Copyright
©2013 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Hepatol. Nov 27, 2013; 5(11): 603-611
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i11.603
Published online Nov 27, 2013. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v5.i11.603
Donor CMV IgG status | Recipient CMV IgG status | Risk type1 | Need for CMV prophylaxis |
Positive | Positive | Low risk | Low |
Positive | Negative | High risk | High |
Negative | Positive | Low risk | Low |
Negative | Negative | Low risk | Low |
Recipient status | Recipient HBVantibody status | Risk of de novo hepatitis | |
No prophylaxis | With prophylaxis | ||
HBV naive | HBcAb-, HBsAb- | 58% | 11% |
No past infection, immunized | HBcAb-, HBsAb+ | 18% | 2% |
Past infection, immune | HBcAb+, HBsAb+ | 4% | 3% |
Past infection, not immune | HBcAb-, HBsAb+ | 14% | 3% |
- Citation: Reddy MS, Varghese J, Venkataraman J, Rela M. Matching donor to recipient in liver transplantation: Relevance in clinical practice. World J Hepatol 2013; 5(11): 603-611
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-5182/full/v5/i11/603.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v5.i11.603