Background and study aims  Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at risk of a second primary tumor in the gastrointestinal tract, most commonly in the esophagus. Screening these patients for esophageal carcinoma may help detect asymptomatic dysplasia and early cancer, thus allowing curative treatment and more prolonged survival, but the impact of endoscopic screening remains uncertain. Here we aimed to describe the long-term results of an esophageal SCC screening program in patients with head and neck cancer in terms of prevalence, associated risk factors, and survival. Patients and methods  We performed an observational study of a prospectively collected database including patients with HNSCC who had undergone high-definition endoscopy with chromoscopy between 2010 and 2018 at a Brazilian tertiary academic center. Results  The study included 1,888 patients. The esophageal SCC prevalence was 7.9 %, with the majority (77.8 %) being superficial lesions. Significant risk factors for esophageal high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and invasive cancer included tumors of the oral cavity and oropharynx and the presence of low-grade dysplasia (LGD). Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter among patients in whom esophageal cancer was diagnosed at an advanced stage ( P  < .001). OS did not significantly differ between patients with HGD and early esophageal cancer versus those without esophageal cancer ( P  = .210) Conclusions  Endoscopic screening for superficial esophageal neoplasia in patients with HNSCC improves esophageal cancer detection. Screening could potentially benefit patients with primary cancer located at the oropharynx or oral cavity. In addition, the detection of esophageal LGD indicates a need for endoscopic surveillance.

Background and study aims  Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the most common secondary tumor in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC). Currently, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred approach to manage superficial ESCC, however, it remains to be elucidated whether patients with HNSCC and early ESCC managed by ESD have different outcomes. Patients and methods  We retrospectively analyzed esophageal ESD for early ESCC from September 2009 to September 2017 and the following variables: demographics, tumor and specimen size, Paris classification, location, en bloc and R0 resection rates, overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). To reduce selection bias, propensity score matching was applied to compare the results. Results  Eighty-nine ESDs were performed in 81 consecutive patients (47 with HNSCC and 34 without HNSCC). Patients with HNSCC who developed superficial ESCC were found to be younger and to refer a more frequent history of alcohol ingestion and smoking. There was no difference in lesion size, number of lesions, procedure time, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, local recurrence and adverse event rate between the two groups. The histological depth of invasion for patients with HNSCC was significantly shallower before ( P  = 0.016) and after ( P  = 0.047) matching. The overall survival rate was similar in both groups. Conclusions  Patients with HNSCC have earlier detection of ESCC, probably due to endoscopic screening. Previous history of chemoradiation and surgery for HNSCC does not affect procedure time, AEs and OS.

Endoscopic resection cap technique (ER-Cap), multiband mucosectomy (MBM), and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been widely applied in the treatment of esophageal squamous neoplasia and cancer. However, little is known with regards to the comparison of these methods. This study aimed to compare the feasibility, safety, effectiveness, and costs of these three techniques.

A retrospective analysis of patients with squamous premalignant or early malignant lesions of the esophagus undergoing ER-Cap, MBM, or ESD from January 2009 to December 2015 in one of the centers in China was performed. The procedural data and follow-up data for all patients were recorded.

A total of 672 patients with 733 lesions were included; 148 lesions (133 patients) were treated with ER-Cap, 427 lesions (388 patients) with MBM, and 158 lesions (151 patients) with ESD. The mean age was 61.59 years and the male-to-female ratio was 2.78:1. The operation time was significantly shorter for ER-Cap (29.26 ± 16.73 mins, p < 0.001) group, and the hospitalization costs were significantly lower in the MBM group (20,942.03 ± 8435.56￥, p = 0.003). The resection sample size of ESD was significantly larger (4.40 ± 1.20 cm, p < 0.001) and the en bloc resection rate of ESD was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than that of the other two groups. The frequencies of perforation, bleeding, and cicatricial stenosis were significantly lower in the MBM group (p < 0.001, p = 0.011, p = 0.009). Three local recurrences were observed in the ER-Cap group, while no recurrence was observed in MBM and ESD groups. There were three and two metastatic patients observed in the MBM and ESD groups, respectively.

ER-Cap, MBM, and ESD are all minimally invasive, safe, and effective methods for treating early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. MBM could be considered as a good alternative when performed by a less-experienced endoscopist in high-incidence areas with limited resources.

Seborrheic keratosis, one of the most common lesions of the epidermis, is rarely seen on mucosal surfaces. We report a case of a distinctive epithelial neoplasm of the esophagus showing close resemblance to seborrheic keratosis that was resected with endoscopic submucosal dissection. A 65-year-old patient's previous esophageal biopsy showed suspicious low grade dysplasia and the patient was referred for endoscopic submucosal dissection of a flat lesion in the mid-esophagus. Macroscopic examination revealed a well circumscribed, pigmented and elevated lesion with a diameter of 20 mm. Microscopically, the lesion was well circumscribed, with plaque-like elevation, and showed hyperkeratosis, acanthosis, and papillomatosis. Broad coalescing solid sheets and interconnecting trabeculae of basaloid cells were the consistent feature throughout the lesion. Squamous eddies and occasional central keratinization were present. Mitotic activity and koilocytes were not identified. Immunohistochemically, the lesion showed diffuse nuclear positivity with p63 and negativity with p16. Ki-67 index was confined to the basal cell layer. With the help of histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings, we diagnosed this morphologically benign case as "seborrheic keratosis-like lesion of the esophagus". It should be kept in mind that seborrheic keratosis-like lesions might be rarely seen on mucosal surfaces such as the esophagus. Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a new, curative, and safe endoscopic resection technique in en-bloc resection of superficial esophageal lesions. To our knowledge, this is the first case of the aforementioned lesion in the esophagus being resected with endoscopic submucosal dissection.

Objective: Synchronous multiple primary early esophageal cancers (SMPEEC) are rare and aggressive. Early detection of esophageal cancer can improve survival rate. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a minimally invasive endoscopic treatment of early esophageal cancers. However, ESD for SMPEEC is little known. We aimed to clarify the clinical outcomes of simultaneous ESD treating SMPEEC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical data of 34 patients, who underwent ESD for SMPEEC at Endoscopy Center of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, between May 2013 and December 2014. The data of lesion size, histopathology, en bloc resection, curative resection, complication, and tumor local recurrence were analyzed. Results: Among 34 patients, 67 lesions were removed simultaneously in 33 cases; 2 lesions were removed in 2 operations for 1 case. For the simultaneous resection, the en bloc rate was 97.01% (65/67) and the curative resection rate was 92.54% (62/67). Postoperative stricture occurred in two cases and delayed bleeding occurred in one case. There was one local recurrence, no metastasis or procedure-related death. Conclusions: Simultaneous ESD as a treatment for SMPEEC is technically feasible, benefited from reducing hospitalization time and medical expenses. For the cases with risk factors of complications, simultaneous ESD needs to be avoided.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection is the reference treatment for early oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, data from Western centres are scarce.

We conducted a retrospective study from a prospectively collected database at a tertiary care centre in France. All consecutive patients undergoing endoscopic submucosal dissection for oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma were included. The main outcome was the curative resection rate. Secondary outcomes were en-bloc resection rates, histologically complete resection rates, morbidity, recurrence-free and overall survival.

Fifty-six cases of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (49 patients; mean age 61.5 ± 10 years; 36 men) were included. En-bloc, histologically complete and curative resection rates were 98%, 86% and 71%, respectively. Fifteen (30%) patients received an additional treatment after endoscopic submucosal dissection, nine treated by chemoradiotherapy, four by surgery and two by further endoscopic submucosal dissection. Within a mean follow-up of 21 ± 15 months, recurrences occurred in 14 (29%) patients (four local, eight metachronous and three distant recurrences). Eight patients died during follow-up, of which two (4%) patients died from oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Factors significantly associated with mortality in this series were: moderate or poor differentiation of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.02) and recurrence of oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (p = 0.028).

Moderately or poorly differentiated cancer is a major prognostic factor and should probably be taken into account when indicating an additional treatment after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Close endoscopic follow-up is essential considering the high recurrence rate.