1
|
Case A, Williams F, Prosser S, Hutchings H, Crosby T, Adams R, Jenkins G, Gwynne S. Reconsidering the Role of Radiotherapy for Inoperable Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review of Gastric Radiotherapy Given With Definitive and Palliative Intent. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2025; 37:103693. [PMID: 39642760 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.103693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2024] [Revised: 11/09/2024] [Accepted: 11/12/2024] [Indexed: 12/09/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The role of radiotherapy (RT) for inoperable gastric cancer (IGC) is commonly low-dose, given reactively for symptoms (e.g. bleeding), in contrast to the oesophagus, where high quality evidence exists for higher doses of RT. This systematic review aims to evaluate the use of, and evidence for, definitive and high-dose palliative RT for IGC and whether a change in practice is warranted. MATERIALS AND METHODS Following registration with PROSPERO (CRD42022297080), MEDLINE, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library were searched in accordance with PRISMA standards for studies evaluating definitive (non-metastatic disease, BED10 >45Gy) or high-dose palliative RT (for symptom/local control, minimum BED10 >30Gy). A manual search of meeting proceedings and clinical trial registries was also performed. RESULTS 31 studies were selected for analysis. 10 definitive studies totalling n = 354 patients receiving RT with 45-50.4Gy/25-28#, showed median overall survival ranging between 11 and 26.4 months, clinical complete response range 12%-45%, G3 gastrointestinal toxicity 0-31% (range) and RT completion rates ranging from 81% to 100%. 21 high-dose palliative studies (n = 955) mostly evaluated haemostatic control and reported 38 different RT regimens (most commonly 30Gy/10#). Bleeding response rate (RR) was 59.6%-90%, pain RR 45.5-100%, obstruction RR 52.9%-100%, G3 gastrointestinal toxicity <5% and RT completion 68%-100%. An additional American National Cancer Database review >4700 non metastatic IGC patients which combined both definitive and palliative doses found significant benefit to RT in addition to chemotherapy. Evidence regarding a dose-response relationship is conflicting, limited by retrospective data. Two studies report high quality -of-life (QOL) scores following gastric RT. CONCLUSION There is a body of mainly non-randomised, observational evidence showing high-dose RT is efficacious, safe and may maintain QOL for patients with IGC. A change in practice will require a prospective randomised controlled trial, which should explore the role of prophylactic, high-BED RT combined with optimal systemic therapy using modern IMRT techniques and RT quality assurance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Case
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea. SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Sketty, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK.
| | - F Williams
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK
| | - S Prosser
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea. SA2 8QA, UK
| | - H Hutchings
- Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Sketty, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
| | - T Crosby
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK
| | - R Adams
- Velindre Cancer Centre, Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK; Cardiff University Centre for Trials Research, Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park Way, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - G Jenkins
- Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Sketty, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
| | - S Gwynne
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Singleton Hospital, Sketty Lane, Swansea. SA2 8QA, UK; Swansea University Medical School, Institute of Life Science 2, Sketty, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang F, Zhang X, Tang L, Wu Q, Cai M, Li Y, Qu X, Qiu H, Zhang Y, Ying J, Zhang J, Sun L, Lin R, Wang C, Liu H, Qiu M, Guan W, Rao S, Ji J, Xin Y, Sheng W, Xu H, Zhou Z, Zhou A, Jin J, Yuan X, Bi F, Liu T, Liang H, Zhang Y, Li G, Liang J, Liu B, Shen L, Li J, Xu R. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2024; 44:127-172. [PMID: 38160327 PMCID: PMC10794017 DOI: 10.1002/cac2.12516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng‐Hua Wang
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Xiao‐Tian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal OncologyKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education)Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Lei Tang
- Department of RadiologyPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Endoscopy CenterPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Mu‐Yan Cai
- Department of PathologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Yuan‐Fang Li
- Department of Gastric SurgerySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Xiu‐Juan Qu
- Department of Medical OncologyThe First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Hong Qiu
- Department of Medical OncologyTongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Yu‐Jing Zhang
- Department of RadiotherapySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Jie‐Er Ying
- Department of Medical OncologyZhejiang Cancer HospitalHangzhouZhejiangP. R. China
| | - Jun Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyRuijin HospitalShanghai Jiaotong University School of MedicineShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Ling‐Yu Sun
- Department of Surgical OncologyThe Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinHeilongjiangP. R. China
| | - Rong‐Bo Lin
- Department of Medical OncologyFujian Cancer HospitalFuzhouFujianP. R. China
| | - Chang Wang
- Tumor CenterThe First Hospital of Jilin UniversityChangchunJilinP. R. China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General SurgeryNanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Miao‐Zhen Qiu
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Wen‐Long Guan
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Sheng‐Xiang Rao
- Department of RadiologyZhongshan HospitalFudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Jia‐Fu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryPeking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Yan Xin
- Pathology Laboratory of Gastrointestinal TumorThe First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Wei‐Qi Sheng
- Department of PathologyZhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Fudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Hui‐Mian Xu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery. The First Hospital of China Medical UniversityShenyangLiaoningP. R. China
| | - Zhi‐Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric SurgerySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Ai‐Ping Zhou
- Department of OncologyNational Cancer CenterNational Clinical Research Center for CancerCancer HospitalChinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical CollegeBeijingP. R. China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation OncologyShenzhen hospitalCancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesBeijingP. R. China
| | - Xiang‐Lin Yuan
- Department of OncologyTongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanHubeiP. R. China
| | - Feng Bi
- Department of Abdominal OncologyWest China Hospital of Sichuan UniversityChengduSichuanP. R. China
| | - Tian‐Shu Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyZhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastric SurgeryTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & HospitalTianjinP. R. China
| | - Yan‐Qiao Zhang
- Department of Medical OncologyCancer Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityHarbinHeilongjiangP. R. China
| | - Guo‐Xin Li
- Department of General SurgeryNanfang HospitalSouthern Medical UniversityGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| | - Jun Liang
- Department of Medical OncologyPeking University International HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Bao‐Rui Liu
- Department of Medical OncologyNanjing Drum Tower HospitalThe Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical SchoolNanjingP. R. China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of GI OncologyKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education)Peking University Cancer HospitalBeijingP. R. China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of OncologyEaster Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Tongji UniversityShanghaiP. R. China
| | - Rui‐Hua Xu
- Department of Medical OncologySun Yat‐sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer MedicineGuangzhouGuangdongP. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lei ZN, Teng QX, Tian Q, Chen W, Xie Y, Wu K, Zeng Q, Zeng L, Pan Y, Chen ZS, He Y. Signaling pathways and therapeutic interventions in gastric cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2022; 7:358. [PMID: 36209270 PMCID: PMC9547882 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-022-01190-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in global cancer diagnosis and fourth in cancer-related death. Despite tremendous progress in diagnosis and therapeutic strategies and significant improvements in patient survival, the low malignancy stage is relatively asymptomatic and many GC cases are diagnosed at advanced stages, which leads to unsatisfactory prognosis and high recurrence rates. With the recent advances in genome analysis, biomarkers have been identified that have clinical importance for GC diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Modern molecular classifications have uncovered the vital roles that signaling pathways, including EGFR/HER2, p53, PI3K, immune checkpoint pathways, and cell adhesion signaling molecules, play in GC tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and therapeutic responsiveness. These biomarkers and molecular classifications open the way for more precise diagnoses and treatments for GC patients. Nevertheless, the relative significance, temporal activation, interaction with GC risk factors, and crosstalk between these signaling pathways in GC are not well understood. Here, we review the regulatory roles of signaling pathways in GC potential biomarkers, and therapeutic targets with an emphasis on recent discoveries. Current therapies, including signaling-based and immunotherapies exploited in the past decade, and the development of treatment for GC, particularly the challenges in developing precision medications, are discussed. These advances provide a direction for the integration of clinical, molecular, and genomic profiles to improve GC diagnosis and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zi-Ning Lei
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA
| | - Qiu-Xu Teng
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA
| | - Qin Tian
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Yuhao Xie
- Institute for Biotechnology, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA
| | - Kaiming Wu
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Qianlin Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Leli Zeng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| | - Yihang Pan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| | - Zhe-Sheng Chen
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA.
- Institute for Biotechnology, St. John's University, Queens, NY, 11439, USA.
| | - Yulong He
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer Research, Digestive Diseases Center, Scientific Research Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, 518107, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kumar R, Tchelebi L, Anker CJ, Sharma N, Bianchi NA, Dragovic J, Goodman KA, Herman JM, Jiang Y, Jones WE, Kennedy TJ, Lee P, Kundranda M, Russo S, Small W, Suh WW, Yee N, Jabbour SK. American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Locoregional Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:391-402. [PMID: 35947781 PMCID: PMC10865426 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the data regarding the use of neoadjuvant, perioperative, surgical, and adjuvant treatment options in localized gastric cancer patients and to develop Appropriate Use Criteria recommended by a panel of experts convened by the American Radium Society. METHODS Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses methodology was used to develop an extensive analysis of peer-reviewed phase 2/2R/3 trials, as well as meta-analyses found within the Ovid Medline database between 2010 and 2020. The expert panel then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in 5 representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). RESULTS For patients with medically operable locally advanced gastric cancer, the strongest recommendation was for perioperative chemotherapy based on high-quality data. Acceptable alternatives included surgery followed by either chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT). For patients with upfront resection of stages I to III gastric cancer (no neoadjuvant therapy), the group strongly recommended adjuvant therapy with either chemotherapy alone or CRT, based on high-quality data. For patients with locally advanced disease who received preoperative chemotherapy without tumor regression, the group strongly recommended postoperative chemotherapy or postoperative CRT. Finally, for medically inoperable gastric cancer patients, there was moderate consensus recommending definitive concurrent CRT. CONCLUSIONS The addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation, either in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or perioperative setting, results in improved survival rates for patients compared with surgery alone. For inoperable patients, definitive CRT is a reasonable treatment option, though largely palliative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Yixing Jiang
- UT Health Cancer Center, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
| | | | | | - Percy Lee
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Suzanne Russo
- School of Medicine, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stritch School of Medicine, Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL
| | - Wonsuk W. Suh
- Ridley-Tree Cancer Center Santa Barbara at Sansum Clinic, Santa Barbara, CA
| | - Nelson Yee
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Mount Kisco
| | - Salma K. Jabbour
- Panel Chair, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yeh JH, Yeh YS, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Chang TK, Su WC, Wang JY. Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Where Are We at? Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14123026. [PMID: 35740693 PMCID: PMC9221037 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14123026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary More than 50% of gastric cancer are at least locally advanced at presentation. For such patients, a multimodal approach rather than mere surgical resection leads to better long-term prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is one of the common treatment strategies for local advanced gastric cancer. Based on the experience and evidence from esophago-gastric cancers, the incorporation of systemic and locoregional therapy has shown superior disease control and reduced local recurrence. However, the optimal chemotherapy regimen, patient selection, technical consideration and potential biomarkers are still under investigation. Furthermore, the comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with neoadjuvant/perioperative chemotherapy is also an important issue to be answered. In the review article, we addressed the current available evidence to provide a comprehensive understanding and the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. Future studies and ongoing trials will be necessary to determine the best candidate and the role of newer systemic and radiation therapies in such patients. NCRT is a feasible treatment option for LAGC, with the ability to achieve favorable disease control and enable higher radical resection rates over those afforded by perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone. Large clinical trials examining the comparative efficacy of NCRT and NCT are underway. The discrepancy between the satisfactory pCR rates associated with NCRT and the nonsignificant association between NCRT and survival warrants further exploration. Furthermore, newer therapies such as immunotherapy and adaptive radiotherapy may be implemented in con-junction with NCRT, and the development of useful biomarkers may ultimately lead to the de-velopment of personalized treatments for LAGC. These research directions may lead to the dis-covery of the optimal approach to administering NCRT to patients with LAGC. They may also aid in the determination of the optimal candidates for undergoing NCRT. Abstract Locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) has a poor prognosis with surgical resection alone, and neoadjuvant treatment has been recommended to improve surgical and oncological outcomes. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been established to be effective for LAGC, the role of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) remains under investigation. Clinical experience and research evidence on esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma (e.g., cardia gastric cancers) indicate that the likelihood of achieving sustainable local control is higher through NCRT than through resection alone. Furthermore, NCRT also has an acceptable treatment-related toxicity and adverse event profile. In particular, it increases the likelihood of achieving an R0 resection and a pathological complete response (pCR). Moreover, NCRT results in higher overall and recurrence-free survival rates than surgery alone; however, evidence on the survival benefits of NCRT versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) remains conflicting. For noncardia gastric cancer, the efficacy of NCRT has mostly been reported in retrospective studies, and several large clinical trials are ongoing. Consequently, NCRT might play a more essential role in unresectable LAGC, for which NCT alone may not be adequate to attain disease control. The continual improvements in systemic treatments, radiotherapy techniques, and emerging biomarkers can also lead to improved personalized therapy for NCRT. To elucidate the contributions of NCRT to gastric cancer treatment in the future, the efficacy, potential toxicity, predictive biomarkers, and clinical considerations for implementing NCRT in different types of LAGC were reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jen-Hao Yeh
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Dachang Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Department of Medical technology, College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Sung Yeh
- Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan;
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Graduate Institute of Injury Prevention and Control, College of Public Health, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Lin Tsai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Wen Huang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Kun Chang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chih Su
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (J.-H.Y.); (T.-K.C.); (W.-C.S.)
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan; (H.-L.T.); (C.-W.H.)
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Pingtung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-3122805; Fax: +886-7-3114679
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Comparison between Heat-Clearing Medicine and Antirheumatic Medicine in Treatment of Gastric Cancer Based on Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Tumor Immune Infiltration Analysis. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:7490279. [PMID: 35069767 PMCID: PMC8767399 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7490279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Clinical research found that TCM is therapeutic in treating gastric cancer. Clearing heat is the most common method, while some antirheumatic medicines are widely used in treatment as well. To explore the pharmacological mechanism, we researched the comparison between heat-clearing medicine and antirheumatic medicine in treating gastric cancer. Methods First, related ingredients and targets were searched, respectively, and are shown in an active ingredient-target network. Combining the relevant targets of gastric cancer, we constructed a PPI network and MCODE network. Then, GO and KEGG enrichment analyses were conducted. Molecular docking experiments were performed to verify the affinity of targets and ligands. Finally, we analyzed the tumor immune infiltration on gene expression, somatic CNA, and clinical outcome. Results A total of 31 ingredients and 90 targets of heat-clearing medicine, 31 ingredients and 186 targets of antirheumatic medicine, and 12,155 targets of gastric cancer were collected. Antirheumatic medicine ranked the top in all the enrichment analyses. In the KEGG pathway, both types of medicines were related to pathways in cancer. In the KEGG map, AR, MMP2, ERBB2, and TP53 were the most crucial targets. Key targets and ligands were docked with low binding energy. Analysis of tumor immune infiltration showed that the expressions of AR and ERBB2 were correlated with the abundance of immune infiltration and made a difference in clinical outcomes. Conclusions Quercetin is an important ingredient in both heat-clearing medicine and antirheumatic medicine. AR signaling pathway exists in both types of medicines. The mechanism of the antitumor effect in antirheumatic medicine was similar to trastuzumab, a targeted drug aimed at ERBB2. Both types of medicines were significant in tumor immune infiltration. The immunology of gastric tumor deserves further research.
Collapse
|
7
|
Anthony M, Goyal U. Definitive Chemoradiation With Dose Escalation for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Case Studies. Cureus 2020; 12:e11040. [PMID: 33214967 PMCID: PMC7673278 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.11040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a prevalent cancer with a predilection for Asian ethnicity and male patients. In early and locally advanced gastric cancer, without significant comorbidities, surgery is a part of the treatment management of this cancer. However, with concurrent comorbidities, surgery may not be recommended and alternative treatment options such as palliative chemotherapy and/or radiation and definitive chemoradiation can be considered to reduce morbidity. We present three cases of gastric cancer where definitive chemoradiation with dose escalation was utilized due to underlying comorbidities and poor performance status. The treatment was generally well tolerated by patients and resulted in substantial reduction in gastric mass size in two patients with median overall survival of 10 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Anthony
- Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, USA
| | - Uma Goyal
- Radiation Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Phase I Trial of Intensity-Modulated Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy Boost with Concurrent Chemotherapy Immediately Following Standard Chemoradiotherapy in Patients Primarily with Advanced Intra-thoracic/Cervical Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 106:340-348. [PMID: 31655197 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Local persistence and relapse of disease in the gross tumor volume (GTV) account for the majority of treatment failures after standard chemoradiation therapy. The primary objective of this phase 1 trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) boost to the GTV with concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin after standard-dose chemoradiation therapy, using image guided intensity modulated radiation therapy techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligible patients were given weekly doses of paclitaxel (45 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 1.5) for 5 weeks with concurrent radiation therapy (50 Gy), immediately followed by an HFRT boost to the GTV with the same chemotherapy regimen. The boost doses were escalated in increments of 7.2 Gy delivered in 6 twice-daily fractions of 1.2 Gy using a modified Fibonacci design. Once the MTD was established, additional patients were treated at that dose to determine the safety. RESULTS Thirty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The incidence of dose-limiting toxicity was 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 0 of 3, 1 of 6 (grade 4 esophagitis), 0 of 3, and 2 of 3 (1 case each of grade 5 esophageal fistula and grade 3 pneumotitis) at 7.2, 14.4, 21.6, 28.8, 36, and 43.2 Gy, respectively, indicating an MTD of 36 Gy. Ten patients treated with this MTD showed no dose-limiting toxicities. The most common acute grade 3 or greater toxicities were esophagitis (26%) and neutropenia (19%). Late toxicity of grade 2 esophageal stricture occurred in 4 patients. The overall response rate was 84% (95% confidence interval, 42%-93%) in the entire cohort. The 1-year local control rate was 100% among those receiving a cumulative dose of the MTD or greater. CONCLUSIONS The MTD of the HFRT boost after standard chemoradiation therapy in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy was 36 Gy, resulting in the cumulative tumor dose of 86 Gy in patients primarily with advanced intrathoracic/cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinomas and not adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction. A phase 2 study to further evaluate this regimen is underway.
Collapse
|
9
|
Shinde A, Novak J, Amini A, Chen YJ. The evolving role of radiation therapy for resectable and unresectable gastric cancer. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:64. [PMID: 31559345 DOI: 10.21037/tgh.2019.08.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastric cancer is a common malignancy worldwide, and treatment of localized disease has shifted from surgery alone to the addition of chemotherapy at various stages in treatment. The role of radiation in the management of gastric cancer has evolved significantly since the seminal publication of INT 0116 demonstrated a survival advantage to adjuvant chemoradiation. In this review, we summarize multiple landmark studies discussing the role of radiation in non-metastatic gastric cancer, both in resectable and unresectable patients. This review will additionally discuss the evidence for pre-operative chemoradiation, as the benefit has already been demonstrated in esophageal and rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Shinde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Novak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Arya Amini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang FH, Shen L, Li J, Zhou ZW, Liang H, Zhang XT, Tang L, Xin Y, Jin J, Zhang YJ, Yuan XL, Liu TS, Li GX, Wu Q, Xu HM, Ji JF, Li YF, Wang X, Yu S, Liu H, Guan WL, Xu RH. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer. Cancer Commun (Lond) 2019; 39:10. [PMID: 30885279 PMCID: PMC6423835 DOI: 10.1186/s40880-019-0349-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 304] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
China is one of the countries with the highest incidence of gastric cancer. There are differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biological characteristics, treatment patterns, and drug selection between gastric cancer patients from the Eastern and Western countries. Non-Chinese guidelines cannot specifically reflect the diagnosis and treatment characteristics for the Chinese gastric cancer patients. The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) arranged for a panel of senior experts specializing in all sub-specialties of gastric cancer to compile, discuss, and revise the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer based on the findings of evidence-based medicine in China and abroad. By referring to the opinions of industry experts, taking into account of regional differences, giving full consideration to the accessibility of diagnosis and treatment resources, these experts have conducted experts' consensus judgement on relevant evidence and made various grades of recommendations for the clinical diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer to reflect the value of cancer treatment and meeting health economic indexes. This guideline uses tables and is complemented by explanatory and descriptive notes covering the diagnosis, comprehensive treatment, and follow-up visits for gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Lin Shen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Jin Li
- Department of Oncology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200120 P. R. China
| | - Zhi-Wei Zhou
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Han Liang
- Department of Gastric Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Cancer for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin, 300060 P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Tian Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Lei Tang
- Medical Imaging Department, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Yan Xin
- Pathology Laboratory of Gastrointestinal Tumor, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning P. R. China
| | - Jing Jin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, China and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 P. R. China
| | - Yu-Jing Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Xiang-Lin Yuan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030 Hubei P. R. China
| | - Tian-Shu Liu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 P. R. China
| | - Guo-Xin Li
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Endoscopy Center, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Hui-Mian Xu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001 Liaoning P. R. China
| | - Jia-Fu Ji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142 P. R. China
| | - Yuan-Fang Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center, China and Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021 P. R. China
| | - Shan Yu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032 P. R. China
| | - Hao Liu
- Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital Affiliated to Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Wen-Long Guan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, 510060 Guangdong P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Li B, Chen L, Luo HL, Yi FM, Wei YP, Zhang WX. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil compared with epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimen for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:600-615. [PMID: 30863759 PMCID: PMC6406203 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i5.600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the first-line regimens for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, both docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) and epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (ECF) regimens are commonly used in clinical practice, but there is still controversy about which is better. AIM To compare the efficacy and safety of DCF and ECF regimens by conducting this meta-analysis. METHODS Computer searches in PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Science Direct, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Scopus were performed to find the clinical studies of all comparisons between DCF and ECF regimens. We used progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse effects (AEs) as endpoints for analysis. RESULTS Our meta-analysis included seven qualified studies involving a total of 598 patients. The pooled hazard ratios between the DCF and ECF groups were comparable in PFS (95%CI: 0.58-1.46, P = 0.73), OS (95%CI: 0.65-1.10, P = 0.21), and total AEs (95%CI: 0.93-1.29, P = 0.30). The DCF group was significantly better than the ECF group in terms of ORR (95%CI: 1.13-1.75, P = 0.002) and DCR (95%CI: 1.03-1.41, P = 0.02). However, the incidence rate of grade 3-4 AEs was also greater in the DCF group than in the ECF group (95%CI: 1.16-1.88, P = 0.002), especially for neutropenia and febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION With better ORR and DCR values, the DCF regimen seems to be more suitable for advanced gastric cancer than the ECF regimen. However, the higher rate of AEs in the DCF group still needs to be noticed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Li
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
- Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Lian Chen
- Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Hong-Liang Luo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Feng-Ming Yi
- Department of Digestive Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Yi-Ping Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| | - Wen-Xiong Zhang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, Jiangxi Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Agolli L, Nicosia L. Between evidence and new perspectives on the current state of the multimodal approach to gastric cancer: Is there still a role for radiation therapy? World J Gastrointest Oncol 2018; 10:271-281. [PMID: 30254722 PMCID: PMC6147768 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v10.i9.271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2018] [Revised: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In patients affected by gastric cancer (GC), especially those in advanced stage, the multidisciplinary approach of treatment is fundamental to obtain a good disease control and quality of life. Although many chemotherapeutics in combination to radiotherapy are adopted in the peri- or postoperative setting, the most optimal timing, regimens and doses remains controversial. In the era of radical surgery performed with D2-lymphadenectomy, the role of radiation therapy remains to be better defined. Categories of patients, who could benefit more from an intensified local treatment rather than more toxic systemic therapy, are still under investigation. Evidence and recent updates of the randomized trials, meta-analysis and prospective trials show that the postoperative radiotherapy plays a fundamental role in reducing the loco-regional recurrence and in turn the disease-free survival in operable advanced GC patients, also after a well performed D2 surgery. Therapeutic decisions should be taken considering the individual patients, but the multimodal approach is necessary to guarantee a longer survival and a good quality of life. Ongoing randomized trials could better define the timing and the combination of radiotherapy and systemic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Agolli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden 01037, Germany
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome 00189, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Schernberg A, Rivin del Campo E, Rousseau B, Matzinger O, Loi M, Maingon P, Huguet F. Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric carcinoma: State of the art and perspectives. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 10:13-22. [PMID: 29928701 PMCID: PMC6008627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2018] [Revised: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
An estimated 990,000 new cases of gastric cancer are diagnosed worldwide each year. Surgical excision, the only chance for prolonged survival, is feasible in about 20% of cases. Even after surgery, the median survival is limited to 12 to 20 months due to the frequency of locoregional and/or metastatic recurrences. This led to clinical trials associating surgery with neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatments to improve tumor control and patient survival. The most studied modalities are perioperative chemotherapy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. To date, evidence has shown a survival benefit for postoperative chemoradiotherapy and for perioperative chemotherapy. Phase III trials are ongoing to compare these two modalities. The aim of this review is to synthesize current knowledge about adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the management of gastric adenocarcinoma, and to consider its prospects by integrating modern radiotherapy techniques.
Collapse
Key Words
- 5FU, 5-fluorouracil
- 5FU-LV, 5-fluorouracil leucovorin
- Adenocarcinoma
- Adjuvant therapy
- CRT, chemoradiotherapy
- CT, chemotherapy
- Chemoradiotherapy
- DCF, Doxorubicin Cisplatin 5-fluorouracil
- ECF, Epirubicin Cisplatin 5-fluorouracil
- ECX, Epirubicin Cisplatin Capecitabin
- FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil oxaliplatin
- FUFOL, bolus 5-fluorouracil followed by leucovorin over 15 minutes
- Gastric cancer
- IMRT
- IMRT, intensity modulated radiation therapy
- LV, leucovorin
- RT, radiation therapy
- XELOX, capecitabin oxaliplatine
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Schernberg
- Service d’Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Paris, France
| | - E. Rivin del Campo
- Service d’Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Paris, France
| | - B. Rousseau
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Paris, France
| | - O. Matzinger
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Center, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Vevey, Switzerland
| | - M. Loi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P. Maingon
- Service d’Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière – Charles Foix, Paris, France
- Université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| | - F. Huguet
- Service d’Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Paris, France
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Paris, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Center, Riviera-Chablais Hospital, Vevey, Switzerland
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Service d’Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Pitié Salpêtrière – Charles Foix, Paris, France
- Université Paris VI Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|