Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Hepatol. Feb 27, 2024; 16(2): 186-192
Published online Feb 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i2.186
Table 1 Differences between The Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method and revised electronic causality assessment method scores
RUCAM
RECAM
Criteria 1: LatencyDomain 1a: Latency from drug start
Domain 1b: Latency from drug stop
Criteria 2: Dechallenge Domain 2: Dechallenge
Different time cut-offs based on R valueSame time cut-offs regardless of R value
Criteria 3: Risk factorsEliminated
Criteria 4: Concomitant drugsDomain 3: Literature supporting drug toxicity (LiverTox)
Criteria 5: Exclusion of non-drug etiologiesDomain 4: Exclusion of non-drug etiologies
Criteria 6: Known hepatotoxicity of drugBecame domain 3
Criteria 7: Rechallenge responseDomain 5: Rechallenge response - both prospectively documented with lab testing and retrospective based on patient history. Includes additional data: Liver biopsy results, atypical viral testing, and presence of severe skin reactions