Copyright
©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2017; 9(2): 77-84
Published online Feb 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.77
Published online Feb 16, 2017. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.77
Table 1 Patients’ background and disease background
VisiGlide2TM | VisiGlideTM | P value | ||
Sex | 122 males | 113 males | NS | |
80 females | 81 females | |||
Age | 72.871 ± 11.403 (36-98) | 70.834 ± 11.824 (38-95) | NS | |
Disease | Bile duct stone | 113 | 103 | NS |
Cholangiocarcinoma | 31 | 26 | NS | |
Chronic pancreatitis | 14 | 18 | NS | |
Pancreatic cancer | 18 | 16 | NS | |
Gallbladder cancer | 3 | 6 | NS | |
Hepatolithiasis | 1 | 5 | NS | |
Metastatic biliary obstruction | 5 | 5 | NS | |
IPMN | 3 | 4 | NS | |
Benign biliary stenosis | 4 | 3 | NS | |
Acute cholecystitis | 5 | 3 | NS | |
PSC | 2 | 2 | NS | |
Postoperative bile leakage | 1 | 1 | NS | |
Pancreaticobiliary maljunction | 1 | 1 | NS | |
Duodenal papillary cancer | 1 | 1 | NS | |
Target region | Bile duct | 190 | 180 | NS |
Pancreatic duct | 12 | 14 | NS | |
Stenosed lesion | Present | 90 | 77 | NS |
Absent | 112 | 117 | NS | |
Procedure | Scheduled ERCP | 157 | 155 | NS |
Emergency | 45 | 39 | NS | |
Purpose | Diagnosis | 10 | 14 | NS |
Diagnosis + treatment | 15 | 9 | NS | |
Treatment | 177 | 171 | NS | |
Papillary treatment | None | 80 | 81 | NS |
Post EST | 110 | 101 | NS | |
Post EPST | 12 | 12 | NS |
Table 2 Accomplishment rate of procedure and procedural time
VisiGlide2TM | VisiGlideTM | P value | |
Success rate | 97.5 (197/202)% | 92.3 (180/195)% | 0.034 |
Procedural time (min) | 23.930 ± 16.207 (4-65) | 31.285 ± 19.122 (4-117) | 0.0001 |
Table 3 Papillary treatment
VisiGlide2TM | VisiGlideTM | ||||
Papillary treatment | n | Success rate of procedure | n | Success rate of procedure | P-value |
EST | 67 | 100 (67/67)% | 67 | 100 (67/67)% | NS |
EST + EPLBD | 3 | 100 (3/3)% | 5 | 100 (5/5)% | NS |
EPST | 3 | 100 (3/3)% | 3 | 100 (3/3)% | NS |
EPBD | 1 | 100 (1/1)% | 4 | 100 (4/4)% | NS |
Total | 74 | 100 (74/74)% | 79 | 100 (79/79)% | NS |
Table 4 Procedure conducted after insertion into the bile duct and pancreatic duct
VisiGlide2TM | VisiGlideTM | ||||
Procedure conducted | n | Success rate of procedure | n | Success rate of procedure | P value |
ENBD | 60 | 98.3 (59/60)% | 51 | 100 (51/51)% | NS |
ENPD | 5 | 100 (5/5)% | 3 | 100 (3/3)% | NS |
ENGBD | 5 | 80.0 (4/5)% | 1 | 100 (1/1)% | NS |
EGBS | 2 | 100 (2/2)% | 1 | 0 (0/1)% | NS |
EBS | 95 | 100 (95/95)% | 78 | 100 (78/78)% | NS |
EPS | 30 | 100 (30/30)% | 22 | 100 (22/22)% | NS |
EML | 2 | 100 (2/2)% | 2 | 100 (2/2)% | NS |
Placement of MS | 12 | 100 (12/12)% | 8 | 100 (8/8)% | NS |
Lithotomy | 88 | 100 (88/88)% | 69 | 100 (69/69)% | NS |
Bile duct biopsy | 8 | 100 (8/8)% | 9 | 100 (9/9)% | NS |
Pancreatic duct biopsy | 0 | - | 1 | 100 (1/1)% | NS |
Peroral cholangioscopy | 2 | 100 (2/2)% | 1 | 100 (1/1)% | NS |
IDUS | 10 | 100 (10/10)% | 6 | 100 (6/6)% | NS |
Bile duct brushing cytology | 12 | 100 (12/12)% | 9 | 100 (9/9)% | NS |
Pancreatic duct brushing cytology | 2 | 100 (2/2)% | 2 | 100 (2/2)% | NS |
Total 333 99.4 (331/333) | Total 263 99.6 (262/263)% | NS | |||
Guidewire type straight angle | 127 | 34 | NS | ||
75 | 0 | NS |
Table 5 Results of incidence of accidental symptoms
VisiGlide2TM | VisiGlideTM | P value | |
n = 202 | n = 194 | ||
Bleeding | 2 | 4 | NS |
Pancreatitis | 3 | 1 | NS |
Perforation | 1 | 0 | NS |
Guidewire perforation | 0 | 4 | NS |
Total (%) | 6 (3.0%) | 9 (4.6%) | NS |
- Citation: Sakai Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Hirata N, Nakaji S, Shimura K, Nishikawa T, Fujimoto T, Hamano T, Nishino T, Yokosuka O. Clinical utility of 0.025-inch guidewire VisiGlide2TM in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 9(2): 77-84
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v9/i2/77.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v9.i2.77