Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Mar 16, 2025; 17(3): 102694
Published online Mar 16, 2025. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v17.i3.102694
Table 1 Patient demographics and features of gastric lesions with endoscopic submucosal dissection attempted, n (%)
Variable
Value
Patient demographicsn = 93
Age at time of ESD procedure (years), mean ± SD (range)75 ± 9.01 (41-91)
Male/female59/34
Caucasian93 (100)
Average number of ESD attempts per patient1.20
Features of lesions with ESD attemptedn = 111
Diameter of lesions (mm), mean ± SD (range)30.4 ± 14.7 (10-100)
Location of lesions
Lower65 (58.6)
Middle32 (28.8)
Upper14 (12.6)
Paris classification
1p1
1s9
1s + 1sp1
1sp18
1s + 2a1
1s + 2b1
1sp + 2c1
2a28
2a + 2b4
2a + 2c44
2b2
2b + 2c1
Pre-index histology
No dysplasia0 (0)
Indefinite for dysplasia2 (1.8)
Low grade dysplasia43 (38.7)
High grade dysplasia41 (36.9)
Intramucosal carcinoma25 (22.5)
Adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion0 (0)
Table 2 Results of completed gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection procedures
Results of completed ESD procedures
Value, n = 101
Average length of hospital stay (day/s), mean ± SD (range)1.60 ± 3.10 (0-30)
Number of 8-day readmission(s)1
ESD technique
ESD61
Hybrid ESD40
Resection
En-bloc75
Piecemeal26
Margins clear on endoscopy, n (%)96 (95.0)
Margins not clear on endoscopy, n (%)5 (4.95)
Curative resection35
Non-curative resection34
For gastric dysplasia
HM not clear, VM clear15
HM clear, VM not clear0
Both HM and VM not clear1
For early gastric neoplasia
Clear margins for cancer and dysplasia but submucosal invasion5
Clear margins for cancer, but HM and/or VM not clear for dysplasia2
Clear margins for cancer, but indeterminate for dysplasia3
HM and/or VM not clear for cancer7
Indeterminate margins for cancer and dysplasia1
Indeterminate29
End piece(s) affected by dysplasia, unable to confirm excision of dysplasia at HM15
Poor tissue preservation4
Piecemeal resections8
Piecemeal and end pieces affected by dysplasia2
Not assessable - index histology shows no dysplasia or indefinite for dysplasia3
Table 3 Five-yearly comparisons of completed gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes, n (%)
Variable
2012-2017
2018-2023
Total number of lesions with completed ESD3368
Resection
En-bloc19 (57.6)56 (82.4)
Piecemeal14 (42.4)12 (17.6)
Margins clear on endoscopy29 (87.9)67 (98.5)
Margins not clear on endoscopy4 (12.1)1 (1.47)
CR group
Total number of lesions in CR group6 (18.2)29 (42.6)
Number of lesions not under follow-up03
Number of lesions with no residual disease or recurrence6 (100)26 (100)
Indeterminate group
Total number of lesions in Indeterminate group14 (42.4)15 (22.1)
Number of lesions not under follow-up24
Number of lesions with no residual disease or recurrence5 (41.7)6 (54.5)
Non-CR group
Total number of lesions in non-CR group11 (33.3)23 (33.8)
Number of pT1b lesions410
Number of lesions not under follow-up07
Number of lesions resected surgically15
Number of lesions with no residual disease or recurrence6 (54.5)8 (50.0)
Not assessable
Number of lesions with index histology showing no dysplasia or indefinite for dysplasia21
Table 4 Disease recurrence on subsequent follow-ups
Recurrence of lesions after completed ESD procedures over 10 years
Value, n = 101
CR group
Total number of lesions in CR group35
Number of lesions under follow-up32
Number of lesions with no residual disease or recurrence at all follow-ups, n (%)32 (100)
Indeterminate group
Total number of lesions in indeterminate group29
Number of lesions under follow-up23
Number of lesions with no residual disease or recurrence, n (%)11 (47.8)
Residual disease5
Local recurrence2
Metachronous5
Synchronous0
Number of lesions showing no recurrence at latest follow-up, n (%)16 (69.6)
Number of lesions showing disease recurrence at latest follow-up (%)7 (30.4)
Non-CR group
Total number of lesions in non-CR group34
Number of lesions under follow-up21
Number of lesions with no residual disease or recurrence, n (%)14 (66.7)
Residual disease2
Local recurrence3
Metachronous1
Synchronous1
Number of lesions showing no recurrence at latest follow-up, n (%)17 (81.0)
Number of lesions showing disease recurrence at latest follow-up, n (%)4 (19.0)
Not Assessable - total number of lesions with index histology showing no dysplasia or indefinite for dysplasia3