Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Stem Cells. Oct 26, 2021; 13(10): 1446-1479
Published online Oct 26, 2021. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i10.1446
Published online Oct 26, 2021. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v13.i10.1446
Retinal disease | Type of SC used | Type of intervention | Clinical trial status | Results: Advantages and disadvantages | Ethical concerns |
RP, AMD | Fetal RPCs[33,147-150] | Subretinal or intravitreal transplantation | Yes[40,151] | Rescue of PHRs and low risk of tumorigenesis. Able to differentiate into MGCs and retinal neurons; improvement of retinal sensitivity. Adverse effects: limited amount of cells and low tissue integration. Promising therapeutic treatment. | Little |
RP, AMD, most retinal degenerations | PSCs and iPSCs | Reprogramed to iPSC[40] | Yes[40,200,293] | Potential replacement of damaged retinal cells. Low immunogenicity. Adverse effects: risk of teratoma development[40,50,156,160-163]. | Little or none |
Genomic instability in iPSC. Further research still needed. | |||||
AMD, retinal degenerations | RPE | Transplantation of RPE sheets from human fetal eyes in AMD patients | Yes[204,283] | Substantial rescue of PHRs. Visual improvement[147,148]. | Concerns about using human tissues |
Little or no evidences of draft rejection[33,203,204,281,285]. | |||||
Adverse effects: unwanted cell aggregation; lack of attachment; cases of anoikis[162,163]. | |||||
AMD, stargardt disease | Human ESC-RPE | Injection of differentiated ESC-RPE cells in subretinal space[238] | Yes phase 1/2a trial[175,176] | Cells form monolayers and display typical RPE features[171-173]. | Concerns about using human tissues |
Improvement of visual acuity. No tumorigenicity or rejection after 4 years[187]. | |||||
Cell sheets preserve RPE characteristics better than cell suspension[175-178]. Absence of serious adverse effects[131,188]. Effectiveness still uncertain. | |||||
AMD | iPSC-RPE | Autologous transplantation into an AMD patient of cell-sheets of RPE, differentiated from iPSC obtained from the skin’s patient[195] | Yes[195,199,200] | Preservation of main RPE features. | Important concerns about safety |
Long term survival of transplanted iPSC-RPE cells[196,199,200]. Visual acuity stable for 4 years[197,198]. | |||||
Presence of mutations in iPSCs[199]. Little immune rejection[202]. Adverse effects: Risk of tumorigenesis. | |||||
Still pending to establish the adequate iPSC-RPE cells and the effectiveness of transplantation. | |||||
AMD, stargardt macular distrophy | human fetal SC | Transplantation of human fetal RPE cells into subretinal space | Yes[176,203] | Improvement of visual parameters.No immunosuppression; No restoring of retinal morphology; no expression of retinal markers[169,208]. Adverse effects: little graft rejection in patients with AMD.Further research still required to provide effective and safe treatments. | Concerns about using aborted human fetuses |
Retinal degeneration | MGCs | Not established | No | Express most SC markers; potentially capable of retinal regeneration after reprogramming. Obstacles: gliosis, low regenerative potential. | Not determined |
Retinal degeneration, retinal injuries and uveitis | Bone marrow (MSC) and hematopoietic SC | Intravitreal injection (in mouse models of RP) | No | Promote regeneration of different retinal cells[238,246-248]. Safety not determined. | Not determined |
- Citation: German OL, Vallese-Maurizi H, Soto TB, Rotstein NP, Politi LE. Retina stem cells, hopes and obstacles. World J Stem Cells 2021; 13(10): 1446-1479
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v13/i10/1446.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v13.i10.1446