To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the novel long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique in closing gastrointestinal defects.

A retrospective analysis was performed on clinical data of patients who underwent endoscopic resection for gastric submucosal tumors at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2020 to November 2023. Patients were categorized into the Long Transparent Cap-Assisted Clip Closure group (LTCCC group) and the Purse-String Suture group (PSS group) based on the method of wound closure after ER. Primary outcomes included closure success rates and closure time, and secondary outcomes covered postoperative hospital stays, occurrence of adverse events, tumor characteristics, and follow-up status.

The closure success rate was 100% in both groups. The closure time in the LTC group was shorter than that in the PSS group (17.44 ± 7.71 min vs. 28.81 ± 9.20 min, P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stays and adverse event rates between the two groups (P > 0.05). Good wound healing was observed during follow-up. No residual lesions, tumor recurrence, metastasis, gastrointestinal fistulae, or sinuses were found during a median follow-up of 32 (5 ~ 73) months.

The long transparent cap-assisted clip closure technique is a simple, safe, and effective method for closing gastrointestinal defects, and can be considered as a treatment option for endoscopic closure of such defects.

A 47-year-old man, who underwent an annual esophagogastroduodenoscopy as part of his routine check-up, was found to have a small subepithelial lesion on the posterior wall of the gastric body in 2013. The lesion gradually increased in size during follow-up. In 2024, 11 years after the initial detection, the lesion had grown to over 10 mm in diameter and exhibited central erythematous depression. Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed, revealing that the lesion originated from the second layer with uniformly low internal echogenicity. A biopsy suggested the possibility of a benign stromal tumor, but a definitive diagnosis was not achieved. To obtain a complete biopsy, en bloc resection was performed using underwater endoscopic mucosal resection. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of a gastric inverted polyp. Since gastric inverted polyps with central depression or erosion have the potential for malignancy, endoscopic resection is recommended.

Specific types of gastric tumors, including gastric linitis plastica and lymphoma, may cause extensive deep-layer infiltration, impeding an accurate diagnosis with endoscopic biopsy. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in diagnosing gastric malignancies with negative endoscopic biopsies.

We retrospectively analyzed suspicious malignant gastric lesion cases in our hospital from October 2017 to August 2023. Clinical manifestations, radiographical examinations, endoscopic examinations, histopathological results, and therapeutic strategies were recorded and analyzed.

Forty malignant gastric tumor cases with negative endoscopic biopsies were incorporated into our study. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy was performed in 16 cases exclusively, whereas 17 patients received EUS-FNA exclusively, and seven patients underwent both simultaneously. Among the 23 patients who received the EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy, 22 (95.7%) were diagnosed with malignancies. Among the 24 patients who received EUS-FNA, a total of 19 cases with malignancies (79.2%) were confirmed by EUS-FNA (p = 0.11): 13 gastric adenocarcinomas, five metastatic malignancies, and one malignant stromal tumor. No adverse events were observed in any of the cases.

EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy and EUS-FNA possess their advantages and disadvantages. EUS-guided bite-on-bite biopsy could serve as a reliable diagnostic method for shallow lesions with negative malignant endoscopic biopsies.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is increasingly used for treating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) in the stomach.

To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and clinical outcomes of EFTR vs surgical resection (SR) for gastric GISTs.

We collected clinical data from patients diagnosed with GISTs who underwent either EFTR or SR at our hospital from October 2011 to July 2024. Patients were matched in a 1:1 ratio based on baseline characteristics and tumor clinical-pathological features using propensity score matching. We analyzed perioperative outcomes and follow-up data. The primary outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS).

Out of 912 patients, 573 met the inclusion criteria. After matching, each group included 95 patients. The EFTR group demonstrated statistically significant advantages over the SR group in average operative time (P < 0.001), length of hospital stay (P < 0.001), time to resume liquid diet (P < 0.001), incidence of adverse events (P = 0.031), and hospitalization costs (P < 0.001). The en bloc resection rate was significantly different, with SR group at 100% and EFTR group at 93.7% (P = 0.038). The median follow-up was 2451.50 days. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients in the EFTR group and 4 patients in the SR group, with no statistically significant difference (P = 1.000). Factors associated with PFS included age, tumor size, high-risk category in the modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk score, and resection status. Resection status was identified as an independent prognostic factor for PFS (P = 0.0173, hazard ratios = 0.0179, 95%CI: 0.000655-0.491). Notably, there was no statistically significant difference in PFS between the two groups.

This study is a non-inferiority design. The EFTR group significantly outperformed the SR group in terms of operative time, length of hospital stay, time to resume a liquid diet, incidence of adverse events, and hospitalization costs, demonstrating its higher economic efficiency and better tolerability. Additionally, although the en bloc resection rate was lower in the EFTR group compared to the SR group, there were no significant differences in tumor recurrence rates and progression-free survival between the two groups. This study found no statistical difference in the primary endpoint of postoperative recurrence rates between the two groups. However, due to sample size limitations, this result requires further validation in larger-scale studies. The current results should be viewed as exploratory evidence.

Gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs) mostly grew in the lumen, but also some of the lesions were extraluminal, in which the stomach was the most common site. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor account for a large proportion of SMT. Due to the deep lesion location of gastric SMT, endoscopic submucosal dissection related techniques are difficult to operate, while endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has been widely used in clinical practice because it is less invasive and can preserve the physiological structure and function of the stomach. However, complete closure of the gastrectomy site after EFTR is critical. If the closure is incomplete, it may cause peritonitis, late perforation and other conditions, and even require further surgical intervention. Although there are currently a number of suture devices and techniques that can be used to promote closure, they have the problem of requiring additional equipment or being inconvenient to use. Although metal clips are widely used, their effectiveness depends on the size and tension of the defect. Therefore, an effective and convenient endoscopic closure technique is urgently needed to solve the closure problem of gastric SMTs after treatment.

To investigate the effect of combined application of the preclosure technique and dental floss traction in gastric wound closure following EFTR.

In this study, the data of 94 patients treated for gastric SMTs at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of the Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University from April 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into a preclosure group (54 patients) and a non-preclosure group (40 patients) on the basis of the timing of wound closure with titanium clips after dental floss traction-assisted EFTR. Each patient in the preclosure group had their wounds preclosed with titanium clips after subtotal lesion resection, whereas each patient in the non-preclosure group had their wounds closed with titanium clips after total lesion resection. The lesion size, wound closure time, number of titanium clips used, incidence of postoperative complications, and postoperative hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.

The wound closure time was significantly shorter in the preclosure group than in the non-preclosure group (6.69 ± 2.109 minutes vs 11.65 ± 3.786 minutes, P < 0.001). The number of titanium clips used was significantly lower in the preclosure group (8.93 ± 2.231) than in the non-preclosure group (12.05 ± 4.495) (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the need for an indwelling gastric tube or the length of postoperative hospital stay (6.41 ± 1.31 vs 6.13 ± 1.06 days). For all patients in the preclosure group and the non-preclosure group, resection was completed successfully without bleeding, abdominal pain, abdominal distension, or other postoperative complications.

Application of the preclosure technique combined with dental floss traction can be used intraoperatively to effectively close the surgical wound in patients undergoing EFTR, reliably preventing the tumor from falling into the peritoneal cavity.

The loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique has been used as an endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions. This study aimed to analyse the efficacy and safety of the loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique for the treatment of gastric fundal subepithelial lesions. Consecutive patients with gastric fundal tumours who underwent the loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique at our centre between January 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively assessed. The primary outcome was surgical success. Twelve patients with 14 gastric fundal subepithelial lesions underwent the loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique during the study period. Two patients had double lesions. Pathology confirmed that out of 14 lesions, 12 were gastrointestinal stromal tumors and 2 were leiomyomas.All the gastrointestinal stromal tumors were of low-risk G1. Operative success was achieved in 14 lesions with complete resection, with no intraoperative transfer to surgery; no adverse effects, including postoperative perforation and bleeding; and no postoperative antibiotic use. During the follow-up period, all 14 lesions showed no recurrence. The loop-assisted inversion and double suture technique is a safe, effective, and time-saving endoscopic treatment for gastric fundal subepithelial lesions. However, prospective large-scale multicentre studies are required.

Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a safe and effective way for the diagnosis and surveillance of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It allows a noninvasive and reproducible follow-up for patients with IBD.

To compare the outcomes of colonoscopy and IUS in diagnosing and monitoring patients with IBD.

A prospective study was conducted over a three-year period (January 2021 to April 2024) comparing endoscopic and IUS findings. A total of 101 patients were included in the study (68 with Crohn's disease and 33 with ulcerative colitis). All patients underwent both IUS and colonoscopy within a 10-day period.

The study found a strong correlation between bowel thickening on IUS and inflammatory activity (P = 0.004), IUS remission and endoscopic remission (P = 0.03), IUS and endoscopic location (P = 0.04), as well as IUS and computed tomography scan findings for collection diagnosis (P < 0.01).

The study's findings demonstrated excellent results for using IUS in the diagnosis and follow-up of IBD patients.

Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) is considered an effective, safe and minimally invasive treatment for esophageal subepithelial lesions (SELs) with maximal dilameter less than 3.0 cm, yet its efficacy for lesions over 3.0 cm remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the application value of STER for SELs of varying sizes.

Consecutive patients with esophageal SELs who underwent STER were retrospectively enrolled from May 2017 to March 2024. Baseline characteristics, surgical information and prognosis were collected and compared among patients with SELs of different sizes, as defined by the maximal diameter of the postoperative specimen.

A total of 133 patients were included, among whom 69 with SELs < 3.0 cm, 31 with SELs between 3.0 and 5.0 cm, 33 with SELs ≥ 5.0 cm. 1 case with SELs ≥ 5.0 cm was converted to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) due to the tumor's adhesion to the epithelial layer. Among those who completed the STER procedure, the en bloc resection rate was 100.0% for all three subgroups, and the recurrence and metastasis rates were 0.0%, demonstrating that STER is effective for SELs of all sizes. However, SELs ≥ 5.0 cm were associated with more adverse events, a higher number of difficult procedures, and more frequent intensive care unit (ICU) transfers (all p < 0.050).

STER is effective and safe for treating esophageal SELs. For lesions exceeding 5 cm, while still feasible, the procedure requires meticulous planning, advanced techniques and careful monitoring due to increased complexity and risks.

The efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection using a clutch cutter (ESD-CC) for subepithelial lesions within the esophagogastric submucosa (SELEGSM) has not been investigated. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ESD-CC for the treatment of SELEGSM.

This prospective study included 15 consecutive patients with 18 SELEGSMs diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography. The primary outcomes were short-term outcomes including en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, procedure time, and complication rate. The secondary outcome was final histological diagnosis.

Among the participants, 18 lesions were identified: 12 in the stomach (nine patients) and six in the esophagus (six patients). The en bloc resection rate was 94.4% (17/18). The R0 resection rate was 88.9% (16/18). The median operating time was 39 min, and no instances of perforation or bleeding were observed. The final diagnoses of SELEGSM included six neuroendocrine tumors (33.3%), six granular cell tumors (33.3%), two ectopic pancreases (11.1%), one inflammatory fibroid polyp (5.6%), one leiomyoma (5.6%), one lipoma (5.6%), and one leiomyosarcoma (5.6%).

ESD-CC appears to be a technically efficient and safe approach for SELEGSM resection, suggesting its potential as a valuable treatment option.

Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) for submucosal tumors (SMTs) has been technically challenging. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EFTR for upper gastrointestinal (GI) SMTs, including extraluminal lesions.

We retrospectively investigated 232 patients with SMTs who underwent EFTR from January 2014 to August 2023. Clinicopathologic characteristics, procedure-related parameters, adverse events (AEs), and follow-up outcomes were assessed in all patients.

The en-bloc resection and en-bloc with R0 resection rates were 98.7% and 96.1%, respectively. The average endoscopic tumor size measured 17.2 ± 8.7 mm, ranging from 6 to 50 mm. The resection time and suture time were 49.0 ± 19.4 min and 22.5 ± 11.6 min, respectively. In all, 39 lesions (16.8%) exhibited predominantly extraluminal growth. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) were the predominant pathology, accounting for 78.4% of the cases. Twenty-one patients (9.1%) encountered complications, including pneumothorax (1/232, 0.43%), hydrothorax (1/232, 0.43%), localized peritonitis (3/232, 1.29%), and fever (16/232, 6.9%). Although the incidence of postoperative fever was notably higher in the predominantly extraluminal group (7/39, 17.9%) compared to the predominantly intraluminal group (9/193, 4.7%, P = 0.008), there were no significant differences in outcomes of the EFTR procedure. No instances of recurrence were observed during the mean follow-up period of 3.7 ± 2.3 years.

EFTR was found to be feasible, safe, and effective for resecting upper GI SMTs, including lesions with predominantly extraluminal growth. Further validation in a prospective study is warranted.

This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and esophageal motility of patients with gastric cardia submucosal tumors (SMTs) and the associated changes after endoscopic resection based on high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM).

From our electronic database, we identified patients who underwent pre-operative evaluation of gastric cardia SMTs between 2015 and 2023. All patients completed standardized symptom questionnaires and underwent endoscopic ultrasonography and HRIM. Endoscopic resection via submucosal dissection or submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection was performed, followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy and HRIM three months later. Esophageal motility on HRIM was compared based on the updated Chicago Classification v4.0.

Thirty patients (mean age, 47.4 ± 12.8 years; male, 50%) were analyzed. Most patients were asymptomatic (43.3%), while others presented with epigastralgia, regurgitation, chest pain, or dysphagia. On endoscopic ultrasonography, the average tumor size was 16.7 ± 4.5 mm (range, 10.0-30.0 mm), and most tumors originated from the fourth layer (80%). On HRIM, eight patients (26.7%) had abnormal esophageal motility, including five with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and three with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. Complete resection was achieved in 25 of the 27 patients (92.6%) who underwent endoscopic treatment. Pathology revealed leiomyomas (96%) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (4%). No significant differences in symptom profiles or HRIM parameters were observed after tumor resection. Three patients with pre-operative IEM exhibited normal motility at the follow-up HRIM.

Up to 26.7% of patients with gastric cardia SMTs had abnormal esophageal motility on HRIM. Endoscopic resection of these SMTs was effective and safe and appeared to improve esophageal motility in patients with IEM.

Mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract are rare compared with epithelial lesions. However, over the past few decades, the increasing volume of gastrointestinal endoscopy has expedited the recognition of several novel entities with varying clinical significance. Its spectrum extends from reactive changes and benign neoplasms to highly aggressive sarcomas. At the malignant end of the spectrum, the importance of correctly diagnosing these tumors is underscored by the specific therapeutic implications available for some tumor types (eg, tyrosine kinase inhibitors for gastrointestinal stromal tumors) that allow personalized treatments. Benign lesions frequently surface among routine polypectomy specimens, sometimes offering diagnostic challenges. However, precise classification is the only way to avoid prognostic uncertainty and overtreatment, and to recognize possible syndromic associations. Hereby, we offer a pragmatic review of the topic from the gastrointestinal pathologist's perspective, who, although more accustomed to epithelial neoplasms, can use an algorithmic approach to diagnose mesenchymal entities successfully.

Background/Objectives: EBUS-TBNA is a safe and minimally invasive procedure to evaluate hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes (LNs). The Franseen needle provides a transbronchial needle biopsy (TBNB). Various needle sizes are available. In the literature, diagnostic yield (DY) and sample adequacy (SA) between needle sizes are still being debated. Methods: In total, 88 patients with lymphadenopathy were consecutively enrolled from June to December 2021. Chest CT and PET/CT scans were performed. Dimension at imaging and EBUS and the standardized uptake value (SUV) were recorded. EBUS-TBNB was performed with 22 G or 25 G needle sizes. DY for cancer and SA for predictive markers were evaluated. Overall DY (ODY) was also evaluated. Results: A 22 G needle was used in 51 patients and a 25 G needle was used in 37 patients with no differences in sex and age. The 22 G population presented a larger median dimension of LN both at imaging and EBUS compared to the 25 G population. Median LN SUV was higher in the 22 G population. Notably, 70 out of 88 patients had LNs suspicious for malignancy, which was higher in the 22 G group compared to the 25 G group (n = 46, 90% vs. n = 24, 65%; p = 0.004). DY for cancer was similar in both groups (84% for 22 G; 91% for 25 G). Also, SA for predictive markers was similar. ODY values were 78% and 92%, respectively, for the 22 G and 25 G needles. Conclusions: The 25 G needle has a higher DY (even if not statistically significant) and SA for predictive markers similar to the 22 G needle; further studies are necessary to evaluate if 25 G is comparable to the 22 G needle.

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are tumors originating from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract wall (muscularis mucosa, submucosa, or muscularis propria) and are covered by overlying mucosa. They are typically incidental findings during routine endoscopy. This article reviews the latest advancements in endoscopic techniques and devices used to resect subepithelial lesions.

Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) should be employed to characterize SELs, with fine needle core biopsy (FNB) utilized with EUS for histopathologic tissue acquisition. EUS can be used as "endoscopic mapping" to mitigate serious complications prior to endoscopic resection. Techniques such as Submucosal Tunnelling Endoscopic Resection (STER), Device-Assisted Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection, and Freehand Full Thickness Resection are available for the complete resection of SELs. The choice of technique depends on the characteristics of the lesion and the level of expertise of the endoscopist. Multiple endoscopic resection techniques for SELs have been developed, each utilizing different tools and devices. A significant shift has occurred from traditional laparoscopic surgical resection to minimally invasive, organ-sparing endoscopic resection. Advancements in "third space" endoscopy and the innovation of novel devices continue to offer less invasive resection techniques for lesions arising from the GI tract wall.

Background/Objectives: Gastric subepithelial lesions (SELs) are often incidentally detected during endoscopic examinations, with most patients being asymptomatic and lesions measuring <20 mm. Despite their generally indolent nature, certain SELs, such as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, require resection. Current guidelines recommend periodic surveillance; however, the natural course and long-term outcomes of gastric SELs have not been sufficiently investigated. This systematic review aimed to synthesize evidence on the progression, growth rate, and risk factors associated with gastric SELs to inform clinical management strategies. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2000 and November 2024. Eligible studies included original studies on the follow-up and progression of gastric SELs. Non-English articles, reviews, case reports, and unrelated topics were excluded. In total, 277 articles were screened, with 15 additional articles identified through manual screening. Ultimately, 41 articles were included in the analysis. The study protocol is registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024614865). Results: Large-scale studies reported low growth rates of 2.0-8.5% over 2.0-5.0 years, while smaller studies reported a broader range of growth rates of 5.4-28.4%. The factors contributing to these discrepancies include patient selection, follow-up duration, and growth criteria. Risk factors for lesion size increase include larger initial lesion size, irregular margins, heterogeneous echo patterns, and certain tumor locations. Conclusions: These findings underscore the need for individualized management strategies based on lesion size, imaging characteristics, and risk factors. The close monitoring of high-risk lesions is crucial for timely intervention. Standardized growth criteria and optimized follow-up protocols are essential for improving clinical decision making and patient outcomes.

Small gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs) in the stomach can be managed through surveillance or resection. However, it is still controversial how often the lesion would progress if left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate the progression rate of small SETs and identify risk factors influencing tumor growth.

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for relevant studies until March 2023. Patient information, endoscopic features of SETs, and surveillance information were extracted from each included study. A random-effects model was applied along with subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Based on 14 studies with 5405 SETs smaller than 3.5 cm, the annual incidence of size increase was 4.0 (95%CI 2.2-5.8) per 100 person-years, and the overall incidence was 12.8% (95%CI 8.3%-17.3%) across a surveillance duration of 51.3 ± 16.9 months. The predicted risk factors for tumor growth included ≥ 1 cm lesion size (1-2 cm vs. < 1 cm, OR 2.61, 95%CI 1.80-3.79; and > 2 cm vs. 1-2 cm, OR 1.25, 95%CI 0.87-1.81), origin in the muscularis propria (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.41-3.10), mucosal change (OR 3.27, 95%CI 1.95-5.50), irregular margin (OR 3.16, 95%CI 1.15-8.69), and hypoechoic pattern (OR 3.06, 95%CI 1.34-7.00).

Most small gastric SETs, particularly those smaller than 1 cm, did not increase in size during surveillance. Special attention should be given to lesions larger than 1 cm, originating from the muscularis propria, or exhibiting mucosal change, irregular margin, and hypoechoic pattern.

Complete excision of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions (U-SELs) eliminates diagnostic uncertainty, obviates the need for surveillance, and may be necessary for definitive diagnosis and management. Current guidelines lack precision and cohesion, and surgery is associated with significant morbidity. We describe and report on the outcomes of our SEL algorithm for endoscopic (SAFE) resection.

U-SELs were enrolled prospectively over 115 months until March 2023. All subjects underwent axial (computed tomography) imaging and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) to exclude a large exophytic component or invasion into local structures, and assess for muscularis propria (MP) involvement.

106 U-SELs (41 esophageal, 65 gastric) were resected (mean patient age 60.6 [SD 13.4]; 51.9% male). Esophageal U-SELs underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; n = 22) or submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) if MP involvement was suspected (n = 19). Gastric U-SELs underwent STER (n = 6 at cardia), ESD (n = 47), or exposing endoscopic full-thickness resection (e-EFTR; n = 12). Technical success rates were 97.6% and 92.3%, respectively. Among the noncardiac gastric U-SELs, five resections (9.6%) were completed laparoscopically owing to deep and broad full-thickness involvement; five (9.6%) required laparoscopic gastrotomy and surgical retrieval after successful resection and closure owing to a large lesion size (mean 47 mm). There was no delayed bleeding, perforation, or recurrence at 13 months.

U-SELs may be effectively and safely treated by endoscopic resection. The SAFE approach provides a framework that facilitates structured decision-making. Esophageal U-SELs suspected of involving the MP should undergo STER. Gastric SELs are best managed by ESD, with a view to proceeding to e-EFTR. A laparoscopic upper gastrointestinal surgeon should be available in case surgical retrieval of the specimen or laparoscopic completion is required.

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with submucosal tumors treated with endoscopic submucosal excavation (ESE) and those treated with mucosal snare resection-endoscopic submucosal excavation (MSR-ESE).

We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients who underwent ESE or MSR-ESE at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine between January 2023 and January 2024. Factors such as operation time, intraoperative perforation, postoperative adverse events, postoperative fasting time, antibiotic use, hospitalization duration, costs, and pathological diagnosis were compared between the two procedures.

A total of 180 patients with submucosal tumors were included in this study. The MSR-ESE group consisted of 75 patients (41.7%), while the ESE group had 105 patients (58.3%). Propensity score matching (PSM) showed no significant differences in postoperative antibiotic use, fasting time, or intraoperative perforation between the two groups (P>0.05). However, the MSR-ESE group demonstrated shorter operation and hospitalization times, lower hospitalization costs, and a reduced incidence of postoperative peritonitis (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified operation time as an independent risk factor for unplanned intraoperative perforation, with the likelihood of perforation increasing significantly as operation time increased (P=0.007, OR=1.015, 95% CI, 1.004 to 1.026).

MSR-ESE outperforms ESE with shorter operation times, lower costs, and fewer postoperative complications, making it a safe and effective treatment for gastric submucosal tumors.

The increasing detection of submucosal tumors (SMTs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGI) is due to the increased clinical use of endoscopy and imaging technology. Some of these SMTs have malignant potential and may cause clinical symptoms. Thus, it is recommended in clinical guidelines to consider resection of these SMTs. Endoscopic techniques have become widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of SMT in the UGI as compared with traditional surgery due to their advantages of minimally invasive, quick recovery, and economical cost. Recently, new endoscopic techniques and instruments have been continuously implemented, leading to revolutionary innovation in endoscopic treatments. However, the safety and efficacy of these innovative techniques remain unclear. Therefore, we have comprehensively summarized the various techniques used in the treatment of UGI tumors in recent years, evaluated the indications and effects of each technique, and compared their benefits and disadvantages. We hope that this review will provide a more comprehensive reference for clinical and endoscopic practitioners, and help them develop more individualized treatment plans for different patients. This will ultimately expand the patient population that can benefit from these innovative technologies.

Endoscopic resection of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs) possesses minimal trauma, expedited recovery, and reduced costs. Nonetheless, intraoperative challenges, including imprecise surgical risk assessment, prevail. Hence, we investigated the correlation between preoperative CT observation features and perioperative parameters for predicting outcomes in SMT patients.

Subjects diagnosed with SMT and undergoing endoscopic surgery conducted at West China Hospital's Endoscopy Center from September 2019 to October 2023 were retrospectively selected. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and computer tomography (CT) were utilized for evaluating SMT. The study assessed the correlation between preoperative CT findings and perioperative parameters.

Increased lesion size on contrast-enhanced CT correlates with increased operative duration, hospital stay, postoperative antibiotic use. Of utmost significance, we observed a significantly higher intraoperative perforation rate for patients with tumor outgrowth compared to those with lesion involvement of the lumen (96.88% vs 29.11%, P < 0.001). These patients also demonstrated an increased risk of postoperative blood stream infections (P = 0.012), necessitating higher antibiotic grade (P = 0.048), along with prolonged gastrostomy tube retention (P = 0.001) and hospitalization (P = 0.018). In addition, CT provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of tumor size (P = 0.037) and growth pattern (P = 0.026) than EUS.

CT assessment of tumor size closer to reality than EUS. Importantly, these features can assist in pinpointing lesions with elevated surgical complexity and high risk of complications, leading to improved preoperative preparation, thereby increasing anticipation of surgical risks and reducing incidence of complications.

Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors (GIMTs) are being increasingly resected under endoscopy. Large GIMTs cannot be completely retrieved through the mouth, but the cut-off diameter of peroral en bloc retrieval (PEBR) for GIMTs completely resected is still unknown. This study aimed to investigate the ability of maximum transverse diameter (MTD) to predict the PEBR rate of GIMTs after endoscopic resection (ER).

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent ER for upper GIMTs from January 2009 to August 2023. The MTD was measured according to the maximum transverse diameter of specimen immediately retrieved after ER. For the PEBR rate, the independent predictors and optimal cut-off value of MTD were determined by logistic regression analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. The potential significance of preoperative CT for the evaluation of MTD was also clarified.

A total of 2032 patients were diagnosed with upper GIMTs after en bloc resection under endoscopy. The overall PEBR rate was 98.72% (2006/2032). The PEBR rate was 100% for 1943 GIMTs with MTD < 2.5 cm, 85.71% (60/70) for GIMTs with 2.5 cm but ≤ 3.0 cm, and 15.79% (3/19) for GIMTs with MTD > 3.0 cm, and these rates were significantly different (P < 0.01). In terms of the PEBR rate of GIMTs, the ROC curve revealed that the optimal cut-off MTD value was 3.0 cm, and logistic regression analysis revealed that MTD > 3.0 cm was an independent predictive factor (OR 71.07, 95% CI 9.14-552.43; P < 0.001). The MTD of CT was related to that of the resected specimen (r = 0.7149, P < 0.01), and CT underestimated the mean MTD of upper GIMTs by 0.17 cm (95% CI 0.09-0.24, P < 0.01).

MTD is an effective indicator for predicting the PEBR rate of GIMTs after ER. Resected specimens with MTD > 3.0 cm could not be routinely retrieved en bloc. Preoperative CT is suitable for evaluating the MTD of GIMTs, but underestimates the mean MTD of upper GIMTs by 0.17 cm.

Nonampullary duodenal polyps are found in up to 5% of all upper endoscopies; the vast majority are identified incidentally in asymptomatic patients. Although most are benign, adenomas are estimated to account for 10%-20% of these lesions. Most international guidelines recommend that all duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection; this may be associated with a near 15% adverse event rate (predominantly bleeding and perforation) in prospective studies, with substantial local recurrence on surveillance. The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update Expert Review was to describe how individuals should be evaluated and risk-stratified for duodenal polyps, the best approaches to endoscopic resection and surveillance, and management of complications, highlighting opportunities for future research to fill gaps in the existing literature.

This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Clinical Practice Updates Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the Clinical Practice Updates Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were drawn from a review of the published literature and from expert opinion. Because systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings regarding the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Non-neoplastic duodenal lesions (eg, metaplastic foveolar epithelium and gastric heterotopia) may mimic neoplastic adenomatous pathology. Careful optical evaluation and pathologic correlation may be necessary to exclude dysplasia. Nondysplastic lesions do not require endoscopic resection unless they are symptomatic or bleeding. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Ideal duodenal endoscopic inspection includes identification of the major and minor papilla with photodocumentation to ensure no involvement by the lesion. Adding a clear distal attachment device to a forward-viewing gastroscope improves visualization of the papilla and the medial wall. A side-viewing duodenoscope should be used when the major and minor papilla are not visible with the gastroscope and for most lesions on the medial wall of the duodenum within 5 cm of the ampulla. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: All duodenal polyps should be described according to their size, Paris morphology, suspected histologic layer of origin (mucosal lesion or subepithelial lesion), duodenal location (D1-4) and orientation (anterior, posterior, medial, or lateral wall), and proximity/relationship to the major papilla to facilitate therapeutic planning and subsequent surveillance. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Given the high frequency of concomitant colonic adenomas in patients with duodenal adenomas, on identification of a duodenal adenoma, a colonoscopy should be performed if a high-quality examination has not been performed in the last 3 years. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Routine small bowel investigation (ie, capsule endoscopy) is not advised in patients with sporadic and nonsporadic duodenal adenomas. Periodic small bowel inspection with capsule endoscopy may be of benefit in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Definitive treatment of duodenal adenomas by endoscopic resection is less morbid, resource-intensive, and expensive than surgery and is therefore the preferred treatment option. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Due to the risk of malignant transformation, all sporadic duodenal adenomas should be considered for endoscopic resection. However, in comparison with colonic adenomas, the time course to malignant transformation may be more prolonged, and the risk of resection-related morbidity much greater. Therefore, the comorbidities and anticipated longevity of the patient must be carefully factored into the decision-making process. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: The approach to endoscopic duodenal resection (ie, hot vs cold and conventional vs underwater endoscopic mucosal resection) should be individualized to reduce bleeding risk, based on lesion size, morphology, patient comorbidities, and endoscopist comfort level with specific techniques. Piecemeal cold snare resection for flat duodenal adenomas mitigates postprocedural bleeding risk and, for lesions <20 mm, is effective and carries a minimal risk of recurrence. In patients with comorbidities with flat nonbulky lesions measuring < 20 mm, cold snare resection can be considered. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Currently, duodenal adenomas >20 mm or with large Paris subtype Is components should be removed by conventional hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection. Thermal ablation of the post-endoscopic mucosal resection margin to mitigate the risk of recurrence to <2%-5% is safe and effective and should be considered. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 10: Endoscopists performing duodenal polyp resection should be aware of the increased risk of postprocedural bleeding (compared with elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract), which usually occurs in the first 48 hours after the procedure, with the risk proportional to the lesion size. For lesions >3 cm, bleeding risk is >25% and may be life-threatening and associated with hemodynamic compromise; however, after resuscitation, endoscopic hemostasis is generally effective. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 11: Evaluation of the postpolypectomy/endoscopic mucosal resection defect is critical to identify concerns for postprocedural duodenal perforation, which, if unrecognized and left untreated, may be life-threatening and often mandates surgery. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 12: Initial endoscopic surveillance for a completely resected duodenal adenoma should be undertaken at an interval of 6 months. Although usually diminutive, recurrence is often scarred and not amenable to conventional snare resection and may require avulsion techniques to achieve cure. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 13: Nonampullary duodenal adenomas associated with familial adenomatous polyposis should be considered for endoscopic resection based on size (≥1 cm), morphologic characteristics, advanced histology (ie, high-grade dysplasia), and/or based on Spiegelman criteria.

This article offers a detailed overview of recent advancements in third space endoscopy (TSE), highlighting key procedures and their clinical applications and outcomes. Clinical TSE started as a treatment for achalasia and was named peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). Outcome data and comparative data of POEM with other treatments were detailed and discussed. This article also explores the indications and outcomes of other TSE procedures, such as G-POEM, Z-POEM, D-POEM, per-rectal endoscopic myotomy, and STER/POET. This article serves as a valuable resource for endoscopists looking to enhance their understanding and stay updated on these advanced TSE procedures.

Esophageal subepithelial lesions (ESELs) encompass a variety of diseases, including leiomyoma, granular cell tumors, hemangioma, lipoma, stromal tumors, leiomyosarcoma, schwannoma, neuroendocrine tumors and more. These lesions often present asymptomatically, leading to a generally low clinical diagnosis rate. Common imaging techniques for diagnosing ESELs include conventional endoscopy, spiral computed tomography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Among these, EUS is currently regarded as one of the most accurate methods for diagnosing ESELs. In recent years, EUS has increasingly been combined with advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, submucosal saline injection, high-frequency impedance measurement, and enhanced imaging to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce missed diagnoses. This article reviews the application and recent advancements of EUS in diagnosing esophageal submucosal lesions.

The study objective was to evaluate the primary feasibility of endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD) and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) via balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) to treat small bowel subepithelial lesions (SELs).

A retrospective case series study was performed. The first fifteen consecutive patients who underwent ESD (n = 10) and EFTR (n = 5) via BAE to remove small bowel SELs from November 2016 to December 2023 were included. The main outcome measures were the technique success rate, operative time and complication rate.

This research focused on 15 cases of jejunoileal SELs, four cases of lipomyoma, three cases of ectopic pancreas, two cases of NETs, three cases of benign fibrous tumours and three cases of angioma. The overall technique success rate was 86.7%, with 100% (10/10) and 60% (3/5) for BAE-ESD and BAE-EFTR, respectively, in removing small bowel SELs. Two cases of EFTR failed, as the BAE operation was unsuitable for tumour resection and suture repair of a perforated wound. No serious bleeding or any postoperative complications occurred. The median time of endoscopic resection via BAE for SELs was 44 min (range 22-68 min).

ESD and EFTR via BAE might be alternative choices for treating small SELs in the small bowel, with the advantages of clear and accurate positioning and minimal invasiveness. However, its superiority over surgery still needs to be further investigated.

In the past decades, endoscopic ultrasound has developed from a diagnostic tool to a platform for many therapeutic interventions. Various technological advancements have emerged since the last Brazilian Consensus, demanding a review and update of the recommendations based on the best scientific evidence.

A group of 32 renowned echoendoscopists selected eight relevant topics to be discussed to generate clinical questions. After that, a literature review was conducted to answer these questions based on the most updated evidence.

Thirty-three statements were formulated and voted on by the experts to reach a consensus. The Oxford System was used to grade the level of evidence.

There is mo-derate evidence to support that the needle shape, gauge, or aspiration technique does not influence the yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue sampling of pancreatic solid lesions. There is moderate evidence to support using EUS-TTNB of the cyst wall to differentiate between mucinous and non-mucinous cystic neoplasms. There is little evidence to support the EUS-guided treatment of gastric varices. There is a high level of evidence to support that EUS-guided biliary drainage and ERCP present similar outcomes in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. There is a high level of evidence for using EUS to diagnose neoplastic pancreatic cysts and detect necrosis before indicating drainage. There is moderate evidence to support EUS-GE over duodenal stent for malignant gastric outlet obstruction in patients with a life expectancy higher than 2 months. There is a high level of evidence to support the use of RFA in treating both functioning and non-functioning types of NET.

The aim of this study was to compare and analyze the clinical effects of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic band electrocision ligation (EEL) in the removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs).

We analyzed the clinical data of 130 patients with gastrointestinal SMTs (diameter ≤10 mm) who underwent endoscopic resection, including 62 cases in the EEL group and 68 in the ESD group, and compared indicators such as surgical time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative hospital stay, and surgical cost, between the EEL and ESD group.

EEL surgery time (8.9 ± 1.1 min) was significantly shorter than the ESD group (62.3 ± 2.8 min) (p < .05), EEL surgery cost (5126.8 ± 26.5 yuan) was significantly lower than the ESD group (15721.3 ± 39.6 yuan) (p < .05), and intraoperative blood loss was also markedly lower in the EEL group (5.6 ± 1.7 ml) compared to the ESD group (42.3 ± 3.5 ml) (p < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time or postoperative complication incidence between the two groups (p > .05).

In treating gastric muscular, mucosal, or submucosal tumors with a diameter of less than 10 mm, the EEL surgical method was superior to the ESD surgical method in terms of surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, and cost. There was no difference in hospital stay and postoperative complication rate between the two methods, which was worthy of clinical application.

Background and study aims Tissue acquisition is required for diagnosis of subepithelial lesions (SELs). However, obtaining adequate tissue remains challenging. This study investigated an EUS-guided technique using a forceps to create a channel and take multiple biopsies from the center of the lesion, therefore called endoscopic ultrasound-guided keyhole biopsy (EUS-KB). Patients and methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 56 patients with SELs in the upper gastrointestinal tract who were scheduled to undergo EUS-KB. The primary aim was to assess diagnostic yield, defined as the percentage of procedures where EUS-KB resulted in a definitive histopathological diagnosis. Furthermore, factors influencing diagnostic yield were investigated. Additional outcomes included technical success and adverse events. Results Technical success was achieved in 55 of 60 biopsies (91.7%). EUS-KB provided a diagnosis in 44 of 55 biopsies (80.0%), histology mostly showing gastrointestinal stromal tumor or leiomyoma. The diagnostic yield was not significantly influenced by the size or location of the SEL. Adverse events occurred in one patient (1.7%). Conclusions EUS-KB is a feasible and safe technique for obtaining a classifying diagnosis for SELs in the upper gastrointestinal tract. It could offer an alternative diagnostic modality, especially in lesions smaller than 20 mm.

Gastrointestinal bleeding is classified as obscure in 5% of patients who remain symptomatic after undergoing upper endoscopy, colonoscopy, and small bowel capsule endoscopy. We present a case of a 45-year-old male who had obscure bleeding for eight years and presented with hemorrhagic shock. He was found to have an ulcerated intra-luminal jejunal lesion on enteroscopy, then had surgical resection that revealed a low-risk gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). If GISTs are bleeding, hemostasis should first be achieved with medical, endoscopic, or radiologic interventions, and then resected because they can have malignancy potential. Furthermore, they should be risk-stratified and either surveilled to monitor for recurrence if low risk or need adjuvant imatinib if high risk. There are currently no screening guidelines for GISTs despite their increasing incidences.

The majority of esophageal subepithelial lesions originating from the muscularis propria (SEL-MPs) are benign in nature, although a subset may exhibit malignant characteristics. Conventional endoscopic resection techniques are time-consuming and lack efficacy for small SEL-MPs.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ligation-assisted endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR-L) following unroofing technique for small esophageal SEL-MPs.

From January 2021 to September 2023, 17 patients diagnosed with esophageal SEL-MPs underwent ESMR-L following unroofing technique at the endoscopy center of Shenzhen People's Hospital. Details of clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed.

The mean age of the patients was 50.12 ± 12.65 years. The mean size of the tumors was 7.47 ± 2.83 mm and all cases achieved en bloc resection successfully. The average operation time was 12.2 minutes without any complications. Histopathology identified 2 Lesions (11.8%) as gastrointestinal stromal tumors at very low risk, 12 Lesions (70.6%) as leiomyoma and 3 Lesions (17.6%) as smooth muscle proliferation. No recurrence was found during the mean follow-up duration of 14.18 ± 9.62 months.

ESMR-L following roofing technique is an effective and safe technique for management of esophageal SEL-MPs smaller than 20 mm, but it cannot ensure en bloc resection and may require further treatment.

There is limited knowledge regarding the management of duodenal subepithelial lesions (SELs) owing to a lack of understanding of their natural course. This study aimed to assess the natural course of asymptomatic duodenal SELs and provide management recommendations.

Patients diagnosed with duodenal SELs and followed up for a minimum of 6 months were retrospectively investigated.

Among the 443,533 patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy between 2008 and 2020, duodenal SELs were identified in 0.39% (1,713 patients). Among them, 396 duodenal SELs were monitored for a median period of 72.5 months (interquartile range, 37.7-111.3 mo). Of them, 16 SELs (4.0%) showed substantial changes in size or morphology at a median follow-up of 35.1 months (interquartile range, 21.7-51.4 mo). Of these SELs with substantial changes, tissues of two SELs were acquired using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy: one was a lipoma and the other was non-diagnostic. Three SELs were surgically or endoscopically removed; two were diagnosed as gastrointestinal stromal tumors, and one was a lipoma. An initial size of 20 mm or larger was associated with substantial changes during follow-up (p = 0.016).

While the majority of duodenal SELs may not exhibit substantial interval changes, regular follow-up with endoscopy may be necessary for cases with an initial size of 20 mm or larger, considering a possibility of malignancy.

Background and study aims Histological confirmation of subepithelial lesions (SELs) in the upper gastrointestinal tract remains challenging. Endoscopic resection of SELs is increasingly used for its excellent diagnostic yield and opportunity to do away with continued surveillance. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the indications, success rates and complications of different endoscopic resection techniques for SELs at a large, tertiary referral hospital in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Patients and methods Data between October 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Main outcomes were R0-resection rate, en bloc resection rate, recurrence rate, and procedure-related adverse events (AEs) (Clavien-Dindo). Secondary outcomes were procedure time, need for surgical intervention, and clinical impact on patient management. Results A total of 58 patients were referred for endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal SELs. The median diameter of lesions was 20 mm (range 7-100 mm). Median follow-up time was 5 months (range 0.4-75.7). Forty-eight procedures (83%) were completed successfully leading to en bloc resection in 85% and R0-resection in 63%. Procedure-related AEs occurred in six patients (13%). Severe complications (CD grade 3a) were seen in three patients. The local recurrence rate for (pre)malignant diagnosis was 2%. Additional surgical intervention was needed in seven patients (15%). A total of 32 patients (67%) could be discharged from further surveillance after endoscopic resection. Conclusions Endoscopic resection is a safe and effective treatment for SELs and offers valuable information about undetermined SELs for which repeated sampling attempts have failed to provide adequate tissue for diagnosis.

Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) plays a critical role in the management of subepithelial lesions (SEL) of upper gastrointestinal tract many can be classified solely by a thorough upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) which can reduce the burden of additional studies.

Analyze the impact of a stepwise approach starting with a second-look UGE before the decision of EUS in patients referred to our center with suspected SEL.

Retrospective cohort study which included all adult patients referred to our center between 2015 and 2020 with suspected SEL.Second-look UGE evaluated the location, size, color, surface characteristics, movability and consistency of the SEL and bite-on-bite biopsies were performed. Decisions on SEL management and follow-up were collected.

A total of 193 SEL (190 patients) were included. At the index-UGE, stomach was the most frequent location (n = 115;59.6%). Most patients performed a second-look UGE (n = 180; 94.7%). A minority was oriented directly to EUS (n = 8;4.2%) or endoscopic resection (n = 2; 1.1%). In patients who underwent a second-look UGE, SEL were excluded in 25 (13.9%) and 21 (11.7%) did not need further work-up. The remaining patients were submitted to EUS (n = 88;48.9%), surveillance by UGE (n = 44; 24.4%) or endoscopic resection (n = 2; 1.1%).

Systematically performing a second-look UGE, in patients referred with suspected SEL, safely preclude the need for subsequent investigation in approximately one-fourth of the patients. As UGE is less invasive and more readily available, we suggest that a second-look UGE should be the initial approach in SEL management.

Long-term outcomes of gastric subepithelial lesions have not been elucidated. To reveal the natural history, we initiated a prospective, 10-year follow-up of patients with small (≤20 mm) gastric subepithelial lesions in September 2014. Here, we report the results of an interim analysis of a prospective observational study.

In total, 567 patients with 610 lesions were prospectively registered between September 2014 and August 2016. The location, size, morphology, and number of subepithelial lesions were recorded on a web-based case report form. This study has been conducted as an Academic Committee Working Group of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

The endoscopic follow-up period was 4.60 ± 1.73 years (mean ± standard deviation), and survival data were investigated for 5.28 ± 1.68 years. This interim analysis revealed that the estimated cumulative incidence of a size increase ≥5 mm, after accounting for patients' death and resection of the tumor as competing risk events, was 4.5% at 5 years. In addition, the estimated cumulative incidence of lesion size increase ≥5 mm or resection of lesions was 7.9% at 5 years, and that of size increase ≥10 mm or resection of lesions was 4.5% at 5 years.

These results indicate that approximately one in 13 patients with small (≤20 mm) gastric subepithelial lesions may require resection or further investigation for increased tumor size (≥5 mm) within 5 years.

Subepithelial lesions (SELs) are associated with various endoscopic resection (ER) outcomes and diagnostic challenges. We aimed to establish a tool for predicting ER-related outcomes and diagnosing SELs and to investigate the predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS).

Phase 1 (system development) was performed in a retrospective cohort (n = 837) who underwent EUS before ER for SELs at eight hospitals. Prediction models for five key outcomes were developed using logistic regression. Models with satisfactory internal validation performance were included in a mobile application system, SEL endoscopic resection predictor (SELERP). In Phase 2, the models were externally validated in a prospective cohort of 200 patients.

An SELERP was developed using EUS characteristics, which included 10 models for five key outcomes: post-ER ulcer management, short procedure time, long hospital stay, high medication costs, and diagnosis of SELs. In Phase 1, 10 models were derived and validated (C-statistics, 0.67-0.99; calibration-in-the-large, -0.14-0.10; calibration slopes, 0.92-1.08). In Phase 2, the derived risk prediction models showed convincing discrimination (C-statistics, 0.64-0.73) and calibration (calibration-in-the-large, -0.02-0.05; calibration slopes, 1.01-1.09) in the prospective cohort. The sensitivities and specificities of the five diagnostic models were 68.3-95.7% and 64.1-83.3%, respectively.

We developed and prospectively validated an application system for the prediction of ER outcomes and diagnosis of SELs, which could aid clinical decision-making and facilitate patient-physician consultation. EUS features significantly contributed to the prediction.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2000040118).