, we found that cells with less STAG2 mRNA expression are more sensitive to ATR and CHK inhibition. In dose-response studies, STAG2 KO cells are more sensitive to the ATR inhibitor berzosertib, whereas STAG2 WT cells are more sensitive to PI3K inhibitor PI-103. These results, in combination with RNA-seq analysis of STAG2-regulated genes, suggest a novel role of STAG2 in regulating PI3K signaling in bladder cancer cells. Finally, synergy experiments revealed that berzosertib exhibits significant synergistic cytotoxicity in combination with cisplatin against MIBC cells. Altogether, our study presents evidence that berzosertib, PI-103, and the combination of berzosertib with cisplatin may be novel opportunities to investigate as precision medicine approaches for MIBC patients based on STAG2 tumor expression.

Background: Ovarian cancers harboring inactivating mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 demonstrate increased sensitivity to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). BRCA1 promoter methylation could serve as a more precise biomarker for therapy response, as it reflects a dynamic mechanism, compared with genomic scarring, which remains persistent and lacks real-time prediction of sensitivity after prior lines of treatment. Additionally, the BRCA1 promoter methylation may provide a more precise biomarker for identifying homologous recombination deficiency compared to genomic scars. In this study, we describe the validation of a pyrosequencing method to assess BRCA1 promoter methylation status. Methods: Tumor DNA from high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma was tested targeting 11 CpG sites adjacent to the BRCA1 transcription start site. All cases had concordant results compared with TCGA methylation data or real-time PCR results. To determine the sensitivity of this assay, we performed a dilution series experiment using seven mixtures of methylated DNA and unmethylated genomic DNA (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.125%, and 1.56%). Results: We observed a high degree of correlation (R2 = 0.9945) between predicted and observed results. Intra- and inter-run reproducibility was established by performing six cases in triplicate in the same run and in three different runs. Conclusions: By applying 10% as the cutoff for detection of methylation, the PyroMark Q24 pyrosequencing assay demonstrated 100% concordance across all the ovarian cancer cases included in this validation. This assay has been approved by the New York State Department of Health as a laboratory-specific assay for clinical use.

In Japan, 5 years have passed since the initiation of precision cancer medicine, and recent data accumulation in familial pancreatic cancer (FPC) and hereditary pancreatic cancer is outstanding. Multigene germline panel tests (MGPTs) have revealed that 7%-18% of patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) harbor pathogenic germline variants (PGVs), almost equal to the levels of breast, ovarian, endometrial, and colorectal cancers, with a higher incidence in FPC (14%-26%). The majority of PGVs seen in PC patients are clinically actionable and associated with homologous recombination (HR) pathways (6%-10%, particularly BRCA1/2 in 5%-6%), and the clinical guidelines recommend or propose genetic testing for all PC patients. Consensus guidelines have been established for most of the hereditary syndromes associated with PC risks, and surveillances of the pancreas and other at-risk organs are recommended for PGV carriers. Hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) is the commonest hereditary cancer syndrome that has moderately increasing life-time risks of PC (3%-7% in Western countries); however, recent Japanese research demonstrated a higher risk level (BRCA1: 16%, BRCA2: 14%). Moreover, recent evidence has suggested a risk linkage between PC and ovarian cancer in HBOC pedigrees. High scores of homologous recombination deficiency suggest biallelic dysfunction of BRCA or other HR-related genes, and the likely effectiveness of platinum agents and PARP inhibitors against PCs. Remote counseling and testing are possible option in the future genetic medicine. As PC ranks in the second commonest target of precision cancer medicine in Japan, we must treat the patients and manage their at-risk relatives efficiently.

Pancreatic acinar cell carcinoma (pACC) is a rare neoplasm of the exocrine pancreas. There is a dearth of information about tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. This study describes the clinical characteristics, genetic alterations, and survival outcomes of resected pACC.

Consecutive patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pathologically confirmed pACC from 1999 to 2022 across three high-volume pancreas surgery centers were analyzed. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatment data, and genetic sequencing were obtained through retrospective abstraction.

A total of 61 patients with resected pACC were identified. Median overall survival (OS) was 73 months and median recurrence free survival was 22 months. Nine patients underwent resection for oligometastatic disease; median OS was not reached after a median follow-up of 31 months from date of metastasectomy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in 67% of patients with FOLFOX/FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, ± irinotecan) the most common regimen (58%). Sequencing data were obtained in 47 (77%) patients. A mutation in at least one of three core genes associated with the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway (BRCA1, BRCA2, or PALB2) occurred in 26% (n = 12) with BRCA2 the most frequently identified. A mutation in any other "non-core" gene associated with DNA damage repair or the HRR pathway was identified in 45% (n = 21) with a high tumor mutational burden of > 10 mutations per megabase in 13%.

Resection of pACC is associated with favorable survival outcomes, even in the setting of oligometastatic disease. Mutations in the HRR pathway are common, providing opportunities for potential targeted therapeutic options.

Uterine sarcomas are rare, aggressive tumors with limited chemotherapy responsiveness. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as targeted therapies for patients with BRCA mutations across multiple cancer types, with anecdotal responses in uterine sarcoma. This retrospective, single-center study aims to describe relevant genomic and clinical features of patients with BRCA-altered uterine sarcoma and the efficacy of PARPis in this population.

Eligible patients included all histopathologically confirmed uterine sarcoma with pathogenic BRCA alterations identified through Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-integrated mutation profiling of actionable cancer targets, excluding carcinosarcoma. Genomic, pathologic, and treatment information was extracted from the cBioPortal database and chart review.

Thirty-five patients were identified with uterine sarcoma harboring pathogenic BRCA alterations, including 33 BRCA2 alterations (70% homozygous deletions, 3% structural variants, 27% mutations) and two BRCA1 mutations. Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) was the most common histology (86%). Thirteen patients with uterine LMS were treated with PARPis in the recurrent/metastatic therapy setting (54% combination therapy regimens) with an overall response rate (ORR) of 46% (1 of 6 for PARPi monotherapy, 5 of 7 for PARPi combination regimens), a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of 62%, and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 13.2 months (range, 1.0-71.9). The median PFS ratio compared with previous systemic therapy was 1.9 (range, 0.4-53.9), and 58% had a PFS ratio of ≥1.3. The median time on PARPi was 14.5 months (range, 1.3-71.9). The ORR for patients with somatic BRCA2 deletions was 60% (n = 6 of 10), with a CBR of 80% (n = 8 of 10). One patient with metastatic disease and progression on previous hormonal and chemotherapy demonstrated a complete response to PARP/PD-L1 inhibitor combination therapy, ongoing for 70+ months.

PARPis demonstrate promising efficacy in patients with uterine LMS with somatic BRCA2 deletions.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, talazoparib, rucaparib, and niraparib, comprise a therapeutic class that targets PARP proteins involved in DNA repair. Cancer cells with homologous recombination repair defects, particularly BRCA alterations, display enhanced sensitivity to these agents because of synthetic lethality induced by PARP inhibitors. These agents have significantly improved survival outcomes across various malignancies, initially gaining regulatory approval in ovarian cancer and subsequently in breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers in different indications. This review offers a comprehensive clinical overview of PARP inhibitor approvals, emphasizing their efficacy across different cancers based on landmark phase 3 clinical trials.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a highly lethal malignancy with limited therapeutic options and poor overall survival. In recent years, advances in genomic profiling have revealed the complex molecular and cellular heterogeneity of PDAC, offering new avenues for therapeutic intervention.

This review explores emerging therapeutic strategies targeting dysregulated molecular pathways, along with the tumor microenvironment, that have shown promise in overcoming drug resistance. Novel immunotherapy strategies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cell therapies, are currently being explored in an attempt to modulate PDAC immugnosuppressive microenvironment. Additionally, we highlight recent clinical trials over the last 5 years and innovative therapeutic strategies aiming to improve outcomes in PDAC.

Significant progress in genomic profiling, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy is shaping the treatment of PDAC. Despite challenges posed by its dense stroma and immune suppressive microenvironment, novel strategies such as IL 6 and CD137 inhibitors, CAR-T, and therapeutic cancer vaccines are promising. KRAS targeted therapies are expanding beyond G12C inhibitors, with novel drugs in development that will further improve treatment options. Additionally, tumor treating fields (TTF) are being investigated in locally advanced PDAC, with the PANOVA-3 trial potentially integrating this modality into future treatment strategies. Continued advancements in these areas will significantly enhance PDAC outcomes.

Cells deficient in DNA repair factors breast cancer susceptibility 1/2 (BRCA1/2) or ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) are sensitive to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Building on our previous findings, we asked how the lysine methyltransferase SETD1A contributed to PARP inhibitor-mediated cell death in these contexts and determined the mechanisms responsible.

We used cervical, breast, lung and ovarian cancer cells bearing mutations in BRCA1 or ATM and depleted SETD1A using siRNA or CRISPR/Cas9. We assessed the effects of the PARPi Olaparib on cell viability, homologous recombination, and DNA repair. We assessed underlying transcriptional perturbations using RNAseq. We used The Cancer Genomics Atlas (TCGA) and DepMap to investigate patient survival and cancer cell characteristics.

Loss of SETD1A from both BRCA1-deficient and ATM-deficient cancer cells was associated with resistance to Olaparib, explained by partial restoration of homologous recombination. Mechanistically, SETD1A-dependent transcription of the crossover junction endonuclease EME1 correlated with sensitivity to Olaparib in these cells. Accordingly, when SETD1A or EME1 was lost, BRCA1 or ATM-mutated cells became resistant to Olaparib, and homologous recombination was partially restored.

Loss of SETD1A or EME1 drives cellular resistance to Olaparib in certain genetic contexts and may help explain why patients develop resistance to PARP inhibitors in the clinic.

Disulfidptosis, a novel form of metabolism-related regulated cell death, is a promising intervention for cancer therapeutic intervention. Although aberrant expression of long-chain noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) expression has been associated with pancreatic carcinoma (PC) development, the biological properties and prognostic potential of disulfidptosis-related lncRNAs (DRLs) remain unclear.

We obtained RNA-seq data, clinical data, and genomic mutations of PC from the TCGA database, and then determined DRLs. We developed a risk score model and analyzed the role of risk score in the predictive ability, immune cell infiltration, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity.

We finally established a prognostic model including three DRLs (AP005233.2, FAM83A-AS1, and TRAF3IP2-AS1). According to Kaplan-Meier curve analysis, the survival time of patients in the low-risk group was significantly longer than that in the high-risk group. Based on enrichment analysis, significant associations between metabolic processes and differentially expressed genes were assessed in two risk groups. In addition, we observed significant differences in the tumor immune microenvironment landscape. Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Rejection (TIDE) analysis showed no statistically significant likelihood of immune evasion in both risk groups. Patients exhibiting both high risk and high tumor mutation burden (TMB) had the poorest survival times, while those falling into the low risk and low TMB categories showed the best prognosis. Moreover, the risk group identified by the 3-DRLs profile showed significant drug sensitivity.

Our proposed 3-DRLs-based feature could serve as a promising tool for predicting the prognosis, immune landscape, and treatment response of PC patients, thus facilitating optimal clinical decision-making.

The use of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) revolutionized the treatment of BRCA-mutated cancers. Identifying patients exhibiting homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has been proved useful to predict PARPi efficacy. However, obtaining HRD status remains an arduous task due to its evolution over the time. This causes HRD status to become obsolete when obtained from genomic scars, rendering PARPi ineffective for these patients. Only two HRD tests are currently FDA-approved, both based on genomic scars detection and BRCA mutations testing. Nevertheless, new technologies for obtaining an increasingly reliable HRD status continue to evolve. Application of these tests in clinical practice is an additional challenge due to the need for lower costs and shorter time to results delay.In this review, we describe the currently available methods for HRD testing, including the methodologies and corresponding tests for assessing HRD status, and discuss the clinical routine application of these tests and their technical validation.

With fatal malignant peculiarities and poor survival rate, outcomes of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) were frustrated by non-response and even resistance to therapy due to heterogeneity across clinical patients. Nevertheless, pharmacogenomics has been developed for individualized-treatment and still maintains obscure in PAAD.

A total of 964 samples from 10 independent multi-center cohorts were enrolled in our study. With drug response data from the profiling of relative inhibition simultaneously in mixtures (PRISM) and genomics of drug sensitivity in cancer (GDSC) databases, we established and validated multidimensionally three pharmacogenomics-classified subtypes using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) and nearest template prediction (NTP) algorithms, separately. The heterogenous biological characteristics and precision medicine strategies among subtypes were further investigated.

Three pharmacogenomics-classified subtypes after stable and reproducible validation, distinguished in six aspects of prognosis, biological peculiarities, immune landscapes, genomic variations, immunotherapy and individualized management strategies. Subtype 2 was close to immunocompetent phenotype and projected to immunotherapy; Subtype 3 held most favorable outcomes and metabolic pathways distinctively, promising to be treated with first-line agents. Subtype 1 with worst prognosis, was anticipated to chromosome instability (CIN) phenotype and resistant to chemotherapeutic agents. In addition, ITGB6 contributed to subtype 1 resistance to 5-fluorouracil, and knockdown of ITGB6 enhanced sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in in vitro experiments. Ultimately, appropriate clinical stratified treatments were assigned to corresponding subtypes according to pharmacogenomic transcripts. Some limitations were not taken into account, thus needs to be supported by more research.

A span-new molecular subtype exploited for PAAD uncovered an insight into precise medication on ground of pharmacogenomics, and highly refined multiple clinical management strategies for specific patients.

Patients with unresectable upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers have limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Although phase I trials provide access to novel therapies, their benefits in this population are unclear.

We aimed to assess efficacy and survival outcomes of patients with refractory UGI cancers within phase I trials.

We conducted a retrospective pooled analysis of phase I trials enrolling patients with advanced UGI cancers who received at least one dose of the study drug at SCRI UK between 2011 and 2023.

Efficacy and survival outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed. Analyses were conducted for the entire cohort and stratified by trial agent class, molecularly matched therapy allocation and receipt of the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Patients participating in multiple trials were analysed separately for each study.

From 1796 screened patients, 124 with UGI cancers were included in 37 phase I trials. Most were male (75%), with liver or peritoneal metastases (73%), treated with a median of 2 prior therapy lines. Of these, 60% received immunotherapy, 30% small molecules and 10% antibody-drug conjugates. Molecularly matched therapy was given to 22% and 86% received treatment at RP2D. In response-evaluable patients, ORR was 15%, CBR 40%, DCR 86% and median OS was 9.7 months. Treatment at RP2D was significantly associated with higher CBR (odds ratio 4.75, p = 0.04) and prolonged PFS (p = 0.04). Depth of response and treatment at RP2D were independent prognostic factors.

Participation in phase I trials offers benefits in refractory upper gastrointestinal cancers with compelling results in late-line settings and potential early access to new therapies.

Pancreatic cancer remains a deadly disease with a low survival rate specifically if diagnosed at later stages. Surgery is one of the mainstay treatments for early stage disease but is accompanied by significant mortality and morbidity even in high volume centers. In the present study we wanted to determine the influence of pre-operative weight loss, BMI and liver function tests on postoperative outcomes.

Data for patients who underwent pancreatic surgery at the American University of Beirut Medical Center between 1998 and 2017 were analyzed. The data included patient demographics, pathologic diagnosis, stage, nodal involvement, tumor grade, surgical margin, type of adjuvant therapy, liver function tests and post-operative complications. The correlation and p-value were determined by the chi-square test with p-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

The analysis included 236 patients. 63% were males and mean age was 60 years. A total of 96 (41%) patients had significant weight loss prior to surgery and 173 (31%) had a BMI > 30 kg/m2 which were considered obese. Obesity and significant weight loss were associated with increased risk of post-operative complications (P = 0.013 and P = 0.004, respectively). Transaminases and cholestatic liver enzymes were not associated with post-operative complications.

Assessment and management of nutritional status particularly weight loss and BMI prior to pancreatic cancer surgery may influence postoperative outcomes in this patient population.

Interpretation of variants identified during genetic testing is a significant clinical challenge. In this study, we developed a high-throughput CDKN2A functional assay and characterized all possible CDKN2A missense variants. We found that 17.7% of all missense variants were functionally deleterious. We also used our functional classifications to assess the performance of in silico models that predict the effect of variants, including recently reported models based on machine learning. Notably, we found that all in silico models performed similarly when compared to our functional classifications with accuracies of 39.5-85.4%. Furthermore, while we found that functionally deleterious variants were enriched within ankyrin repeats, we did not identify any residues where all missense variants were functionally deleterious. Our functional classifications are a resource to aid the interpretation of CDKN2A variants and have important implications for the application of variant interpretation guidelines, particularly the use of in silico models for clinical variant interpretation.

Currently, those recommended to undergo pancreatic cancer (PC) surveillance include appropriately aged individuals at high risk of PC due to an identifiable genetic susceptibility or those without identifiable genetic susceptibility who nonetheless have a strong family history of PC. With increases in identification of individuals at high risk for PC and increased use of PC surveillance in clinical practice, there has been increasing debate about who should undergo surveillance as well as how surveillance should be performed including use of imaging and blood-based testing. Furthermore, there is increasing interest in the outcomes of PC surveillance in high-risk individuals with some studies demonstrating that surveillance leads to downstaging of PC and improvements in survival. In this review, we summarize the current state of PC surveillance in high-risk individuals, providing an overview of the risk factors associated with PC, selection of high-risk individuals for PC surveillance, and the current, but non-uniform, recommendations for performing PC surveillance. Additionally, we review approaches to apply various imaging and blood-based tests to surveillance and the outcomes of PC surveillance.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, and its global burden has increased significantly over the past few years. The incidence of pancreatic cancer has also increased in the United States, and most of this increase is attributed to the population's aging process in addition to the rise in the prevalence of risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol intake. Most patients with pancreatic cancer present with advanced unresectable or metastatic disease. Only a few patients present at an early stage with localized disease, and a multidisciplinary approach is required to maximize survival and outcomes. The surgical approach is an option for localized disease, and surgery's safety and efficacy have also been improved in recent years due to the increasing use of minimally invasive surgical techniques. Moreover, systematic chemotherapy has also been used and has had a significant impact on survival. More recently, neoadjuvant therapy has been used for pancreatic cancer along with radiation therapy, optimizing survival among those patients. Targeted therapies have been introduced based on genetic testing in metastatic pancreatic cancer and have shown promising results. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents such as PARP inhibitors and vaccines have emerged with optimal results in terms of survival. To conclude, pancreatic cancer is considered a disease with poor long-term survival; however, recent developments in pharmacotherapy have changed its treatment and have improved outcomes with improved survival. Our review summarizes ongoing therapeutic options for local and metastatic pancreatic cancer. It also summarizes new state-of-the-art therapies that have emerged or are in trials, which can change the pancreatic cancer treatment perspective.

The introduction of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPi) has completely changed the treatment landscape of breast cancer susceptibility 1-2 (BRCA1-BRCA2)-mutant cancers and generated a new avenue of research in the fields of DNA damage response and cancer therapy. Despite this, primary and secondary resistances to PARPi have become a challenge in the clinic, and novel therapies are urgently needed to address this problem. After two decades of research, a unifying model explaining sensitivity of cancer cells to PARPi is still missing. Here, we review the current knowledge in the field and the increasing evidence pointing to a crucial role for replicative gaps in mediating sensitization to PARPi in BRCA-mutant and 'wild-type' cancer cells. Finally, we discuss the challenges to be addressed to further improve the utilization of PARPi and tackle the emergence of resistance in the clinical context.

Mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAm) and other homologous recombination repair genes (HRRm) are associated with several cancers. We evaluated the prevalence and association with overall survival (OS) of somatic BRCAm and HRRm among patients with advanced solid tumors.

We used deidentified data from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative dataset derived from patients with tumors genotyped using next-generation sequencing between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years diagnosed with non-small-cell lung, colorectal, breast, bladder, prostate, or pancreatic cancer, with documented BRCA/HRR somatic mutation status. The primary analysis was OS (censored at the start of poly[ADP ribose] polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]/immunotherapy) after initiation of second-line therapy since most patients had sequencing after first-line therapy.

Among eligible patients, 242/7022 (3.4%) had BRCAm and 477/5474 (8.7%) had HRRm. Adjusted OS HRs (95% CI) for the primary analysis (using the initiation of second-line therapy as index date) were 0.79 (0.61-1.03) with/without BRCAm (n = 116/n = 3394) and 0.83 (0.69-0.99) with/without HRRm (n = 247/n = 2656); in sensitivity analysis of patients with stage IV disease, HRs were 0.97 (0.68-1.38) with/without BRCAm (n = 58/n = 1847) and 0.92 (0.73-1.18) with/without HRRm (n = 132/n = 1488).

Overall, BRCAm and HRRm did not show a strong association with OS, with a trend toward longer OS among patients receiving standard second-line therapies excluding PARPi/immunotherapy.

We provide a comprehensive tumor-intrinsic kinome landscape that provides a roadmap for the use of kinase inhibitors in PDAC treatment approaches.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly aggressive and often lethal malignancy, requiring the development of enhanced therapeutic approaches. The DNA damage response (DDR) pathway is frequently altered during PDAC development, leading to an increased occurrence of DNA damage. DNA topoisomerase II-binding protein 1 (TOPBP1) plays a supportive role in regulating the DDR pathway, and its overexpression has been linked to the tumorigenesis of various cancers. This study investigated the biological role of TOPBP1 in PDAC pathogenesis and evaluated its clinical relevance in guiding treatment regimens. We examined the relationship between TOPBP1 expression, DDR pathway modulation, and therapeutic response in PDAC cell lines, primary cells, and subcutaneous mouse models. We found that elevated TOPBP1 expression was positively correlated with increased histologic grade and reduced patient survival in PDAC. TOPBP1 knockdown increased the sensitivity of PDAC cells to olaparib treatment and improved therapeutic efficacy in both PDAC cell lines and subcutaneous mouse models. Combination treatment with olaparib and AZD6738 effectively induced P53-dependent apoptosis via inhibiting the ATR pathway and enhancing signaling through the ATM pathway, which significantly reduced the viability of pancreatic cell lines. Notably, this combination therapy was more effective in PDAC cell lines exhibiting high TOPBP1 expression, indicating that TOPBP1 may serve as a useful predictive biomarker. In conclusion, TOPBP1 is a potential marker for optimizing the olaparib and AZD6738 combination therapy in PDAC. This study highlights the clinical significance of TOPBP1 in the treatment of PDAC and emphasizes the potential implications for a broader population of patients.

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been licensed for the maintenance therapy of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer carrying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. However, mutations in BRCA1/2 are notably rare in pancreatic cancer.

There is a significant unmet clinical need to broaden the utility of PARPi.

RNA sequencing was performed to screen potential targets for PARPi sensitivity. The synthetic lethal effects were verified in patient-derived xenograft (PDX), xenograft and patient-derived organoid models. Mechanisms were explored via LC‒MS/MS, coimmunoprecipitation, laser microirradiation, immunofluorescence, the homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) reporter system, in situ proximity ligation assay and live-cell time-lapse imaging analyses.

Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) is an exploitable vulnerability. TPX2 was downregulated in PDX models sensitive to PARPi, and TPX2 inhibition conferred synthetic lethality to PARPi both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, TPX2 functions in a cell cycle-dependent manner. In the S/G2 phase, ATM-mediated TPX2 S634 phosphorylation promotes BRCA1 recruitment to double-strand breaks (DSBs) for HR repair, whereas non-phosphorylated TPX2 interacts with 53BP1 to recruit it for NHEJ. The balance between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated TPX2 determines the DSB repair pathway choice. During mitosis, TPX2 phosphorylation enhances Aurora A activity, promoting mitotic progression and chromosomal stability. Targeting TPX2 S634 phosphorylation with a cell-penetrating peptide causes genomic instability and mitotic catastrophe and enhances PARPi sensitivity. Additionally, the inhibition of TPX2 or S634 phosphorylation combined with gemcitabine further sensitised pancreatic cancer to PARPi.

Our findings revealed the dual-functional significance of TPX2 in controlling DNA DSB repair pathway choice and mitotic progression, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy involving PARPi for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Recently, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has become a new target for hereditary cancers. Molecular-based approaches for hereditary cancers in the clinical setting have been reviewed. In particular, the efficacy of the PARP inhibitor has been considered by several clinical trials for various kinds of hereditary cancers. This indicates that the PARP inhibitor can be effective for any kind of BRCA mutated cancers, regardless of the organ-specific cancer. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has become a new target for hereditary cancers, indicating the necessity to confirm the status of HRD-related genes. ARID1A, ATM, ATRX, PALB2, BARD1, RAD51C and CHEK2 are known as HRD-related genes for which simultaneous examination as part of panel testing is more suitable. Both surgical and medical oncologists should learn the basis of genetics including HRD. An understanding of the basic mechanism of homologous repair recombination (HRR) in BRCA-related breast cancer is mandatory for all surgical or medical oncologists because PARP inhibitors may be effective for these cancers and a specific strategy of screening for non-cancers exists. The clinical behavior of each gene should be clarified based on a large-scale database in the future, or, in other words, on real-world data. Firstly, HRD-related genes should be examined when the hereditary nature of a cancer is placed in doubt after an examination of the relevant family history. Alternatively, HRD score examination is a solution by which to identify HRD-related genes at the first step. If lifetime risk is estimated at over 20%, an annual breast MRI is necessary for high-risk screening. However, there are limited data to show its benefit compared with BRCA. Therefore, a large-scale database, including clinical information and a long-term follow-up should be established, after which a periodical assessment is mandatory. The clinical behavior of each gene should be clarified based on a large-scale database, or, in other words, real-world data.

Molecular profiling is increasingly implemented to guide treatment of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), especially when for clinical trials enrollment. This study aimed to describe actionable alterations detected in KRAS mutated (KRASm) versus KRAS wild-type (KRASwt) PDAC, the latter group being considered enriched in molecular alterations.

This prospective monocentric study included patients with locally advanced or metastatic PDAC who underwent next-generation sequencing (NGS) on liquid biopsy and/or tissue samples between 2015 and 2023, as part of the BIP academic study (NCT02534649). Actionable alterations were classified using the ESCAT (ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of molecular Targets).

A total of 378 patients with a PDAC underwent NGS: 73 on tissue samples, 162 on liquid biopsies, and 143 on both tissue and liquid. Liquid biopsies had a 59.3 % performance (181 informative samples out of 305). Among 318 informative NGS samples, 273 (86 %) were KRASm, and 45 (14 %) were KRASwt. Median overall survival (OS) was 19.35 in KRASwt patients and 16.89 months for KRASm patients (HR 0.67, 95 %CI (0.49-0.90), p = 0.02). ESCAT alterations were found in 15.7 % of total population, with 31.1 % in KRASwt tumors and 13.2 % in KRASm tumors. BRCA1/2 mutations were identified in 7.5 % of the population, and one NTRK fusion was found in a KRASwt PDAC. The molecular tumor board considered 71 patients (22.3 %) eligible for early-phase trials, with 14 treated with matched therapy.

Although actionable mutations were more frequent in KRASwt tumors, 13.2 % of KRASm PDAC harbored ESCAT alterations, emphasizing the importance of molecular profiling regardless of KRAS status.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis; however, advancements in cancer genome profiling using next-generation sequencing have provided new perspectives. KRAS mutations are the most frequently observed genomic alterations in patients with PDAC. However, until recently, it was not considered a viable therapeutic target. Although KRAS G12C mutations for which targeted therapies are already available are infrequent in PDAC, treatments targeting KRAS G12D and pan-KRAS are still under development. Similarly, new treatment methods for KRAS, such as chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, have been developed. Several other potential therapeutic targets have been identified for KRAS wild-type PDAC. For instance, immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in PDAC treatment with microsatellite instability-high/deficient mismatch repair and tumor mutation burden-high profiles. However, for other PDAC cases with low immunogenicity, combination therapies that enhance the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors are being considered. Additionally, homologous recombination repair deficiencies, including BRCA1/2 mutations, are prevalent in PDAC and serve as important biomarkers for therapies involving poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and platinum-based therapies. Currently, olaparib is available for maintenance therapy of BRCA1/2 mutation-positive PDAC. Further therapeutic developments are ongoing for genetic abnormalities involving BRAF V600E and the fusion genes RET, NTRK, NRG, ALK, FGFR2, and ROS1. Overcoming advanced PDAC remains a formidable challenge; however, this review outlines the latest therapeutic strategies that are expected to lead to significant advancements.

Pancreatic cancer arising in the context of BRCA predisposition may benefit from poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We analyzed real-world data on the impact of olaparib on survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer patients harboring germline BRCA mutations in Italy, where olaparib is not reimbursed for this indication.