Copyright
©2009 Baishideng.
World J Stem Cells. Dec 31, 2009; 1(1): 55-66
Published online Dec 31, 2009. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.55
Published online Dec 31, 2009. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.55
Stem cell type | Properties | Functions |
MSCs | Multipotent and pluripotent. Bone marrow is the major source of MSC | MSCs are capable of differentiating into bone, cartilage, fat, muscle, marrow stroma, and other tissue types |
ESCs | Derived from an early stage embryo and can differentiate into derivatives of all three primary germ layers. ESCs are multipotent and pluripotent | Can differentiate into brain and nervous system cells, insulin producing cells of the pancreas, bone cells, hematopoietic cells, endothelial cells, cardiomyocytes |
ASCs | Multipotent, oligopotent, or unipotent progenitor cells. Derived from a more mature tissue, such as the umbilical cord, bone marrow, or skin | To treat leukemia and related bone/blood cancers through bone marrow transplants |
HSCs | Found in the bone marrow. Multipotent | All types of blood cells |
iPS | Derived from epithelial cells. Pluripotent | The iPS cell lines could be differentiated into heart muscle and neuronal cells, in addition to basic cell types (ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm) |
Mammary stem cells | Isolated from human and mouse tissue | Growth of mammary glands |
Endothelial stem cells | Multipotent cells found in the bone marrow | Can differentiate into endothelial cells, the cells that make up the lining of blood vessels |
Fabrication technique | Advantages | Drawbacks |
Laser deposition | Uniform distribution of pore size, simple and fast | Reduced resolution and poor surface finish |
Self assembly | Can generate fibrous networks capable of supporting cells in three dimensions. Cell-seeding problems associated with using prefabricated nanofibrous scaffolds eliminated owing to spontaneous assembly | Lack mechanical strength, Limited amphiphilic materials, random and very short nanofibers |
Lithography | Relatively good resolution | Time consuming and expensive. |
Electrospinning | The properties of electrospun nanofibers, such as fiber diameter, can be controlled readily via manipulation of spinning parameters. Capable of mimicking the stem cell niche | Electrospinning yields a flat mat that has limited three dimensionality and suffers from cell infiltration problems because of the small pore size of the mats |
Phase separation | A nanofibrous (fibers with diameters of 50-500 nm) three-dimensional scaffold can be constructed. Has controllable high porosity, surface-to- volume ratios, and well as defined mechanical properties | Nanofiber distribution and uniformity is subject to the controllability of the processing |
Cell type | Nanotopography | Advantages | Ref. |
Chondrocytes | (a) PCL nanofibrous scaffold (200-800 nm) in the presence of TGF-β1; (b) Collagen nanofibers of diameter 110 nm-1.8 μm | The differentiation of the stem cells into chondrocytes in the nanofibrous scaffold was comparable to an established cell pellet culture. Nanotopography supports chondrocyte growth and infiltration | [82,90] |
Osteoblasts | (a) Ceramics like HA, alumina and titania having nanostructures of grain sizes less than 100 nm and nanophase zinc oxide (23 nm); (b) PLGA, PLLA and PCL nanofibers (diameter 200-800 nm); (c) Nanotubes of diameter less than 100 nm | Enhanced proliferation and differentiation of MSC to osteoblasts | [67,77-79,105-113] |
Smooth muscle cells (SMC) | (a) PLGA and PCL, PLLA-CL nanofibers (diameter 200-800 nm); (b) Nanogratings of 350 nm in width, spacing, and depth imprinted on PMMA or PDMS | SMC adhesion was enhanced on the nanostructured substrates compared to the conventional submicron substrates | [114-118] |
Fibroblasts | (a) PLGA (85:15 ratio) nanofibers of diameter 500-800 nm; (b) Nanocolumns | Increased endocytic activity. Nanotopography can be used to improve hemocompatibility of blood-contacting biomaterials | [82] |
Nerve cells | (a) Silicon wafer in the range of 20-70 nm; (b) PLLA or PCL scaffolds via electrospinning and phase separation | The cell adhesion and viability significantly improved on the nanofeatured surface | [70,91] |
- Citation: Ravichandran R, Liao S, Ng CC, Chan CK, Raghunath M, Ramakrishna S. Effects of nanotopography on stem cell phenotypes. World J Stem Cells 2009; 1(1): 55-66
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v1/i1/55.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v1.i1.55