Effective therapeutic strategies for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) remain challenging, including a lack of response to therapy and post-treatment relapse. The rapid development of targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) offers promising data for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-expressing tumors. This approach exhibits more advantages than somatostatin analog (SSA) therapy, which is primarily effective for well-differentiated and slow-growing GEP-NENs. Fortunately, some clinical studies on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) labeled with α-emitting radionuclides for GEP-NENs patients showed effective results for those with more advanced GEP-NENs, or those with malignant metastasis. For the improvement of clinical efficacy and the decline in the incidence of treatment-related relapse, recent progress in developing novel techniques and effective disease management strategies for optimal targeting has led to the emergence of targeted alpha therapy (TAT) in GEP-NENs patients. For instance, labeled technology and combination therapy could contribute to significantly improved long-term outcomes. However, the exact dosimetry for precision oncology, the shortage of radionuclides, and the stability of disease control are still under careful consideration. More high-quality, large-scale prospective studies are essential for obtaining valuable evidence on challenging problems and for further exploration.

SANET-ep (NCT02588170) and SANET-p (NCT02589821) demonstrated the efficacy and safety of surufatinib versus placebo in patients with advanced extra-pancreatic and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Here, we present a pooled analysis of final overall survival (OS) from two randomised phase 3 studies.

The SANET studies were randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 studies in China, comparing the efficacy and safety of oral 300-mg surufatinib (n = 265) versus placebo (n = 133) in patients with unresectable/metastatic, well-differentiated NETs (grade 1/2). After progression of disease or study unblinding, patients receiving placebo crossed over/switched to open-label surufatinib. By pooling the data from the two studies, OS analysis was completed using Kaplan-Meier methodology and a Cox proportional hazards model in the intention-to-treat population. Exploratory analyses were performed using different models to correct the confounding effect introduced by crossover. Long-term safety was assessed.

At study termination, 69 % of the placebo group had crossed over/switched to surufatinib. Median OS was 50.1 versus 46.8 months for patients initially on surufatinib versus those initially on placebo (stratified hazard ratio [HR] 0.935, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.684-1.278; p = 0.6727). After correcting the confounding effect introduced by crossover/switching, the HR ranged from 0.558 to 0.825. Commonly (≥10 %) reported treatment-related adverse events (grade 3/4) included hypertension and proteinuria.

OS of patients initially on surufatinib was not significantly longer versus patients initially on placebo, likely due to the high amount of crossover from placebo to surufatinib. No new safety signals were observed.

SANET-ep (NCT02588170) and SANET-p (NCT02589821).

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) pose a considerable challenge due to their increasing incidence and frequently late-stage diagnosis. The arrival of multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) into clinical practice has brought notable progress in the management of advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). This review aims at exploring the impact of MKIs in reshaping the treatment landscape for advanced GEP-NETs. Current approaches in managing advanced GEP-NETs are discussed, including somatostatin analogs, surgery, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, and approved systemic treatments such as everolimus or sunitinib. The limitations and challenges faced in treating these tumors remain significant. Here, we review the clinical evidence supporting the use of everolimus as a targeted therapy, which has demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS), and the need for alternative therapies. Discussions focus on the clinical effectiveness and the emerging role of both established and novel MKIs in the treatment of GEP-NETs, including recent evidence from the CABINET trial and other emerging agents such as surufatinib, axitinib, pazopanib, and lenvatinib. We explore the clinical evidence that showcases sunitinib's and other MKIs' effectiveness in prolonging PFS compared to placebo in advanced GEP-NETs. Recently, MKIs have shown to have a significant impact for the treatment of advanced GEP-NETs. There remain several unmet needs that must be addressed, particularly regarding optimal treatment sequencing and the development of predictive biomarkers. Ongoing research and the use of current and emerging MKIs hold great potential to advance the treatment landscape for advanced GEP-NETs significantly.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are a rare subset of pancreatic neoplasms with diverse biological behavior and clinical presentations. Traditional treatment approaches, such as surgery and targeted therapies, have significantly improved outcomes. However, advancements in molecular biology, immunotherapy, and minimally invasive techniques have ushered in a new era of treatment possibilities. This manuscript explores the emerging modalities in PNET management, emphasizing the need for a multidisciplinary approach tailored to individual patient profiles.

The majority of neuroendocrine neoplasms in pancreas are non-functional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-PanNETs), which exhibit a high occurrence of distant metastases with limited therapeutic options. Here, we perform a comprehensive molecular characterization of 108 NF-PanNETs through integrative analysis of genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and phosphoproteomic profiles. Proteogenomic analysis provides functional insights into the genomic driver alterations of NF-PanNETs, revealing a potential mediator of MEN1 alterations using Men1-conditional knockout mice. Machine-learning-based modeling uncovers a three-protein signature as an independent prognostic factor, which is validated by an independent external cohort. Proteomic and phosphoproteomic-based stratification identifies four subtypes with distinct molecular characteristics, immune microenvironments, and clinicopathological features. Drug screening using patient-derived tumor organoids identifies cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 5 and Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Subunit Alpha1 D (CACNA1D) as ubiquitous and subtype-specific targets, respectively, with in vivo validation using xenograft models. Together, our proteogenomic analyses illustrate a comprehensive molecular landscape of NF-PanNETs, revealing biological insights and therapeutic vulnerabilities.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a diverse group of malignancies that can occur in various organs, with a notable prevalence in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract, which are the focus of this Review. Although NETs are rare in individual organs, their incidence has increased over recent decades, highlighting the urgent need for current classification systems to evolve by incorporating recent advances in the understanding of NET biology. Several omics studies have revealed molecular subtypes, which, when integrated into existing classification frameworks, may provide more clinically relevant insights for patients with NETs. This Review examines recent progress in elucidating the biology of NETs, with a particular emphasis on the tumor microenvironment and cells of origin. The existence of different cells of origin, which may contribute to distinct molecular groups, along with profiles of immune infiltration - despite being generally low - could explain the emergence of more aggressive cases and the potential for metastatic progression. Given the molecular heterogeneity of NETs and the diversity of their microenvironments and different cells of origin, there is an urgent need to develop morphomolecular classification systems. Such systems would make it possible to better characterize tumor progression, identify new therapeutic targets, and, ultimately, guide the development of personalized therapies.

Erianin has potential anticancer activities, especially against lung cancer. The specific mechanisms underlying the anti-cancer effects, including the molecular targets and signaling pathways in lung cancer, remain poorly understood and necessitate further investigation.

Lung cancer cell viability was evaluated using the CCK-8 assay. Flow cytometry was used to examine the effects of erianin on apoptosis and cell cycle progression. mRNA sequencing and metabolomics analysis were utilized to explore erianin-induced biological changes. Potential targets were identified and validated through molecular docking and Western blot analysis. The roles of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and carbamoyl-phosphate synthetase/aspartate transcarbamylase/dihydroorotase (CAD) in erianin-induced growth inhibition were studied using gene overexpression/knockdown techniques with uridine and aspartate supplementation confirming pyrimidine metabolism involvement. Additionally, lung cancer-bearing nude mouse models were established to evaluate the anti-lung cancer effects of erianin in vivo.

Erianin significantly inhibits the proliferation of lung cancer cells, induces apoptosis, and causes G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. Integrative analysis of mRNA sequencing and metabolomics data demonstrated that erianin disrupts pyrimidine metabolism in lung cancer cells. Notably, uridine supplementation mitigated the inhibitory effects of erianin, establishing a connection between pyrimidine metabolism and anticancer activity. Network pharmacology analyses identified mTOR as a key target of erianin. Erianin inhibited mTOR phosphorylation, thereby blocking downstream effectors (S6K and CAD), which are essential regulators of pyrimidine metabolism.

Erianin is a promising therapeutic candidate for lung cancer. Erianin likely inhibits lung cancer cell growth by disrupting pyrimidine metabolism by suppressing mTOR activation.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) comprise a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that originate from neuroendocrine cells, characterized by their ability to secrete hormones and peptides. Once considered rare, the incidence of NETs has steadily increased due to improved diagnostic modalities. The therapeutic landscape is multifaceted, ranging from surgery for localized disease to pharmacological interventions for advanced cases. However, the absence of robust predictive biomarkers precludes patient stratification and optimization of therapy. Everolimus, an oral mTOR inhibitor, has emerged as a key therapeutic agent due to its dual role in inhibiting cell proliferation and angiogenesis. Nevertheless, challenges such as resistance mechanisms, toxicity and optimal treatment sequencing remain unresolved. This article provides a comprehensive review of the role of everolimus in the management of NETs, focusing in particular on unresolved issues, from the absence of predictive biomarkers to the unavailability of defined guidelines for determining the correct therapeutic sequence.

Patients with neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) may develop carcinoid syndrome, carcinoid heart disease, or other symptoms from overproduction of hormones. Hepatic resection and cytoreduction is the most direct treatment of NETLMs in eligible patients, and cytoreduction improves symptoms, may reduce the sequelae of carcinoid syndrome, and extends survival. Parenchymal-sparing procedures, such as ablation and enucleation, should be considered during cytoreduction to maximize treatment of multifocal tumors while preserving healthy liver tissue. For patients with large hepatic tumor burdens, high-grade disease, or comorbidities precluding surgery, liver-directed and systemic therapies can be used to palliate symptoms and improve progression-free survival.

The second-line treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of unknown primary origin remains uncertain. This report presented a patient who received octreotide plus IBI-318 plus anlotinib as a second-line treatment for multiple metastatic NETs of unknown primary lesions after the failure of octreotide plus everolimus.

A 32-year-old male patient presented with elevated CEA (197.83 ng/ml) without specific symptoms. A contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scan showed multiple metastatic lymph nodes and multiple low-density nodules in the liver of undetermined nature. A right supraclavicular lymph node biopsy indicated NET, but the primary tumor origin remained unknown. PD-L1 expression was negative in tumor tissue according to immunohistochemistry. Immunofluorescence indicated the CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and Treg cells were gathered around blood vessels, with only a few infiltrating lymphocytes in the tumor tissue. Treatment with octreotide (30 mg/28 d) plus everolimus (5 mg qd) led to disease progression after three cycles. Treatment was changed to octreotide (30 mg/28 d) plus IBI318 (400 mg/28 d) plus anlotinib (10 mg/1-14 d/q3w), leading to partial remission, which was sustained up to the last follow-up (June 20, 2023), with a PFS of 11 months. The patient experienced no treatment-related adverse reactions.

Octreotide plus IBI318 plus anlotinib achieved benefits in a patient with advanced NETs of unknown primary lesions after first-line treatment failure, even though with low PD-L1 expression. This case suggests that combining SSAs, TKIs and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors could be an alternative second-line treatment for patients with advanced, well-differentiated NETs.

Evidence-based treatment decisions for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) require individualized patient-centered decision-making that accounts for patient and cancer characteristics.

To create an accessible guidance document to educate clinicians and patients on biomarkers informing prognosis and treatment in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs.

A multidisciplinary panel in-person workshop was convened to define methods. English language articles published from January 2016 to January 2023 in PubMed (MEDLINE) and relevant conference abstracts were reviewed to investigate prognostic and treatment-informing features in unresectable or metastatic GEP-NENs. Data from included studies were used to form evidence-based recommendations. Quality of evidence and strength of recommendations were determined using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework. Consensus was reached via electronic survey following a modified Delphi method.

A total of 131 publications were identified, including 8 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, 6 randomized clinical trials, 29 prospective studies, and 88 retrospective cohort studies. After 2 rounds of surveys, 24 recommendations and 5 good clinical practice statements were developed, with full consensus among panelists. Recommendations focused on tumor and functional imaging characteristics, blood-based biomarkers, and carcinoid heart disease. A single strong recommendation was made for symptomatic carcinoid syndrome informing treatment in midgut neuroendocrine tumors. Conditional recommendations were made to use grade, morphology, primary site, and urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic levels to inform treatment. The guidance document was endorsed by the Commonwealth Neuroendocrine Tumour Collaboration and the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society.

The study results suggest that select factors have sufficient evidence to inform care in GEP-NENs, but the evidence for most biomarkers is weak. This article may help guide management and identify gaps for future research to advance personalized medicine and improve outcomes for patients with GEP-NENs.

Serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE) had been associated with survival of several cancers. However, its prognostic significance for colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been effectively discussed. We aimed to investigate the relationship between baseline serum NSE and the overall survival (OS) of colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRAD) patients.

A retrospective study had been conducted by including 564 histopathology confirmed CRAD patients between January 2013 and December 2018 from Yunnan Provincial Cancer hospital, China. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the crude and adjusted associations between serum NSE measured at diagnosis and the OS of the patients. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was further applied to delineate dose-response trend of the NSE-OS association.

After controlling for possible confounding factors, baseline serum NSE was significantly associated with OS in CRAD: when dichotomizing by the median, patients with higher baseline serum NSE (NSE >= 12.93 ng/mL) were observed a worse prognosis (hazard ratio, HR: 1.82, 95% CI [1.30-2.55], p < 0.01). Stratified analysis by tumor stage revealed a stronger NSE-OS association in advanced CRAD patients. RCS disclosed a prominent dose-response relationship in NSE-OS association for all CRAD patients: along with the increase of baseline serum NSE, the adjusted HR of CRAD patients increased gradually. This dose-response trend is also evident in advanced stage CRAD patients, but not in early stage CRAD patients.

Serum NSE measured at diagnosis might be a useful prognostic indicator for CRAD, especially for advanced stage patients.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arise from neuroendocrine cells in a wide variety of organs. One of the most affected disease sites is the gastrointestinal system, which originates the gastro-entero-pancreatic NENs (GEP-NENs), a heterogenous group of malignancies that are rapidly increasing in incidence. These tumors can be functioning, with secretory activity leading to identifiable clinical syndromes, or non-functioning, with no secretory activity but with local symptoms of tumor growth and metastasis. A limitation in biomarkers is a crucial unmet need in non-secretory NEN management, as clinical decision-making is made more difficult by obstacles in tumor classification, prognostic evaluation, assessment of treatment response and surveillance. The objective of this review is to present existing and novel biomarkers for NENs that can function as prognostic factors and monitor disease progression or regression longitudinally, with a special emphasis on innovative research into novel multianalyte biomarkers.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are genomically diverse tumors. The management of newly diagnosed well-differentiated pNETs is limited by a lack of sensitivity of existing biomarkers for prognostication. Our goal was to investigate the potential utility of genetic markers as a predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Whole-exome sequencing of resected well-differentiated, low and intermediate-grade (G1 and G2) pNETs and normal adjacent tissue from patients who underwent resection from 2005 to 2015 was performed. Genetic alterations were classified using pan-genomic and oncogenic pathway classifications. Additional samples with genetic and clinicopathologic data available were obtained from the publicly available International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database and included in the analysis. The prognostic relevance of these genomic signatures on PFS and RFS was analyzed.

Thirty-one patients who underwent resection for pNET were identified. Genomic analysis of mutational, copy number, cytogenetic, and complex phenomena revealed similar patterns to prior studies of pNETs with relatively few somatic gene mutations but numerous instances of copy number changes. Analysis of genomic and clinicopathologic outcomes using the combined data from our study as well as the ICGC pNET cohort (n = 124 patients) revealed that the recurrent pattern of whole chromosome loss (RPCL) and metastatic disease were independently associated with disease progression. When evaluating patients with local disease at the time of resection, RPCL and alterations in the TGFβ oncogenic pathway were independently associated with the risk of recurrence.

Well-differentiated pNETs are genomically diverse tumors. Pathway signatures may be prognostic for predicting disease progression and recurrence.

This study aimed to assess 68Ga-DOTA-TATE (-TOC) PET/CT quantitative parameters in monitoring and predicting everolimus response in neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients with hepatic metastases (NELM).

This retrospective analysis included 29 patients with 62 target lesions undergoing everolimus treatment and pre-therapy, and follow-up 68Ga-DOTA-TATE (-TOC) PET/CT scans. Response evaluation utilized progression-free survival (PFS) categorized as responders (R; PFS > 6 months) and non-responders (NR; PFS ≤ 6 months). Lesion size and density, along with maximum and median standardize uptake value (SUV) in target lesions, liver, and spleen were assessed. Tumor-to-spleen (T/S) and tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratios were calculated, including the tumor-to-spleen (T/S) ratio and tumor-to-liver (T/L) ratio (using SUVmax/SUVmax, SUVmax/SUVmean, and SUVmean/SUVmean).

PET/CT scans were acquired 19 days (interquartile range [IQR] 69 days) pre-treatment and 127 days (IQR 74 days) post-starting everolimus. The overall median PFS was 264 days (95% CI: 134-394 days). R exhibited significant decreases in Tmax/Lmax and Tmean/Lmax ratios compared to NR (p = 0.01). In univariate Cox regression, Tmean/Lmax ratio was the sole prognostic parameter associated with PFS (HR 0.5, 95% CI 0.28-0.92, p = 0.03). Percentage changes in T/L and T/S ratios were significant predictors of PFS, with the highest area under curve (AUC) for the percentage change of Tmean/Lmax (AUC = 0.73). An optimal threshold of < 2.5% identified patients with longer PFS (p = 0.003). No other imaging or clinical parameters were predictive of PFS.

This study highlights the potential of quantitative SSTR-PET/CT in predicting and monitoring everolimus response in NET patients. Liver metastasis-to-liver parenchyma ratios outperformed size-based criteria, and Tmean/Lmax ratio may serve as a prognostic marker for PFS, warranting larger cohort investigation.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise from the body's diffuse endocrine system. Coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and NETs of the duodenum (D-NETs) is a rare occurrence in clinical practice. The classification and treatment criteria for D-NETs combined with a second primary cancer have not yet been determined.

We report the details of a case involving female patient with coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and a D-NET diagnosed by imaging and surgical specimens. The tumors were treated by surgery and four courses of chemotherapy. The patient achieved a favorable clinical prognosis.

Coexisting primary adenocarcinoma of the colon and D-NET were diagnosed by imaging, laboratory indicators, and surgical specimens. Surgical resection combined with chemotherapy was a safe, clinically effective, and cost-effective treatment.

Background: Although survival outcomes for neuroendocrine liver metastases (NETLM) are improved with liver-direct therapies (LDT), including hepatic debulking and nonsurgical trans-arterial embolization, the benefit is less established in the setting of concurrent extrahepatic disease (EHD). We performed a population-based study to characterize the rates of LDT being performed for NETLM with EHD patients and whether LDT is associated with survival outcomes. Methods: Patients with NETLM and EHD were identified using the California Cancer Registry database merged with data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development between 2000 and 2012. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and survival outcomes were analyzed for these patients with and without LDT. Results: 327 NETLM patients with EHD were identified. EHD sites included lung, peritoneum, bone, and brain. A total of 71 (22%) of these patients underwent LDT. Compared to NETLM with EHD patients who did not undergo LDT, patients who received LDT had longer median overall survival (27 vs. 16 months, p = 0.006). Within the LDT group, 23 patients underwent liver resection. Liver resection was associated with longer median overall survival compared to nonsurgical LDT (138 vs. 13 months, p < 0.001). Conclusions: LDT candidacy should be determined for patients on a case-by-case basis, but the presence of EHD should not preclude LDT with appropriate patient selection.

Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) of the breast are characterized by neuroendocrine architectural and cytological features, which must be supported by immunohistochemical positivity for neuroendocrine markers (such as Chromogranin and Synaptophysin). According to the literature, making a diagnosis of primary neuroendocrine breast cancer always needs to rule out a possible primary neuroendocrine neoplasm from another site. Currently, the latest 2022 version of the WHO of endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms has classified breast NENs as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs), differentiating them from invasive breast cancers of no special type (IBCs-NST). with neuroendocrine features. The current review article describes six cases from our series and a comprehensive review of the literature in the field of NENs of the breast.

Patients with gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) often present with advanced disease. Primary tumor resection (PTR) in the setting of unresectable metastatic disease is controversial. Most studies evaluating the impact of PTR on overall survival (OS) have been performed using large population-based databases, with limited treatment related data. This study aims to determine whether PTR improves OS and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET. This is a retrospective single-institution study of patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET between 1978 and 2021. The primary outcome was OS. The secondary outcome was PFS. Chi-squared tests and Cox regression were used to perform univariate and multivariate analyses (MVA). OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Between 1978 and 2021, 505 patients presented with metastatic NET, 151 of whom had well-differentiated GEP-NET. PTR was performed in 31 PNET and 77 SBNET patients. PTR was associated with improved median OS for PNET (136 vs. 61 months, p = .003) and SBNET (not reached vs. 79 months, p<.001). On MVA, only higher grade (HR 3.70, 95%CI 1.49-9.17) and PTR (HR 0.21, 95%CI 0.08-0.53) influenced OS. PTR resulted in longer median PFS for patients with SBNET (46 vs. 28 months, p = .03) and a trend toward longer median PFS for patients with PNET (20 vs. 13 months, p = .07). In patients with metastatic well-differentiated GEP-NET, PTR is associated with improved OS and may be associated with improved PFS and should be considered in a multidisciplinary setting. Future prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are highly heterogeneous and potentially malignant tumors arising from secretory cells of the neuroendocrine system. Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are the most common subtype of NENs. Historically, GEP-NENs have been regarded as infrequent and slow-growing malignancies; however, recent data have demonstrated that the worldwide prevalence and incidence of GEP-NENs have increased exponentially over the last three decades. In addition, an increasing number of studies have proven that GEP-NENs result in a limited life expectancy. These findings suggested that the natural biology of GEP-NENs is more aggressive than commonly assumed. Therefore, there is an urgent need for advanced researches focusing on the diagnosis and management of patients with GEP-NENs. In this review, we have summarized the limitations and recent advancements in our comprehension of the epidemiology, clinical presentations, pathology, molecular biology, diagnosis, and treatment of GEP-NETs to identify factors contributing to delays in diagnosis and timely treatment of these patients.

The study aimed to compare and correlate morphological and functional parameters in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) and their synchronous liver metastases (NELM), while also assessing prognostic imaging parameters.

Patients with G1/G2 pNET and synchronous NELM underwent pretherapeutic abdominal MRI with DWI and 68Ga-DOTATATE/TOC PET/CT were included. ADC (mean, min), SNR_art and SNT_T2 (SNR on arterial phase and on T2) and SUV (max, mean) for three target NELM and pNET, as well as tumor-free liver and spleen (only in PET/CT) were measured. Morphological parameters including size, location, arterial enhancement, cystic components, T2-hyperintensity, ductal dilatation, pancreatic atrophy, and vessel involvement were noted. Response evaluation used progression-free survival (PFS) with responders (R;PFS>24 months) and non-responders (NR;PFS ≤ 24 months).

33 patients with 33 pNETs and 95 target NELM were included. There were no significant differences in ADC and SUV values between NELM and pNET. 70% of NELM were categorized as hyperenhancing lesions, whereas the pNETs exhibited significantly lower rate (51%) of hyperenhancement (p<0.01) and significant lower SNR_art. NELM were qualitatively and quantitatively (SNR_T2) significantly more hyperintense on T2 compared to pNET (p=0.01 and p<0.001). NELM of R displayed significantly lower ADCmean value in comparison to the ADC mean value of pNET (0.898 versus 1.037x10-3mm²/s,p=0.036). In NR, T2-hyperintensity was notably higher in NELM compared to pNET (p=0.017). The hepatic tumor burden was significantly lower in the R compared to the NR (10% versus 30%).

Arterial hyperenhancement and T2-hyperintensity differ between synchronous NELM and pNET. These findings emphasize the importance of a multifaceted approach to imaging and treatment planning in patients with these tumors as well as in predicting treatment responses.

Background: Both everolimus and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are approved as monotherapies for advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Research in animal models showed synergism between the two treatment modalities. This study evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining everolimus and PRRT for the treatment of unresectable NETs. Methods: Adult patients (≥18 years) with progressing and unresectable histologically confirmed grade 1-2 NETs of all origins were enrolled. Everolimus was started at a 5 mg daily dose and was increased after the initial three patients to 10 mg daily. Patients were treated concurrently with 177Lu-DOTATATE at an 8-week interval, with four cycles planned. Safety was the primary endpoint, with response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) being secondary. Results: Eleven patients were enrolled. The trial was terminated early for poor accrual. The median age was 51 years (18-64), and 4 were males. The median number of cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE was 3, and the median cumulative dose was 300 mCi. The most frequent grade 1-2 toxicities were stomatitis (90.9%) and nausea (72.7%). Less frequent were fatigue (63.6%), anorexia, diarrhea, and skin changes (each at a 36.4% rate). Grade 3 toxicities occurred in 36% (fatigue, infection, pneumonitis, neutropenia, and stroke). No patient developed grade 4 toxicity. Treatment was stopped because of progression in three patients, and toxicity in another three patients; in addition, four patients were halted due to therapy interruption and in one patient who developed stroke. One patient achieved partial response, and nine patients had stable disease. One patient developed disease progression. At a median follow-up of 18.9 months, three patients died and one was lost to follow-up. The median PFS was 23.3 months. Conclusions: The combination of everolimus at a dose of 10 mg daily and 177Lu-DOTATATE appears not to be feasible. A larger trial at a lower dose of everolimus is warranted.

To develop a computed tomography (CT) radiomics-based interpretable machine learning (ML) model to predict the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) in a non-invasive manner.

Patients with pNETs who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between 2010 and 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Radiomics features were extracted, and five radiomics-based ML models, namely logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), XGBoost, and GaussianNB, were developed. The performance of these models was evaluated using a time-independent testing set, and metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. The accuracy of the radiomics model was compared to that of needle biopsy. The Shapley Additive Explanation (SHAP) tool and the correlation between radiomics and biological features were employed to explore the interpretability of the model.

A total of 122 patients (mean age: 50 ± 14 years; 53 male) were included in the training set, whereas 100 patients (mean age: 48 ± 13 years; 50 male) were included in the testing set. The AUCs for LR, SVM, RF, XGBoost, and GaussianNB were 0.758, 0.742, 0.779, 0.744, and 0.745, respectively, with corresponding accuracies of 73.0%, 70.0%, 77.0%, 71.9%, and 72.9%. The SHAP tool identified two features of the venous phase as the most significant, which showed significant differences among the Ki-67 index or mitotic count subgroups (p < 0.001).

An interpretable radiomics-based RF model can effectively differentiate between G1 and G2/3 of pNETs, demonstrating favorable interpretability.

The radiomics-based interpretable model developed in this study has significant clinical relevance as it offers a non-invasive method for assessing the pathological grade of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors and holds promise as an important complementary tool to traditional tissue biopsy.

• A radiomics-based interpretable model was developed to predict the pathological grade of pNETs and compared with preoperative needle biopsy in terms of accuracy. • The model, based on CT radiomics, demonstrated favorable interpretability. • The radiomics model holds potential as a valuable complementary technique to preoperative needle biopsy; however, it should not be considered a replacement for biopsy.

The foregut, which includes the esophagus, stomach and duodenum, represents one of the most common sites for neuroendocrine neoplasms. These are highly heterogenous with different risk of progression depending on location, cell-type of origin, size, grade and other factors. Various endoscopic and imaging modalities exist to inform therapeutic decision-making, which may be in the form of surgical or endoscopic resection and medical therapy depending on the extent of the disease after diagnostic evaluation. This narrative review aims to explore the literature on the multimodal management of such foregut neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Sapanisertib is a potent ATP-competitive, dual inhibitor of mTORC1/2. Ziv-aflibercept is a recombinant fusion protein comprising human VEGF receptor extracellular domains fused to human immunoglobulin G1. HIF-1α inhibition in combination with anti-angiogenic therapy is a promising anti-tumor strategy. This Phase 1 dose-escalation/expansion study assessed safety/ tolerability of sapanisertib in combination with ziv-aflibercept in advanced solid tumors.

Fifty-five patients with heavily pre-treated advanced metastatic solid tumors resistant or refractory to standard treatment received treatment on a range of dose levels.

Fifty-five patients were enrolled and treated across a range of dose levels. Forty were female (73%), median age was 62 (range: 21-79), and ECOG PS was 0 (9, 16%) or 1 (46, 84%). Most common tumor types included ovarian (8), colorectal (8), sarcoma (8), breast (3), cervical (4), and endometrial (4). Median number of prior lines of therapy was 4 (range 2-11). Sapanisertib 4 mg orally 3 days on and 4 days off plus 3 mg/kg ziv-aflibercept IV every 2 weeks on a 28-day cycle was defined as the maximum tolerated dose. Most frequent treatment-related grade ≥2 adverse events included hypertension, fatigue, anorexia, hypertriglyceridemia, diarrhea, nausea, mucositis, and serum lipase increase. There were no grade 5 events. In patients with evaluable disease (n = 50), 37 patients (74%) achieved stable disease (SD) as best response, two patients (4%) achieved a confirmed partial response (PR); disease control rate (DCR) (CR + SD + PR) was 78%.

The combination of sapanisertib and ziv-aflibercept was generally tolerable and demonstrated anti-tumor activity in heavily pre-treated patients with advanced malignancies.

Metastatic insulinoma is a rare malignant neuroendocrine tumor characterized by inappropriate insulin secretion, resulting in life-threatening hypoglycemia, which is often difficult to treat. There is currently very limited information about the efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for clinical control of hypoglycemia. The aim of this long-term retrospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of PRRT for improving hypoglycemia, to evaluate the change of medication after PRRT, and to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Inclusion criteria were histologically proven somatostatin receptor-positive metastatic malignant insulinoma and at least 2 cycles of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC or [177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC therapy from early 2000 to early 2022. A semiquantitative scoring system was used to quantify the severity and frequency of hypoglycemic episodes under background antihypoglycemic therapy (somatostatin analog, diazoxide, everolimus, corticosteroids): score 0, no hypoglycemic episodes; score 1, hypoglycemic events requiring additional conservative treatment with optimization of nutrition; score 2, severe hypoglycemia necessitating hospitalization and combined medication or history of hypoglycemic coma. Hypoglycemic score before and after PRRT was analyzed. Time of benefit was defined as a time range of fewer hypoglycemic episodes in the observation period than at baseline. Information on antihypoglycemic medication before and after therapy, PFS, and OS was recorded. Results: Twenty-six of 32 patients with a total of 106 [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC cycles were included. The average observation period was 21.5 mo (range, 2.3-107.4 mo). Before therapy, 81% (n = 21) of the patients had a hypoglycemia score of 2 and 19% (n = 5) had a score of 1. After PRRT, 81% of patients (n = 21) had a decreased score, and the remaining 5 patients showed a stable situation. There was temporary worsening of hypoglycemia just after injection of [90Y]Y-DOTATOC/[177Lu]Lu-DOTATOC in 19% of patients. The average time of benefit in the observation period was 17.2 mo (range, 0-70.2 mo). Antihypoglycemic medication reduction was achieved in 58% (n = 15) of patients. The median OS and PFS after the start of PRRT were 19.7 mo (95% CI, 6.5-32.9 mo) and 11.7 mo (95% CI, 4.9-18.5 mo), respectively. Conclusion: To our knowledge, our study included the largest cohort of patients with malignant insulinoma to be evaluated. Long-lasting symptom control and reduction of antihypoglycemic medications were shown in most patients after late-line PRRT.

We aim to investigate the time toxicity of patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with Lutetium-177 Dotatate in a single institution.

This is a retrospective cohort study.

All patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours treated with Lutetium-177 Dotatate at the Alexander Fleming Institute were included. Our primary endpoint was to evaluate time toxicity, which accounted for every day that the patient had contact with any department of any healthcare institution.

Our cohort included 21 patients with metastatic disease, female sex 86%, and a median age of 55 (IQR 44-63). The primary tumour site was the small intestine in 47.6% of the cases. The median number of previous systemic treatments for advanced disease was two (IQR 2-3). The overall response rate was 19%, and 66.6% had clinical benefit. The median calculated 'time toxicity' was 11 days (IQR 8-18), representing 5.7% of the total treatment duration. The main contributors to time toxicity included infusion days, blood draws, radiological scans, and hospitalisations (median of 4 days for each).

Lutetium-177 Dotatate treatment for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours was associated with low time toxicity, excellent tolerability, a good response and prolonged PFS, of which the median was not reached in the short follow-up we present. Newer treatments with different mechanisms of action provide longer survival and widen the landscape of choices. Understanding new clinical endpoints is important for the transition into a more modern clinical practice, strengthening personalised and patient-oriented strategies.

Given the considerable heterogeneity in neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs), it appears unlikely that a sole biomarker exists capable of fully capturing all useful clinical aspects of these tumors. This is reflected in the abundant number of biomarkers presently available for the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of NEN patients. Although assessment of immunohistochemical and radiological markers remains paramount and often obligatory, there has been a notable surge of interest in circulating biomarkers over the years given the numerous benefits associated with liquid biopsies. Currently, the clinic primarily relies on single-analyte assays such as the chromogranin A assay, but these are far from ideal because of limitations such as compromised sensitivity and specificity as well as a lack of standardization. Consequently, the quest for NEN biomarkers continued with the exploration of multianalyte markers, exemplified by the development of the NETest and ctDNA-based analysis. Here, an extensive panel of markers is simultaneously evaluated to identify distinct signatures that could enhance the accuracy of patient diagnosis, prognosis determination, and response to therapy prediction and monitoring. Given the promising results, the development and implementation of these multianalyte markers are expected to usher in a new era of NEN biomarkers in the clinic. In this review, we will outline both clinically implemented and more experimental circulating markers to provide an update on developments in this rapidly evolving field.

To develop recommendations for systemic therapy for well-differentiated grade 1 (G1) to grade 3 (G3) metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs).

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

Eight randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) are recommended as first-line systemic therapy for most patients with G1-grade 2 (G2) metastatic well-differentiated GI-NETs. Observation is an option for patients with low-volume or slow-growing disease without symptoms. After progression on SSAs, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is recommended as systematic therapy for patients with somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive tumors. Everolimus is an alternative second-line therapy, particularly in nonfunctioning NETs and patients with SSTR-negative tumors. SSAs are standard first-line therapy for SSTR-positive pancreatic (pan)NETs. Rarely, observation may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients until progression. Second-line systemic options for panNETs include PRRT (for SSTR-positive tumors), cytotoxic chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. For SSTR-negative tumors, first-line therapy options are chemotherapy, everolimus, or sunitinib. There are insufficient data to recommend particular sequencing of therapies. Patients with G1-G2 high-volume disease, relatively high Ki-67 index, and/or symptoms related to tumor growth may benefit from early cytotoxic chemotherapy. For G3 GEP-NETs, systemic options for G1-G2 may be considered, although cytotoxic chemotherapy is likely the most effective option for patients with tumor-related symptoms, and SSAs are relatively ineffective. Qualifying statements are provided to assist with treatment choice. Multidisciplinary team management is recommended, along with shared decision making with patients, incorporating their values and preferences, potential benefits and harms, and other characteristics and circumstances, such as comorbidities, performance status, geographic location, and access to care.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a heterogenous and recurrent group of malignancies originating from neuroendocrine secretory cells diffused on all parts of the human body. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) account for most NENs. Considering the abundance of possible origins, locations, and tumor specifications, there is still no consensus about optimal treatment options for these neoplasms. In light of the escalating immunotherapeutic approaches, it is crucial to define indications for such therapy in GEP-NETs. Bearing in mind the significance of pathophysiological mechanisms and tumor microenvironment (TME) impact on carcinogenesis, defining TME structure and correlation with the immune system in GEP-NETs appears essential. This paper aimed to assess the characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment for a better understanding of the possible therapeutic options in GEP-NETS. The authors performed a systematic review, extracting papers from the PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Among 3800 articles identified through database searching, 292 were assessed for eligibility. Ultimately, 28 articles were included in the qualitative synthesis. This paper sums up the research on the immune cell infiltrates, immune checkpoint expression, cytokine profile, neoangiogenesis, and microbiome in the TME of GEP-NETs.

Gastro-enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) represent a rare and highly heterogeneous entity with increasing incidence. Based on the results obtained from several trials performed in the last decade, various therapeutic options have been established for the treatment of patients with GEP-NETs. The options include somatostatin analogues, targeted therapies (sunitinib and everolimus), chemotherapy (with temozolomide or streptozocin-based regimens), and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. The treatment choice is influenced by various clinico-pathological factors including tumour grade and morphology, the primary mass location, hormone secretion, the volume of the disease and the rate of tumour growth, as well as patient comorbidities and performance status. In this review, the efficacy and safety of treatment options for patients with GEP-NETs is discussed and the evidence to inform the best sequence of available therapies to control tumour growth, prolong patient survival, and to lower potential toxicity, while maintaining patient quality of life is explored.