Copyright
©The Author(s) 2019.
World J Stem Cells. Apr 26, 2019; 11(4): 222-235
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i4.222
Published online Apr 26, 2019. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v11.i4.222
Table 1 Summary of mesenchymal stem cell preclinical trials in osteoarthritis animal models from 2015 to 2018
Animal models (osteoarthritis) | MSC type | Interventions | Results | Ref. |
Sheep | AD-MSCs | AD-MSCs/HA vs HA | µCT, MRI and immunohistochemistry: AD-MSCs/HA > HA | Lv et al[34], 2018 |
Sheep | Allogeneic AD-MSCs | AD-MSCs/HA vs HA | MRI and macroscopy examinations: AD-MSCs/HA > HA | Feng et al[35], 2017 |
Rabbits | BMSCs | BMSCs/HA vs PRP vs PRP/HA | Histological scores and immunohistochemistry: BMSCs/HA > PRP/HA > PRP | Desando et al[36], 2017 |
Rabbits | Allogeneic BMSCs | BMSCs/HA vs HA | Histological scores and cartilage content: BMSCs/HA > HA | Chiang et al[37], 2016 |
Dogs | AD-MSCs | AD-MSCs/PRP vs PRP | Focal compressive strength: AD-MSCs/PRP > PRP function and pain: AD-MSCs/PRP > PRP | Yun et al[38], 2016 |
Rabbits | AD-MSCs | AD-MSCs/PRP vs PRP | Macroscopic and histological examinations: AD-MSCs/PRP > PRP | Hermeto et al[39], 2016 |
Table 2 Summary of mesenchymal stem cells/platelet-rich plasma clinical trials in osteoarthritis patients from 2012 to 2018
Defect type | MSC type | Delivery system | Type of study | Results | Ref. |
OA | AD-MSC | MSCs/PRP | Case series (n = 21); Final follow-up: 6 mo | Significant positive changes at MRI | Bui et al[55], 2014 |
OA | AD-MSC | MSCs/PRP | Case series (n = 18); Final follow-up: 24.3 mo | Clinical improvement; Function and pain improvement at 24.3 mo | Koh et al[52], 2013 |
OA | AD-MSC | MSCs/PRP | Case series (n = 30); Final follow-up: 24 mo | Reducing pain and improving function in patients with knee OA | Koh et al[56], 2012 |
OA | AD-MSC | MSCs/PRP | Case series (n = 21); Final follow-up: 24 mo | Function and pain improvement as compared with PRP only | Koh et al[57], 2014 |
OA | Autologous SVF | SVF/PRP | Case series (n = 21); Final follow-up: 24 mo | All patients’ scores of pain improved to > 96; and quality of life scores to > 93 | Gibbs et al[58], 2015 |
OA | Autologous SVF | SVF/PRP | Case series (n = 10); Final follow-up: 24 mo | Cartilage thickness improvement | Bansal et al[59], 2017 |
Table 3 Summary of intra-articular injection of expanded bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis treatment (2015-2018)
Cell type | Type of study | Experimental design | Cell dosage | Measurement | Results | Ref. |
Autologous | Case series (n = 61); Final follow up: 6 mo | Phase I/II study | Not mentioned | VAS, WOMAC and X-ray | Significantly reductions in knee pain and increased quality of life at 6 mo follow-up | Garay-Mendoza et al[68], 2018 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 13); Final follow up: 24 mo | Phase I/II study | Intra-articular injection of 30.5 × 106 MSCs | MRI and KOOS | After intra-articular injection with BM-MSCs had significantly improved the KOOS and knee cartilage thickness | Al-Najar et al[69], 2017 |
Allogeneic | Case series (n = 60); Final follow up: 24 mo | Double-blind, multicentric, placebo-controlled, phase II study | Four dose levels were studied in this trial: 25 × 106, 50 × 106, 75 × 106, and 150 × 106 | VAS, ICOAP and WOMAC | A 25 × 106 cell dose may be the most effective among the doses; WOMAC, ICOAP, and VAS scores decreased by the time of the final follow-up period | Gupta et al[70], 2016 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 30); Final follow up: 12 mo | Double-blind, multicentric, phase I/II study | Two dose levels were studied in this trial: 10 × 106 and 100 × 106 | VAS, WOMAC, X-ray and MRI | A clinical and functional improvement of knee OA by the injection of 100 × 106 cell dose; Improvement of pain and knee function of OA patients at 12 mo follow-up | Lamo-Espinosa et al[71], 2016 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 4); Final follow up: 60 mo | Phase I study | Intra-articular injection of 8-9 × 106 MSCs | Walking time, X-ray and VAS | Earlier transplantation may give better results in long-term follow-up | Soler et al[72], 2016 |
Allogeneic | Case series (n = 30); Final follow up: 12 mo | Multicentric, phase I/II study | Intra-articular injection of 40 × 106 MSCs | VAS, WOMAC, and LEQUESNE; MRI | Significantly improves cartilage quality and provides pain relief | Vega et al[73], 2015 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 30); Final follow up: 30 mo | Not mentioned | Intra-articular injection of 0.5 × 106 MSCs | Walking distance, VAS, WOMAC and MRI | Significantly improves cartilage quality and knee function, and reduces pain level | Emadedin et al[74], 2015 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 4); Final follow up: 60 mo | Phase I study,open label | Intra-articular injection of 8 × 106 MSCs | VAS, Knee motion, Range, X-ray | Earlier transplantation may give better results in long-term follow-up | Davatch et al[75], 2016 |
Table 4 Summary of intra-articular injection of expanded umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis treatment (2015-2018)
Cell type | Type of study | Experimental design | Cell dosage | Measurement | Results | Ref. |
Allogeneic | Case series (n = 7); Final follow-up: 60 mo | Open-label, single-arm, single-center, phase I/II study | A dose of 500 µL/cm2 of the defect area with a cell concentration of 0.5 × 107 MSCs per milliliter | ICRS, VAS, IKDC and MRI | Improvements in pain and knee function at 6 mo follow-up; Without significant deterioration over 7 yr of follow-up; Efficacy and safety | Park et al[66], 2017 |
Allogeneic | Case series (n = 36); Final follow up: 12 mo | Not mentioned | Intra-articular injection of (2-3) × 107 MSCs | Lysholm, WOMAC and SF-36 scale score | Improvement of the joint function and quality of life | Wang et al[76], 2016 |
Allogeneic | Case series (n = 40); Final follow up: 12 mo | randomized, triple-blind trial, phase I/II trial | Intra-articular injection of 20 × 106 (single-dose and repeated doses) MSCs | OARSI, WOMAC, VAS and SF-36 score | Efficacy and safety; Repeated injections of UC-MSCs had lower scores than others at 12 mo; Improvement of pain and knee function of OA patients at 12 mo follow-up | Matas et al[77], 2018 |
Table 5 Summary of intra-articular injection of expanded adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in knee osteoarthritis treatment (2015-2018)
Cell type | Type of study | Experimental design | Cell dosage | Measurement | Results | Ref. |
Autologous | Case series (n = 18); Final follow-up: 24 mo | Randomized and Double-blinded, A phase I/II study | Three dose groups: The low-dose (1 × 107), mid-dose (2 × 107) and high-dose group (5 × 107) cells | WOMAC, SF-36 and NRS-11 | The dosage of 5 × 107 MSCs exhibited the highest improvement in pain, function and cartilage volume of the knee joint | Song et al[78], 2018 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 18); Final follow-up: 24 mo | A phase I/II study | Phase I: 10 × 106 (low-dose), 50 × 106 (mid-dose), 100 × 106 (high-dose); Phase II:100 × 106 (high-dose) | VAS, WOMAC and MRI | A 100 × 106 cell dose may be the most effective among the doses | Jo et al[79], 2017 |
Autologous | Case series (n = 18); Final follow-up: 20 mo | A phase I, bicentric, single-arm, open-label | Three dose levels were studied in this trial: 2 × 106 (low-dose), 10 × 106 (mid-dose) and 50 × 106 (high-dose) cells | WOMAC, VAS, SF-36, KOOS and OARSI | The group of patients injected with 2 × 106 cells exhibited the best response to MSC treatment, which can improve pain and induce structural benefit | Pers et al[80], 2016 |
- Citation: Wang AT, Feng Y, Jia HH, Zhao M, Yu H. Application of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: A concise review. World J Stem Cells 2019; 11(4): 222-235
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v11/i4/222.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v11.i4.222