Published online Jan 27, 2022. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.158
Peer-review started: March 27, 2021
First decision: June 7, 2021
Revised: June 17, 2021
Accepted: December 22, 2021
Article in press: December 22, 2021
Published online: January 27, 2022
Processing time: 299 Days and 10.8 Hours
Recently, a single letter change has taken the world by storm. A group of experts have developed a consensus to upgrade the term non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), suggesting that MAFLD would more accurately reflect not only the disease pathogenesis but would also help in patient stratification for management with NAFLD. However, the difference of opinion exists, which has made the NAFLD vs MAFLD debate the current talk of the town. This review will focus on the plausibility and implications of redefining NAFLD as MAFLD.
Core Tip: A group of experts have recently developed a consensus towards redefining non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), suggestive of a more accurate differential diagnosis and signifying the exact disease pathogenesis to achieve higher patient stratification and delivery of better care to patients with NAFLD while avoiding stigmatization due to the presence of the word ‘alcohol’, particularly in regions where alcohol consumption is a taboo for cultural and religious reasons. However, differences in experts' opinions considering the implications of redefining NAFLD as MAFLD still hold strong. Therefore, this review article focuses on the plausibleness and implications of redefining NAFLD as MAFLD.