Copyright
©2010 Baishideng.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 16, 2010; 2(2): 50-53
Published online Feb 16, 2010. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i2.50
Published online Feb 16, 2010. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v2.i2.50
Table 1 Specification of transnasal endoscopes
GIF-N260 | EG-530N2 | EG-1580K | |
Direction of view | Forward-viewing | Forward-viewing | Forward-viewing |
Angle of view | 120˚ | 120˚ | 140˚ |
Outer diameter (mm) | |||
Distal end | 5 | 5.9 | 5.5 |
Insertion end | 5.5 | 5.9 | 5.1 |
Bending section | |||
Up/Down | 210˚/90˚ | 210˚/90˚ | 210˚/120˚ |
Right/Left | 100˚/100˚ | 100˚/100˚ | NA |
Working length (mm) | 1100 | 1100 | 1050 |
Total length (mm) | 1420 | 1400 | 1360 |
Working chnnel diameter (mm) | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Table 2 Advantage and drawbacks of transnasal endoscopic biliary drainage
Advantages | Drawbacks |
Fewer deleterious hemodynamic effects | Low success rate of selective cannulation |
Possible procedure without conscious sedation | Limited devices |
Possible one-step placement of naso-bliary tube | Limited procedures |
Possible procedure in the bedside | Impossible transnasal insertion |
- Citation: Itoi T, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Tsuchiya T, Kurihara T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Moriyasu F. Transnasal endoscopic biliary drainage as a rescue management for the treatment of acute cholangitis. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 2(2): 50-53
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5190/full/v2/i2/50.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v2.i2.50