Copyright
©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Stem Cells. Jul 26, 2014; 6(3): 322-343
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.322
Published online Jul 26, 2014. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.322
Adherence to plastic surfaces in standard culture conditions | ||
Positive (> 95% +) | Negative (< 2% +) | |
Immunophenotype | CD105 | CD45 |
CD73 | CD34 | |
CD90 | CD14 or CD11b | |
CD79a or CD19 | ||
HLA-DR | ||
In vitro differentiation to osteoblasts, adipocytes and chondroblasts (demonstrated by appropriate staining of cell cultures) |
Study | Assay | Description |
Similarities | ||
Adipogenic differentiation | Oil O Red staining | Both pMSCs and dMSCs showed accumulation of lipid-rich vacuoles[109,194] |
Chondrogenic differentiation | Toluidine Blue staining | Chondrogenic differentiation potential was similar between pMSCs and dMSCs[109] |
Differences | ||
Chromosomic alterations | CGH arrays, FISH | pMSCs did not carry the genomic abnormalities detectable in their correspondent myeloma cells[111,194,195]. Only pMSCs showed several non-recurrent chromosomal gains and losses (> 1 Mb size) and “hot-spot” regions with discrete (< 1 Mb) genomic alterations[195] |
Gene expression profiling | Gene expression microarray | Among 145 differentially expressed genes between pMSCs and dMSCs, 46% accounted for tumor-microenvironment cross-talk. Functional assignment revealed their implication in tumor-support (e.g., GDF15), angiogenesis (e.g., ANGPTL4, PAI1, SCG2), and contribution to bone disease (e.g., NPR3, WISP1, EDG2)[111]. Even a distinct transcriptional pattern was found associated to the occurrence of bone lesions in pMSCs[113] |
Immunophenotype | Flow cytometry | Although few significant differences in cell surface marker expression were found between dMSCs and pMSCs, the latter expressed reduced VCAM1 and fibronectin[196], and higher ICAM1[197] compared to dMSCs |
Bone formation markers | qPCR, WB | Expression of bone formation markers (i.e., osteocalcin and osteopontin), master transcription factors of osteogenic differentiation (i.e., Runx2/Cbfa1 and Osterix) and TAZ (a Runx2/Cbfa1 transcriptional co-activator) was lower in pMSCs than in dMSCs[109] |
Expression and secretion of growth factors/cytokines/ chemokines | RT-PCR, ELISA | Compared to dMSCs, pMSCs showed increased expression of IL-1β[111], IL-3[112], IL-6[111,112,194,198], IL-10[199], BAFF[199], GDF15[111,198], TNFα[112], TGFβ1[112,198], DKK1[111,121,198], RANKL[112], AREG[111], and decreased expression of TGFβ2, TGFβ3 and FasL[112] |
Senescence profile | β-gal staining, propidium iodide DNA staining, qPCR | pMSCs showed an early senescence state compared to dMSCs, as assessed by increased expression of senescence-associated β-galactosidase, increased cell size and accumulation of cells in S phase[198] |
Immunoability | Co-cultures of MSCs and lymphocytes or PBMCs | pMSCs exhibited reduced efficiency to suppress T-cell proliferation compared to that of dMSCs[112,194,198] |
Angiogenic potential | qPCR, ELISA, tube formation assay | Angiogenic factors (bFGF, HGF and VEGF) were elevated in the CM of pMSCs compared to dMSCs. Besides, CM from pMSCs significantly promoted proliferation, chemotaxis and capillary formation of HUVECs compared to dMSCs[200] |
Controversial points | ||
Proliferation rate | Cell density, CFU-F | Whereas some studies did not find differences in CFU-F number and cell density between dMSCs and pMSCs[111], others found a deficient proliferative potential in pMSCs which could be partly explained by the reduced expression of receptors for several growth factors[121] |
ALP expression and activity | BCIP-NBT staining and pNPP hydrolysis | ALP expression/activity did not differ between MSCs from both origins[111], whereas other authors found it was significantly reduced in pMSCs compared to dMSCs, with lowest levels in pMSCs from patients with bone lesions[110] |
Matrix mineralization | Alizarin Red and Von Kossa staining | Some groups have reported a significative reduction of matrix mineralization by pMSCs relative to dMSCs[110,111,198], although others have not observed those differences[121,194] |
Hematopoietic stem cell support | Long-term co-cultures | Some authors reported that the ability to support the growth of hematopoietic stem cells did not differ between dMSCs and pMSCs[111,194], whilst others found that pMSCs better supported CD34+ progenitor expansion[198] |
Drug | Mechanism of action | Signaling pathway | Cell target | Preclinical studies | Phase of clinical trials |
BHQ880 | Neutralizing anti-DKK1 antibody | Wnt | MSC, MMPC | [122,123,125] | II[126,127] |
Romosozumab (AMG785) | Neutralizing anti-sclerostin antibody | MSC | [79,83] | II (postmenopausal osteoporosis)[129] | |
LiCl | GSK3β inhibitor | MSC, MMPC | [131] | NA | |
DAPT | γ-secretase inhibitor | Notch | MSC, MMPC | [110,142] | NA |
GSI15 | OC, MMPC | [139] | |||
Bortezomib and second generation PIs | Proteasome inhibitor | UPR | MSC, OC, MMPC | [179,180,201] | Bortezomib and carfilzomib: Approved Oprozomib: I/II Ixazomib: III |
RAP-011 (mouse) Sotatercept/ACE-011 (human) | Decoy receptor neutralizing activin A | BMP | MSC, OC, MMPC | [61,62] | II[153,154] |
SB431542 | TGFβ inhibitor | MSC | [150] | NA | |
Ki26894 | MSC | ||||
MLN3897 | CCR1 antagonists | CCL3 | MSC, OC, MMPC | [58,160] | NA |
CCX721 (mouse) CCX354-C (human) | OC, MMPC | [157] | II (rheumatoid arthritis)[161] |
- Citation: Garcia-Gomez A, Sanchez-Guijo F, del Cañizo MC, San Miguel JF, Garayoa M. Multiple myeloma mesenchymal stromal cells: Contribution to myeloma bone disease and therapeutics. World J Stem Cells 2014; 6(3): 322-343
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v6/i3/322.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v6.i3.322