Simultaneous inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (NAMPT) has been shown to be synergistically effective against breast cancer susceptibility (BRCA) wild-type triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) through synthetic lethality, which may be explored to broaden the clinical utility of PARP inhibitors. Herein, we report the discovery of dual PARP/NAMPT inhibitors through a pharmacophore linking approach. The lead compound 13j with potent inhibitory activity against both PARP1 and NAMPT (IC50 = 0.8 and 18 nM, respectively) effectively inhibited the proliferation of TNBC MDA-MB-231 cells with wild-type BRCA at submicromolar level. Mechanically, 13j disrupted the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway, caused the accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and ultimately induced apoptotic cell death. In addition, this compound exhibited potent inhibitory potency on the migration of MDA-MB-231 cells. This study demonstrates that compound 13j is a promising lead compound for the development of better PARP/NAMPT inhibitors to treat TNBC with wild-type BRCA.

The histone deacetylase inhibitor pracinostat (SB939) may inhibit metastasis of triple-negative breast cancer by downregulating fibronectin (FN1) expression through the STAT3 signaling pathway. SB939 exhibits low cytotoxicity and is a potential targeted agent against breast cancer. The present study investigated the value of STAT3 and FN1 as breast cancer treatment targets and integrated cancer databases and bioinformatics tools to evaluate the effect of SB939 on breast cancer metastasis. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis, Gene Expression Database of Normal and Tumor Tissues 2, The University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer data analysis portal, GeneMANIA, Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins, LinkedOmics and Tumor Immune Estimation Resource databases were used in the present study. SB939 inhibited enrichment of the STAT3 pathway and decreased the expression of FN1. FN1 and STAT3 expression was markedly higher in breast cancer tissues compared with normal tissues. Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated that increased expression of STAT3 and FN1 was associated with low survival in patients with breast cancer with overall, recurrence-free and disease-specific survival and FN1 having the strongest association with MMP2, which facilitating extracellular matrix degradation and metastatic niche formation. Furthermore, MMP2 exhibits crosstalk STAT3 to induce metastasis of breast cancer cells. To conclude, SB939 may be used as a small molecule compound for the clinical treatment of breast cancer.

Race/ethnicity may affect outcomes in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) due to biological and social determinants. We evaluated the impact of race/ethnicity on clinical, socioeconomic, and genomic characteristics, clinical trial participation, and receipt of genotype-matched therapy among patients with MBC.

A retrospective study of patients with MBC who underwent cell-free DNA testing (cfDNA, Guardant360, 74 gene panel) between 11/2016 and 11/2020 was conducted. Receipt of genotype-matched therapy targeted at a cfDNA actionable mutation was determined. Pearson χ2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare categorical and continuous variables between groups. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association of race and receiving matched therapy.

A total of 425 patients with MBC and cfDNA results were identified (White: 369, Black: 27, Hispanic: 15, and Asian: 14). White patients traveled further for cancer care than other groups (P < 0.001). White patients had the highest rates of commercial insurance, Black patients had the highest rates of state-supported insurance, and Asian patients had the highest uninsured rates (P < 0.001). Clinical trial enrollment did not differ by race/ethnicity (P = 0.34). The proportion of patients with ≥1 actionable mutation in cfDNA did not vary by race/ethnicity (P = 0.18). The highest rates of matched therapy were observed in White patients (P < 0.001). After multivariable logistic regression adjusting for subtype, commercial versus other insurance, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and distance to center, White patients remained more likely to receive matched therapy (P = 0.024).

Racial/ethnic minority patients were less likely to receive matched therapy. Further research is needed to identify barriers to precision medicine.

Despite the impressive improvements achieved by endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and the forthcoming availability of alternative endocrine manipulations and targeted therapies, hormone-receptor positive/HER2 negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) is almost inevitably destined to become endocrine- refractory. At this time chemotherapy has been recently challenged and partly replaced by new targeted options as antibody-drug conjugated (ADCs). Trastuzumab-deruxtecan has been proven meaningfully superior to chemotherapy either in 1st and later lines after progression to CDK4/6i in HER2-low ABC and results with other ADCs as Sacituzumab Govitecan and Datopotamab-deruxtecan are promising, but the definition of cross-resistance between these drugs sharing either antibody or payload is crucial before implementing them in a useful sequence. While PARP inhibitors are the standard 2nd line in patients with gBRCA mutation, it is not still known whether patients with mutations of PALB2 or of other homologous recombinant defect (HRD)-related genes will benefit of the same treatment. On the other hand, the results obtained with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in HR+ /HER2-ABC contrarily to the early setting are disappointing up to now, but investigations of ICIs in combination with other targeted drugs which may increase immune response and the search for better markers of activity are under way. Moreover the anticipation in upfront treatment of ADCs or PARPi in patients with features of putative endocrine resistance and/or of less sensitiviy to CDK4/6i and the choice of therapy in patients recurring during or soon after adjuvant CDK4/6i and olaparib represent further challenges for the future.

This study evaluates real-world outcomes, toxicities, and prescribing patterns of PARP inhibitors (PARPis) for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Electronic health records of 62 MBC patients treated with olaparib (n = 48) or talazoparib (n = 14) at Mayo Clinic System between 2017 and 2022 were analyzed. Time-to-treatment-failure (TTF) was assessed utilizing the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of TTF were identified in a multivariate Cox-proportional hazard regression model adjusting for relevant tumor and demographic characteristics.

Among 62 patients who received PARPis for MBC, 55 had germline (g) pathogenic variants (PVs) (gBRCA1 = 24, gBRCA2 = 26, and gPALB2 = 4) and 8 patients had somatic (s) PVs (sBRCA1 = 4, sBRCA2 = 2, sATM = 1, sCDKN2A = 1). Median TTF in the gBRCA1, gBRCA2, and gPALB2 PV carriers were 7, 8, and 9 months, respectively (P = .37). Complete or partial responses were observed among 51.8% of patients with gBRCA or gPALB2 PVs. In multivariate analysis, HER2 positivity (hazard ratio, HR: 4.9, P = .007) and somatic PVs in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes other than BRCA (sATM or sCDKN2A) (HR: 11.7, P = .01) were associated with a shorter TTF. No significant difference in TTF was observed by the type of PARPi, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, age, or number of prior therapies. Eight (16.7%) patients receiving olaparib and seven (50%) receiving talazoparib required dose reductions due to toxicities.

In real-world practice, PARPis are well-tolerated with promising TTF in gBRCA1/2 and gPALB2 carriers. Further studies will delineate the clinical efficacy of PARPis in other MBC subsets, such as sBRCA mutations, HER2-positive disease, and CNS metastasis.

Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are approved for Breast Cancer gene (BRCA)-mutant HER2- breast cancer, and there is clinical interest in expanding indications to include homologous recombination deficient (HRD) breast cancers. Yet, response in these populations remains variable, suggesting clinical utility in developing a better biomarker to select patients for PARPi and predict response. Here, we evaluate a radiolabeled PARPi, [18F]FluorThanatrace ([18F]FTT), as a functional biomarker of PARPi response in breast cancer.

A single-arm prospective observational trial was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania. [18F]FTT-PET uptake was measured in 24 women with untreated primary breast cancer and correlated with tumor HRD score. In a separate cohort of ten subjects with metastatic HER- breast cancer, [18F]FTT-PET uptake was measured at baseline and after a short interval on a PARPi (a measure of drug-target engagement) and correlated to progression free survival (PFS).

Here we show that baseline [18F]FTT-PET uptake does not correlate to HRD tissue score, supporting that [18F]FTT provides distinct information from genetic features. Baseline [18F]FTT-PET uptake and the change in uptake from baseline to after PARPi initiation significantly correlates to PFS in woman with breast cancer who received a PARPi (ρ = 0.74, P = 0.023 and ρ = -0.86, P = 0.012, respectively).

These early results suggest the potential of [18F]FTT-PET to select patients for PARPi treatment and monitor in vivo pharmacodynamics after therapy start. Absence of association with HRD scores supports [18F]FTT uptake as a novel measure that may be leveraged as a biomarker. Further studies are warranted.

Matched targeted therapies (MTT) given alone or in combination with systemic anti-cancer therapies have delivered proven survival benefit for many people with newly diagnosed cancer. However, there is little evidence of their effectiveness in the recurrent or late-stage setting. With this uncertainty, alongside the perception that late-stage cancers are too genetically heterogenous or too mutationally diverse to benefit from matched targeted therapies, next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumours in people with refractory cancer remains a low priority. As a result, next-generation sequencing testing of recurrent or late-stage disease is discouraged. We lack evidence to support the utility of next generation sequencing in guiding matched targeted therapies in this setting.

To evaluate the benefits and harms of matched targeted therapies in people with advanced cancers in randomised controlled trials.

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the World Health Organisation International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO-ICTRP) search portal up to 30th October 2024. We also screened reference lists of included studies and also the publications that cited these studies.

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that had enroled participants with advanced/refractory solid or haematological cancers who had progressed through at least one line of standard anti-cancer systemic therapy. To be eligible, all participants should have received matched targeted therapy based on next-generation sequencing carried out on their tumour (tumour tissue, blood or bone marrow).

We systematically searched medical databases (e.g. MEDLINE, Embase) and trial registers for randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rates (ORR), serious (grade 3 or 4) adverse events (AEs) and quality of life (QOL). We used a random-effects model to pool outcomes across studies and compared predefined subgroups using interaction tests. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment of certainty was used to evaluate the quality of evidence.

We identified a total of 37 studies, out of which 35 studies (including 9819 participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All included studies compared a matched targeted therapy intervention to standard-of-care treatment, non-matched targeted therapies or no treatment (best supportive care): Matched targeted therapy versus standard-of-care treatment Matched targeted therapy (MTT) compared with standard systematic therapy probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 34% (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59 to 0.74; 14 studies, 3848 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, MTT might have little to no difference in risk of death (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.97; 14 studies, 3848 participants; low-certainty evidence) and may increase overall response rates (low-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in severe (grade 3/4) adverse events between matched targeted therapy and standard-of-care treatment (low-certainty evidence). There was limited evidence of a difference in quality of life between groups (very low-certainty of evidence). Matched targeted therapy in combination with standard-of-care treatment versus standard-of-care treatment alone Matched targeted therapy in combination with standard-of-care treatment compared with standard-of-care treatment alone probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 39% (HR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.53-0.70, 14 studies, 2,637 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and risk of death by 21% (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.70 to 0.89; 11 studies, 2575 participants, moderate-certainty evidence). The combination of MTT and standard-of-care treatment may also increase overall response rates (low-certainty evidence). There was limited evidence of a difference in the incidence of severe adverse events (very low-certainty evidence) and quality of life between the groups (very low-certainty of evidence). Matched targeted therapy versus non-matched targeted therapy Matched targeted therapy compared with non-matched targeted therapy probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 24% (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.89; 3 studies, 1568 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and may reduce the risk of death by 25% (HR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.86, 1307 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was little to no effect on overall response rates between MTT and non-MTT. There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall response rates (low-certainty evidence) and severe adverse events between MTT and non-MTT (low-certainty evidence). None of the studies comparing MTT and non-MTT reported quality of life. Matched targeted therapy versus best supportive care Matched targeted therapy compared with the best supportive care (BSC) i.e. no active treatment probably reduces the risk of disease progression by 63% (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.50; 4 studies, 858 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall survival between groups (HR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.06, 3 studies, 783 participants; low-certainty evidence). There was no clear evidence of a difference in overall response rates (very low-certainty of evidence) and incidence of severe adverse events (very low-certainty of evidence) between the groups. Quality of life was reported in a single study but did not provide composite scores. Risk of bias The overall risk of bias was judged low for eight studies, unclear for two studies, and the remaining 27 studies were high risk.

Matched targeted therapies guided by next-generation sequencing in people with advanced cancer prolongs the time before cancer progresses compared to standard therapies. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that it prolongs overall survival, improves the quality of life or increases adverse events. Importantly, this review supports equitable access to next-generation sequencing technology for all people with advanced cancer and offers them the opportunity to access genotype-matched targeted therapies.

Olaparib exhibits antitumor effects in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients with germline mutations in DNA repair genes. We previously reported that simvastatin reduced the expression of DNA repair genes in PC-3 cells. The efficacy of combination therapy using olaparib and simvastatin as "BRCAness" in castration-resistant and taxane-resistant prostate cancers was evaluated in this study.

PC-3, LNCaP, and 22Rv1 human prostate cancer cell lines were used to develop androgen-independent LNCaP cells (LNCaP-LA). mRNA and protein expression levels were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and western blot analysis, respectively. Cell viability was determined using the MTS assay and cell counts. All evaluations were performed on cells treated with simvastatin with or without olaparib.

The mRNA levels of BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51, FANCD2, FANCG, FANCA, BARD1, RFC3, RFC4, and RFC5, which are known DNA repair genes, were downregulated by simvastatin in androgen-independent prostate cancer cells, such as PC-3, LNCaP-LA, and 22Rv1 cells. In contrast, the expression of all these genes remained unchanged in androgen-dependent LNCaP cells following treatment with simvastatin. Furthermore, simvastatin increased the expression of above stated genes in normal prostate stromal cells (PrSC). The reduction in BRCA1 and BRCA2 expression following siRNA transfection increased the cytocidal effects of Olaparib in PC-3 and LNCaP-LA cells. The combination of olaparib and simvastatin further inhibited cell proliferation compared to monotherapy with either drug in PC-3, 22Rv1, and LNCaP-LA cells but not in PrSC cells. In a 22Rv1-derived mouse xenograft model, the combination of olaparib and simvastatin enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation. Moreover, we established a 22Rv1 cell line with acquired resistance to Cabazitaxel (22Rv1-CR). In 22Rv1-CR cells, simvastatin also decreased the expression of BRCA1, BRCA2, and FANCA, and the combination of olaparib and simvastatin further enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation compared with treatment with either of the drugs alone.

Simvastatin altered the expression of several genes associated with DNA repair in castration-resistant and taxane-resistant prostate cancer cells. The combination of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and drugs that decrease DNA repair gene expression can potentially affect castration-resistant and taxane-resistant prostate cancer growth.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as critical agents for cancer therapy. By inhibiting the catalytic activity of PARP enzymes and trapping them in the DNA, PARPis disrupt DNA repair, ultimately leading to cell death, particularly in cancer cells with homologous recombination repair deficiencies, such as those harboring BRCA mutations. This review delves into the mechanisms of action of PARPis in anticancer treatments, including the inhibition of DNA repair, synthetic lethality, and replication stress. Furthermore, the clinical applications of PARPis in various cancers and their adverse effects as well as their combinations with other therapies and the mechanisms underlying resistance are summarized. This review provides comprehensive insights into the role and mechanisms of PARP and PARPis in DNA repair, with a particular focus on the potential of PARPi-based therapies in precision medicine for cancer treatment.

Oxidative DNA damage, resulting from endogenous cellular processes and external sources plays a significant role in mutagenesis, cancer progression, and the pathogenesis of neurological disorders. Base Excision Repair (BER) is involved in the repair of base modifications such as oxidations or alkylations as well as single strand breaks. The DNA glycosylase OGG1, initiates the BER pathway by the recognition and excision of 8oxoG, the most common oxidative DNA lesion, in both nuclear and mitochondrial DNA. Beyond DNA repair, OGG1 modulates transcription, particularly pro-inflammatory genes, linking oxidative DNA damage to broader biological processes like inflammation and aging. In cancer therapy, BER inhibition has emerged as a promising strategy to enhance treatment efficacy. Targeting OGG1 sensitizes cells to chemotherapies, radiotherapies, and PARP inhibitors, presenting opportunities to overcome therapy resistance. Additionally, OGG1 activators hold potential in mitigating oxidative damage associated with aging and neurological disorders. This review presents the development of several inhibitors and activators of OGG1 and how they have contributed to advance our knowledge in the fundamental functions of OGG1. We also discuss the new opportunities they provide for clinical applications in treating cancer, inflammation and neurological disorders. Finally, we also highlight the challenges in targeting OGG1, particularly regarding the off-target effects recently reported for some inhibitors and how we can overcome these limitations.

The Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) molecular subtyping and target identification based on Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is of considerable worth for routine use. Yet, literature on this topic is limited worldwide and needs to be enriched with data from different populations.

We assessed the IHC expression of subtyping biomarkers (Cytokeratins 5, 14 and 17, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor, Claudins 3 and 7, E-cadherin, Vimentin and Androgen receptor) and predictive biomarkers (Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) density, Breast Cancer Antigen 1 (BRCA1) and P53) in a cohort of TNBC patients. Clinicopathologic parameters and overall survival (OS) were investigated as well.

The patients were aged 50.11 ± 12.13y (more than 40y in 76.56% of patients), and 23.44% had a BC family history. They were in a non-advanced stage: 51.6% T2 stage, 56.2% negative lymph node involvement, 76.6% without metastasis and 64.1% grade II Scarff-Bloom-Richardson classification (SBR). The IHC subtypes were: 53.1% Basal-like1 (BL1), 6.3% Basal-like2 (BL2), 17.2% Mesenchymal (MES), 9.4% Luminal Androgen Receptor (LAR), 4.7% Mixed subtype and 9.4% "Unclassified" type. The LAR subtype involved the youngest patients (40.17 ± 8.68y, p = 0.02). The "Unclassified" subtype expressed the p53 mutated-type pattern more frequently (100%, p = 0.07). The BRCA1 mutated pattern and TILs infiltration were present in (23.44% and 37.5% of patients, respectively). The OS of the subtypes differed significantly (p = 0.007, log-rank test). The subtypes median OS were, respectively, 15.47 mo. (Unclassified), 18.94 mo. (BL2), 27.23 mo. (MES), 27.28 mo. (Mixed), 30.88 mo. (BL1), and 45.07 mo. (LAR). There was no difference in the OS following age, BRCA1 expression, p53 pattern and TILs density. Though, the OS following the TNM stage was different (p = 0.001). A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that TNM staging and TNBC subtypes, independently influence the OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.017, respectively). Hence, IHC is useful in TNBC subtyping for prognostic purposes and in the identification of therapeutic biomarkers. Further investigation is required to confirm our results and to implement IHC as a routine tool to improve patient's care.

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the signaling pathways implicated in breast cancer (BC), the most prevalent malignancy among women and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Special emphasis is placed on the structural dynamics of protein complexes that are integral to the regulation of these signaling cascades. Dysregulation of cellular signaling is a fundamental aspect of BC pathophysiology, with both upstream and downstream signaling cascade activation contributing to cellular process aberrations that not only drive tumor growth, but also contribute to resistance against current treatments. The review explores alterations within these pathways across different BC subtypes and highlights potential therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways. Additionally, the influence of specific mutations on therapeutic decision-making is examined, underscoring their relevance to particular BC subtypes. The article also discusses both approved therapeutic modalities and ongoing clinical trials targeting disrupted signaling pathways. However, further investigation is necessary to fully elucidate the underlying mechanisms and optimize personalized treatment approaches.

To investigate the performance of an in-house tumor sequencing panel to identify patients with breast cancer and a germline pathogenic variant (gPV).

Retrospective and blinded tumor sequencing analysis in 90 patients with breast cancer and prior germline genetic testing (45 non-carriers and 45 carriers of a gPV) using an in-house panel (VHIO-300). Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of tumor sequencing were calculated. A Cohen's kappa coefficient ≥0.80 was predefined as minimum to be reliably acceptable for clinical implementation.

The cohort included 84 women and 6 men with a median age of 48 years (29-84). Tumors of germline carriers were mainly stage II (47 % vs 31 %, P = 0.047), luminal B-like (56 % vs 31 %, p = 0.037) or triple negative (22 % vs 16 %, = 0.037). The in-house tumor panel identified 91 % (40/44) of the gPV. The analysis did not detect any of the 2 patients with germline large rearrangement alterations nor 2 of the 7 patients with intronic variants included. The tumor sequencing panel yielded 7 % of false positive results (ie, genetic alterations suggestive of germline origin). Hence, S was 91 %, Sp 93 % and Cohen's kappa coefficient between tumor and germline testing was 0.84 (95 % CI 0.73-0.95).

Tumor tissue sequencing with our in-house panel demonstrated an acceptable performance to identify patients with breast cancer carriers of a gPV.

PARP inhibitors are effective in treating ovarian cancer, especially for BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers and those with HRD (homologous recombination deficiency). Concerns over toxicity and costs have led to the search for predictive biomarkers. We present an updated systematic review, expanding on a previous ESMO review on PARP inhibitor biomarkers.

Following ESMO's 2020 review protocol, we extended our search to March 31, 2023, including PubMed and clinical trial data. We also reviewed the reference lists of review articles. We conducted a meta-analysis using a random-effects model to evaluate hazard ratios and assess the predictive potential of biomarkers and the effectiveness of PARP inhibitors in survival.

We found 375 articles, 103 of which were included after screening (62 primary research, 41 reviews). HRD remained the primary biomarker (95%), particularly BRCA1/2 variants (77%). In the non-HRD category, six articles (10%) introduced innovative biomarkers, including ADP-ribosylation, HOXA9 promoter methylation, patient-derived organoids, KELIM, and SLFN11.

Prospective assessment of real-time homologous recombination repair via nuclear RAD51 levels shows promise but needs validation. Emerging biomarkers like ADP-ribosylation, HOXA9 promoter methylation, patient-derived organoids, KELIM, and SLFN11 offer potential but require large-scale validation.

Breast cancer accounts for about 30% of all new female cancers each year, and its incidence is increasing 0.6% per year. An enhanced understanding of the molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis has led to the development of constantly evolving strategies for local and systemic therapies. Perioperative chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and endocrine therapy play pivotal roles in the overall treatment plan. Guidelines on the appropriate use of these drugs in patients undergoing extirpative breast surgery and/or breast reconstruction are lacking. Clear indications for the management of systemic therapies relative to the timing of surgery is crucial to ensure consistent treatment outcomes and to minimize complications. Our purpose is to propose evidence-based recommendations to optimize the perioperative management of systemic therapies in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery and breast reconstructive surgery. In this review, we outline the basic tenets of breast cancer therapies, provide an overview on wound-healing principles, delineate relevant pharmacodynamic concepts, summarize literature and pharmacologic data from various preclinical studies and clinical trials, and propose treatment recommendations. Synopsis: This review proposes evidence-based recommendations regarding systemic therapies management for outcome optimization in the perioperative period in breast cancer patients.

This study aimed to assess current treatment strategies for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) and the perceptions of clinical experts in Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, and Iceland, comparing them to international guidelines to provide insights into how these therapies are implemented and adapted to national Nordic guidelines.

A three-round modified Delphi method was followed with consensus defined as 70% agreement. A steering committee selected 20 experienced oncologists as panellists and developed the questionnaires. Questions included items related to treatment preferences in different treatment lines with different clinical scenarios in mTNBC patients.

In the first round, eight out of 33 questions on clinical treatment reached consensus with 14 out of 27 in the second round reaching consensus. In round three, eight out of eight questions reached consensus. The preferred treatment for mTNBC patients with PD-L1 positive was checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) in combination with chemotherapy. For patients with germline BRCA mutation and PD-L1 negative disease, PARP-inhibitors were preferred as 1L and sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in both 2L and later lines. Disagreement was observed for chemotherapy in later lines where evidence is sparse or lacking.

The high level of consensus for new treatment strategies, such as CPI and PARP-inhibitors in 1L and SG in 2L or later lines, in comparison with the limited consensus for older treatments, such as chemotherapy, may reflect the growing academic evidence for different treatment strategies. Understanding the treatment patterns across different countries contributes to gaining consensus on the upcoming therapeutic advances.

Female breast cancer (FBC) is a well-known public health issue worldwide. However, male breast cancer (MBC), though rare, may be overlooked by both public health authorities and clinicians. Both diseases exhibit similarities, and understanding their behavior over time is crucial to grasping their annual impact on many citizens. Furthermore, analyzing if medical personnel are well allocated and influence disease outcomes in a limited setting such as the Public Health System (PHS) is of utmost importance.

This ecological study utilized secondary data from 2008 to 2020 to explore the relationship between the number of doctors per 100,000 inhabitants and mortality from FBC and MBC in Brazil. All data were sourced from Brazil's PHS. Mortality rates were analyzed by age and standardized according to the World Health Organization's population figures. The number of physicians was calculated per 100,000 inhabitants. A linear regression analysis was performed using a stepwise selection/backward elimination approach.

Between 2008 and 2020, Brazil recorded 195,969 breast cancer-related deaths among adults, including 2,220 male victims. The majority of these deaths occurred in the Southeast region among patients older than 50 years. Although both MBC and FBC demonstrated increasing trends over the study period, no correlation was found between the number of physicians and mortality rates for MBC. Conversely, an increase in primary care physicians over the years was positively correlated with mortality rates for FBC (p < 0.05). In addition, the number of physicians in the PHS (β = -0.163; 95% CI: -0.240 to -0.085; p = 0.002), oncologists (β = -0.507; 95% CI: -0.881 to -0.134; p = 0.015), and radiotherapists (β = -6.402; 95% CI: -12.357 to -0.446; p = 0.039) all showed an inverse association with FBC mortality.

The increasing trends in FBC and MBC underscore the need for urgent monitoring. Lower FBC mortality correlates with higher numbers of physicians and specialized care, highlighting the critical role of healthcare workforce capacity and the strategic allocation of specialized personnel in enhancing patient outcomes.

Guidelines for the first-line treatment of Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced or recurrent breast cancer have shifted to combination therapies of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. However, determining an optimal subsequent therapy following CDK4/6 inhibitor progression remains challenging, especially for tumors lacking actionable mutations. Real-world data suggest that fulvestrant monotherapy is frequently selected in this post-CDK4/6 inhibitor setting. This review examines its therapeutic potential in this evolving landscape. A systematic literature search using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov identified 153 clinical trials published between 2017 and November 2024, from which ten studies met our strict inclusion criteria, focusing solely on fulvestrant monotherapy. These trials encompassed 1038 patients who had prior exposure to CDK4/6 inhibitors. The selected studies were categorized into three groups: monotherapy trials (EMERALD, SERENA-2, AMEERA-3, and ELAINE-1), combination therapy trials (CAPItello-291 and VERONICA), and CDK4/6 inhibitor rechallenge trials (post-MONARCH, PACE, PALMIRA, and MAINTAIN). The median progression-free survival for fulvestrant monotherapy was 3.18 months (range 1.9-5.3 months). Factors affecting the efficacy of fulvestrant monotherapy in second-line therapy include prior treatments, treatment duration, and genetic mutations. Given that the efficacy of fulvestrant was short-lived in the second or subsequent lines, participating in clinical trials is a vital option until a novel alternative treatment choice becomes available.

The randomized GeparOLA trial reported comparable pathologic complete response (pCR) rates with neoadjuvant treatment containing olaparib versus carboplatin. In this study, we evaluate the association between functional homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) by RAD51 foci and pCR and the potential of improving patient selection by combining RAD51 and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.

This is a post hoc blinded biomarker analysis from the randomized GeparOLA trial. Patients with early-stage HER2-negative breast cancer and HRD assessed by Myriad MyChoice or BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations were randomized 1:1 to receive (i) paclitaxel plus olaparib or (ii) paclitaxel plus carboplatin, both followed by epirubicin/cyclophosphamide. Functional HRD was predefined as a RAD51 score ≤10% (RAD51-low).

Overall, 90 of 97 (92.8%) samples were evaluable for RAD51 testing, and 72 of 90 (80.0%) were RAD51-low. The pCR rate in patients with RAD51-low tumors was 66.7% (48/72), whereas it decreased to 22.2% (4/18) in those with RAD51-high. In the multivariable model including clinicopathologic factors and treatment, the RAD51 score remained significantly associated with pCR (OR = 12.03; 95% confidence interval, 2.60-55.73; P = 0.002). Patients with RAD51-low and high stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in their tumors achieved a pCR rate of 75.0% (27/36). Similar results were observed for olaparib or carboplatin. In the exploratory disease-free survival analysis, no differences were observed between RAD51 groups (high vs. low: HR = 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-2.97).

In a preselected population with HRD, according to a genetic test, RAD51 testing identifies patients with different pCR rates under PARP inhibitor-based or platinum-based therapies. Future biomarker-driven studies should consider this information to refine stratification factors and to improve patient selection.

Here, we explore the impact of three decades of BRCA1 research on the lives of mutation carriers and propose strategies to improve the prevention and treatment of BRCA1-associated cancer.

PARP inhibitors are a class of agents that have shown significant preclinical activity in models defective in homologous recombination (HR). The identification of synthetic lethality between HR defects and PARP inhibition led to several clinical trials in tumors with known HR defects (initially mutations in BRCA1/2 genes and subsequently in other genes involved in HR). These studies demonstrated significant responses in breast and ovarian cancers, which are known to have a significant proportion of patients with HR defects. Since the approval of the first PARP inhibitor (PARPi), olaparib, several other inhibitors have been developed, expanding the armamentarium available to clinicians in this setting. The positive results obtained in breast and ovarian cancer have expanded the use of PARPi in other solid tumors with HR defects, including prostate and pancreatic cancer in which these defects have been identified. The clinical trials have demonstrated responses to PARPi which are now also available for the subset of patients with prostate and pancreatic cancer with HR defects. This review summarizes the results obtained in solid tumors with PARPi and their potential use when combined with other agents, including immune checkpoint inhibitors that are likely to further increase the survival of these patients which still needs a dramatic improvement.

We proposed in 2005 that androgens replace oestrogens as the driver steroids in a subgroup of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with androgen receptor (AR) expression called molecular apocrine (MA) or luminal androgen receptor (LAR). Here, we report the analysis of a clinical trial evaluating the antitumour activity of the anti-androgen darolutamide in MA breast cancer. Our aim was to assess the clinical benefit in patients with AR-positive TNBCs defined by immunohistochemistry and by RNA profiling.

In this multicentre, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial, women aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and with advanced TNBC that was previously treated with a maximum of one line of chemotherapy were recruited from 45 hospitals in France. After central confirmation of TNBC status and AR positivity (≥10%; SP107 antibody), participants were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive darolutamide 600 mg orally twice daily or capecitabine minimum 1000 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks on and 1 week off, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, lost to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent. Randomisation was done centrally using the minimisation procedure and was stratified according to the number of previous lines of chemotherapy. Transcriptomic analysis was used to classify tumours into groups with high and low AR activity (MAhigh and MAlow). The primary clinical endpoint was clinical benefit rate at 16 weeks (confirmed complete response, partial response, or stable disease). The primary translational endpoint was clinical benefit rate in the darolutamide group in MAhigh tumours versus all other tumours. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03383679), and is closed to recruitment.

Between April 9, 2018, and July 20, 2021, 254 women were screened and 94 were randomly assigned to darolutamide (n=61) or capecitabine (n=33), of whom 90 were evaluable for efficacy analyses. Median follow-up at the data cutoff on July 20, 2022, was 22·5 months (IQR 16·5-30·5). The clinical benefit rate was 29% (17 of 58; 90% CI 19-39) with darolutamide and 59% (19 of 32; 90% CI 45-74) with capecitabine. In patients treated with darolutamide, the clinical benefit rate was 57% (12 of 21; 95% CI 36-78) in MAhigh tumours, and 16% (five of 31; 95% CI 3-29; p=0·0020) in other tumours. The most common grade 3 adverse events were palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (none of 60 in the darolutamide group vs two [6%] of 33 in the capecitabine group), and headache (three [5%] vs none). No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were observed. Drug-related serious adverse events occurred in three (5%) patients in the darolutamide group and three (9%) in the capecitabine group, which were toxicoderma (n=1) and headache (n=2) in the darolutamide group, and diarrhoea, general physical deterioration, and hepatic cytolysis in the capecitabine group (n=1 each).

This study did not reach its prespecified endpoint for darolutamide activity in patients with triple-negative breast cancer selected on the basis of immunohistochemistry for AR. Further studies selecting patients based on RNA profiling might allow better identification of tumours sensitive to anti-androgens.

Bayer and Fondation Bergonié.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is the key enzyme among other PARPs for post-translational modification of DNA repair proteins. It has four functional domains for DNA-binding, automodification and enzymatic activity. PARP-1 participates in poly-ADP-ribosylation of itself or other proteins during DNA damage response. It recruits reparation machinery proteins that restore native DNA sequence. PARP-1 participates in chromatin structure organization and gene expression regulation. It was shown that PARP-1-dependent regulation mechanisms affect on possible risk of carcinogenesis. Therefore, PARP-1 was proposed as a novel target for cancer treatment. Three generations of PARP-1 inhibitors had been developed depending on pharmacophore structure. To date, four PARP-1 inhibitors have been approved for cancer treatment as a chemotherapy potentiators or as a stand-alone therapy. However, different cytotoxicity effects of specific PARP-1 inhibitors were observed due to diverse PARP-1 activity in cellular processes. Moreover, cancer cells can develop resistance to PARP-1 inhibitors and decrease chemotherapy efficacy. There are promising strategies how to avoid these disadvantages including dual-targeted inhibitors and combination therapy.

Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer has a poor prognosis and poses significant therapeutic challenges. Until recently, limited therapeutic options have been available for patients with advanced disease after failure of first-line chemotherapy. The aim of this review is to assess the current evidence supporting second-line treatment options in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Evidence was reviewed from controlled clinical trials in which eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, gemcitabine, gemcitabine plus carboplatin, fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan, sacituzumab govitecan, olaparib, and talazoparib were used in the second-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer, either as study drugs or as comparators. The benefit of treatment was evaluated using the European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale. Based on the evidence review, sacituzumab govitecan was identified as the preferred second-line treatment option for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, supported by clinical evidence and consensus across international clinical guidelines. Olaparib and talazoparib are of use in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. Exploratory data for fam-trastuzumab-deruxtecan suggest a survival benefit in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low, hormone-receptor-negative patients, but further solid evidence is required. Other chemotherapies with lower European Society for Medical Oncology-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale scores may continue to be useful in highly selected patients.

Promising cancer treatments, such as DDR inhibitors, are often challenged by the heterogeneity of responses in clinical trials. The present work aimed to build a computational framework to address those challenges.

A semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of tumour growth inhibition was developed to investigate the efficacy of PARP and ATR inhibitors as monotherapies, and in combination. Key features of the DNA damage response were incorporated into the model to allow the emergence of synthetic lethality, including redundant DNA repair pathways that may be impaired due to genetic mutations, and due to PARP and ATR inhibition. Model parameters were calibrated using preclinical in vivo data for PARP inhibitors rucaparib and talazoparib and the ATR inhibitor gartisertib.

The model successfully captured the monotherapy efficacies of rucaparib and talazoparib, as well as the combination efficacy with gartisertib. The model was evaluated against multiple tumour xenografts with diverse genetic backgrounds and was able to capture the observed heterogeneity of response profiles.

By enabling simulation of in vivo tumour growth inhibition with PARP and ATR inhibitors for specific tumour types, the model provides a rational approach to support the optimisation of dosing regimens to stratified populations.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, talazoparib, rucaparib, and niraparib, comprise a therapeutic class that targets PARP proteins involved in DNA repair. Cancer cells with homologous recombination repair defects, particularly BRCA alterations, display enhanced sensitivity to these agents because of synthetic lethality induced by PARP inhibitors. These agents have significantly improved survival outcomes across various malignancies, initially gaining regulatory approval in ovarian cancer and subsequently in breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancers in different indications. This review offers a comprehensive clinical overview of PARP inhibitor approvals, emphasizing their efficacy across different cancers based on landmark phase 3 clinical trials.

This review comprehensively analyzes the current landscape of tumor-agnostic therapies in oncology. Tumor-agnostic therapies are designed to target specific molecular alterations rather than the primary site of the tumor, representing a shift in cancer treatment. We discuss recent approvals by regulatory agencies such as the FDA and EMA, highlighting therapies that have demonstrated efficacy across multiple cancer types sharing common alterations. We delve into the trial methodologies that underpin these approvals, emphasizing innovative designs such as basket trials and umbrella trials. These methodologies present unique advantages, including increased efficiency in patient recruitment and the ability to assess drug efficacy in diverse populations rapidly. However, they also entail certain challenges, including the need for robust biomarkers and the complexities of regulatory requirements. Moreover, we examine the promising prospects for developing therapies for rare cancers that exhibit common molecular targets typically associated with more prevalent malignancies. By synthesizing these insights, this review underscores the transformative potential of tumor-agnostic therapies in oncology. It offers a pathway for personalized cancer treatment that transcends conventional histology-based classification.

Preclinical models of breast cancer that better predict patient-specific drug responses are critical for expanding the clinical utility of targeted therapies, including for inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP). Reprogramming primary cancer cells into human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) recently emerged as a powerful tool to model drug response phenotypes, but its use to date has been limited to hematopoietic malignancies. We designed an optimized reprogramming methodology to generate breast cancer-derived hiPSCs (BC-hiPSCs) from nine patients representing all major subtypes of breast cancer. BC-hiPSCs retain patient-specific oncogenic variants, including variants unique to individual tumor subclones. Additionally, we developed a protocol to differentiate BC-hiPSCs into mammary epithelial cells and mammary-like organoids for in vitro disease modeling, including drug response phenotyping. Using these tools, we demonstrated that BC-hiPSCs can be used to screen for differential sensitivity to PARP inhibitors and mechanistically investigated the causal genetic variant driving drug sensitivity in one patient.

Cells deficient in DNA repair factors breast cancer susceptibility 1/2 (BRCA1/2) or ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) are sensitive to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Building on our previous findings, we asked how the lysine methyltransferase SETD1A contributed to PARP inhibitor-mediated cell death in these contexts and determined the mechanisms responsible.

We used cervical, breast, lung and ovarian cancer cells bearing mutations in BRCA1 or ATM and depleted SETD1A using siRNA or CRISPR/Cas9. We assessed the effects of the PARPi Olaparib on cell viability, homologous recombination, and DNA repair. We assessed underlying transcriptional perturbations using RNAseq. We used The Cancer Genomics Atlas (TCGA) and DepMap to investigate patient survival and cancer cell characteristics.

Loss of SETD1A from both BRCA1-deficient and ATM-deficient cancer cells was associated with resistance to Olaparib, explained by partial restoration of homologous recombination. Mechanistically, SETD1A-dependent transcription of the crossover junction endonuclease EME1 correlated with sensitivity to Olaparib in these cells. Accordingly, when SETD1A or EME1 was lost, BRCA1 or ATM-mutated cells became resistant to Olaparib, and homologous recombination was partially restored.

Loss of SETD1A or EME1 drives cellular resistance to Olaparib in certain genetic contexts and may help explain why patients develop resistance to PARP inhibitors in the clinic.

Despite guidelines recommending genetic testing for all cases of very young breast cancer (VYBC), poor uptake has been reported. This study aimed to examine genetic testing referral rates and outcomes over a 20-year period within the Canadian context.

A retrospective chart review of all incident VYBC cases (at or below 35 years of age) between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2019 was conducted. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic factors and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the predictors associated with referral for genetic counseling and positive genetic test results.

628 women were identified with VYBC. Most women presented with stage 2 (42%), hormone receptor-positive (HR +) and HER2-negative (54%) invasive ductal carcinoma (94%). Over the study period, referral rates increased from 44 to 84%. Of women initially tested for BRCA1/BRCA2, only 21% were referred for updated panel testing. Among those tested, 19% had a pathogenic variant, 21% of whom reported no family history of cancer. Predictors of referral included stage 0-2 disease while predictors of positive test results included a second breast cancer diagnosis and positive family history.

Despite guidelines based on age alone, barriers to referral persist. Results of this study suggest the need for new models of care that ensure equitable access to genetic testing for all women diagnosed with VYBC regardless of family history, ethnicity, or disease stage. As genetic testing criteria evolve, protocols must address these barriers to prevent missed opportunities for testing.

Increasing evidence shows that a very small population of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is responsible for cancer recurrence, drug resistance, and metastasis. CSCs usually reside in hypoxic tumor regions and are characterized by high tumorigenicity. Their inaccessible nature allows them to avoid the effects of conventional treatments such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery. In addition, conventional chemo- and radiotherapy is potentially toxic and could help CSCs to spread and survive. New therapeutic targets against CSCs are sought, including different signaling pathways and distinct cell surface markers. Recent advances in nanotechnology have provided hope for the development of new therapeutic avenues to eradicate CSCs. In this review, we present newly discovered nanoparticles that can be co-loaded with an apoptosis-inducing agent or differentiation-inducing agent, with high stability, cellular penetration, and drug release. We also summarize the molecular characteristics of CSCs and the signaling pathways responsible for their survival and maintenance. Controlled drug release targeting CSCs aims to reduce stemness-related drug resistance, suppress tumor growth, and prevent tumor relapse and metastases.

The median overall survival (OS) is approximately 10 months when chemotherapy alone is the first-line treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The approval of the two PD-L1 inhibitors, atezolizumab and durvalumab, marked the beginning of the immunotherapy era for ES-SCLC. Serplulimab, as the first PD-1 inhibitor to achieve success in the first-line treatment of ES-SCLC, has not only demonstrated significant improvements in patient survival outcomes but also ushered in a new era for PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of ES-SCLC. Recently, antiangiogenic agents with chemo-immunotherapy have achieved breakthroughs in first-line ES-SCLC treatment. Improving the clinical benefits of individualized treatment for patients with ES-SCLC remains challenging. Challenges include identifying biomarkers for targeted therapy, exploring new treatments, developing new medicines, and classifying SCLC molecular subtypes. This review provides an in-depth analysis of research on first-line ES-SCLC treatment. Additionally, it discusses advances in ES-SCLC treatment.

Breast cancer, characterized by unique epidemiological patterns and significant heterogeneity, remains one of the leading causes of malignancy-related deaths in women. The increasingly nuanced molecular subtypes of breast cancer have enhanced the comprehension and precision treatment of this disease. The mechanisms of tumorigenesis and progression of breast cancer have been central to scientific research, with investigations spanning various perspectives such as tumor stemness, intra-tumoral microbiota, and circadian rhythms. Technological advancements, particularly those integrated with artificial intelligence, have significantly improved the accuracy of breast cancer detection and diagnosis. The emergence of novel therapeutic concepts and drugs represents a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine. Evidence suggests that optimal diagnosis and treatment models tailored to individual patient risk and expected subtypes are crucial, supporting the era of precision oncology for breast cancer. Despite the rapid advancements in oncology and the increasing emphasis on the clinical precision treatment of breast cancer, a comprehensive update and summary of the panoramic knowledge related to this disease are needed. In this review, we provide a thorough overview of the global status of breast cancer, including its epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and molecular subtyping. Additionally, we elaborate on the latest research into mechanisms contributing to breast cancer progression, emerging treatment strategies, and long-term patient management. This review offers valuable insights into the latest advancements in Breast Cancer Research, thereby facilitating future progress in both basic research and clinical application.

Hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer is the most common type of breast cancer, with continuous recurrence remaining an important clinical issue. Current relapse predictive models in HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients still have limitations. The integration of multidimensional data represents a promising alternative for predicting relapse. In this study, we leverage our multi-omics cohort comprising 579 HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients (200 patients with complete data across 7 modalities) and develop a machine-learning-based model, namely CIMPTGV, which integrates clinical information, immunohistochemistry, metabolomics, pathomics, transcriptomics, genomics, and copy number variations to predict recurrence risk of HR+/HER2- breast cancer. This model achieves concordance indices (C-indices) of 0.871 and 0.869 in the train and test sets, respectively. The risk population predicted by the CIMPTGV model encompasses those identified by single-modality models. Feature analysis reveals that synergistic and complementary effects exist in different modalities. Simultaneously, we develop a simplified model with a mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.840, presenting a useful approach for clinical applications.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is traditionally treated with systemic chemotherapy, often resulting in significant off-target toxicity. In this study, we assess the efficacy of intraductal chemotherapeutic delivery, aimed at reducing systemic side effects. Using an in situ TNBC model, created by intraductal injection of 4T1-luc cells, we identified day 3 post-tumor implantation as an optimal early intervention point. Echocardiographic analysis confirmed that intraductal administration of eribulin (ERI) or doxorubicin (DOX) did not cause cardiac dysfunction or apoptosis. Our results demonstrate that intraductal delivery of ERI and DOX significantly enhances anti-tumor and anti-metastatic effects. Mechanistically, ERI followed by DOX increased intratumoral perfusion, improved drug concentration, reversed epithelial-mesenchymal transition, and inhibited tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Additionally, this approach triggered immunogenic cell death and activated a systemic anti-tumor immune response. These findings underscore the potential of intraductal chemotherapy as a safe, highly effective approach, offering a preclinical foundation for minimally invasive TNBC therapies.

Antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel drugs that exert specific cytotoxicity against breast cancer. Although ADCs such as trastuzumab emtansine and trastuzumab deruxtecan have significantly improved survival for patients with breast cancer expressing HER2, there is still controversy over options after ADCs. The radiotherapy and ablation should also be used as an effective strategy for oligoprogressions. Herein, we conducted a review of ADCs, and then discussed several strategies to maximize the potential benefit to patients with HER2 expression breast cancer.

Background. Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related death among women, with genetic mutations playing a key role. While high-penetrance mutations are well-studied, moderate-to-low-penetrance mutations, which present challenges in clinical decision-making and patient outcomes, are less understood. This study explores the quality of life of breast cancer patients with moderate-penetrance mutations, focusing on the psychosocial and physical consequences of mastectomy and reconstruction to improve patient-centered care. Materials and Methods. A cohort of 620 breast cancer patients treated at Regina Maria Private Health Network, Bucharest, between January 2022 and July 2024 was identified. From this group, 61 patients were selected based on the following criteria: (1) meeting NCCN genetic testing guidelines, (2) carrying moderate-to-low-penetrance mutations, (3) undergoing bilateral mastectomy with double reconstruction, and (4) agreeing to complete a modified version of the BREAST-Q questionnaire. Genetic testing was performed using a 125-gene next-generation sequencing panel. Statistical analyses included non-parametric tests to examine group differences and correlations. Results. Significant correlations were found between several factors. Emotional distress was positively correlated with concerns for family, while couple relationships and financial burden showed a strong positive association. Negative correlations were found between couple relationships and self-concept. Distress levels varied, with "Interference with personal relationships" causing more distress than "Impact on employment", and financial burden causing more distressing than impact on sexuality. Conclusions. Prophylactic mastectomy significantly reduces cancer risk for women with moderate-penetrance mutations. This study highlights the relationship between surgical choices and quality-of-life factors, advancing personalized prevention strategies and emphasizing patient-centered care.

Mutations in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCAm) and other homologous recombination repair genes (HRRm) are associated with several cancers. We evaluated the prevalence and association with overall survival (OS) of somatic BRCAm and HRRm among patients with advanced solid tumors.

We used deidentified data from the AACR GENIE Biopharma Collaborative dataset derived from patients with tumors genotyped using next-generation sequencing between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2017. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years diagnosed with non-small-cell lung, colorectal, breast, bladder, prostate, or pancreatic cancer, with documented BRCA/HRR somatic mutation status. The primary analysis was OS (censored at the start of poly[ADP ribose] polymerase inhibitors [PARPi]/immunotherapy) after initiation of second-line therapy since most patients had sequencing after first-line therapy.

Among eligible patients, 242/7022 (3.4%) had BRCAm and 477/5474 (8.7%) had HRRm. Adjusted OS HRs (95% CI) for the primary analysis (using the initiation of second-line therapy as index date) were 0.79 (0.61-1.03) with/without BRCAm (n = 116/n = 3394) and 0.83 (0.69-0.99) with/without HRRm (n = 247/n = 2656); in sensitivity analysis of patients with stage IV disease, HRs were 0.97 (0.68-1.38) with/without BRCAm (n = 58/n = 1847) and 0.92 (0.73-1.18) with/without HRRm (n = 132/n = 1488).

Overall, BRCAm and HRRm did not show a strong association with OS, with a trend toward longer OS among patients receiving standard second-line therapies excluding PARPi/immunotherapy.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most aggressive and malignant type of breast cancer with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. One of the most significant impediments in TNBC treatment is the high heterogeneity of this disease, as highlighted by the detection of several molecular subtypes of TNBC. Each subtype is driven by distinct mutations and pathway aberrations, giving rise to specific molecular characteristics closely connected to clinical behavior, outcomes, and drug sensitivity. This review summarizes the knowledge regarding TNBC molecular subtypes and how it can be harnessed to devise tailored treatment strategies instead of blindly using targeted drugs. We provide an overview of novel targeted agents and key insights about new treatment modalities with an emphasis on the androgen receptor signaling pathway, cancer stem cell-associated pathways, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway, growth factor signaling, and immunotherapy.

PARP inhibitors (PARPi) have been licensed for the maintenance therapy of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer carrying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations. However, mutations in BRCA1/2 are notably rare in pancreatic cancer.

There is a significant unmet clinical need to broaden the utility of PARPi.

RNA sequencing was performed to screen potential targets for PARPi sensitivity. The synthetic lethal effects were verified in patient-derived xenograft (PDX), xenograft and patient-derived organoid models. Mechanisms were explored via LC‒MS/MS, coimmunoprecipitation, laser microirradiation, immunofluorescence, the homologous recombination (HR) or non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) reporter system, in situ proximity ligation assay and live-cell time-lapse imaging analyses.

Targeting protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2 (TPX2) is an exploitable vulnerability. TPX2 was downregulated in PDX models sensitive to PARPi, and TPX2 inhibition conferred synthetic lethality to PARPi both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, TPX2 functions in a cell cycle-dependent manner. In the S/G2 phase, ATM-mediated TPX2 S634 phosphorylation promotes BRCA1 recruitment to double-strand breaks (DSBs) for HR repair, whereas non-phosphorylated TPX2 interacts with 53BP1 to recruit it for NHEJ. The balance between phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated TPX2 determines the DSB repair pathway choice. During mitosis, TPX2 phosphorylation enhances Aurora A activity, promoting mitotic progression and chromosomal stability. Targeting TPX2 S634 phosphorylation with a cell-penetrating peptide causes genomic instability and mitotic catastrophe and enhances PARPi sensitivity. Additionally, the inhibition of TPX2 or S634 phosphorylation combined with gemcitabine further sensitised pancreatic cancer to PARPi.

Our findings revealed the dual-functional significance of TPX2 in controlling DNA DSB repair pathway choice and mitotic progression, suggesting a potential therapeutic strategy involving PARPi for patients with pancreatic cancer.