Liver transplantation (LT) is the only cure for patients with end-stage liver disease. With an increase in the prevalence of obesity and associated metabolic risk factors cardiovascular disease, in particular coronary artery disease is increasingly recognised in patients with liver cirrhosis. Identification and management of these cardiovascular risk factors may influence post-transplant clinical outcomes. A detailed assessment of patients' cardiovascular status is therefore crucial in the decision-making of patients for LT. Identification of patients with CAD requires risk stratification around perioperative and long term post-operative period. Advanced age, male sex, smoking diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity and metabolic-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis significantly increase the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD). Patients with these high-risk factors should undergo cardiac investigations with higher sensitivity to identify CAD. Patients with low-risk factors for CAD may undergo cardiac investigations with high specificity. Patients with cirrhosis may also suffer from conditions directly related to liver disease such as cirrhotic cardiomyopathy and porto-pulmonary hypertension, and conditions unrelated to liver disease such as arrhythmias. Rarely, valvular heart disease may be identified during transplant evaluation. Clinicians managing patients for liver transplantation should carefully evaluate cardiovascular risk and treat it appropriately prior to the surgery, to minimise post-transplant complication. A multidisciplinary approach involving transplant physicians, anaesthetists, cardiologists and transplant surgeons is strongly recommended.

A combined liver transplant (LT) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) may sometimes be needed for patients with decompensated cirrhosis who also have significant coronary artery disease (CAD). However, such a procedure is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.

From May 2012 to August 2020, eight patients with significant coronary artery disease (CAD) underwent combined off pump CABG (OPCAB) and living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at our center. We analyzed patient demographics, preoperative clinical findings, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.

Mean recipient age and body mass index were 59 ± 6 years and 26 ± 3kg/m2, respectively. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 20. Four patients each had hypertension and diabetes. Mean total duration of the surgery was 982 ± 117 min, with 598 ± 89 min for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The mean volume of packed red blood cell transfusion was 2500ml. The duration of the ventilatory support (median 49 h post-surgery), and the median intensive care unit and hospital stay (8 and 18 days, respectively). Two patients died during the postoperative period due to sepsis with multiorgan failure No recipient had evidence of acute coronary syndrome, stress cardiomyopathy; none required interventional hemodynamic support. Four patients developed atrial arrhythmia's in the post-operative period, all were managed successfully with medical management.

Combined CABG and LDLT is feasible but poses significant challenges. Careful preprocedure planning, and meticulous intra- and post-operative management involving a multidisciplinary team of LT Surgeons and anesthetists, hepatologists, cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons is required to ensure optimal outcomes in these patients.

Organ transplantation is the treatment of choice for individuals with kidney failure requiring kidney replacement therapy, as well as for those with end-stage liver disease. Despite the significant reduction in long-term morbidity and mortality with transplantation, kidney and liver allograft recipients remain at high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) and premature death from cardiovascular causes. This heightened risk is represented across all phenotypes of CVD, including coronary heart disease, heart failure, arrhythmias, valvulopathies and pulmonary hypertension. Pre-existing vascular risk factors for CVD, coupled with superimposed cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic derangements after transplantation, driven at least in part by post-transplant weight gain, immunosuppressive therapies and de novo risk factors such as dyslipidaemia and diabetes, coalesce to increase total CVD risk. In this review, we summarise pathophysiological considerations for both the short- and long-term increase in CVD risk following kidney/liver transplantation. We review the different phenotypes of CVD, with unique considerations for post-transplant care in this patient population. Finally, we highlight the need for awareness about long-term CVD risk and a multidisciplinary approach to managing organ-specific CVD risk in kidney and liver transplant patients.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among LT candidates and accounts for up to 40% of the overall mortality within one month. It is influenced by traditional and nontraditional risk factors related to end-stage liver disease. A large proportion of CLD patients have underlying cardiovascular disease (CVD) especially if the etiology is metabolic associated steatohepatitis. Despite the large number of liver transplantations being conducted in India, there is a lack of an evidence-based guidelines for screening of CVD in this patient population. This consensus statement from Liver Transplant Society of India (LTSI) is the first attempt for developing an evidence-based document on preoperative cardiac evaluation from India. A task force consisting of transplant-anesthesiologists, transplant hepatologists, liver transplant surgeon and cardiologists from high volume centres was formed which reviewed the existing evidence and literature and formulated graded recommendations. The document focuses on identification of underlying cardiac pathologies, risk stratification and optimisation of modifiable cardiac diseases. Implementation of best practices and optimal strategies should be encouraged to improve cardiovascular outcomes in these populations.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is increasingly observed in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, data on the incidence and prevalence of CAD in cirrhotic patients are heterogeneous, and the association remains uncertain. In this study, we aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to address these issues.

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Incidence, prevalence, and factors associated with CAD were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk ratio (RR) and odds ratio (OR), with their 95% confidence interval (CI), were calculated to evaluate differences in CAD incidence and prevalence between patients with and without liver cirrhosis.

Fifty-one studies were included. The pooled incidences of CAD, acute coronary syndromes, and myocardial infarction (MI) were 2.28%, 2.02%, and 1.80%, respectively. Liver cirrhosis was not significantly associated with CAD incidence (RR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.46-1.28) or MI (RR = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.49-1.57). The pooled prevalence of CAD, acute coronary syndromes, and MI was 18.87%, 12.54%, and 6.12%, respectively. Liver cirrhosis was not significantly associated with CAD prevalence (OR = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.83-2.01) or MI (OR = 0.58; 95% CI = 0.28-1.22). Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis C virus, advanced age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking history, and family history of CAD were significantly associated with CAD in cirrhotic patients.

CAD is common in cirrhotic patients, but cirrhosis itself may not be associated with an increased CAD risk. In addition to traditional risk factors, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatitis C virus infection are also associated with CAD presence in cirrhotic patients.

This review assesses the outcomes of coronary interventions in patients with liver cirrhosis and coronary artery disease (CAD), focusing on the clinical challenges posed by cirrhosis-related hemodynamic and coagulopathic changes. It highlights essential considerations for managing these patients, who have an increased risk of adverse events during coronary procedures.

Recent studies have shown that patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing PCI experience significantly higher mortality rates compared to non-cirrhotic patients, particularly in the context of STEMI and NSTEMI. Coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia increase the risk of bleeding and vascular complications during interventions. Radial access has been suggested as a safer alternative to femoral access in these patients due to reduced bleeding complications. Additionally, contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a prevalent risk, with cirrhotic patients demonstrating higher rates of acute kidney injury post-PCI. Preventive strategies such as minimizing contrast exposure and utilizing intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) are recommended. Managing CAD in cirrhotic patients requires careful consideration of their unique pathophysiological state. Higher in-hospital mortality, bleeding risks, and vascular complications necessitate tailored procedural strategies, such as radial access and contrast minimization. The balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks is critical in decision-making, with IVUS and hydration strategies being promising approaches. Further research is required to optimize treatment protocols and improve long-term outcomes for this high-risk population.

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) has emerged as a public health threat as it affects approximately 38% of the adult population worldwide, with its prevalence rising in step with that of obesity and type 2 diabetes. Beyond the implications of MASLD for liver health, it is also associated with cardiovascular and vascular dysfunction. Although the many shared risk factors and common metabolic milieu might indicate that cardiovascular disease and MASLD are discrete outcomes from common systemic pathogeneses, a growing body of evidence has identified a potential causal relationship between MASLD and coronary artery disease, which is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with MASLD and all-cause mortality worldwide. This Review takes an interdisciplinary approach, drawing on hepatology, cardiology, endocrinology, and metabolic and internal medicine specialists to help to delineate the intricate interplay between MASLD and coronary artery disease. It sheds light on novel opportunities for targeted interventions and personalised management strategies.

Cardiac complications are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in recipients of liver transplant (LT). Previous guidelines recommended stress testing to exclude coronary artery disease (CAD), although recent guidelines recommend coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). We aimed to assess the prevalence and predictors of CAD on CCTA and compare CCTA with stress testing in consecutive adult candidates for LT who underwent CAD noninvasive assessment between 2020 and 2023. Patients who underwent a stress test between January and December 2020 formed the stress cohort, and patients who underwent CCTA between January 2021 and September 2023 formed the CCTA cohort. There were 141 patients in the stress test cohort and 269 patients in the CCTA cohort. Stress test results were nondiagnostic or inconclusive in 18 patients (12.8%) whereas CCTA was nondiagnostic in 6 patients (2.2%). In patients evaluated with CCTA, mean coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was 332 ± 716 AU, with moderate or greater (>50%) stenosis in 33 patients (12.3%). New CAD was diagnosed in 158 patients (58.7%) using CCTA and in 5 patients (3.5%) using stress tests. Clinically actionable CAD (coronary artery calcium >100) on CCTA was present in 96 patients (35.7%). The number of CAD risk factors was associated with the presence of CAD on CCTA. In conclusion, there was a great burden of CAD, mainly nonobstructive, in a large cohort of candidates for LT who underwent CAD testing over a 4-year period. The current recommended risk-based evaluation of candidates for LT using CCTA as a first-line test was feasible and effective. Diagnosis of clinically actionable CAD on CCTA provides a vast opportunity for optimizing cardiac care in candidates for and recipients of LT.

Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with end-stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting liver transplantation (LT) remains poorly defined. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the relationship between T2DM and clinical outcomes among patients with LT waitlist registrants. We hypothesize that the presence of T2DM will be associated with worse clinical outcomes.

593 patients adult (age 18 years or older) who were registered for LT between 1/2010 and 1/2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The impact of T2DM on liver-associated clinical events (LACE), survival, hospitalizations, need for renal replacement therapy, and likelihood of receiving LT were evaluated over a 12-month period. LACE was defined as variceal hemorrhage, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to determine the association between T2DM and clinical outcomes.

The baseline prevalence of T2DM was 32% (n = 191) and patients with T2DM were more likely to have esophageal varices (61% vs. 47%, p = 0.002) and history of variceal hemorrhage (23% vs. 16%, p = 0.03). The presence of T2DM was associated with increased risk of incident ascites (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.11, 3.28, p = 0.019). Patients with T2DM were more likely to require hospitalizations (56% vs. 49%, p = 0.06), hospitalized with portal hypertension-related complications (22% vs. 14%; p = 0.026), and require renal replacement therapy during their hospitalization. Patients with T2DM were less likely to receive a LT (37% vs. 45%; p = 0.03). Regarding MELD labs, patients with T2DM had significantly lower bilirubin at each follow-up; however, no differences in INR and creatinine were noted.

Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of clinical outcomes. This risk is not captured in MELD score, which may potentially negatively affect their likelihood of receiving LT.

The optimal cardiovascular assessment of liver transplant (LT) candidates is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the performance of CT-based coronary tests (coronary artery calcium score [CACS] and coronary CT angiography [CCTA]) and a modification of the CAD-LT score (mCAD-LT, excluding family history of CAD) to diagnose significant coronary artery disease (CAD) before LT and predict the incidence of post-LT cardiovascular events (CVE).

We retrospectively analysed a single-centre cohort of LT candidates who underwent non-invasive tests; invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was performed depending on the results of non-invasive tests. mCAD-LT was calculated in all patients.

Six-hundred-and-thirty-four LT candidates were assessed and 351 of them underwent LT. CACS, CCTA and ICA were performed in 245, 123 and 120 LT candidates, respectively. Significant CAD was found in 30% of patients undergoing ICA. The AUROCs of mCAD-LT (.722) and CCTA (.654) were significantly higher than that of CACS (.502) to predict the presence of significant CAD. Specificity of the tests ranged between 31% for CCTA and 53% for CACS. Among patients who underwent LT, CACS ≥ 400 and mCAD-LT were independently associated with the incidence of CVE; in patients who underwent CCTA before LT, significant CAD at CCTA also predicted post-LT CVE.

In this cohort, mCAD-LT score and CT-based tests detect the presence of significant CAD in LT candidates, although they tend to overestimate it. Both mCAD-LT score and CT-based tests classify LT recipients according to their risk of post-LT CVE and can be used to improve post-LT risk mitigation.

The burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is poorly characterized, particularly vs other liver diseases including metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). To identify available evidence, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane database searches (main search: 2011-September 6, 2021; additional ad hoc search [MEDLINE only]: September 7, 2021-February 15, 2023), plus manual searches (2019-September 2021), were performed. Studies reporting CVD outcomes (angina, coronary artery disease [CAD], heart failure, myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease, stroke, venous thromboembolic disease, and CV mortality) in adults with histologically confirmed MASH and MASLD or other liver diseases were identified, with studies of MASLD without confirmed MASH excluded. Of 8732 studies, 21 were included. An increased incidence or prevalence of CVD in patients with MASH vs other conditions was reported in 12 studies; odds ratios (OR), where reported, ranged from 3.12 (95 % CI: 1.33-5.32) to 4.12 (95 % CI: 1.91-8.90). The risk of CAD was increased in people with MASH in 6 of 7 studies, while the risk of stroke was increased in 6 of 6 studies, and heart failure in 2 of 4 studies. Three of 6 studies provided evidence of increased CVD-related mortality in patients with MASH vs those without. In conclusion, this literature review suggests that CVD is prevalent in patients with MASH and may contribute to increased mortality. Accordingly, cardiovascular risk factors should be aggressively managed in this population. Whether the CVD burden in patients with MASH is a direct consequence of MASH itself requires further study.

Liver transplantation is a highly complex and challenging field of clinical practice. Although it was originally developed in western countries, it has been further advanced in Asian countries through the use of living donor liver transplantation. This method of transplantation is the only available option in many countries in the Asia-Pacific region due to the lack of deceased organ donation. As a result of this clinical situation, there is a growing need for guidelines that are specific to the Asia-Pacific region. These guidelines provide comprehensive recommendations for evidence-based management throughout the entire process of liver transplantation, covering both deceased and living donor liver transplantation. In addition, the development of these guidelines has been a collaborative effort between medical professionals from various countries in the region. This has allowed for the inclusion of diverse perspectives and experiences, leading to a more comprehensive and effective set of guidelines.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the second most performed solid organ transplant. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a critical consideration for LT candidacy, particularly in patients with known CAD or risk factors, including metabolic dysfunction associated with steatotic liver disease. The presence of severe CAD may exclude patients from LT; therefore, precise preoperative evaluation and interventions are necessary to achieve transplant candidacy. Cardiovascular complications represent the earliest nongraft-related cause of death post-transplantation. Timely intervention to reduce cardiovascular events depends on adequate CAD screening. Coronary disease screening in end-stage liver disease is challenging because standard noninvasive CAD screening tests have low sensitivity due to hyperdynamic state and vasodilatation. As a result, there is overuse of invasive coronary angiography to exclude severe CAD. Coronary artery calcium scoring using a computed tomography scan is a tool for the prediction of cardiovascular events, and can be used to achieve risk stratification in LT candidates. Recent literature shows that qualitative assessment on both noncontrast- and contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography can be used instead of calcium score to assess the presence of coronary calcium. With increasing prevalence, protocols to address CAD in LT candidates must be reconsidered. Percutaneous coronary intervention could allow a shorter duration of dual-antiplatelet therapy in simple lesions, with safer perioperative outcomes. Hybrid coronary revascularization is an option for high-risk LT candidates with multivessel disease nonamenable to percutaneous coronary intervention. The objective of this review is to evaluate existing methods for preoperative cardiovascular risk stratification, and to describe interventions before surgery to optimize patient outcomes and reduce cardiovascular event risk.

The prevalence of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is increasing globally due to factors such as urbanization, obesity, poor nutrition, sedentary lifestyles, healthcare accessibility, diagnostic advancements, and genetic influences. Research on MAFLD and HCC risk factors, pathogenesis, and biomarkers has been conducted through a narrative review of relevant studies, with a focus on PubMed and Web of Science databases and exclusion criteria based on article availability and language. Steatosis marks the early stage of MASH advancement, commonly associated with factors of metabolic syndrome such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. Various mechanisms, including heightened lipolysis, hepatic lipogenesis, and consumption of high-calorie diets, contribute to the accumulation of lipids in the liver. Insulin resistance is pivotal in the development of steatosis, as it leads to the release of free fatty acids from adipose tissue. Natural compounds hold promise in regulating lipid metabolism and inflammation to combat these conditions. Liver fibrosis serves as a significant predictor of MASH progression and HCC development, underscoring the need to target fibrosis in treatment approaches. Risk factors for MASH-associated HCC encompass advanced liver fibrosis, older age, male gender, metabolic syndrome, genetic predispositions, and dietary habits, emphasizing the requirement for efficient surveillance and diagnostic measures. Considering these factors, it is important for further studies to determine the biochemical impact of these risk factors in order to establish targeted therapies that can prevent the development of HCC or reduce progression of MASH, indirectly decreasing the risk of HCC.

The number of liver transplants (LT) performed worldwide continues to rise, and LT recipients are living longer post-transplant. This has led to an increasing number of LT recipients requiring lifelong care. Optimal care post-LT requires careful attention to both the allograft and systemic issues that are more common after organ transplantation. Common causes of allograft dysfunction include rejection, biliary complications, and primary disease recurrence. While immunosuppression prevents rejection and reduces incidences of some primary disease recurrence, it has detrimental systemic effects. Most commonly, these include increased incidences of metabolic syndrome, various malignancies, and infections. Therefore, it is of utmost importance to optimize immunosuppression regimens to prevent allograft dysfunction while also decreasing the risk of systemic complications. Institutional protocols to screen for systemic disease and heightened clinical suspicion also play an important role in providing optimal long-term post-LT care. In this review, we discuss these common complications of LT as well as unique considerations when caring for LT recipients in the years after transplant.

NAFLD is common after liver transplantation (LT) and is associated with an increased metabolic burden. Currently, there is a paucity of investigations into the treatment of post-LT NAFLD. In the present study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar, a novel dual peroxisome proliferator-associated receptor α/γ agonist, on the treatment of post-LT NAFLD and metabolic burden. This is a phase 2A, single-center, open-label, single-arm study in which patients with post-LT NAFLD received saroglitazar magnesium 4 mg daily for 24 weeks. NAFLD was defined by a controlled attenuation parameter ≥264 dB/m. The primary endpoint was the reduction in liver fat as measured by MRI proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Secondary MRI-based metabolic endpoints included visceral adipose tissue, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue volumes, muscle fat infiltration, and fat-free muscle volume. Saroglitazar treatment led to a reduction in MRI-PDFF from 10.3±10.5% at baseline to 8.1±7.6%. A relative 30% reduction from baseline MRI-PDFF value was noted in 47% of all patients and 63% of patients with baseline MRI-PDFF >5%. Reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase was an independent predictor of MRI-PDFF response. Saroglitazar did not decrease fat-free muscle volume nor increase muscle fat infiltration, but did lead to a mild increase in visceral adipose tissue and abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue. The study drug was well tolerated and a mild nonsignificant increase in serum creatinine was noted. Saroglitazar did not affect the weight. The study provides preliminary data demonstrating the safety and metabolic benefits of saroglitazar in LT recipients and underscores the importance of future studies to establish its efficacy after LT.

The effect of liver cirrhosis on vascular remodeling in vivo remains unknown. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of cholestatic liver cirrhosis on carotid arterial remodeling. A total of 79 male Sprague Dawley rats underwent bile duct ligation (cirrhotic group) or sham surgery (control group) and 28 days later left carotid artery balloon dilatation; 3, 7, 14 and 28 days after balloon dilatation, the rats were euthanized and carotid arteries were harvested. Histological sections were planimetrized, cell counts determined, and systemic inflammatory parameters measured. Up to day 14 after balloon dilatation, both groups showed a comparable increase in neointima area and degree of stenosis. By day 28, however, both values were significantly lower in the cirrhotic group (% stenosis: 20 ± 8 vs. 42 ± 10, p = 0.010; neointimal area [mm²]: 0.064 ± 0.025 vs. 0.138 ± 0.025, p = 0.024). Simultaneously, cell density in the neointima (p = 0.034) and inflammatory parameters were significantly higher in cirrhotic rats. This study demonstrates that cholestatic liver cirrhosis in rats substantially increases neointimal cell consolidation between days 14 and 28. Thereby, consolidation proved important for the degree of stenosis. This may suggest that patients with cholestatic cirrhosis are at lower risk for restenosis after coronary intervention.

Liver transplant(ation) (LT) is the most effective treatment for patients with decompensated liver disease. The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes and the growing number of patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease being evaluated for LT, have resulted in a greater proportion of LT candidates presenting with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease. As cardiovascular disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after LT, a thorough cardiovascular evaluation pre-LT is crucial. In this review, we discuss the latest evidence on the cardiovascular evaluation of LT candidates and we focus on the most prevalent conditions, namely ischaemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation and other arrhythmias, valvular heart disease, and cardiomyopathies. LT candidates undergo an electrocardiogram, a resting transthoracic echocardiography and an assessment of their cardiopulmonary functional ability as part of their standardised pre-LT work-up. Further diagnostic work-up is undertaken based on the results of the baseline evaluation and may include a coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. The evaluation of potential LT candidates for cardiovascular disease requires a multidisciplinary approach, with input from anaesthetists, cardiologists, hepatologists and transplant surgeons.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently the fastest growing indication to liver transplantation (LT) in Western Countries, both for end stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is often expression of a systemic metabolic syndrome; therefore, NAFLD/NASH patients require a multidisciplinary approach for a proper pre-surgical evaluation, which is important to achieve a post-transplant outcome comparable to that of other indications to LT. NAFLD/NASH patients are also at higher risk of post-transplant cardiovascular events, diabetes, dyslipidemia, obesity, renal impairment and recurrent NASH. Lifestyle modifications, included diet and physical activity, are key to improve survival and quality of life after transplantation. A tailored immunosuppressive regimen may be proposed in selected patients. Development of new drugs for the treatment of recurrent NASH is awaited.

The association of aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase ratio (De Ritis ratio) with clinical outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) remains unclear. This study aims to assess the association of De Ritis ratio with adverse cardiovascular events in patients with CCS.

The study included 5020 patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Patients were categorized into groups according to tertiles of the De Ritis ratio: tertile 1 (De Ritis ratio: <.75; n = 1688 patients), tertile 2 (De Ritis ratio: .75-1.08; n = 1666 patients) and tertile 3 (De Ritis ratio: >1.08; n = 1666 patients). The primary endpoint was 3-year mortality.

At 3 years, there were 384 deaths, 176 myocardial infarctions and 61 strokes. In groups with De Ritis in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd tertiles, deaths occurred in 5.0%, 7.5% and 14.5% of the patients, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval [1.06-1.12], p < .001); myocardial infarctions occurred in 2.6%, 3.5% and 5.1% of the patients, respectively (p < .001); strokes occurred in 1.0%, 1.2% and 1.9% of the patients, respectively (p = .030); bleeding at 30 days (n = 112) occurred in 1.4%, 1.6% and 3.7% of the patients, respectively (p < .001). The C-statistic of the Cox proportional hazards model for all-cause mortality with baseline data without the De Ritis ratio was .815 [.794-.836] and .818 [.797-.838] after the inclusion of the De Ritis ratio (delta C-statistic = .003; p = .005).

In patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, an elevated De Ritis ratio was associated with long-term major adverse cardiovascular events.

Coronary heart disease is an important source of mortality and morbidity among kidney transplantation and liver transplantation candidates and recipients and is driven by traditional and nontraditional risk factors related to end-stage organ disease. In this scientific statement, we review evidence from the past decade related to coronary heart disease screening and management for kidney and liver transplantation candidates. Coronary heart disease screening in asymptomatic kidney and liver transplantation candidates has not been demonstrated to improve outcomes but is common in practice. Risk stratification algorithms based on the presence or absence of clinical risk factors and physical performance have been proposed, but a high proportion of candidates still meet criteria for screening tests. We suggest new approaches to pretransplantation evaluation grounded on the presence or absence of known coronary heart disease and cardiac symptoms and emphasize multidisciplinary engagement, including involvement of a dedicated cardiologist. Noninvasive functional screening methods such as stress echocardiography and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy have limited accuracy, and newer noninvasive modalities, especially cardiac computed tomography-based tests, are promising alternatives. Emerging evidence such as results of the 2020 International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness With Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease trial emphasizes the vital importance of guideline-directed medical therapy in managing diagnosed coronary heart disease and further questions the value of revascularization among asymptomatic kidney transplantation candidates. Optimizing strategies to disseminate and implement best practices for medical management in the broader end-stage organ disease population should be prioritized to improve cardiovascular outcomes in these populations.

Advances in surgical and medical technology over the years has made liver transplantation possible for older and higher risk patients. Despite rigorous preoperative cardiac testing, cardiovascular events remain a major cause of death after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, there are little data on the outcomes of OLT in patients with preexisting coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to compare all-cause and cardiovascular mortality of patients with and without history of CAD undergoing OLT.

Six hundred ninety-three adult patients with cirrhosis underwent liver transplantation between July 2013 and December 2018 (female n = 243, male n = 450; median age 59).

During the study period of 5 y (median follow-up, 24.1 mo), 92 of 693 patients (13.3%) died. All-cause mortality in the CAD group was significantly higher than in the non-CAD group (26.7% versus 9.6%; P <0.01). Cardiovascular events accounted for 52.5% of deaths (n = 21) in patients with CAD compared with 36.5% (n = 19) in non-CAD patients. At 6 mo, patients with combined nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)/CAD had significantly worse survival than those with CAD or NASH alone ( P <0.01). After 6 mo, patients with CAD alone had similar survival to those with combined NASH/CAD.

Patients with preexisting CAD before liver transplantation are at higher risk of death from any cause, specifically cardiovascular-related death. This risk increases with coexisting NASH. The presence of NASH and CAD at the time of liver transplant should prompt the initiation of aggressive risk factor modification for patients with CAD.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) currently affects more than 25% of the world population and is rising. NAFLD can progress to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis that is associated with hepatic inflammation and fibrosis and can result in cirrhosis with subsequent liver failure. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) has now emerged as one of the leading etiologies for a liver transplant among adults in the United States. Given the rising incidence of liver transplants in patients with NASH-related cirrhosis, it is essential for anesthesiologists to be familiar with this condition as well as with NASH-related comorbidities and perioperative complications. Not only is NASH linked to metabolic syndrome, but it also is independently associated with cardiovascular disease, renal and thyroid dysfunction, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and a hypercoagulable state. The association with these conditions can affect the perioperative outcome of these patients, particularly because of increased mortality from major adverse cardiovascular events and sepsis. In order to decrease the perioperative morbidity and mortality of patients with NASH undergoing a liver transplant, a multidisciplinary approach to their perioperative management is essential, along with careful preoperative evaluation and aggressive intraoperative and postoperative monitoring. The focus of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of challenges associated with liver transplants in patients with NASH and to provide suggestions for appropriate patient selection and perioperative management.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is associated with increased mortality and risk of complications but is often asymptomatic and under-recognized. A systematic review of NASH epidemiology was conducted to provide information on the burden of NASH and highlight important evidence gaps for future research.

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for English-language publications published from 2010 to January 2022 that reported on natural history, risk factors, comorbidities, and complications of a NASH population or subpopulation.

Overall, 173 publications were included. NASH was shown to have a variable disease course and high prevalence of comorbid disease. Although many patients progressed to cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease, disease regression or resolution was reported in up to half of patients in some studies. Reported risk factors for disease progression or resolution included levels of (or changes in) serum fibrosis markers, liver enzymes, and platelets. The presence of NASH increased the risk of liver cirrhosis and other serious diseases such as hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer, chronic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. In 2017, NASH was responsible for ∼118,000 cirrhosis deaths globally, and an increasing proportion of patients are receiving liver transplantation for NASH in Europe and the United States. Consolidation of data was hampered by heterogeneity across the studies in terms of patient populations, follow-up time, and outcomes measured.

NASH is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, an increased risk of comorbidities, and imposes an increasing burden among liver transplantation recipients. Longer studies with harmonized study criteria are required to better understand the impact of NASH on patient outcomes.

The link between heart and liver cirrhosis was recognized decades ago, although much data regarding atherosclerosis and ischemic heart disease are still missing. Ischemic heart disease or coronary artery disease (CAD) and liver cirrhosis could be associated with characteristic epidemiological and pathophysiological features. This connection determines increased rates of morbidity and all-cause mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis. In the era of a metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease pandemic, primary prevention and early diagnosis of coronary artery disease could improve the prognosis of liver cirrhosis patients. This review outlines a summary of the literature regarding prevalence, risk assessment and medical and interventional treatment options in this particular population. A collaborative heart-liver team-based approach is imperative for critical management decisions for patients with CAD and liver cirrhosis.

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is an important cause of mortality among liver transplantation (LT) recipients; however, the data on CVD risk stratification following LT are limited. Thus, the primary aim of this study was to evaluate the association between decline in renal function early after LT and atherosclerotic events. This retrospective study included all patients receiving LT between 2007 and 2019. Early renal function was quantified as estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) 6 months after LT. The primary endpoint for the study was a composite atherosclerotic cardiovascular event of three-point major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which includes nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, or death from CVD. A total of 553 LT recipients met entry criteria. After a median follow-up of 74 months (interquartile range 46-111), 94 (17%) LT recipients died and CVD-associated death occurred in 20 patients. MACE-3 occurred in 66 (12%) patients, with nonfatal MI being the most common event (n = 30). A strong inverse relationship between early GFR and MACE-3 was noted in unadjusted analysis with hazard ratio (HR) 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95-0.98; p = 0.0001) and remained significant even after accounting for age, sex, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, calcineurin inhibitor use, and Framingham Risk Score (FRS; HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.95-0.97; p = 0.0001 per unit increase in GFR). Furthermore, an independent interaction between GFR, FRS, and likelihood of developing an MACE-3 was noted. GFR 6 months following LT is a strong predictor of developing atherosclerotic events. This relationship is independent of traditional CVD risk stratification models (e.g. FRS) and thus has the potential to be incorporated into CVD risk assessment after LT but requires further validation.

Metabolic flexibility is the ability to match biofuel availability to utilization. Reduced metabolic flexibility, or lower fatty acid (FA) oxidation in the fasted state, is associated with obesity. The present study evaluated metabolic flexibility after liver transplantation (LT).

Patients receiving LT for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) (n = 35) and non-NASH (n = 10) were enrolled. NASH was chosen as these patients are at the highest risk of metabolic complications. Metabolic flexibility was measured using whole-body calorimetry and expressed as respiratory quotient (RQ), which ranges from 0.7 (pure FA oxidation) to 1.0 is (carbohydrate oxidation).

The two cohorts were similar except for a higher prevalence of obesity and diabetes in the NASH cohort. Post-prandially, RQ increased in both cohorts (i.e. greater carbohydrate utilization) but peak RQ and time at peak RQ was higher in the NASH cohort. Fasting RQ in NASH was significantly higher (0.845 vs. 0.772, p < .001), indicative of impaired FA utilization. In subgroup analysis of the NASH cohort, body mass index but not liver fat content (MRI-PDFF) was an independent predictor of fasting RQ. In NASH, fasting RQ inversely correlated with fat-free muscle volume and directly with visceral adipose tissue.

Reduced metabolic flexibility in patients transplanted for NASH cirrhosis may precede the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after LT.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common and emerging liver disease in adults, paralleling the epidemic of obesity and diabetes and leading to worrisome events (hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease). In the past years, mounting evidence added insights about epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis and lifestyle-based or drug treatment of NAFLD. In this rapidly evolving scenario, members of the Associazione Italiana per lo Studio del Fegato, the Società Italiana di Diabetologia and the Società Italiana dell'Obesità reviewed current knowledge on NAFLD. The quality of the published evidence is graded, and practical recommendations are made following the rules and the methodology suggested in Italy by the Centro Nazionale per l'Eccellenza delle cure and Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Whenever possible, recommendations are placed within the context the Italian Healthcare system, with reference to specific experience and local diagnostic and management resources.Level of evidence Level of evidence of recommendations for each PICO question were reported according to available evidence.

Recommendations on non-invasive imaging to assess pre-operative cardiac risk among liver transplant candidates vary amongst societal guidelines and individual institutional practices. In 2018, a standardized pre-transplant coronary evaluation protocol was established at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA, to ensure appropriate and consistent pre-operative testing was performed.

All patients who underwent liver transplant evaluation between January 1st, 2016 and December 31st, 2019, were retrospectively analyzed and divided into three cohorts; before the introduction of the protocol (prior to 2018), initial protocol favoring invasive coronary angiography (ICA) (2018), and amended protocol favoring coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) (post-2018). We described clinical characteristics, candidacy for transplant, and cardiovascular complications during follow-up. As an unadjusted exploratory analysis, the Cochran-Armitage Exact Trend Test was used to examine univariate differences across time.

A total of 462 patients underwent liver transplant evaluation during the study period. Among these, 218 (47.2%) patients underwent stress test, 50 (10.8%) underwent CCTA, and 68 (14.8%) underwent ICA. Across the three time periods, there was an increase in the proportion of CCTAs performed (3%, 6.3%, and 26.3% respectively; p <0.001) and proportion of patients diagnosed with obstructive CAD using CCTA (0%, 30%, and 51.4% respectively; p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in post-transplant cardiac complications among patients evaluated before 2018, during 2018, and after 2018 (5.9% vs. 5.6 vs. 6.0%; p=1.0).

Our findings suggest it is reasonable to shift practice to a less invasive approach utilizing CCTA or nuclear stress testing when assessing liver transplant candidates at increased cardiovascular risk.

The shift in the changing etiology of cirrhosis requiring liver transplantation (LT) has resulted in an increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) that can potentially impact post-LT outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the prevalence of CAD, risk factors, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with CAD before LT. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles describing CAD in pre-LT patients. Meta-analysis of proportions using the generalized linear mix model was conducted to analyze the pooled prevalence of CAD in pre-LT patients. Associated risk factors for CAD in pre-LT patients and outcomes were evaluated in conventional pairwise meta-analysis. A total of 39 studies were included. The pooled prevalence of patients diagnosed with CAD before LT was 15.9% (95% CI, 9.8%-24.7%). Age, male sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, hepatitis B virus, and hepatocellular carcinoma were significantly associated with CAD. Patients from high-income countries especially North America, Europe, and South America, with the associated risk factors were at increased risk for CAD before LT. CAD before LT was associated with an increased odds of overall mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-1.4; P = 0.01) and cardiac-related mortality (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P = 0.03). A total of 48.7% of included articles considered the presence of cardiovascular risk factors for CAD screening. However, 10.3% of the studies screened for CAD in pre-LT patients via invasive coronary angiography only, without stress testing or risk stratification. This study demonstrates the high prevalence of CAD in pre-LT patients, associated risk factors, and outcomes. There is heterogeneity among guidelines and practice in screening for pre-LT CAD, and more studies are needed to establish consensus.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common and emerging liver disease in adults, paralleling the epidemic of obesity and diabetes, and leading to worrisome events (hepatocellular carcinoma and end-stage liver disease). In the last years, mounting evidence added insights about epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis and lifestyle-based or drug treatment of NAFLD. In this rapidly evolving scenario, members of the Associazione Italiana per lo Studio del Fegato (AISF), the Società Italiana di Diabetologia (SID) and the Società Italiana dell'Obesità (SIO) reviewed current knowledge on NAFLD. The quality of the published evidence is graded, and practical recommendations are made following the rules and the methodology suggested in Italy by the Centro Nazionale per l'Eccellenza delle cure (CNEC) and Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS). Whenever possible, recommendations are placed within the context the Italian Healthcare system, with reference to specific experience and local diagnostic and management resources. Level of evidence: Level of evidence of recommendations for each PICO question were reported according to available evidence.

The ideal cardiac risk stratification strategy for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is unknown. Our institution performed coronary angiography for asymptomatic OLT candidates at high risk for CAD: ≥65 years of age, diabetic and ≥55 years of age or diagnosed ≥5 years, abnormal stress test, or at the discretion of the OLT committee.

The analysis included 301 consecutive, asymptomatic OLT candidates who underwent coronary angiography. The primary outcome was the prevalence of obstructive CAD.

At 2-year follow-up, OLT was performed in 44.9%, and 42.2% died. The prevalence of obstructive CAD, involvement of the proximal or mid LAD, and 3-vessel CAD were 10.3%, 6.6%, and 0.7%, respectively. Percutaneous and surgical revascularization were performed in 7.0% and 1.3%, respectively. Stress test was performed in 54.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of stress testing were 0% and 87.1%, respectively. The negative and positive predictive values of stress testing were 91.4% and 0%, respectively. Chest computed tomography (CT) was performed in 83.1%. Moderate or severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) was present in 47.8%. The sensitivity and specificity of moderate or severe CAC were 88.9% and 57.3%, respectively. The negative and positive predictive values of moderate or severe CAC were 97.7% and 20.2%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CAC was an independent predictor of obstructive CAD (HR 10.7; 95% CI 3.2-37.9; p < 0.001).

The prevalence of obstructive CAD in asymptomatic OLT candidates at high risk was uncommon. Alternative diagnostic strategies may be preferred to coronary angiography.