Neovascularisation of carotid plaques contributes to their vulnerability. Current imaging methods such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) usually lack the required spatial resolution and quantification capability for precise neovessels identification. We aimed at quantifying plaque vascularisation with ultrasound localization microscopy (ULM) and compared the results to histological analysis.

We conducted a prospective, monocentric, study involving patients who were undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for carotid artery stenosis. The day before CEA ultrasound examination coupled with the injection of microbubbles (MB) as a contrast agent (CEUS) to image the MB circulating within and around the carotid plaque was performed. CEUS images analysis classified patients into 2 groups: absence of neovascularisation (group A) or presence of neovascularisation (group B). ULM was performed by localising and tracking individual MB centres to reconstruct the neovessels structure with a resolution of around 60 μm. Plaques were manually segmented on the images to quantify the number of neovessels and various haemodynamic metrics inside the plaques. Histological analysis of the excised carotid plaque specimens classified patients into 2 groups: absence of neovascularisation (group I) or presence of neovascularisation (group II).

Among the 26 patients included, classification was as follows: group I: n = 8 and group II: n = 18, 18 patients had analysable CEUS images and were classified as follows: group A: n = 10, group B: n = 8. The median (Q1-Q3) number of MB tracked per second inside the plaque was 0.03 (0-0.37) for patients in group I and 0.51 (0-3) for patients in group A versus (vs.) 3.55 (1.26-17.68) for patients in group II and 9.69 (5.83-34.68) for patients in group B (p = 0.00049; p = 0.010 respectively). The length of the MB tracks was 0.02 mm (0-0.16) in group I vs. 0.29 mm (0.22-0.45) in group II (p = 0.0069). The study also showed that flow in the neovessels was greater during systole than during diastole period: 9.38 (1.67-19.17) MB tracked per second vs. 1.35 (0.28-6.56) (p = 0.021).

ULM allows the detection of neovessels within the carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Thus, ULM provides a precise picture of plaque neovascularisation in patients and could be used as a non-invasive imaging technique to assess carotid plaque vulnerability.

The study was sponsored and funded by Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (CRC 1806 APHP INNOVATION 2018). Co-funding by ART (Technological Research Accelerator) biomedical ultrasound program of INSERM, France.

In patients with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), endoscopic techniques (including capsule techniques and balloon enteroscopy for the small intestine), ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are primarily used as often complementary imaging techniques. Radiation exposure needs to be kept in mind when using CT and conventional X‑ray-techniques. Therefore, most importantly, ultrasound and MRI have changed the routine diagnostics of intestinal diseases. US, CT and MRI not only assess the lumen but, similarly importantly, also the wall and the surrounding structures of the gastrointestinal tract. Furthermore, functional processes can be visualized and provide important information about passage and perfusion, which is mainly true for real-time ultrasound. CT and MRI are usually carried out with the use of contrast agents as contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and contrast-enhanced MRI (CEMRI). Ultrasound is performed conventionally or with intravascular (CEUS) and/or extravascular intracavitary contrast agent application (icCEUS). This article provides an overview of the current significance of the mentioned imaging procedures in patients with IBD and discusses the typical indications.

With the rising incidence of chronic kidney disease worldwide, an increasing number of patients are expected to require renal transplantation, which remains the definitive treatment of end stage renal disease. Medical imaging, primarily ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced CT and/or MRI, plays a large role in pre-transplantation assessment, especially in the characterization of lesions within the native kidneys. However, patients with CKD/ESRD often have relative contraindications to CT- and MR-contrast agents, limiting their utilization within this patient population. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), which combines the high temporal and spatial resolution of ultrasonography with intravascular microbubble contrast agents, provides a promising alternative. This review aims to familiarize the reader with the literature regarding the use of CEUS in the evaluation of cystic and solid renal lesions and provide case examples of its use at our institution in the pre-transplant setting.

Venous thrombosis has been widely studied in humans, but not in dogs. This study was designed to evaluate a venous thrombus in dogs, from creation to solution, by means of various ultrasonographic techniques. Nine healthy Beagle dogs were included in the study. The venous thrombus was formatted by puncturing the lumen of the external jugular veins and then, the veins were examined with B-mode, color Doppler, pulsed-wave Doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) techniques, at regular intervals, within 210-270 min after venipuncture. Haemodynamic parameters were calculated at two different locations, before and after the site of the thrombus formation. The existence of a thrombus was confirmed by CEUS technique. Thrombus volume and echogenicity were evaluated. The results showed that the visualization of the venous thrombus by color Doppler modality was not feasible in some veins. The blood volume was the parameter that could more precisely indicate the presence or absence of a thrombus. In cases where thrombus volume was less than 0.001 cm3, it was impossible to detect its presence using haemodynamic parameters. The CEUS imaging depicted accurately the size and shape of an anechoic venous thrombus, even when its volume was 0.001cm3.

Intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a rapidly evolving imaging technique that uses a microbubble contrast agent to enhance ultrasonographic images by augmenting characterization of blood vessels and organ perfusion. CEUS is considered as a useful problem-solving tool and as an indicated first-line imaging modality in select settings. CEUS technique has an inherent advantage over its predecessor B-mode and Doppler imaging. This article reviews different approved and off-label use of CEUS in the pediatric and adult population and also discusses Food and Drug Administration-approved contrast agents in the United States, their reported side effects, and ongoing efforts in the field.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is an advanced ultrasound (US) technique utilizing ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to provide detailed visualization of anatomic and vascular architecture, including the depiction of microcirculation. CEUS has been well-established in echocardiography and imaging of focal hepatic lesions and recent studies have also shown the utility of CEUS in non-hepatic applications like the urinary system. The updated guidelines by the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) from 2018 describe the use of CEUS for non-hepatic applications. CEUS' excellent safety profile and spatial resolution make it a superior modality to conventional US and is often comparable and even superior to CECT in some instances. In comparison to other cross-sectional imaging modalities such as CECT or MRI, CEUS offers a safe (by virtue of non-nephrotoxic US contrast agents), accurate, cost-efficient, readily available, and a quick means of evaluation of multiple pathologies of the urinary system. CEUS also has the potential to reduce the overall economic burden on patients requiring long-term follow-up due to its low cost as compared to CT or MRI techniques. This comprehensive review focuses on the applications of CEUS in evaluating the urinary system from the kidneys to the urinary bladder. CEUS can be utilized in the kidney to evaluate complex cystic lesions, indeterminate lesions, pseudotumors (vs solid renal tumors), renal infections, and renal ischemic disorders. Additionally, CEUS has also been utilized in evaluating renal transplants. In the urinary bladder, CEUS is extremely useful in differentiating a bladder hematoma and bladder cancer when conventional US techniques show equivocal results. Quantitative parameters of time-intensity curves (TICs) of CEUS examinations have also been studied to stage and grade bladder cancers. Although promising, further research is needed to definitively stage bladder cancers and classify them as muscle-invasive or non-muscle invasive using quantitative CEUS to guide appropriate intervention. CEUS has been very effective in the classification of cystic renal lesions, however, further research is needed in differentiating benign from malignant renal masses.

Splenic injuries are common in abdominal trauma, as the spleen is one of the most often harmed organs. The treatment of splenic injuries underwent major changes during the past decades, shifting from a surgical approach to nonoperative management. This change of the proceedings results from a constantly growing awareness of the spleen's crucial hematological and immunological function and was possible owing to the advances in radiological techniques. In a setting of high-energy trauma in hemodynamically stable patients, computed tomography (CT) remains the gold standard. Where ultrasonography (US) is of major importance is in cases of unstable patients undergone high-energy trauma or in patients after low-energy trauma. Nevertheless, baseline US's sensitivity is not sufficient to detect splenic traumatic injuries; hence, a new method was developed involving ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs), called contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). In a low-energy trauma setting, it facilitates the diagnosis of abdominal lesions with a sensitivity close to that of CT, without the disadvantages of the latter. In addition, CEUS can be used in the follow-up of abdominal traumatic injuries. The fact that CEUS preserves CT's sensitivity while not carrying the risk of radiation-induced cancer makes it feasible for children and pregnant women. This review aims to discuss the technical aspects of CEUS, the limitations, and possibilities regarding this modality, present the appearance of both a healthy and injured spleen, and compare CEUS's effectiveness to that of CT through an analysis of retrievable studies.

Acute pyelonephritis (APN) is a bacterial infection resulting in kidney inflammation, typically arising as a complication of an ascending urinary tract infection that ascends from the bladder to the kidneys. Clinical diagnosis is generally based on clinical and laboratory findings. Recent guidelines recommend not performing diagnostic imaging unless a complicated APN is suspected or the infection affects high-risk patients such as the elderly, immunocompromised individuals, or diabetics. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a valuable tool in both the diagnosis and follow-up of APN. It aids in distinguishing small simple nephritic involvement from abscess complications and monitoring their evolution over time during antibiotic therapy. Given its lack of ionizing radiation and nephrotoxicity, CEUS is a valid diagnostic modality for approaching and monitoring pyelonephritis, improving early identification and characterization of inflammatory lesions. This review aims to summarize the main evidence on the use of ultrasound and CEUS in the diagnosis of APN and its follow-up.

To evaluate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) perfusion patterns in the differentiation of benign and malignant retroperitoneal masses (RMs).

Between 2006 and 2023, 122 consecutive patients with an RM visualizable by B-mode US were investigated additionally with CEUS. On CEUS, the extent of enhancement (classified as marked, reduced, or absent) and the homogeneity of enhancement (HE; classified as homogeneous or inhomogeneous) were evaluated. Subsequently, the malignancy rate according to CEUS perfusion patterns was determined.

On CEUS, marked enhancement was significantly more frequently associated with malignancy than with benignity (p < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). All lesions with no enhancement were benign. Regarding HE, there was no significant difference between benign and malignant lesions (p = 0.07, Fisher's exact test).

On CEUS, marked enhancement in an RM may be indicative of a malignant lesion. Furthermore, absent enhancement can be considered to be an indication of benignity. The use of CEUS can be helpful in the evaluation of the malignancy of retroperitoneal masses.

Lipomatous soft tissue tumors (STT), ranging from benign lipomas to malignant liposarcomas, require accurate differentiation for timely treatment. Complementary to MRI, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is emerging as a promising tool, providing insight into tumor microperfusion in real-time. This study aims to explore the potential of preoperative CEUS in differentiating benign lipomatous tumors from malignant liposarcoma subtypes.

Eighty-seven patients with lipomatous STT scheduled for surgery were enrolled. Clinical and MRI assessments were conducted to obtain general tumor characteristics. CEUS was used for a standardized tumor perfusion evaluation. Perfusion analysis included peak enhancement, rise time, wash-in perfusion index, and wash-out rate, reflecting the perfusion kinetics. Histopathological results were obtained for every STT and compared to perfusion characteristics.

In total, 48 lipoma, 23 ALT and 11 liposarcoma were identified. Significant differences in tumor microperfusion were demonstrated, with higher perfusion levels indicating higher malignancy (Peak enhancement [a.u.] of Lipoma: 145 ± 238; ALT: 268 ± 368; Liposarcoma: 3256 ± 4333; p (ALT vs. Liposarcoma) < 0.001). A perfusion-based identification of a benign lipoma or ALT versus sarcoma resulted in a positive predictive value of 93%. Patient-related factors (age, gender, BMI, ASA score, smoking status) had no significant impact on the CEUS-based perfusion parameters.

Our study suggests CEUS as a capable non-invasive tool for improving preoperative assessment of lipomatous STT. It can assist in the distinction between benign and malignant STT, accelerating treatment decisions and enhancing patient outcomes. Significant correlations between CEUS-derived parameters and malignancy highlight its risk assessment potential.

By combining high-frequency and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), the position of the severed end of a finger extensor tendon injury and the injury classification can be determined as part of a comprehensive preoperative evaluation in clinical practice. However, there have been no reports of high-frequency ultrasound combined with CEUS for the preoperative diagnosis of human finger extensor tendon injury.

One case of complete rupture of the extensor tendon was diagnosed by ultrasound, which was completely consistent with the surgery; one case of incomplete rupture was ultimately confirmed clinically; and one case of distal phalangeal bone base avulsion fracture with tendon contusion and missed diagnosis on the first radiographic examination was confirmed by follow-up radiographic examination.

Different types of finger extensor tendon injuries exhibit distinctive contrast-enhanced ultrasonography findings. Combined high-frequency and contrast-enhanced ultrasound can accurately locate the position of the severed end of the finger extensor tendon injury before surgery while observing the contrast agent filling area to clarify injury classification, providing a reliable imaging basis for clinical practice and ultimately developing personalized diagnosis and treatment plans for patients to ensure minimal trauma and pain, as well as optimal treatment effects.

Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound is widely accepted as a highly informative, safe, and easily reproducible technique for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of different pathologies of the biliary tree. This review article describes the diverse applications for CEUS in intracavitary biliary scenarios, supported by a literature review of the utilization of the method in indications like biliary obstruction by various etiologies, including postoperative strictures, evaluation of the biliary tree of liver donors, and evaluation of the localization of a drainage catheter. We also provide pictorial examples of the authors' personal experience with the use of intracavitary CEUS in cases of PTCD as a palliative intervention. Intracavitary CEUS brings all the positive features of US together with the virtues of contrast-enhanced imaging, providing comparable accuracy to the standard techniques for diagnosing biliary tree diseases.

Purpose To compare the tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of US-guided biopsies of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) with and without contrast agents. Materials and Methods A retrospective study was conducted at four medical centers in patients with PPLs who underwent US-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) between January 2017 and October 2022. The patients were divided into contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) and US groups based on whether prebiopsy CEUS evaluation was performed. Tissue adequacy and the diagnostic accuracy of PTNB, stratified by lesion size, were analyzed and compared between groups. A propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was conducted using the nearest-neighbor matching method. Results A total of 1027 lesions were analyzed, with 634 patients (mean age, 59.4 years ± 13.0 [SD]; 413 male) in the US group and 393 patients (mean age, 61.2 years ± 12.5; 270 male) in the CEUS group. The CEUS group produced more acceptable samples than the US group (98.2% vs 95.7%; P = .03) and achieved higher diagnostic accuracy (96.9% vs 94.2%; P = .04), with no evidence of a difference in sensitivity (96.7% vs 94.0%; P = .06). PSM and stratified analyses (n = 358 per group) indicated higher tissue adequacy (99.0% vs 95.7%; P = .04) and diagnostic accuracy (98.5% vs 92.9%; P = .006) in the CEUS group compared with the US group for 2-7-cm PPLs but not for lesions larger than 7 cm. Conclusion PTNB with prebiopsy CEUS evaluation demonstrated significantly better tissue adequacy and diagnostic accuracy compared with US guidance alone for PPLs ranging from 2 to 7 cm, with similar biopsy performance achieved between groups for lesions larger than 7 cm. Keywords: Contrast Material, Thoracic Diseases, Ultrasonography, Image-Guided Biopsy © RSNA, 2024.

The off-label use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound has been increasingly used for pediatric patients.

The purpose of this retrospective study is to report any observed clinical changes associated with the intravenous (IV) administration of ultrasound contrast to critically ill neonates, infants, children, and adolescents.

All critically ill patients who had 1 or more contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans while being closely monitored in the neonatal, pediatric, or pediatric cardiac intensive care units were identified. Subjective and objective data concerning cardiopulmonary, neurological, and hemodynamic monitoring were extracted from the patient's electronic medical records. Vital signs and laboratory values before, during, and after administration of ultrasound contrast were obtained. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro, version 15. Results were accepted as statistically significant for P-value<0.05.

Forty-seven contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans were performed on 38 critically ill patients, 2 days to 17 years old, 19 of which were female (50%), and 19 had history of prematurity (50%). At the time of the contrast-enhanced ultrasound scans, 15 patients had cardiac shunts or a patent ductus arteriosus, 25 had respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical oxygenation and ventilation, 19 were hemodynamically unstable requiring continual vasoactive infusions, and 8 were receiving inhaled nitric oxide. In all cases, no significant respiratory, neurologic, cardiac, perfusion, or vital sign changes associated with IV ultrasound contrast were identified.

This study did not retrospectively identify any adverse clinical effects associated with the IV administration of ultrasound contrast to critically ill neonates, infants, children, and adolescents.

Identifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer (BC) is of great significance in selecting optimal treatment strategy. Different molecular subtypes of BC have various vascular distribution characteristics. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can dynamically display the microcirculation of tumor. This study intends to explore the conventional ultrasound and CEUS characteristics of different molecular subtypes of BC.

During this prospective study, 86 patients with BC who were divided into Luminal A (LA), Luminal B (LB), HER2 over-expression (H2), and triple-negative (TN). The CEUS qualitative and quantitative characteristics of BC with different molecular subtypes was explored, as well as the conventional ultrasound features. In addition, the diagnostic efficiency of CEUS quantitative parameters in differentiating molecular subtypes of BC was analyzed.

Our study found that the Adler grade differed significantly among 4 molecular subtypes (P < .05). The enhancement speed, enhancement degree and size after enhancement of 4 molecular subtypes were statistically different (P < .05). The wash in slope (WIS), peak intensity (PI), and wash-in area under the curve (WiAUC) differed significantly among 4 subtypes (P < .05). The diagnostic efficiency of PI was better for detecting LA and H2 subtype with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.778 and 0.734, respectively.

Different molecular subtypes of BC have different CEUS and conventional ultrasound characteristics. CEUS can provide valuable imaging basis for precise clinical diagnosis and individualized therapy of BC with different molecular subtypes.

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recognized the need to formalize and enhance training in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This manuscript represents the outcome of a formal Delphi process resulting in an official Position Statement of the ESGE and provides a framework to develop and maintain skills in diagnostic EUS. This curriculum is set out in terms of the prerequisites prior to training; the recommended steps of training to a defined syllabus; the quality of training; and how competence should be defined and evidenced before independent practice. 1:  Trainees should have achieved competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before training in diagnostic EUS. 2:  The development of diagnostic EUS skills by methods that do not involve patients is advisable, but not mandatory, prior to commencing formal training in diagnostic EUS. 3:  A trainee's principal trainer should be performing adequate volumes of diagnostic EUSs to demonstrate maintenance of their own competence. 4:  Training centers for diagnostic EUS should offer expertise, as well as a high volume of procedures per year, to ensure an optimal level of quality for training. Under these conditions, training centers should be able to provide trainees with a sufficient wealth of experience in diagnostic EUS for at least 12 months. 5:  Trainees should engage in formal training and supplement this with a range of learning resources for diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy (FNA/FNB). 6:  EUS training should follow a structured syllabus to guide the learning program. 7:  A minimum procedure volume should be offered to trainees during diagnostic EUS training to ensure that they have the opportunity to achieve competence in the technique. To evaluate competence in diagnostic EUS, trainees should have completed a minimum of 250 supervised EUS procedures: 80 for luminal tumors, 20 for subepithelial lesions, and 150 for pancreaticobiliary lesions. At least 75 EUS-FNA/FNBs should be performed, including mostly pancreaticobiliary lesions. 8:  Competence assessment in diagnostic EUS should take into consideration not only technical skills, but also cognitive and integrative skills. A reliable valid assessment tool should be used regularly during diagnostic EUS training to track the acquisition of competence and to support trainee feedback. 9:  A period of supervised practice should follow the start of independent activity. Supervision can be delivered either on site if other colleagues are already practicing EUS or by maintaining contacts with the training center and/or other EUS experts. 10:  Key performance measures including the annual number of procedures, frequency of obtaining a diagnostic sample during EUS-FNA/FNB, and adverse events should be recorded within an electronic documentation system and evaluated.

The aim of the work described here was to explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with the enhancement pattern and qualitative analysis in distinguishing different types of hypovascular solid renal lesions.

A total of 140 patients with 140 renal tumors (all diagnosed by pathology), which manifested hypo-enhancement on CEUS, were included in this study. We compared conventional ultrasound (US) and CEUS features in five common hypovascular renal tumors, including renal angiomyolipoma (RAML), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), renal pelvic urothelial carcinoma (RPUC), papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC). The diagnostic value of conventional US and qualitative parameters of CEUS for differentiating hypovascular solid renal lesions were evaluated.

The mean age of patients with a benign renal lesion was younger than that of patients with a malignant renal lesion (p < 0.05). Echogenicity and qualitative parameters such as wash-out, perfusion defects and perilesional rim-like enhancement (PRE) in the two groups differed significantly (all p values <0.05). Benign renal lesions exhibited mainly slow wash-out, whereas malignant renal lesions exhibited predominantly fast wash-out on CEUS (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in echogenicity, such as between RAML and ccRCC, between RAML and RPUC and between RAML and pRCC (all p values <0.05). The rates of appearance of perfusion defect in ccRCC (48%, 13/27) and pRCC (53%, 10/19) were significantly higher than the rate in RAML (14%, 6/43) (p < 0.05). The rates of appearance of PRE in ccRCC (15%, 4/27), pRCC (26%, 5/19) and chRCC (24%,4/17) were significantly higher than the rate in RAML (9%, 4/43) (p < 0.05).

CEUS with the enhancement pattern and qualitative analysis may be helpful in distinguishing malignant from benign hypovascular renal lesions.

Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) is a technique to quantify tissue perfusion based on phase-specific enhancement after the injection of microbubble contrast agents for diagnostic ultrasound. The guidelines of the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) published in 2004 and updated in 2008, 2011, and 2020 focused on the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), including essential technical requirements, training, investigational procedures and steps, guidance regarding image interpretation, established and recommended clinical indications, and safety considerations. However, the quantification of phase-specific enhancement patterns acquired with ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) is not discussed here. The purpose of this EFSUMB Technical Review is to further establish a basis for the standardization of DCE-US focusing on treatment monitoring in oncology. It provides some recommendations and descriptions as to how to quantify dynamic ultrasound contrast enhancement, and technical explanations for the analysis of time-intensity curves (TICs). This update of the 2012 EFSUMB introduction to DCE-US includes clinical aspects for data collection, analysis, and interpretation that have emerged from recent studies. The current study not only aims to support future work in this research field but also to facilitate a transition to clinical routine use of DCE-US.

In the last decade, there has been a great effort in developing new technologies to enhance surgical visualization and guidance. This comprehensive and narrative review aimed to provide a wide and extensive overview of the current state of the art on this topic and their near-future perspectives linked to the development of artificial intelligence (AI), by focusing on the most recent and relevant literature.

A comprehensive and narrative review of the literature was performed by searching specific terms on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases, assessing the current state of the art on this topic.

Fluorescence-guided surgery, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), ultra-high frequency ultrasound (UHFUS), photoacoustic imaging (PAI), and augmented reality (AR) are boosting the field of image-guided techniques as the rapid development of AI in surgery is promising a more automated decision-making and surgical movements in the operating room.

Fluorescence-guided surgery, CEUS, UHFUS, PAI, and AR are becoming crucial to give surgeons a new level of information during the intervention, with the right timing and sequence, and represent the future of surgery. As many more controlled studies are needed to validate the employment of these technologies, the next generation of surgeons must become more familiar with the basics of AI to better incorporate new tools into the daily surgical practice of the future.

Background: Small renal masses (SRMs) are defined as contrast-enhanced renal lesions less than or equal to 4 cm in maximal diameter, which can be compatible with stage T1a renal cell carcinomas (RCCs). Currently, 50-61% of all renal tumors are found incidentally. Methods: The characteristics of the lesion influence the choice of the type of management, which include several methods SRM of management, including nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, ablation, observation, and also stereotactic body radiotherapy. Typical imaging methods available for differentiating benign from malignant renal lesions include ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: Although ultrasound is the first imaging technique used to detect small renal lesions, it has several limitations. CT is the main and most widely used imaging technique for SRM characterization. The main advantages of MRI compared to CT are the better contrast resolution and tissue characterization, the use of functional imaging sequences, the possibility of performing the examination in patients allergic to iodine-containing contrast medium, and the absence of exposure to ionizing radiation. For a correct evaluation during imaging follow-up, it is necessary to use a reliable method for the assessment of renal lesions, represented by the Bosniak classification system. This classification was initially developed based on contrast-enhanced CT imaging findings, and the 2019 revision proposed the inclusion of MRI features; however, the latest classification has not yet received widespread validation. Conclusions: The use of radiomics in the evaluation of renal masses is an emerging and increasingly central field with several applications such as characterizing renal masses, distinguishing RCC subtypes, monitoring response to targeted therapeutic agents, and prognosis in a metastatic context.

To evaluate the effectiveness of conventional US (ultrasound), SMI (superb microvascular imaging), and CEUS (contrast-enhanced ultrasound) features for the assessment of the activity of inflammatory bowel disease.

Conventional US, CEUS and SMI features of 76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups: active group (n = 57) and inactive group (n = 19), with endoscopic results as reference standard. Results in the active group and inactive group were compared using an independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated. US quantitative and TIC-based quantitative parameters were analyzed, and each patient was scored based on the parameters that are statistically significant and immediately available in the clinic to evaluate the diagnostic ability of conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features for active IBD patients.

Qualitative parameters such as CEUS enhancement pattern I/II, LimbergIII/IV, and lost bowel stratification were reliable indicators of active patients. Quantitative parameters such as bowel thickness and VI of mSMI were reliable indicators of active patients. Patients scored based on these statistically significant parameters with a score ≥3, were highly suspected to be active patients. For TIC-based quantitative parameters, PE, WiAUC, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, WiR, WiPI, and WoR were statistically significant in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD.

Conventional US, SMI, and CEUS features may help in the differentiation of active IBD from inactive IBD and have potential application value in the choice of treatment options.

Splenic tumors are rare and can pose a differential diagnostic challenge, especially as an incidental imaging finding. Due to a lack of large scale biopsy studies the available literature is limited with respect to clear imaging criteria for dignity.

The present work is intended to show the chances of a targeted elicitation of the medical history as well as the possibilities and limitations of multimodal sonography in order to achieve the correct diagnosis of a splenic lesion using simple and gentle methods.

Selective literature search and clinical case studies.

In the differential diagnostics of focal splenic lesions, information about pre-existing hemato-oncological or inflammatory rheumatological diseases is essential in order to correctly classify incidental findings in particular. In addition to B‑mode ultrasound (B-US) and color-coded Doppler ultrasound (CD-US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in particular provides crucial differential diagnostic information. While hyperechoic foci in B‑US or arterially hypervascularized splenic foci in CD-US/CEUS are usually benign, hypoechoic and arterially hypoperfused foci in CD-US/CEUS must be further clarified. Although the ultrasound-guided biopsy of the spleen has a higher risk of bleeding than a liver biopsy, it is still the gentlest and most effective method for achieving the histological clarification of splenic lesions when the indications are correct.

Through the combination of the medical history and multimodal ultrasound methods, if necessary supplemented by an ultrasound-guided biopsy, focal splenic lesions can be successfully classified in most cases with a direct impact on further clinical procedures.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is a widely available and well-tolerated technique that can expand the diagnosis of a variety of vascular liver diseases. This paper presents an overview of the current possibilities of the use of CEUS in vascular liver diseases. Particularly where Doppler sonography has technical limitations, CEUS provides additional opportunities to visualize vascular thrombosis and other obstructions restricting blood flow. When CT or MRI contrast agents cannot be used because of severe allergy or renal insufficiency, CEUS can be a valuable diagnostic alternative and has demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance in at least some vascular liver diseases, such as portal vein thrombosis. In addition, CEUS works without radiation and, therefore, might be particularly suitable for young patients and children. This may be useful, for example, in congenital disorders such as persistent umbilical vein or preduodenal portal vein. Vascular liver disease is rare and comprehensive data are still lacking, but the available literature provides promising insights into potential new ways to study vascular liver disease. Although most studies are based on small sample sizes or even case reports, the high diagnostic utility is undisputed.

The risk assessment for carotid atherosclerotic lesions involves not only determining the degree of stenosis but also plaque morphology and its composition. Recently, carotid contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has gained importance for evaluating vulnerable plaques. This review explores CEUS's utility in detecting carotid plaque surface irregularities and ulcerations as well as intraplaque neovascularization and its alignment with histology. Initial indications suggest that CEUS might have the potential to anticipate cerebrovascular incidents. Nevertheless, there is a need for extensive, multicenter prospective studies that explore the relationships between CEUS observations and patient clinical outcomes in cases of carotid atherosclerotic disease.

This study aimed to assess the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in detecting extracranial carotid artery occlusion.

A systematic literature search was conducted in the Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. Prospective or retrospective studies that reported sensitivity and specificity of CEUS for the diagnosis of carotid artery occlusion were selected. Eight studies (354 arteries) were included in the meta-analysis. A bivariate random-effect model was used to estimate overall sensitivity and specificity. The results were also summarized by developing a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve.

The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios were 0.99 (95% CI: 0.83-1.00), 0.97 (95% CI: 0.90-0.99), 30.0 (95% CI: 9.8-91.4), and 0.01 (95% CI: 0.00-0.21), respectively; the odds ratio for diagnosis was 4,796 (95% CI: 119-192,584).

The diagnostic test accuracy suggests that CEUS is a reliable tool for diagnosis of extracranial carotid artery occlusion.

Ultrasound is a vital tool for the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a non-invasive, safe, and cost-effective method for evaluating tumour blood vessels, that play a crucial role in tumour growth and progression.

To explore CEUS's role in the quantitative evaluation of CRC blood vessels and their correlation with angiogenesis markers and prognosis.

This study prospectively enrolled 100 patients with CRC confirmed by histopathology. All patients received preoperative CEUS examinations. Quantitative parameters, such as peak intensity (PI), time to peak (TTP), and area under the curve (AUC), were derived from time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis. Tumour tissue samples were obtained during surgery and examined immunohistochemically to assess the expression of angiogenesis markers, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and microvessel density (MVD). The correlation between CEUS parameters, angiogenesis markers, and clinicopathological features was evaluated using appropriate statistical tests.

Quantitative CEUS parameters (PI, TTP, and AUC) showed significant correlations with VEGF expression (P < 0.001) and MVD (P < 0.001), indicating a strong link between tumour blood vessels and angiogenesis. Increased PI, reduced TTP, and expanded AUC values were significantly related to higher tumour stage (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), and distant metastasis (P < 0.001). Furthermore, these parameters were recognized as independent predictors of overall survival and disease-free survival in multivariate analysis (P < 0.001).

CEUS has a high potential in guiding treatment planning and predicting patient outcomes. However, more comprehensive, multicentre studies are required to validate the clinical utility of CEUS in CRC management.

It is time for a change. CEUS is an established method that should be much more actively included in renal cyst monitoring strategies. This review compares the accuracies, strengths, and weaknesses of CEUS, CECT, and MRI in the classification of renal cysts. In order to avoid overstaging by CEUS, a further differentiation of classes IIF, III, and IV is required. A further development in the refinement of the CEUS-Bosniak classification aims to integrate CEUS more closely into the monitoring of renal cysts and to develop new and complex monitoring algorithms.

Extrahepatic biliary tract and gallbladder neoplastic lesions are relatively rare and hence are often underrepresented in the general clinical recommendations for the routine use of ultrasound (US). Dictated by the necessity of updated summarized review of current literature to guide clinicians, this paper represents an updated position of the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (SIUMB) on the use of US and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in extrahepatic biliary tract and gallbladder neoplastic lesions such as extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder adenocarcinoma, gallbladder adenomyomatosis, dense bile with polypoid-like appearance and gallbladder polyps.

In recent years, advancements in technology have allowed the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasounds (CEUS) with high-frequency transducers, which in turn, led to new possibilities in diagnosing a variety of diseases and conditions in the field of radiology, including neonatal brain imaging. CEUSs overcome some of the limitations of conventional ultrasounds (US) and Doppler USs. It allows the visualization of dynamic perfusion even in the smallest vessels in the whole brain and allows the quantitative analysis of perfusion parameters. An increasing number of articles are published on the topic of the use of CEUSs on children each year. In the area of brain imaging, the CEUS has already proven to be useful in cases with clinical indications, such as hypoxic-ischemic injuries, stroke, intracranial hemorrhages, vascular anomalies, brain tumors, and infections. We present and discuss the basic principles of the CEUS and its safety considerations, the examination protocol for imaging the neonatal brain, and current and emerging clinical applications.

The aim of the work described here was to provide an evidence-based evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in acute kidney injury (AKI) and assess variations in renal microperfusion with CEUS quantitative parameters in patients at a high risk of developing AKI.

A meta-analysis and systematic review were conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and the Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library databases were used to search the relevant articles systematically (2000-2022). Studies using CEUS to assess renal cortical microcirculation in AKI were included.

Six prospective studies (374 patients) were included. The overall quality of included studies was moderate to high. CEUS measures, maximum intensity (standard mean difference [SMD]: -1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.64 to -1.09) and wash-in rate (SMD: -0.77, 95% CI: -1.09 to -0.45) were lower in the AKI+ group than in the AKI- group, and mean transit time (SMD: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.11-1.40) and time to peak (SMD: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.99-2.27) were higher in the AKI+ group. Moreover, maximum intensity and wash-in rate values changed before creatinine changed in the AKI+ group.

Patients with AKI had reduced microcirculatory perfusion, prolonged perfusion time and a reduced rising slope in the renal cortex, which occurred before serum creatinine changes. And they could be measured using CEUS, indicating that CEUS could help in the diagnosis of AKI.

The aims of this study were to develop the Ovarian-Adnexa Reporting and Data System (O-RADS) and O-RADS + contrast-enhanced ultrasound (O-RADS CEUS) scoring system to distinguish adnexal masses (AMs) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these systems with that of a magnetic resonance imaging scoring system (ADNEX MR).

We retrospectively evaluated 278 ovarian masses from 240 patients between May 2017 and July 2022. Pathology and adequate follow-up were used as reference standards for comparing the validity of O-RADS, O-RADS CEUS and ADNEX MR scoring to diagnose AMs. Area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity were calculated. The inter-class correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated to evaluate inter-reader agreement (IRA) between the two sonographers and two radiologists who analyzed the findings with the three modalities.

The AUCs of O-RADS, O-RADS CEUS and ADNEX MR scores were 0.928 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.895-0.956), 0.951(95% CI: 0.919-0.973) and 0.964 (95% CI: 0.935-0.983), respectively. Their sensitivities were 95.7%, 94.3 and 91.4%, and their specificities were 81.3%, 92.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The three modalities had accuracies of 84.9%, 92.8% and 95.7%, respectively. O-RADS had the highest sensitivity but significantly lower specificity (p < 0.001), whereas the ADNEX MR scoring had the highest specificity (p < 0.001) but lower sensitivity (p < 0.001). O-RADS CEUS had intermediate sensitivity and specificity (p < 0.001).

The addition of CEUS significantly improves the efficacy of O-RADS in diagnosing AMs. The diagnostic efficacy of the combination is comparable to that of the ADNEX MR scoring system.

Emergency imaging of the scrotum is part of routine medical practice. Indications include epididymitis/epididymo-orchitis, testicular torsion, trauma, tumors and infarction. Prompt diagnosis and management are needed to ensure optimal patient outcome. Ultrasound (US) is the initial, and often the only, imaging modality for testicular pathologies. Usually, B-mode and color Doppler US are adequate. In challenging cases, contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) facilitates final diagnosis or increases the examiner's confidence by confirming findings on non-enhanced US. This paper elaborates on the examination technique of CEUS for testicular pathologies, thereby showing its added value over baseline US techniques in the emergency setting.

Surgical resection is the cornerstone of solid tumour treatment. Current techniques for evaluating margin statuses, such as frozen section, imprint cytology, and intraoperative ultrasound, are helpful. However, an intraoperative assessment of tumour margins that is accurate and safe is clinically necessary. Positive surgical margins (PSM) have a well-documented negative effect on treatment outcomes and survival. As a result, surgical tumour imaging methods are now a practical method for reducing PSM rates and improving the efficiency of debulking surgery. Because of their unique characteristics, nanoparticles can function as contrast agents in image-guided surgery. While most image-guided surgical applications utilizing nanotechnology are now in the preclinical stage, some are beginning to reach the clinical phase. Here, we list the various imaging techniques used in image-guided surgery, such as optical imaging, ultrasound, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, and the most current developments in the potential of nanotechnology to detect surgical malignancies. In the coming years, we will see the evolution of nanoparticles tailored to specific tumour types and the introduction of surgical equipment to improve resection accuracy. Although the promise of nanotechnology for producing exogenous molecular contrast agents has been clearly demonstrated, much work remains to be done to put it into practice.

A definite pathologic diagnosis of intrapancreatic metastasis is crucial for the management decision, i.e., curative or palliative surgery versus chemotherapy or conservative/palliative therapy. This review focuses on the appearance of intrapancreatic metastases on native and contrast-enhanced transabdominal ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound. Differences and similarities in relation to the primary tumor, and the differential diagnosis from pancreatic carcinoma and neuroendocrine neoplasms are described. The frequency of intrapancreatic metastases in autopsy studies and surgical resection studies will be discussed. Further emphasis is placed on endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling to confirm the diagnosis.

The World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (WFUMB) is addressing the issue of incidental findings (IFs) with a series of publications entitled "Incidental imaging findings-the role of ultrasound". IFs in the liver of newborns and children are rare and much less commonly encountered than in adults; as a result, they are relatively much more frequently malignant and life-threatening, even when they are of benign histology. Conventional B-mode ultrasound is the well-established first line imaging modality for the assessment of liver pathology in pediatric patients. US technological advances, resulting in image quality improvement, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), liver elastography and quantification tools for steatosis have expanded the use of ultrasound technology in daily practice. The following overview is intended to illustrate incidentally detected liver pathology covering all pediatric ages. It aims to aid the examiner in establishing the final diagnosis. Management of incidentally detected focal liver lesions (FLL) needs to take into account the diagnostic accuracy of each imaging modality, the patient's safety issues (including ionizing radiation and nephrotoxic contrast agents), the delay in diagnosis, the psychological burden on the patient and the cost for the healthcare system. Moreover, this paper should help the pediatric clinician and ultrasound practitioner to decide which pathologies need no further investigation, which ones require interval imaging and which cases require further and immediate diagnostic procedures.

Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) may aid the resection of space-occupying brain lesions, though technical limits may hinder its reliability.

IOUS (MyLabTwice^®, Esaote, Italy) with a microconvex probe was utilized in 45 consecutive cases of children with supratentorial space-occupying lesions aiming to localize the lesion (pre-IOUS) and evaluate the extent of resection (EOR, post-IOUS). Technical limits were carefully assessed, and strategies to enhance the reliability of real-time imaging were accordingly proposed.

Pre-IOUS allowed us to localize the lesion accurately in all of the cases (16 low-grade gliomas, 12 high-grade gliomas, eight gangliogliomas, seven dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors, five cavernomas, and five other lesions, namely two focal cortical dysplasias, one meningioma, one subependymal giant cell astrocytoma, and one histiocytosis). In 10 deeply located lesions, IOUS with hyperechoic marker, eventually coupled with neuronavigation, was useful to plan the surgical route. In seven cases, the administration of contrast ensured a better definition of the vascular pattern of the tumor. Post-IOUS allowed the evaluation of EOR reliably in small lesions (<2 cm). In large lesions (>2 cm) assessing EOR is hindered by the collapsed surgical cavity, especially when the ventricular system is opened, and by artifacts that may simulate or hide residual tumors. The main strategies to overcome the former limit are inflation of the surgical cavity through pressure irrigation while insonating, and closure of the ventricular opening with Gelfoam before insonating. The strategies to overcome the latter are avoiding the use of hemostatic agents before IOUS and insonating through normal adjacent brain instead of corticotomy. These technical nuances enhanced the reliability of post-IOUS, with a total concordance to postoperative MRI. Indeed, the surgical plan was changed in about 30% of cases, as IOUS showed a residual tumor that was left behind.

IOUS ensures reliable real-time imaging in the surgery of space-occupying brain lesions. Limits may be overcome with technical nuances and proper training.

A practical noninvasive method to identify sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in breast cancer patients, who had a suspicious axillary lymph node (ALN) at ultrasound (US), but a negative clinical physical examination is needed. To predict SLN metastasis using a nomogram based on US and biopsy-based pathological features, this retrospective study investigated associations between clinicopathological features and SLN status.

Patients treated with SLN dissection at four centers were apportioned to training, internal, or external validation sets (n = 472, 175, and 81). Lymph node ultrasound and pathological characteristics were compared using chi-squared and t-tests. A nomogram predicting SLN metastasis was constructed using multivariate logistic regression models.

In the training set, statistically significant factors associated with SLN+ were as follows: histology type (p < 0.001); progesterone receptor (PR: p = 0.003); Her-2 status (p = 0.049); and ALN-US shape (p = 0.034), corticomedullary demarcation (CMD: p < 0.001), and blood flow (p = 0.001). With multivariate analysis, five independent variables (histological type, PR status, ALN-US shape, CMD, and blood flow) were integrated into the nomogram (C-statistic 0.714 [95% CI: 0.688-0.740]) and validated internally (0.816 [95% CI: 0.784-0.849]) and externally (0.942 [95% CI: 0.918-0.966]), with good predictive accuracy and clinical applicability.

This nomogram could be a direct and reliable tool for individual preoperative evaluation of SLN status, and therefore aids decisions concerning ALN dissection and adjuvant treatment.

Since FDA approval for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), clinical applications have increased to include diagnostic imaging of hepatic, renal, and other abdominal lesions. The modality has also demonstrated utility in certain image-guided procedures. Intravascular ultrasound contrast agents use microbubbles to improve visibility of solid tumors. Lesions not well seen on grayscale or Doppler ultrasound may become amenable to CEUS-guided biopsy or ablation.

This pictorial essay provides eleven examples to illustrate the current use of CEUS in a variety of abdominal image-guided procedures. Hepatic, renal, peritoneal, and soft tissue cases are presented.

CEUS can improve visualization and targeting in abdominal image-guided procedures, without nephrotoxicity or radiation exposure.

The application of thoracic ultrasound examination has not long been developed because ultrasound's interaction with the lung does not generate an anatomical image but an artifactual one. Subsequently, the evaluation of pulmonary artifacts and their correlation to specific diseases allowed the development of ultrasound semantics. Currently, pneumonia still represents one of the main causes of hospitalization and mortality. Several studies in the literature have demonstrated the ultrasound features of pneumonia. Although ultrasound cannot be considered the diagnostic gold standard for the study of all lung diseases, it has experienced an extraordinary development and growth of interest due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This review aims to provide essential information on the application of lung ultrasound to the study of infectious pneumonia and to discuss the differential diagnosis.

The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess subchondral bone microcirculation perfusion in adults with early osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) using contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and to evaluate its correlation with the Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) stage. We investigated 97 adult patients with definite ONFH by imaging a total of 155 hips, performing CEUS, storing images of CEUS processes at different ARCO stages and generating CEUS time-intensity curves (TICs) to obtain perfusion parameters. Differences in CEUS parameters at different ARCO stages were analyzed, and correlations were explored. A logistic regression model was constructed by incorporating the meaningful CEUS indicators. The CEUS parameters time to peak (TTP), peak intensity (PI), enhanced intensity (EI), ascending slope (AS), descending slope (DS) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were significantly different in ARCO stage Ⅰ compared with stage ⅢA, and the same results were obtained in stage Ⅱ compared with stage ⅢA. However, there were no significant differences between stages Ⅰ and Ⅱ. The MTT (mean transit time) assay was not significantly different between the different stages. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of TTP, PI, EI, AS, DS and AUC in stages Ⅰ and ⅢA had a certain diagnostic efficacy, similar to the results in stages Ⅱ and ⅢA. The diagnostic performance of DS was less accurate in stages Ⅰ and ⅢA, while the diagnostic performance of TTP was less accurate in stages Ⅱ and ⅢA. ARCO stage was independently and negatively correlated with TTP and DS and independently and positively correlated with PI, EI, AS and AUC. The MTT assay was not correlated with ARCO stage. Logistic regression models containing statistically significant TTP, EI and AUC values were constructed, and all three values were closely related to the ARCO stage. In patients with different ARCO stages of ONFH, CEUS can effectively assess subchondral bone perfusion of the femoral head and is expected to become an effective imaging method for the diagnosis of early ONFH.

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS), similar to other radiologic modalities, requires specific technical considerations and is subject to image artifacts. These artifacts may affect examination quality, negatively impact diagnostic accuracy, and decrease user comfort when using this emerging technique. Some artifacts are related to commonly known gray-scale US artifacts that can also appear on the contrast-only image (tissue-subtracted image obtained with the linear responses from background tissues nulled). These may include acoustic shadowing and enhancement; reverberation, refraction, and reflection; and poor penetration. Other artifacts are exclusive to CEUS owing to the techniques used for contrast mode image generation and the unique properties of the microbubbles that constitute ultrasound-specific contrast agents (UCAs). UCA-related artifacts may appear on the contrast-only image, the gray-scale image, or various Doppler mode images. Artifacts related to CEUS may include nonlinear artifacts and unintentional microbubble destruction resulting in pseudowashout. The microbubbles themselves may result in specific artifacts such as pseudoenhancement, signal saturation, and attenuation and shadowing and can confound the use of color and spectral Doppler US. Identifying and understanding these artifacts and knowing how to mitigate them may improve the quality of the imaging study, increase user confidence, and improve patient care. The authors review the principles of UCAs and the sound-microbubble interaction, as well as the technical aspects of image generation. Technical considerations, including patient positioning, depth, acoustic window, and contrast agent dose, also are discussed. Specific artifacts are described, with tips on how to identify and, if necessary, apply corrective measures, with the goal of improving examination quality. ^© RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.