Brief Article
Copyright ©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2013; 5(4): 169-173
Published online Apr 16, 2013. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i4.169
Table 1 Endoscopy claims against gastroenterologists (1985 to 2006) n (%)
Etiology of claimsFrequency (n = 341)
Improper performance175 (51.3)
Diagnosis error (failure, incorrect)59 (17.3)
Meritless (no clear evidence)35 (10.3)
Failure to supervise or monitor17 (4.9)
Not indicated/contraindicated14 (4.1)
Failure to recognize complication12 (3.5)
Failure to communicate with patient6 (1.8)
Delay in performance4 (1.2)
Others19 (5.6)
Table 2 Endoscopy claims by specialty against all providers according to procedure, ranked according to total claims payment to plaintiffs (1985-2008) (n = 1901)
ProcedureClosed claimsTotal paid claimsTotal claim payments ($)Mean claim payments ($)
Colonoscopy78821654 093 000250 430.56
Flexible sigmoidoscopy51318228 674 000157 549.45
ERCP2176725 207 000376 223.88
Rigid proctoscopy1255115 726 000308 352.94
EGD209479 666 000205 659.57
PEG4972 598 000371 142.86
Internal medicine766-70 730 101261 963
Gastroenterology562-30 841 008250 740
General surgery231-13 305 060187 395
General/family practice101-7 288 674186 889
Colorectal surgery87-6 593 000286 652
Other specialties154-7 206 157163 776
Table 3 Absolute percentage increase of average closed claims
Linear increase/yr ($)Model R2Expon increase/yr, %Model R2
Colonoscopy229 0000.397612.590.4874
ERCP122 0000.509819.060.4076
EGD23 0000.05677.530.1697
Sigmoidoscopy-93 0000.1873-4.60.1938