Observational Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Hepatol. Aug 27, 2024; 16(8): 1131-1144
Published online Aug 27, 2024. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v16.i8.1131
Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression affects clinicopathological features and prognosis of aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma
Qiu-Ju Liang, Qin-Qin Long, Feng-Qin Tian, Qun-Ying Su, Xiao-Ying Zhu, Xi-Dai Long, Clinicopathological Diagnosis and Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise 533000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
Qiu-Ju Liang, Xi-Dai Long, Department of Tumor Pathology, Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Pathology of Guangxi Higher Education Institutes, Baise 533000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China
ORCID number: Qiu-Ju Liang (0009-0007-5205-8799); Qin-Qin Long (0000-0001-9891-1651); Feng-Qin Tian (0009-0001-3019-6329); Qun-Ying Su (0009-0000-6086-5039); Xiao-Ying Zhu (0009-0000-6827-6394); Xi-Dai Long (0000-0003-0960-0689).
Co-first authors: Qiu-Ju Liang and Qin-Qin Long.
Author contributions: Liang QJ and Long QQ performed the experiments, formal analysis, and data curation, and they contributed equally to this work and should be considered as co-first authors; Tian FQ, Su QY, and Zhu XY constructed the histopathological sample library and collected the clinicopathological information and following-up data for all patients; Long XD conceptualized and designed the study, received grant support, had full access to the data, and is responsible for the integrity and accuracy of data analysis; all authors contributed to data acquisition and interpretation and reviewed and approved the final version.
Supported by the Science-Technology Planning Project of Guangxi, No. Guike-AD19245174; Guangxi Training Program for Medical High-level Academic Leaders, No. 6 of Guiweikejiaofa [2020]-15; Bose Talent Highland, No. 2020-3-2; Building Projects from the Key Laboratory of Molecular Pathology (Hepatobiliary Diseases) of Guangxi, No. Guiweikejiaofa [2020]-17; the Key Laboratory of Tumor Molecular Pathology of Guangxi Colleges and Universities, No. Guijiaokeyan [2022]-10; and Clinical Key Specialty Building Project (For Pathology) of Guangxi, No. Guiweiyifa [2022]-21.
Institutional review board statement: The present study was approved by the Ethics Review Committees of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities and carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines (No. AYJM20210708).
Informed consent statement: Informed consent from the patients was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xi-Dai Long, MD, PhD, Professor, Research Scientist, Clinicopathological Diagnosis and Research Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, No. 18 Zhongshan Road, Baise 533000, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. sjtulongxd@ymun.edu.cn
Received: March 6, 2024
Revised: June 27, 2024
Accepted: July 10, 2024
Published online: August 27, 2024
Processing time: 168 Days and 21.4 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

The dysregulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP3) was positively correlated with the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is not clear whether TIMP3 expression is associated with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)-related HCC (AHCC).

AIM

To assess the effects of TIMP3 expression on the clinicopathological features and prognosis of AHCC.

METHODS

A retrospective study, including 182 patients with AHCC, was conducted to explore the link between TIMP3 expression in cancerous tissues and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of AHCC. TIMP3 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry and its effects on the clinicopathological features and prognosis of AHCC were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression survival analysis. Odds ratio, hazard ratio (HR), median overall survival time (MST), median tumor recurrence-free survival time (MRT), and corresponding 95% confidential interval (CI) was calculated to evaluate the potential of TIMP3 expression in predicting AHCC prognosis.

RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that compared with high TIMP3 expression, low TIMP3 expression in tumor tissues significantly decreased the MST (36.00 mo vs 18.00 mo) and MRT (32.00 mo vs 16 mo) of patients with AHCC. Multivariate Cox regression survival analysis further proved that decreased expression of TIMP3 increased the risk of death (HR = 2.85, 95%CI: 2.04-4.00) and tumor recurrence (HR = 2.26, 95%CI: 1.57-3.26). Furthermore, decreased expression of TIMP3 protein in tissues with AHCC was significantly correlated with tumor clinicopathological features, such as tumor size, tumor grade and stage, tumor microvessel density, and tumor blood invasion. Additionally, TIMP3 protein expression was also negatively associated with amount of AFB1-DNA adducts in tumor tissues.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that the dysregulation of TIMP3 expression is related to AHCC biological behaviors and affects tumor outcome, suggesting that TIMP3 may act as a prognostic biomarker for AHCC.

Key Words: Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression; Aflatoxin B1; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Clinicopathological feature; Prognosis

Core Tip: This study retrospectively analyzed tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP3) expression and the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma (AHCC). It was found that TIMP3 expression was statistically associated with the prognosis of AHCC as an independent risk factor. The dysregulation of TIMP3 expression affected the clinicopathological features and has great value to predict the prognosis of AHCC.



INTRODUCTION

In China, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors and represents a major healthcare challenge. Approximately half of all patients with HCC in the world are in China, making this tumor as the second leading cause of death due to malignant tumors among Chinese people[1]. According to Annals of China Health Statistics Version 2022 (http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202305/6ef68aac6bd14c1eb9375e01a0faa1fb.shtml), the death rate of HCC is increasing in the past 50 years. Evidence from epidemiological studies has shown that hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure are two dominant causes of HCC. Despite significant advances in research on the occurrence and development of HCC induced by different etiological factors over the past few decades[2], the detailed mechanisms underlying the progression of this malignancy remain unclear. Recent studies have shown that HCC patients with different genetic profiles featured different survival duration even though receiving the same treatment[3-6]. Therefore, it is very crucial for patients with HCC to need biomarkers predicting their survival duration.

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP3), an important member of the TIMP gene family, locates at 22q12.3 in human and consists of four introns and five exons (Gene ID: 7078). This gene encodes a secreted glycoprotein consisting of 221 amino acids with a molecular weight of approximately 21 KD. TIMP3 protein contain two functional domains: An N-terminal domain and a C-terminal domain[7-9]. Functionally, TIMP3 acts as an inhibitor of the matrix metalloproteinases and plays an important role in the degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Recently, increasing evidence has exhibited that the dysregulation of TIMP3 may be involved in the progression of cancers via modifying the infiltration and metastasis capacity of cancer cells and remodeling tumor microenvironmental structure[7,9]. However, the roles of TIMP3 expression in AFB1-related HCC (AHCC) prognosis and clinicopathological features have not been investigated. Here, we conducted a hospital-based clinicopathological study to explore whether the dysregulation of TIMP3 expression in cancerous tissues modifies the clinicopathological features and prognosis of AHCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study population

This is a hospital-based retrospective study. The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities (No. AYJM20210708), and informed consent from patients was waived due to the retrospective nature of this study. In this study, AHCC was defined as HCC with AFB1 exposure. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Patients with histopathologically diagnosed HCC; (2) Patients not receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy before their tumors were resected; (3) Patients with enough available paraffin-embedded tumor samples for TIMP3 protein expression and AFB1 exposure analyses; (4) Patients with available clinicopathological data and survival follow-up information; (5) Patients with AFB1 exposure [AFB1-DNA adducts (ADAs) in tumor tissues: > 1.00 μmol/mol DNA]; and (6) Patients who agreed that their resected tumor tissues can be used for scientific research. The exclusion criteria included: (1) Cases with a history of other tumors such as cholangiocellular carcinoma; and (2) Samples not meeting the needs of immunohistochemistry or enzyme linked immunosorbent assay.

According to the abovementioned inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 182 patients with HCC were screened at the Histopathological Sample Library of the Clinicopathological Diagnosis and Research Center (HSL-CDRC), the Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities between January 2014 and December 2018. Samples and corresponding clinicopathological and survival data for all subjects were obtained from the HSL-CDRC. In this study, tumor grades and stages were elucidated according to the criteria of Edmondson and Steiner (ES) grading system and tumor-node-metastasis staging system, respectively. Tumor grade was divided into two groups: Low grade (ES-I and ES-II) and high grade (ES-III and ES-IV). Survival status and time for all cases were confirmed by telephonic follow-up and medical records. The last follow-up date was October 31, 2023. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the period from the date of tumor surgical resection therapy to the date of death or last follow-up, whereas tumor recurrence-free survival (RFS) was defined as the period from the date of tumor surgical resection therapy to the date of tumor recurrence or last follow-up.

AFB1 exposure data

AFB1 exposure status for all patients with HCC was evaluated through the number of ADAs in cancerous tissues. The number of ADAs was calculated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as previously described[10]. Based on the level of AFB1 exposure, the patients were divided into two groups: Low AFB1-exposure group (ADAs in tumor tissues ≤ 2.00 μmol/mol DNA) and high AFB1-exposure group (ADAs in tumor tissues > 2.00 μmol/mol DNA), according to the average value of the number of ADAs in the cancerous tissues with HCC.

TIMP3 expression assays

The amount of TIMP3 protein expression in HCC cancerous tissues was assayed by immunohistochemistry technique as previously described[11]. Briefly, paraffin-embedded tissues from each patient were fixed on glass slides and were treated with dimethylbenzene. After that, TIMP3 protein was tested using an anti-TIMP3 polyclonal antibody (1:250 dilution; catalog bs-0417R, Beijing Bioss Biology, Inc., Beijing, China) and UltraSensitiveTM SP IHC Kit (catalog KIT-9730, Maixin Biotechnology, Inc., Xiamen, China). Positive and negative controls were used. The amount of TIMP3 protein expression was quantified according to the following immunohistochemistry analytic formula of the immunoreactive scoring (IRS) system[12]:

IRS = SI × PP, wherein SI represents staining intensity and PP represents the percentage of positive cells.

Based on the level of TIMP3 protein expression in HCC cancerous tissues, the patients were divided into two groups: Patients with low TIMP3 expression (LTE; IRS < 6) and those with high TIMP3 expression (HTE; IRS ≥ 6).

Tumor microvessel density evaluation

Tumor microvessel density (MVD) in HCC cancerous tissues was analyzed according to our previously reported method[13]. In brief, microvessels were first stained using anti-CD31 antibody [catalog 2011101101, Gene Tech (Shanghai) Company Limited, Shanghai, China] and then counted at × 200 magnification. In this study, MVD was defined as the number of microvessels in the cancerous regions over five fields in each slide. Based on the average MVD, the patients were divided into two groups: patients with low MVD (< 50) and those with high MVD (≥ 50).

Statistical analysis

The χ2 test was used to analyze the distribution difference of clinicopathological features between LTE and HTE. Risk effects of TIMP3 expression on tumor characteristics, including alpha fetoprotein (AFP), tumor size, tumor grade and stage, MVD, microvessel infiltration (MVI), and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), were estimated by logistic regression analysis, with odds ratio and corresponding 95% confidential interval (CI) calculated. The effects of TIMP3 expression on HCC survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis. For Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, survival curves (with log-rank test) were plotted, and then median OS time (MST) and median RFS time (MRT) were calculated for different dumb variables. Regarding Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, univariable analysis was initially performed for screening potential risk biomarkers, which were then included in multivariable survival analysis (stepwise method with the likelihood ratio test) to identified independent predictors of death and tumor recurrence, with hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95%CIs calculated. Correlation between TIMP3 expression and AFB1 exposure was assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis. In this study, all statistical analyses were performed using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) software (version 29.00) (SPSS Institute, Chicago, IL, United States), and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.

RESULTS
Clinicopathology information of AHCC patients

A total of 182 patients with AHCC were included in the final analyses (Table 1). Among these patients, about 70% were male and their average age was 49.52 ± 10.79 years old. About 52% of AHCC cases had high differentiation, and 36.3% showed MVI. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that the MST and MRT of patients with AHCC was 26.00 (23.02-28.98) mo and 25.00 (20.44-29.56) mo, respectively. All patients with AHCC featured positive AFB1 exposure, with an average amount of adducts of 2.00 ± 0.79 μmol/mol DNA. Moreover, patients having higher AFB1 exposure featured a poorer OS (Figure 1A) and RFS (Figure 1B).

Figure 1
Figure 1 Effects of aflatoxin B1 exposure and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression on survival of patients with aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma. A and B: Effects of aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) exposure on overall survival (OS) and tumor recurrence-free survival (RFS) of patients with AFB1-related hepatocellular carcinoma (AHCC). The level of AFB1 exposure was assessed using AFB1-DNA adducts in HCC cancerous tissues; C and D: Effects of TIMP3 expression on OS and RFS of patients with AHCC. The level of TIMP3 protein expression in AHCC tissues was tested by immunohistochemistry combined with the immunoreactive scoring system; E and F: Effects of AFB1 exposure combined with TIMP3 expression on OS and RFS of AHCC. Cumulative hazard function was plotted by the Kaplan-Meier method, and P value was calculated with two-sided log-rank tests. LAE: Low AFB1-exposure group; HAE: High AFB1-exposure group; LTE: Low TIMP3 expression; HTE: High TIMP3 expression; AETE1: Low aflatoxin B1 exposure plus high TIMP3 expression; AETE2: Low aflatoxin B1 exposure plus low TIMP3 expression; AETE3: High aflatoxin B1 exposure plus high TIMP3 expression; AETE4: High aflatoxin B1 exposure plus low TIMP3 expression.
Table 1 Clinicopathological features of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Variable
n
Percentage (%)
Total182100.0
Age (years)1
< 499853.8
≥ 498446.2
Gender
Male13574.2
Female4725.8
Race
Han8948.9
Others9351.1
Smoking
No13875.8
Yes4424.2
Drinking
No13574.2
Yes4725.8
HBsAg
Negative6334.6
Positive11965.4
Anti-HCV
Negative14981.9
Positive3318.1
AFP
Negative6435.2
Positive11864.8
AFB1 exposure
Low7541.2
High10758.8
Tumor size
≤ 5 cm5630.8
> 5 cm12669.2
ES grade
Low9451.6
High8848.4
TNM stage
I3016.5
II7842.9
III7440.7
Liver cirrhosis
No5630.8
Yes12669.2
MVD
Low9049.5
High9250.5
PVTT
Negative12769.8
Positive5530.2
MVI
Negative11663.7
Positive6636.3
Association of TIMP3 expression with clinicopathological features of AHCC

TIMP3 protein expression in AHCC cancerous tissues was assessed by immunohistochemistry technique with the IRS system. According to the average amount of TIMP3 expression, the patients were divided into two groups: Patients with HTE and those with LTE (as described in Materials and Methods). Table 2 summarizes the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with AHCC according to the level of TIMP3 protein expression. Different distributions were found for AFP, tumor size, tumor grade and stage, MVD, MVI, and PVTT, but not other clinicopathological features. To explore the risk effects of TIMP3 expression on clinicopathological characteristics, we accomplished logistic regression analyses (Table 3). The results showed that decreased TIMP3 protein expression in cancerous tissues increased the risk of tumor progression. Compared with patients with HTE, those with LTE featured a higher risk of tumor dedifferentiation (OR = 3.04, 95%CI: 1.65-5.65).

Table 2 Clinical pathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma according to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression.
VariableLTE
nHTE
n
Percentage (%)
Percentage (%)
P value
Total89100.093100.0
Age (years)0.78
< 494752.85154.8
≥ 494247.24245.2
Gender0.18
Male7078.76569.9
Female1921.32830.1
Race0.89
Han4449.44548.4
Others4550.64851.6
Smoking0.38
No7078.76873.1
Yes1921.32526.9
Drinking0.50
No6876.46772.0
Yes2123.62628.0
HBsAg0.13
Negative2629.23739.8
Positive6370.85660.2
Anti-HCV0.47
Negative7179.87883.9
Positive1820.21516.1
AFP4.66 × 10-13
Negative89.05660.2
Positive8191.03739.8
Tumor size2.54 × 10-4
≤ 5 cm1618.04043.0
> 5 cm7382.05357.0
ES grade3.84 × 10-4
Low3438.26064.5
High5561.83335.4
TNM stage1.18 × 10-4
I66.72425.8
II3539.34346.2
III4853.92628.0
Liver cirrhosis0.14
No3236.02425.8
Yes5764.06974.2
MVD2.97 × 10-3
Low3438.25660.2
High5561.83739.8
PVTT2.32 × 10-5
Negative4955.17883.9
Positive4044.91516.1
MVI2.99 × 10-4
Negative4550.67176.3
Positive4449.42223.7
Table 3 The risk effects of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression in the cancerous tissues on the clinicopathological features of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Risk effects
ORLTE/HTG1
95%CI
P value
Higher AFP15.326.63-35.381.65 × 10-10
Higher tumor size3.471.75-6.873.69 × 10-4
Tumor dedifferentiation3.041.65-5.654.31 × 10-4
Higher TNM stage2.601.64-4.074.21 × 10-5
Higher MVD2.451.35-4.453.20 × 10-3
Higher risk of PVTT4.382.18-8.833.52 × 10-4
Higher risk of MVI3.241.71-6.143.20 × 10-4
Univariable survival TIMP3 expression and AHCC survival based on univariable survival models

To investigate the effects of TIMP3 protein expression in cancerous tissues on the prognosis of patients with AHCC, we first accomplished Kaplan-Meier survival analyses (Table 4). The results showed that TIMP3 protein expression statistically affected the MST and MRT of patients with AHCC, as well as known clinicopathological variables (including AFP, AFB1 exposure, tumor size, tumor grade and stage, tumor MVD and MVI, and PVTT). Patients with LTE featured a shorter MST or MRT compared to those with HTE (18.00 mo vs 36.00 mo for MST; 16.00 mo vs 32.00 mo for MRT), which suggested that the downregulation of TIMP3 expression shortened patients’ OS and RFS. Figure 1C and D shows this trend. Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis further demonstrated that abnormal expression of TIMP3 significantly modified the death risk of patients with AHCC (HR = 2.92; 95%CI: 2.19-4.09), as well as known risk clinicopathological variables such as AFP, AFB1 exposure, tumor size, tumor grade and stage, tumor MVD and MVI, and PVTT (Table 5). Similar results were also observed in the analyses of RFS.

Table 4 Univariable Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
OS
RFS

De, n (%)
MST (95%CI)
P value
Re, n (%)
MRT (95%CI)
P value
Age (years)0.710.97
< 4979 (80.6)27.00 (22.12-31.88)68 (69.4)27.00 (20.88-33.12)
≥ 4971 (84.5)23.00 (19.04-26.96)56 (66.7)24.00 (18.84-29.16)
Gender0.680.55
Male113 (83.7)26.00 (2299-29.01)91 (67.4)24.00 (17.96-30.05)
Female37 (78.7)26.00 (21.71-30.29)33 (70.2)25.00 (17.96-30.04)
Race0.760.26
Han74 (83.1)27.00 (22.55-31.76)65 (73.0)25.00 (19.01-30.99)
Others76 (81.7)26.00 (21.88-30.81)59 (63.4)25.00 (15.63-34.37)
Smoking0.060.01
No114 (82.6)24.00 (20.33-27.67)101 (73.2)24.00 (18.62-29.38)
Yes36 (81.8)27.00 (19.67-34.43)23 (52.3)33.00 (15.27-50.74)
Drinking0.100.03
No110 (81.5)24.00 (20.17-27.83)97 (71.9)24.00 (18.44-29.56)
Yes40 (85.1)27.00 (22.53-31.47)27 (57.4)30.00 (15.73-44.27)
HBsAg0.260.05
Negative44 (69.8)28.00 (24.38-31.62)34 (54.0)29.00 (18.01-40.00)
Positive106 (89.1)24.00 (19.47-28.53)90 (75.6)22.00 (16.52-27.48)
Anti-HCV0.450.88
Negative123 (82.6)24.00 (19.69-28.31)99 (66.4)24.00 (17.81-30.19)
Positive27 (81.8)28.00 (23.80-32.20)25 (75.8)28.00 (20.61-35.39)
AFP1.85 × 10-91.03 × 10-6
Negative44 (68.7)41.00 (29.46-52.54)35 (54.7)40.00 (30.18-49.82)
Positive106 (89.8)20.00 (17.24-22.77)89 (75.4)17.00 (13.10-20.90)
AFB1 exposure1.31 × 10-99.39 × 10-10
Low58 (77.3)36.00 (26.75-45.25)38 (50.7)43.00 (33.01-52.99)
High92 (86.0)20.00 (17.22-22.78)86 (80.4)18.00 (14.25-21.75)
Tumor size5.52 × 10-85.3 × 10-6
≤ 5 cm37 (66.1)39.00 (27.27-50.73)31 (55.4)40.00 (31.01-48.99)
> 5 cm113 (89.7)19.00 (15.84-22.16)93 (73.8)16.00 (12.48-19.52)
ES grade3.82 × 10-49.07 × 10-3
Low75 (79.8)33.00 (28.08-37.92)61 (64.9)30.00 (25.23-34.77)
High75 (85.2)20.00 (17.07-22.93)63 (71.6)19.00 (13.83-24.17)
TNM stage7.40 × 10-174.47 × 10-11
I24 (80.0)45.00 (35.63-54.37)19 (63.3)37.00 (28.77-45.23)
II59 (75.6)27.00 (23.79-30.21)47 (60.3)29.00 (21.89-36.11)
III67 (90.5)12.00 (8.63-15.37)58 (78.4)10.00 (6.26-13.75)
Liver cirrhosis0.930.43
No45 (80.4)27.00 (21.49-32.52)34 (60.7)27.00 (21.56-32.44)
Yes105 (83.3)25.00 (21.51-28.49)90 (71.4)24.00 (19.69-28.31)
MVD7.60 × 10-111.07 × 10-11
Low68 (75.6)34.00 (31.65-36.35)49 (54.4)36.00 (27.49-44.51)
High82 (89.1)15.00 (11.87-18.13)75 (81.5)13.00 (9.00-16.01)
PVTT1.50 × 10-69.99 × 10-7
Negative103 (81.1)29.00 (24.61-33.39)80 (63.0)30.00 (25.71-34.29)
Positive47 (85.5)12.00 (7.96-16.04)44 (80.0)8.00 (5.09-10.91)
MVI6.65 × 10-81.55 × 10-7
Negative95 (81.9)29.00 (24.69-33.31)73 (62.9)30.00 (25.90-34.10)
Positive55 (83.3)11.00 (6.66-15.34)51 (77.3)8.00 (4.38-11.62)
TIMP33.91 × 10-111.89 × 10-6
LTE86 (96.6)18.00 (16.64-21.36)70 (78.7)16.00 (12.31-19.69)
HTE64 (68.8)36.00 (28.20-43.81)54 (58.1)32.00 (22.79-41.21)
Table 5 Univariable Cox proportional hazard regression survival analysis.
OS
RFS
Variable
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age (years), ≥ 49 vs < 491.06 (0.77-1.47)0.721.01 (0.71-1.44)0.97
Gender, male vs female0.93 (0.64-1.35)0.680.89 (0.59-1.32)0.55
Race, Han vs others0.95 (0.69-1.31)0.760.80 (0.58-1.32)0.27
Smoking, yes vs no0.70 (0.48-1.03)0.070.57 (0.36-0.89)0.01
Drinking, yes vs no0.74 (0.51-1.07)0.110.63 (0.41-0.96)0.03
HBV, positive vs negative1.22 (0.86-1.74)0.271.48 (0.99-2.19)0.05
HCV, positive vs negative0.85 (0.56-1.30)0.460.97 (0.62-1.50)0.89
AFP, positive vs negative2.93 (2.03-4.24)1.18 × 10-82.63 (1.75-3.95)3.04 × 10-6
AFB1 exposure, high vs low3.00 (2.06-4.36)8.43 × 10-93.41 (2.25-5.18)8.67 × 10-9
Tumor size (cm), > 5 vs ≤ 52.70 (1.85-3.93)2.63 × 10-72.50 (1.65-3.77)1.37 × 10-5
ES grade, III-IV vs I-II1.79 (1.29-2.49)5.55 × 10-41.60 (0.79-2.30)0.01
TNM stage, II vs I1.57 (0.97-2.53)0.061.35 (0.79-2.30)0.27
TNM stage, III vs I5.95 (3.56-9.94)1.01 × 10-114.29 (2.48-7.41)1.92 × 10-7
Liver cirrhosis, yes vs no1.02 (0.72-1.44)0.931.17 (0.79-1.74)0.43
MVD, high vs low2.87 (2.06-4.02)6.84 × 10-103.40 (2.34-4.96)1.82 × 10-10
PVTT, positive vs negative2.30 (1.62-3.28)4.06 × 10-62.43 (1.68-3.53)2.95 × 10-6
MVI, positive vs negative2.48 (1.75-3.50)2.56 × 10-72.53 (1.76-3.64)5.63 × 10-7
TIMP3, LTE vs HTE2.92 (2.19-4.09)4.10 × 10-102.34 (1.63-3.38)4.80 × 10-6

Given that both TIMP3 expression and some clinicopathological features modified the survival of AHCC, we accomplished stratification analyses of TIMP3 expression based on the risky clinicopathological features of AHCC (including AFP, AFB1 exposure, tumor size, tumor grade and stage, tumor MVD and MVI, and PVTT). The results demonstrated that patients with different TIMP3 expression had a similar MST and MRT among stratified variables AFP, AFB1 exposure, tumor size, tumor grade and stage, tumor MVD and MVI, and PVTT, but not AFB1 exposure (data not shown). Next, AFB1 exposure and TIMP3 was combined to divide the patients into four groups: Low AFB1 exposure plus HTE (AETE1), low AFB1 exposure plus LTE (AETE2), high AFB1 exposure plus HTE (AETE3), and high AFB1 exposure plus LTE (AETE4). Patients with LTE had a shorter OS and RFS in case of high AFB1 exposure compared with low AFB1 exposure (16.00 mo vs 28.00 mo for MST and 12.00 mo vs 37.00 mo for MRT) (Figure 1E and F, Table 6). Furthermore, these AHCC cases with AETE4 also featured a higher death risk (HR = 7.41; 95%CI: 4.49-12.23) and tumor recurrence risk (HR = 6.38; 95%CI: 3.68-11.05) (Table 6).

Table 6 Effects of aflatoxin B1 exposure and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression on survival of patients with aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma.
OS
RFS
Variable
MST (95%CI)
HR (95%CI/P value)
MRT (95%CI)
HR (95%CI/P value)
AETE147.00 (43.20-50.80)1.0049.98 (42.03-57.93)11.00
AETE228.00 (21.25-34.75)2.51 (1.48-4.24/6.44 × 10-4)37.00 (21.45-52.55)1.84 (0.95-3.57/0.07)
AETE326.00 (21.29-30.71)2.59 (1.53-4.40/4.04 × 10-4)28.00 (21.60-34.40)2.90 (1.63-5.15/2.86 × 10-4)
AETE416.00 (11.72-20.28)7.41 (4.49-12.23/4.77 × 10-15)12.00 (7.65-16.35)6.38 (3.68-11.05/3.85 × 10-11)
Multivariable survival analysis

To explore whether TIMP3 expression is an independent prognostic biomarker for AHCC prognosis, multivariable survival analyses were performed, which showed that the dysregulation of TIMP3 expression in cancerous tissues was an independent biomarker predicting AHCC survival (Table 7). Patients with LTE, compared with those with HTE, featured an increasing death risk (HR = 2.85; 95%CI: 2.04-4.00) and tumor recurrence risk (HR = 2.26; 95%CI: 1.57-3.26). However, multiplicative interactive effects of AFB1 exposure and TIMP3 expression on AHCC survival were not observed.

Table 7 Mulvariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis for survival.
OS
RFS
Variable
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
AFP, positive vs negative2.85 (1.96-4.15)5.06 × 10-82.48 (1.64-3.73)1.44 × 10-5
AFB1 exposure, high vs low2.92 (1.99-4.27)3.71 × 10-83.23 (2.12-4.94)5.78 × 10-8
Tumor size (cm), > 5 vs ≤ 52.93 (1.99-4.31)4.53 × 10-82.79 (1.83-4.25)2.00 × 10-6
ES grade, III-IV vs I-II1.81 (1.29-2.55)6.19 × 10-41.63 (1.12-2.37)0.01
TNM stage, II vs I1.61 (1.02-2.42)0.031.75 (1.04-2.45)0.02
TNM stage, III vs I6.22 (3.70-10.48)6.21 × 10-124.43 (2.54-7.71)1.47 × 10-7
MVD, positive vs negative2.88 (2.05-4.04)1.07 × 10-93.34 (2.29-4.89)4.71 × 10-10
PVTT, positive vs negative2.30 (1.59-3.32)8.73 × 10-62.34 (1.60-3.42)1.16 × 10-5
MVI, positive vs negative2.48 (1.74-3.54)5.63 × 10-72.44 (1.68-3.53)2.42 × 10-6
TIMP3, LTE vs HTE2.85 (2.04-4.00)1.17 × 10-92.26 (1.57-3.26)1.26 × 10-5
AFB1 exposure is negatively correlation with TIMP3 expression in HCC tissues

In view that AFB1 exposure is associated with tumor angiogenesis[14] and TIMP3 expression can modify MVD, we explored the correlation between AFB1 exposure and TIMP3 expression by Spearman’s correlation analysis (Table 8). The results indicated that AFB1 exposure was negatively correlated with the levels of TIMP3 protein expression in cancerous tissues (r = -0.216; P = 0.003).

Table 8 Correlation between aflatoxin B1 exposure and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Low AFB1 exposure
High AFB1 exposure
rP value
n
Percentage (%)
n
Percentage (%)
LTE2736.06257.9-0.2160.003
HTE4864.04542.1
DISCUSSION

To our best knowledge, no studies have investigated the linkage between TIMP3 expression and AHCC prognosis. In this study, we explored the effects of TIMP3 protein expression in cancerous tissues on the prognosis of AHCC and found that the downregulation of TIMP3 expression in cancerous tissues shortened the OS and RFS of AHCC patients and increased their risk of death (HR = 2.85; 95%CI: 2.04-4.00) and tumor recurrence (HR = 2.26; 95%CI: 1.57-3.26). These findings imply that the dysregulation of TIMP3 expression may be a potential biomarker predicting AHCC prognosis.

AHCC is mainly caused by the exposure to AFB1 due to the contaminant of nutrients (such as grains, peanuts, soybeans, and corn) in tropic and subtropic regions, including East and South-East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa[15]. Nowadays, AFB1 has been regarded as a type I chemical carcinogen. Mechanically, AFB1 binds with DNA and results in the formation of ADAs and ultimately genomic instability, which is involved in DNA damage (including DNA single strand breaks, double strand breaks, chromosomal aberration damage, unscheduled DNA synthesis, abnormal chromatid exchange, the formation of micronuclei and macronuclei, and oxidation DNA damage), mutagenesis (mainly the mutation from GC to TA), the abnormality of tumor suppressor genes (including p53, bcl2, p27, p16, and p21) or oncogenes (mainly c-myc and ras), the interaction between AFB1 and other carcinogens (e,g., HBV), inheritance alterations (e.g., genetic variants in glutathione S-transferase T1), or immunosuppression (e.g., decreasing the expression or secretions of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor and interleukin)[16,17]. In view of ADAs playing an important role in the AHCC carcinogenesis, they have been regarded as a vital biomarker for HCC patients with exposure to AFB1[18]. In this study, AHCC was defined as HCC with ADAs in tumor tissues > 1.00 mmol/mol DNA mainly because individuals having this amount of AFB1 exposure featured a noticeable death risk and tumor recurrence risk[18]. All patients with AHCC included in the present study were from Guangxi , a high AFB1 exposure area in China, and had a median amount of ADAs of 2.00 ± 0.79 mmol/mol DNA. Similar to our previous studies[14,19], increasing levels of AFB1 exposure significantly shortened the OS and RFS of patients with AHCC.

TIMP3 is a member of TIMP gene family (mainly consisting of TIMP1 to 4) that has been proved to act as a class of negative regulators of matrix metalloproteinases by regulating the degradation of ECM and tissue remodeling. TIMP3 plays an important role not only in stabilizing tissue construction and function, but also in inhibiting the migration of endothelial cells and inducing cell apoptosis[7,9]. In the past decades, increasing evidence has shown that the dysregulation of TIMP3 expression may be involved in the pathogenesis of some human cancers such as liver cancer[20-26], colon cancer[27], esophageal cancer[28], gastric carcinoma[28], renal clear cell carcinoma[29], pancreatic endocrine tumors[30], meningiomas[31], and so on. Most of previous studies showed that TIMP3 expression is downregulated and results in decreased apoptosis of cancer cells and increased capacity of tumor proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis[7,9]. In this study, we found that the downregulation of TIMP3 protein expression in AHCC cancerous tissues was correlated with an increased risk of tumor proliferation, dedifferentiation, MVD, MVI, and metastasis, and ultimately shortened the OS and RFS of patients with AHCC. This suggest that TIMP3 has tumor suppressing effects in liver cancer. Supporting our findings, several recent studies[20,21,23,25,26,32-34] have demonstrated that the dysregulation of TIMP3, e.g., expression downregulation, genetic variables, and abnormal promoter methylation, results in the progression of hepatocellular carcinogenesis. Also, a previous study has shown that non-viral vectors encoding TIMP3 have the potential to treat HCC[35]. However, RNA in situ hybridization implied that TIMP3 expression is upregulated in head and neck cancer and this upregulation is linked with tumor development and progression[36]. Results from carcinogen-induced HCC mouse model analyses revealed that these mice with TIMP3 loss had a decreased risk of HCC following acute carcinogen treatment, possibly because of the loss of TIMP3 expression, which induces p38 pathway-related cell cycle arrest and hepatic cell differentiation[21]. Taken together, TIMP3 may have dual effects in cancers, which is associated with different signal pathways, such as cell-cycle regulation pathway, cell differentiation pathway, and inflammation pathway[21,37].

Interestingly, our study demonstrated that TIMP3 expression was negatively associated with AFB1 exposure and that the effects of TIMP3 protein expression on AHCC survival were more obvious among patients with high AFB1 exposure. However, we did not find evidence of multiplicative interaction of AFB1 exposure and TIMP3 expression. This implies that TIMP3 and AFB1 may affect the prognosis of AHCC via an addictive interaction. Altogether, AHCC patients with both downregulation of TIMP3 expression and high AFB1 exposure should obtain more attention to improve their survival.

CONCLUSION

In summary, our study has demonstrated that the dysregulation of TIMP3 expression is significantly associated with the clinicopathological features of AHCC and affects the survival of AHCC patients. Our findings suggest that decreased TIMP3 protein expression may act as a potential biomarker for predicting the survival of AHCC patients. However, the present study had several limitations. First, because this study was based on a hospital-based retrospective clinicopathological analysis of paraffin-embedded samples, differential analyses of TIMP3 expression between tumor tissues and non-tumor tissues (including normal liver tissues and liver tissues with lesions such as inflammation, cirrhosis, atypical hyperplasia, or adenoma) were not accomplished. Second, despite the levels of TIMP3 protein expression being tested, we did not evaluate the levels of TIMP3 mRNA expression in cancerous tissues. Finally, although we investigated the effects of TIMP3 expression in AHCC tissues on tumor clinicopathological features and prognosis, functional analyses were not performed. Therefore, further exploration is needed to elucidate the exact molecular mechanisms underlying our findings.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Dr. Qiu-Xiang Liang, Dr. Yun Yi, Yun Xia, Yong-Zhi Huang, and Dr. Yuan-Feng Zhou for sample collection and management and Dr. Hua Huang for assistance with molecular biochemical technique.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Gastroenterology and hepatology

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C, Grade D, Grade D

Novelty: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade C, Grade C

P-Reviewer: Hashimoto N; Ueda H S-Editor: Fan M L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Che XX

References
1.  Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115-132.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11444]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12726]  [Article Influence: 1590.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
2.  Vogel A, Meyer T, Sapisochin G, Salem R, Saborowski A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet. 2022;400:1345-1362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 646]  [Article Influence: 323.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (39)]
3.  Gao X, Zhao C, Zhang N, Cui X, Ren Y, Su C, Wu S, Yao Z, Yang J. Genetic expression and mutational profile analysis in different pathologic stages of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. BMC Cancer. 2021;21:786.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Katoh H, Shibata T, Kokubu A, Ojima H, Loukopoulos P, Kanai Y, Kosuge T, Fukayama M, Kondo T, Sakamoto M, Hosoda F, Ohki M, Imoto I, Inazawa J, Hirohashi S. Genetic profile of hepatocellular carcinoma revealed by array-based comparative genomic hybridization: identification of genetic indicators to predict patient outcome. J Hepatol. 2005;43:863-874.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Osman HA, El-Sayed M, Tag-Adeen M, Sabra A, El-Sawy SA, Mahmoud MA, Elwahab SMA, Wahman M, Hassan MH. Genetic profile of MIF single nucleotide polymorphism (rs755622 G>C) in hepatocellular carcinoma among Egyptian patients. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2023;9:46-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Zekri AR, Hafez MM, Bahnassy AA, Hassan ZK, Mansour T, Kamal MM, Khaled HM. Genetic profile of Egyptian hepatocellular-carcinoma associated with hepatitis C virus Genotype 4 by 15 K cDNA microarray: preliminary study. BMC Res Notes. 2008;1:106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Su CW, Lin CW, Yang WE, Yang SF. TIMP-3 as a therapeutic target for cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919864247.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 11.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Boon L, Ugarte-Berzal E, Vandooren J, Opdenakker G. Glycosylation of matrix metalloproteases and tissue inhibitors: present state, challenges and opportunities. Biochem J. 2016;473:1471-1482.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Anand-Apte B, Bao L, Smith R, Iwata K, Olsen BR, Zetter B, Apte SS. A review of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP-3) and experimental analysis of its effect on primary tumor growth. Biochem Cell Biol. 1996;74:853-862.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Long XD, Ma Y, Huang HD, Yao JG, Qu DY, Lu YL. Polymorphism of XRCC1 and the frequency of mutation in codon 249 of the p53 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma among Guangxi population, China. Mol Carcinog. 2008;47:295-300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Long XD, Ma Y, Zhou YF, Ma AM, Fu GH. Polymorphism in xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C codon 939 and aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma in the Guangxi population. Hepatology. 2010;52:1301-1309.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Friedrichs K, Gluba S, Eidtmann H, Jonat W. Overexpression of p53 and prognosis in breast cancer. Cancer. 1993;72:3641-3647.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Liu YX, Long XD, Xi ZF, Ma Y, Huang XY, Yao JG, Wang C, Xing TY, Xia Q. MicroRNA-24 modulates aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis and tumorigenesis. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:482926.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Huang L, Long Q, Su Q, Zhu X, Long X. Aflatoxin B1-DNA adducts modify the effects of post-operative adjuvant transarterial chemoembolization improving hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis. Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2023;4:780-792.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209-249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50630]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49712]  [Article Influence: 16570.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (121)]
16.  Long XD, Deng YL, Huang XY, Yao JG, Su QY, Wu XM, Wang J, Xu QQ, Zhu XY, Wang CW, Huang BC, Xia Q.   Molecular Mechanisms of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Related to Aflatoxins: An Update. In: Liver Research and Clinical Management. 2018.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Long XD, Surguchov A.   Aflatoxin B1 Occurrence, Detection and Toxicological Effects. IntechOpen; 2020.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Long XD, Yao JG, Huang XY, Huang BC, Wang C, Wu XM, Luo CY, Ma Y, Xia Q. Molecular epidemiology studies on aflatoxin B1-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao. 2013;33:1187-1190.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Su QY, Lu J, Huang XY, Yao JG, Wu XM, Huang BC, Wang CW, Xia Q, Long XD.   CBX4 Expression and AFB1-Related Liver Cancer Prognosis. In: Cancer Prognosis. 2018.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Casagrande V, Mauriello A, Bischetti S, Mavilio M, Federici M, Menghini R. Hepatocyte specific TIMP3 expression prevents diet dependent fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2017;7:6747.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Defamie V, Sanchez O, Murthy A, Khokha R. TIMP3 controls cell fate to confer hepatocellular carcinoma resistance. Oncogene. 2015;34:4098-4108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Lai HJ, Lo SJ. Epigenetic methylation of TIMP-3 may play a role in HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma. Chang Gung Med J. 2005;28:453-455.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Lü GL, Wen JM, Xu JM, Zhang M, Xu RB, Tian BL. [Relationship between TIMP-3 expression and promoter methylation of TIMP-3 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma]. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2003;32:230-233.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
24.  Shen B, Jiang Y, Chen YR, Zheng HC, Zeng W, Li YY, Yin A, Nie Y. Expression and inhibitory role of TIMP-3 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2016;36:494-502.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Tsai HT, Hsieh MJ, Chiou HL, Lee HL, Hsin MC, Liou YS, Yang CC, Yang SF, Kuo WH. TIMP-3 -1296 T>C and TIMP-4 -55 T>C gene polymorphisms play a role in the susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma among women. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:8999-9007.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Turner SL, Mangnall D, Bird NC, Bunning RA, Blair-Zajdel ME. Expression of ADAMTS-1, ADAMTS-4, ADAMTS-5 and TIMP3 by hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. Int J Oncol. 2012;41:1043-1049.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Liang J, Chen M, Hughes D, Chumanevich AA, Altilia S, Kaza V, Lim CU, Kiaris H, Mythreye K, Pena MM, Broude EV, Roninson IB. CDK8 Selectively Promotes the Growth of Colon Cancer Metastases in the Liver by Regulating Gene Expression of TIMP3 and Matrix Metalloproteinases. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6594-6606.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 8.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Gu P, Xing X, Tänzer M, Röcken C, Weichert W, Ivanauskas A, Pross M, Peitz U, Malfertheiner P, Schmid RM, Ebert MP. Frequent loss of TIMP-3 expression in progression of esophageal and gastric adenocarcinomas. Neoplasia. 2008;10:563-572.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 43]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 47]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Masson D, Rioux-Leclercq N, Fergelot P, Jouan F, Mottier S, Théoleyre S, Bach-Ngohou K, Patard JJ, Denis MG. Loss of expression of TIMP3 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1430-1437.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Wild A, Ramaswamy A, Langer P, Celik I, Fendrich V, Chaloupka B, Simon B, Bartsch DK. Frequent methylation-associated silencing of the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 gene in pancreatic endocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88:1367-1373.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 61]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Barski D, Wolter M, Reifenberger G, Riemenschneider MJ. Hypermethylation and transcriptional downregulation of the TIMP3 gene is associated with allelic loss on 22q12.3 and malignancy in meningiomas. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:623-631.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 4.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Wang X, Wang Z, Wang Q, Wang B. Modulatory effect of euxanthone in liver cancer-bearing obese mice: crosstalk between PPARγ and TIMP3 signalling axes. 3 Biotech. 2021;11:464.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Song G, Cao HX, Yao SX, Li CT. Abnormal expression of WIF1 in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and its regulating effect on invasion and metastasis factors of TIMP-3 and caveolin-1 of hepatocellular carcinoma. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2015;8:958-963.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Gu X, Fu M, Ding Y, Ni H, Zhang W, Zhu Y, Tang X, Xiong L, Li J, Qiu L, Xu J, Zhu J. TIMP-3 expression associates with malignant behaviors and predicts favorable survival in HCC. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106161.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Tran PL, Vigneron JP, Pericat D, Dubois S, Cazals D, Hervy M, DeClerck YA, Degott C, Auclair C. Gene therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma using non-viral vectors composed of bis guanidinium-tren-cholesterol and plasmids encoding the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases TIMP-2 and TIMP-3. Cancer Gene Ther. 2003;10:435-444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Kornfeld JW, Meder S, Wohlberg M, Friedrich RE, Rau T, Riethdorf L, Löning T, Pantel K, Riethdorf S. Overexpression of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA in head and neck cancer: association with tumour development and progression. Br J Cancer. 2011;104:138-145.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 50]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Jackson HW, Hojilla CV, Weiss A, Sanchez OH, Wood GA, Khokha R. Timp3 deficient mice show resistance to developing breast cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0120107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 15]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]