Copyright
©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastrointest Endosc. Apr 16, 2015; 7(4): 328-335
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.328
Published online Apr 16, 2015. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i4.328
Quality monitoring in colonoscopy: Time to act
Mary A Atia, Francisco C Ramirez, Suryakanth R Gurudu, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, United States
Author contributions: Atia MA composed majority of the manuscript with in-depth literature review; Ramirez FC edited the manuscript, provided additional references; Gurudu SR helped formulate literature review, final review of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest: We have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Suryakanth R Gurudu, MD, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Arizona,1300 E. Shea Boulevard, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, United States. gurudu.suryakanth@mayo.edu
Telephone: +1-480-3016990
Received: August 27, 2014
Peer-review started: August 28, 2014
First decision: December 26, 2014
Revised: January 3, 2015
Accepted: January 18, 2015
Article in press: January 20, 2015
Published online: April 16, 2015
Processing time: 235 Days and 11.7 Hours
Peer-review started: August 28, 2014
First decision: December 26, 2014
Revised: January 3, 2015
Accepted: January 18, 2015
Article in press: January 20, 2015
Published online: April 16, 2015
Processing time: 235 Days and 11.7 Hours
Core Tip
Core tip: Quality is a measure of actual performance compared to the defined standard as outlined by the medical community. Important quality measures in colonoscopy include informed consent, adequate bowel preparation, cecal intubation, withdrawal time, adenoma detection rate, appropriate screening and surveillance follow-up recommendations, and adverse events. The above quality measures could affect patient outcomes and therefore should be implemented and monitored regularly.