Published online Aug 27, 2023. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i8.985
Peer-review started: May 6, 2023
First decision: June 1, 2023
Revised: June 18, 2023
Accepted: July 17, 2023
Article in press: July 17, 2023
Published online: August 27, 2023
Processing time: 107 Days and 17.2 Hours
Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is renamed from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), but there are differences in diagnostic criteria. Since the research on MAFLD is just beginning, however, evidence on its incidence and prevalence in the general population and in specific subpopulations remains limited.
MAFLD proposal is not only a change in nomenclature. On one hand, MAFLD includes patients with concomitant liver diseases and secondary causes of fatty liver. On the other hand, patients with hepatic steatosis but not fulfilling the metabolic criteria are not classified as MAFLD. How these criteria affect our understanding of the epidemiology of MAFLD is unclear. The clinical characteristics and risk factors between MAFLD and NAFLD has not been adequately explored. We aimed to further clarify a possible link and difference between the two diagnostic criteria.
We sought to assess the impact of the new definition on the epidemiology of fatty liver disease and compare MAFLD with NAFLD in a general population. Potential risk factors of MAFLD-diagnosed individuals were also explored.
A total of 85242 adults were selected from the Chinese health management database in 2017–2022. Specifically, the participants were divided into MAFLD group, NAFLD group and MAFLD & NAFLD group for analysis and comparison. Several elements were included such as prevalence, disease characteristics, and risk factors.
We found a higher prevalence of MAFLD than NAFLD. There are differences in clinical features between MAFLD, NAFLD and MAFLD & NAFLD. In addition to the common risk factors, we identified CKD may be related with MAFLD.
MAFLD was more prevalent than NAFLD in the study population, with two-fifths of individuals meeting the diagnosis criteria. Compared to NAFLD, MAFLD has its own disease characteristics and risk factors. Intervention program should address the risk factors for MAFLD and regular screening for the disease is recommended.
Some of the risk factors for MAFLD have been initially identified, but cross-sectional studies of causality are weak. In the future, multi-centre, multi-regional longitudinal studies could be conducted to elucidate disease characteristics, disease trajectory and risk factors in depth.