Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Hepatol. Dec 27, 2020; 12(12): 1276-1288
Published online Dec 27, 2020. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v12.i12.1276
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients included
Variables1
Total sample (n = 190)
Age (yr)56.6 ± 11.0
Gender
Male116 (61.1)
Female74 (38.9)
Child-Turcotte-Pugh
A107 (56.3)
B48 (25.3)
C35 (18.4)
Etiology
HCV90 (47.4)
Alcohol51 (26.8)
HCV + alcohol21 (11.1)
Other228 (14.7)
Phase angle6.06 ± 2.20
Table 2 Characteristics of the patients according to the bioelectrical impedance vector analysis method, related to age, sex, staging (Child-Turcotte-Pugh score), etiology and phase angle
Variables1Total sample (n = 190)Classification quadrants - BIVA
Q1 (n = 91; 47.9%)
Q2 (n = 36; 18.9%)
Q3 (n = 27; 14.2%)
Q4 (n = 36; 18.9%)
P value
Age (yr) 56.6 ± 11.056.8 ± 9.6450.3 ± 14.3357.7 ± 9.2461.6 ± 8.94< 0.001
Gender 0.642
Male116 (61.1)54 (59.3)20 (55.6)17 (63.0)25 (69.4)
Female74 (38.9)37 (40.7)16 (44.4)10 (37.0)11 (30.6)
Child-Turcotte-Pugh0.052
A107 (56.3)52 (57.1)27 (75.0)13 (48.1)15 (41.7)
B48 (25.3)25 (27.5)5 (13.9)9 (33.3)9 (25.0)
C35 (18.4)14 (15.4)4 (11.1)5 (18.5)12 (33.3)
Etiology0.380
HCV90 (47.4)45 (49.5)16 (44.4)13 (48.1)16 (44.4)
Alcohol51 (26.8)29 (31.9)7 (19.4)7 (25.9)8 (22.2)
HCV + alcohol21 (11.1)6 (6.6)4 (11.1)4 (14.8)7 (19.4)
Other228 (14.7)11 (12.1)9 (25.0)3 (11.1)5 (13.9)
Phase angle6.06 ± 2.206.49 ± 2.4447.30 ± 2.1245.07 ± 0.6734.46 ± 0.703< 0.001
Table 3 Distribution of the sample by age group related to phase angle classification, bioelectrical impedance vector analysis quadrants, sex, Child-Turcotte-Pugh score and etiology
Variables1Age (yr)
20-39 (n = 11; 5.8%)
40-49 (n = 32; 16.8%)
50-59 (n = 66; 34.7%)
≥ 60 (n = 81; 42.6%)
P value
PA7.67 ± 2.5046.68 ± 2.633, 45.79 ± 1.6135.83 ± 2.2930.014
PA classification0.007
Good prognosis11 (100)524 (75.0)43 (65.2)43 (53.1)
Bad prognosis0 (0.0)8 (25.0)23 (34.8)38 (46.9)5
BIVA Quadrant classification 0.002
Q14 (36.4)15 (46.9)36 (54.5)36 (44.4)
Q27 (63.6)58 (25.0)10 (15.2)11 (13.6)
Q30 (0.0)6 (18.8)5 (7.6)16 (19.8)
Q40 (0.0)3 (9.4)15 (22.7)18 (22.2)
Gender0.162
Male9 (81.8)22 (68.8)42 (63.6)43 (53.1)
Female2 (18.2)10 (31.3)24 (36.4)38 (46.9)
Child-Turcotte-Pugh0.194
A9 (81.8)18 (56.3)31 (47.0)49 (60.5)
B2 (18.2)8 (25.0)17 (25.8)21 (25.9)
C0 (0.0)6 (18.8)18 (27.3)11 (13.6)
Etiology0.030
HCV1 (9.1)14 (43.8)34 (51.5)41 (50.6)
Alcohol3 (27.3)9 (28.1)16 (24.2)23 (28.4)
HCV + alcohol1 (9.1)4 (12.5)6 (9.1)10 (12.3)
Other26 (54.5)55 (15.6)10 (15.2)7 (8.6)
Table 4 Association of the classification of phase angle prognosis related to age, sex, staging (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) and etiology
Variables1Classification PA – 5.4°
P value
Good prognosis (> 5.4°; n = 121)Bad prognosis (< 5.4°; n = 69)
Age (yr) 54.2 ± 11.360.9 ± 9.0< 0.001
Gender0.040
Male81 (66.9)35 (50.7)
Female40 (33.1)34 (49.3)
Child-Turcotte-Pugh < 0.001
A81 (66.9)326 (37.7)
B26 (21.5)22 (31.9)
C14 (11.6)21 (30.4)3
Etiology0.060
HCV51 (42.1)39 (56.5)
Alcohol39 (32.2)12 (17.4)
HCV + alcohol11 (9.1)10 (14.5)
Other220 (16.5)8 (11.6)