Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Stem Cells. Jun 26, 2021; 13(6): 503-520
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i6.503
Table 1 Monoclonal antibody studies
Drug [Ref.]
Target
No. of patients
Study design
Study phase
Results
ObinutuzumabCD20
[42]781CLL (CIRS ≥ 6) O + Clb vs R + Clb3PFS: 28.9 mo vs 15.7 mo (HR 0.49, P < 0.0001; OS: NR vs 73.1 mo (HR 0.76, P = 0.0245) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Infusion reactions 20% vs 4%, Neutropenia 33% vs 28%
[44]1202FL (untreated) O + Chemo vs R + Chemo33-yr PFS rate: 80.0% vs 73.3% HR 0.66 P = 0.001 ORR: 88.5% vs 86.9% 3-yr OS rate: 94.0% vs 92.1% (HR 0.75, P = 0.21) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 74.6% vs 67.8%
[45]413FL (rituximab refractory) O + Benda vs Benda3PFS: NR vs 14.9 mo (HR 0.55, P = 0.0001) OS: ND Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Neutropenia 33% vs 26%; Infusion reactions 11% vs 6%
Tafasitamab[47]CD1992DLBCL R/RT + Lenalidomide2ORR: 43% CR: 18% PFS: 12.1 mo Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Neutropenia 48%, Thrombocytopenia 17%, Febrile neutropenia 12%
Magrolimab[52]CD4722R/R DLBCL or FL M + R1bDLBCL ORR/CR: 40%/33% FL ORR/CR: 71%/43% AEs: Anemia, Infusion reactions
Mogamulizumab[53]CCR4372CTCL R/R Mo vs Vorinostat3PFS: 7.7 mo vs 3.1 mo (HR 0.53, P < 0.0001) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Mo: pyrexia 4%, cellulitis 3%; V: cellulitis 3%, PE 3%, sepsis 3%
Table 2 Antibody-drug conjugate studies
Drug [Ref.]
Target
No. of patients
Study design
Study phase
Results
Brentuximab-vedotinCD30
[10,58]102R/R cHL 2ORR/CR: 72%/33% PFS 9.3 mo; OS 40.5 mo; AEs: PSN 42%, nausea 35%, fatigue 34%
[59,60]329R/R high-risk cHL maint BV vs Pbo35-yr PFS rate 59% vs 41% (HR 0.52) OS: NR AEs: PSN (90% resolved)
[61]1334Untreated cHL CS III/IV BV + AVD vs ABVD32-yr mPFS rate: 82.1% vs 77.2% (HR 0.77, P = 0.04) AEs: Neutropenia 58% vs 45%, PSN 67% vs 43%, PN 1% vs 3%
[62]131R/R CTCL or cALCL; vs MTX or BV3ORR4: 56.3% vs 12.5% (P < 0.0001); EFS: 9.4 mo vs 2.3 mo (HR 0.28, P < 0.0001) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 41% vs 47%; PSN: 67% vs 6%
[63]58R/R ALCL2ORR/CR: 86%/66%; 5-yr OS rate: 60%, 5-yr OS rate (in CR vs non-CR): 79% vs 25%
[64]601Untreated CD30+ sALCL; BV + CHP vs CHOP3PFS: 48.2 mo vs 20.8 mo (HR 0.71, P = 0.011); OS: NR vs NR (HR 0.66, P = 0.024) AEs: febrile neutropenia 18% vs 15%, PSN 52% vs 55%
Polatuzumab vedotin[65]CD79b80R/R DLBCL; PV + R + Benda vs R + Benda2CR: 40% vs 17.5% PFS: 9.5 mo vs 3.7 mo (HR 0.63, P < 0.001) Grade ≥ 3 AEs: Anemia 28.2% vs 17.9%, Neutropenia 46.2% vs 33.3% Thrombocytopenia 41.0% vs 23.1%
Moxetumomab-pasudotox[68]CD2280R/R HCL2ORR: 75% CR: 30% (85% MRD-); AEs: Edema 39%, nausea 35%, fatigue 34%, headache 33%
Table 3 Bispecific antibody studies
Drug
Target
No. of patients
Study design
Study phase
Results
Blinatumomab[71]CD3/CD1938R/R FL, MCL, DLBCL1ORR/CR: 64%/38%; PFS 6.7 mo; OS 4.6 yr; OS ( for CR/PR): 7.7 yr; AEs: Infections (pneumonia, diarrhea, sepsis)
Mosunetuzumab[72]CD3/CD20218R/R B-NHL1NHL ORR/CR: 64.1%/42.2%; DLBCL ORR/CR: 34.7%/16.6% AEs: CRS 28.4%, NAEs: 44%
CD20-TCB[73]CD3/CD2038R/R DLBCL1ORR/CR: 47%/34% AEs: CRS 55.1%, Neutropenia 34.7%
Table 4 Checkpoint inhibitor studies
Drug [Ref.]
Target
No. of patients
Study design
Study phase
Results
NivolumabPD-1
[84]243R/R cHL (after ASCT)2ORR/CR: 69%/40%; PFS: 14.7 mo, Grade ≥ 3 AEs: lipase increases 5%, neutropenia 3%, ALT increases 3%
[88]61R/R cHL with BV1/2ORR/CR: 82%/61%; AEs: Infusion reactions 44% (BV), corticosteroid therapy 8%
[89]64R/R cHL Nivo + BV, Ipi + BV, Nivo + Ipi + BV1/2ORR: 89%, 76%, 82% Grade ≥ 3 AEs: 16%, 42%, 50%
PembrolizumabPD-1
[85]210R/R cHL2ORR/CR: 69%/22.4% 6-mos DoR rate: 75.6% TRAEs: hypothyroidism 12.4%, pyrexia 10.5%
[86]304R/R cHL vs BV3PFS: 13.2 mo vs 8.3 mo (HR 0.65, P = 0.00271), ORR/CR: 65.6%/24.5% vs 54.2%/24.2% TRAEs: 19.6% vs 25%
[91]74R/R PMBCL2ORR/CR: 45%/13% DoR: NR (12.5 mo FU); Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs: 23%
[92]24R/R CTCL2ORR: 38%; IRAEs: 17%
Table 5 Chimeric antigen receptor T cell studies
Drug [Ref.]
Target/co-stimulator
No. of patients
Study design
Study phase
Results
Axicabtagene-ciloleucel[96]CD19/CD28111R/R DLBCL 2ORR/CR: 82%/54%; DoR (FU 15.4 mo): 42%, 40% CR; 18-mos OS rate: 52% Grade ≥ 3 AEs: neutropenia 78%, CRS 13%, ICANS 28%
Tisagenlecleucel[97]CD19/4-1BB93R/R DLBCL2ORR/CR: 52%/40%; DoR (FU 12 mo): 65%, 79% CR; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: CRS 22%, ICANS 12%, cytopenias 28%, infections 20%
Lisocabtagene-maraleucel[98]CD19/4-1BB344R/R DLBCL2ORR/CR: 73%/53%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: CRS 2%, ICANS 10%
Brexucabtagene-autoleucel (KTE-X19)[99]CD19/CD2874R/R MCL2ORR/CR: 93%/67%; 1-yr PFS/ OS rate: 61%/83%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: cytopenias 94%, infections 32%, CRS 15%, ICANS 31%
Tisagenlecleucel[100]CD19/4-1BB14R/R CLL1ORR/CR: 57%/28%; No relapses in CR patients (n = 4). All CR patients developed CRS
Lisocabtagene-maraleucel[101]CD19/4-1BB23R/R CLL (56.5% progressed after ibrutinib and venetoclax)1/2ORR/CR: 82%/45.5%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: anemia 96%, thrombocytopenia 70%, CRS 9%, ICANS 22%
Axicabtagene-ciloleucel[102]CD19/CD2894R/R FL, MZL2ORR/CR: FL 95%/80% MZL 86%/71%; Grade ≥ 3 AEs: neutropenia 33%, anemia 28%, CRS 11%, ICANS 19%