Minireviews Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Stem Cells. Nov 26, 2016; 8(11): 376-383
Published online Nov 26, 2016. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v8.i11.376
Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in retinal and optic nerve diseases: An update of clinical trials
Sonia Labrador-Velandia, María Luz Alonso-Alonso, José Carlos Pastor, Iván Fernandez-Bueno, Girish Kumar Srivastava, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
Sara Alvarez-Sanchez, Jorge González-Zamora, Irene Carretero-Barrio, José Carlos Pastor, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valladolid, 47005 Valladolid, Spain
José Carlos Pastor, Iván Fernandez-Bueno, Girish Kumar Srivastava, Centro en Red de Medicina Regenerativa y Terapia Celular de Castilla y León, 47011 Valladolid, Spain
José Carlos Pastor, Iván Fernandez-Bueno, Girish Kumar Srivastava, Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa Sanitaria del Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Oftared, 28029 Madrid, Spain
José Carlos Pastor, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, 47003 Valladolid, Spain
Author contributions: All the authors contributed to the paper.
Supported by A grants from the Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León, No. VA118U14; and the Centro en Red de Medicina Regenerativa y Terapia Celular de la Junta de Castilla y León, 47011 Valladolid.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:
Correspondence to: Girish Kumar Srivastava, PhD, Principal and Senior Investigator, Instituto Universitario de Oftalmobiología Aplicada, Universidad de Valladolid, Campus Miguel Delibes, Paseo de Belén, 17, 47011 Valladolid, Spain.
Telephone: +34-9-83184753 Fax: +34-9-83184762
Received: June 8, 2016
Peer-review started: June 14, 2016
First decision: July 11, 2016
Revised: July 23, 2016
Accepted: September 13, 2016
Article in press: September 18, 2016
Published online: November 26, 2016


Retinal and optic nerve diseases are degenerative ocular pathologies which lead to irreversible visual loss. Since the advanced therapies availability, cell-based therapies offer a new all-encompassing approach. Advances in the knowledge of neuroprotection, immunomodulation and regenerative properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been obtained by several preclinical studies of various neurodegenerative diseases. It has provided the opportunity to perform the translation of this knowledge to prospective treatment approaches for clinical practice. Since 2008, several first steps projecting new treatment approaches, have been taken regarding the use of cell therapy in patients with neurodegenerative pathologies of optic nerve and retina. Most of the clinical trials using MSCs are in I/II phase, recruiting patients or ongoing, and they have as main objective the safety assessment of MSCs using various routes of administration. However, it is important to recognize that, there is still a long way to go to reach clinical trials phase III-IV. Hence, it is necessary to continue preclinical and clinical studies to improve this new therapeutic tool. This paper reviews the latest progress of MSCs in human clinical trials for retinal and optic nerve diseases.

Key Words: Mesenchymal stem cells, Cell therapy, Optic nerve diseases, Clinical trials, Retinal diseases

Core tip: Advances in the knowledge of neuroprotection, immunomodulation and regenerative properties of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are contributed by several preclinical studies of various neurodegenerative diseases. It has provided opportunity to perform the translation of treatment approach to the clinical practice. Several clinical trials in patients with retinal and optic nerve diseases have been developed since 2008. Most of them using MSCs are in I/II phase. However, there is still a long way to go to reach clinical trials Phase III-IV. Hence, it is necessary to continue with preclinical and clinical studies to improve this new therapeutic tool.


Retinal dystrophies, diabetic retinopathy, age related macular degeneration and optic nerve diseases are chronic and degenerative ocular pathologies which lead to irreversible visual loss. Retinal degeneration is a leading cause of incurable low vision and blindness worldwide[1]. Most retinal and optic nerve diseases are caused by irreversible apoptosis of retinal neural cells or adjacent supporting tissue. Because there is no curative treatment for these degenerative diseases, current therapies mainly focus on the aetiology cause or at specific situations, such as late complications. However, most of them have low efficacy. Since the advanced therapies availability, cell-based therapies offer a new all-encompassing approach[2].

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent and self-renewing stem cells derived from bone marrow, adipose tissue, and other mesenchymal tissues, which can be induced to differentiate into bone marrow, cartilage, muscle, lipid, myocardial cells, glial cells and neurons[3,4]. MSCs have some features that make them useful in cell therapy research. These are easy to isolate and expand rapidly after a short period of dormancy[5]. They are free of ethical issues associated with the harvesting of embryonic stem cells[6]. Also, it is considered that MSCs are “immunoprivileged” because they do not express Major Histocompatibility Complex class II (MHC-II) on their surface, associated with transplant rejections[7], and this advantage allows its use as an autologous or allogenic form[8]. Furthermore, MSCs produce several growth factors with paracrine actions that are believed to modulate the microenvironment of diseased tissues, promote survival and activate endogenous repair mechanisms[9].

Due to this features MSCs have been used in several preclinical studies of retinal and optic nerve diseases, where they have demonstrated their properties of immunomodulation, neuroprotection and tissue repair[10-13]. These properties support the clinical use of MSCs as an opportunity for tissue repair and regeneration in several neurodegeneratives disorders. To remember, the stages of clinical trials for drugs in development can be divided into four phases. The main purpose of the first clinical stage, phase I, is to observe the tolerance and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the drug in the human body and to provide evidence to establish the phase II administration protocol. The purpose of phase II clinical trials is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the drug in patients with the target indication. In phase III, the efficacy and safety of the drug in patients with the target indication is further validated, providing the basis of the evidence used for review during the drug registration and application process. The phase IV clinical trial, which takes place during the post marketing period, provides further evidence regarding the drug’s efficacy and any emerging adverse reactions under conditions of real-life use in large numbers of patients[14].

In this review, we summarize the latest progress of MSCs in human clinical trials for retinal and optic nerve diseases.


Bone marrow is the first isolation source of MSCs following by umbilical cord and adipose tissue[15]. Although bone marrow is the best source of obtaining MSCs, there are some aspects that reduced their use: Limited growth rate, differentiation capability depending on the donor age, and risk inherited to sample collection[15]. Regarding to umbilical cord source to obtain MSCs, it is required an optimal protocol such as, time of recollection and process less than 16 h, as well as, volume collection higher than 30 mL to get a success culture[16]. MSCs obtaining by adipose tissue source have a similar morphology and phenotype to the bone marrow source, but these cells have a higher capability of proliferation and adipose tissue samples are easier to collect from liposuction procedures[17].


Cryopreservation consists on the interruption of cellular metabolism regulated by processes of freezing and thawing, maintaining a good functional and structural cellular state. To preserve a biological sample as long as possible, without losing their properties, cells are immersed in liquid nitrogen at extremely low temperature (-196 °C), stopping the metabolic activity of the cells[18].

Cryopreservation has been performed primarily for the purpose of preserving the hematopoietic stem cell populations for transplantation. Currently, the use of this procedure has been extended, allowing the preservation of the biological potential, and to retain the biological age at time of cryopreservation. In autologous patients, MSCs are collected and cryopreserved for later clinical use. In allogeneic patients, cryopreservation permits banking of cells for human leukocyte antigen typing and matching, facilitating the logistical transport of cellular products to transplant centers, and allowing enough time for the screening of transmissible diseases in the donated cells before transplantation[19].


Today, there are ongoing clinical trials of advanced therapies’ using MSCs in various retinal and optic nerve diseases. In these clinical trials the main route of administration is the intravitreal injection following by subretinal implant and then intravenous route. In all these studies it is used autologous stem cells from bone marrow or adipose tissue. On Table 1 it is shown all clinical trials finished and ongoing registered in and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, until today (Last search performed on 18 May 2016).

Table 1 Clinical trials for retinal and optic nerve diseases.
Clinical trialConditionCellsRoute of administrationDoseEstimated enrollmentRecruitment statusStudy phaseCountryStart date
NCT010685611Retinosis pigmentariaABMSCIntravitreal injection10 × 106 cells/0.1 mL5CompletedIBrazil2010
NCT01531348Retinosis pigmentariaABMMSCIntravitreal injection1 × 106 cells/0.1 mL10Enrolling by invitationITailandia2012
NCT015607152Retinosis pigmentariaABMSCIntravitreal injection10 × 106 cells/0.1 mL50RecruitingIIBrasil2012
NCT017360593Retinosis pigmentaria, AMD, DR,VOABMSCIntravitreal injection3.4 × 106 cells/0.1 mL15Enrolling by invitationIEEUU2012
NCT01914913Retinosis pigmentariaABMSC--15RecruitingI/IIIndia2014
NCT02280135Retinosis pigmentariaABMSCIntravitreal injection30 × 106 cells/0.1 mL10RecruitingISpain2014
NCT02709876Retinosis pigmentariaABMSCIntravitreal injection-50RecruitingI/IIArabia2014
NCT01518127Stargardt’s disease and AMDABMSCIntravitreal injection10 × 106 cells/0.1 mL10RecruitingI/IIBrazil2011
NCT017360593Stargardt’s disease,AMD, DR, VO, RPABMSCIntravitreal injection3.4 × 106 cells/0.1 mL15RecruitingIEEUU2012
Carta al editor Act. Opht4Diabetic retinopathyABMSCIntravitreal injection18 × 107 cells/0.5 mL1CompletedIGermany2008
NCT01518842Diabetic retinopathyABMSCIntravitreal injection2 × 104 cells/0.1 mL30UnknownI/IIBrasil2011
IRCT201111291414N29Diabetic retinopathyABMMSCIntravenous2 × 106 cells/kg20OngoingI/IIIran2011
NCT017360593Diabetic retinopathy, VO, HRDABMSCIntravitreal injection3.4 × 106 cells/0.1 mL15RecruitingIEEUU2012
ChiCTR-ONC-16008055Diabetic retinopathyASMSC--30RecruitingI/IIChina2013
NCT01518127AMD, Stargardt’s diseaseABMSCIntravitreal injection10 × 106 cells/0.1 mL10RecruitingI/IIBrasil2011
NCT017360593AMD, DR, VO, HRDABMSCIntravitreal injection3.4 × 106 cells/0.1 mL15RecruitingIEEUU2012
NCT02016508AMDABMSCIntravitreal injection-1UnknownI/IIEgypt2013
NCT02024269AMDAASCIntravitreal injection--WithdrawnIEEUU2013
NCT00787722Neuromielitis ópticaAHSCIntravenous-10RecruitingIEEUU2008
NCT01364246Neuromielitis ópticaUC-MSCIntravenous-20UnknownI/IIChina2010
NCT01339455Neuromielitis ópticaAHSCIntravenous-3OngoingI/IICanada2011
NCT02249676Neuromielitis ópticaABMMSCIntravenous2 × 106 cells/kg15RecruitingIIChina2014
NCT02638714Optic nerve atrophyAHSC--100OngoingI/IIJordania2013
NCT01834079Optic nerve atrophyABMSCIntrathecal10 × 107 cells/dose24RecruitingI/IIIndia2014
ChiCTR-TRC-14005093Traumatic optic neuropathyUC-MSCEndonasal-70RecruitingI/IIChina2014
NCT02330978GlaucomaABMMSCIntravitreal injection1 × 106 cells/0.1 mL10RecruitingIBrasil2014
NCT02144103GlaucomaAASCSubtenon injection0.5 mL16Enrolling by invitationIRussia2014
NCT019208675Retinal diseases, Macular degeneration, HRD, OND, glaucomaABMSCRetrobulbar, subtenon, intravenous, intravitreal and intraocular injection1.2 × 1012 cells/15 mL300RecruitingIEstados Unidos2013
Clinical trials in retinal dystrophies: Retinitis pigmentosa and stargardt’s disease

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) includes some inherited diseases which are characterized by a classic pattern of difficulties in dark adaptation and night blindness in adolescence, loss of mid-peripheral visual field in young adulthood and central vision later in life due to the severe loss of rod and cone photoreceptors[20]. The RP is one of the leading hereditary degenerative retinal diseases, affecting 1 in 4000 individuals[20]. RP is characterized by the classic triad of decreased arteriolar diameter, pigment spicules deposits in the mid periphery of the retina and pallor of the papilla[20].

Stargardt’s disease (SD) is the most common form of inherited juvenile macular degenerations. Its prevalence worldwide is estimated to be 1 in 10000 individuals[21]. Patients initially present with reduced central vision. The pathology is defined by the accumulation of lipofuscin in the apical zone of the RPE cells. The patients present decreased vision to legal blindness and secondary choroidal neovascularization, with bilateral gradual involvement of vision[21].

There are nine clinical trials that use MSCs to treat this kind retinal dystrophies (6 for RP, 2 for SD and RP and 1 for RP and other diseases) (Table 1). Although most clinical trials are in recruitment phase, there are two completed to treat retinitis pigmentosa, both were held at Hospital das Clinicas (Medical school Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo) - (NCT01068561 phase I, NCT01560715 phase II). The cells used were autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs, which were administered through intravitreal injection containing 10 × 106 cells/0.1 mL. The MSCs were obtained through aspiration of 10 mL bone marrow tissue from the posterior iliac crest and were separated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation. Regarding to the clinical trial NCT01068561 (phase I), there is a case reported[22]. The case is about one recruited patient of this study, who had macular oedema associated with RP, which showed complete resolution of the oedema 7 d after injection, and the effect remained for one month of follow-up with optical coherence tomography. They concluded that the adult stem cells can restore the blood ocular barrier due their paracrine effects or by osmotic gradient allowing the absorption of macular oedema[22]. The trial NCT01560715 (phase II) is completed and also have published results[23], they concluded that the therapy with intravitreal use MSC can improve the quality of life of patients with RP, although the improvement is lost with time. Patient’s improvement has been evaluated with vision-related quality of life test (NEI VFG-25) before therapy and 3 and 12 mo later. There was a statistically significant improvement 3 mo after treatment, whereas by 12th month there was no significant difference from baseline[23].

At the hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia (Spain), it is being carried out a phase I clinical trial with autologous bone marrow stem cells in patients with RP. This clinical trial continues recruiting patients. Regarding to the other clinical trials for RP and Stargardt’s disease (NCT01531348, NCT017336059, NCT01914913, NCT02280135, NCT027 09876 and NCT01518127), they are on phase I or I/II, and they are recruiting patients (Table 1).

Clinical trials in diabetic retinopathy and age macular degeneration

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a prevalent microvascular complication of diabetes, and remains the leading cause of preventable blindness in working-aged people (20-74 years)[24]. About 30% all diabetics have signs of diabetic retinopathy, and 30% of these might have vision-threatening retinopathy, defined as severe retinopathy or macular edema[25]. The current standard treatment for management of these disorders relies mainly on laser therapy, which is inherently destructive, or antiangiogenic therapy, both associated with unavoidable ocular/systemic side-effects[25].

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a progressive chronic disease of the central retina and a leading cause of vision loss worldwide, it accounts for 8% of all blindness worldwide and is the most common cause of blindness in developed countries[26], particularly in people older than 60 years. Its prevalence is likely to increase as a consequence of exponential population ageing. There have been significant advances in the management of exudative AMD with the introduction of anti-angiogenesis therapy, and patients now have effective treatment options that can prevent blindness and, in many cases, restore vision[27]. However antiangiogenic treatment doesn’t stop the progression nor serves to treat dry AMD. Thus, new approaches like stem cell therapy are needed.

The use of bone marrow derived stem cells (BMDSC) therapy for the DR has been evaluated[28,29] and there are five ongoing clinical trials (NCT01518842, IRCT 201111291414N29, NCT01736059, ChiCTR-ONC-16008055 and NCT01920867) (Table 1). In relation to this therapy for the AMD, it has been evaluated in four (4) ongoing clinical trials (NCT02016508, NCT01 920867, NCT01736059 y NCT01518127). One of them (NCT01736059) has published results in the AMD patients[30]. Bone marrow stem cells used in these clinical trials was harvested from the patient’s own iliac crest (autologous use) with an average final volume of 50 mL (20-100 mL). Then, mononuclear cells were separated by Ficoll-gradient centrifugation. The dose of cells is between 2 × 104-1.8 × 108 suspended in 0.1 mL buffered saline solution. A trial using adipose derived stems cells (ADSC) has been withdrawn prior to enrollment (NCT02024269), however they don’t explain the reasons.

Results of stem cell-treatment for the DR are limited to the report on two patients. A 43-year-old patient with very advanced atrophy of the retina and optic nerve caused by the DR and vision limited to defective light perception, after cell treatment patient have improvement but no signs of any side-effects, such as inflammation or infection[28]. The other reports a patient with macular oedema associated with macular ischemia, and describe the decrease of macular oedema and the improvement of retinal function after intravitreal injection of BMDSC[29].

Moreover, the only clinical results of MSCs therapy for the AMD[30] describes two patients who start from a visual acuity (VA) of 20/200. After intravitreal injection, they had an improvement with its new VA of 20/80 and 20/160. The patient with VA 20/80 kept it during first six months and the other patient with VA 20/160 worsened to its initial state of 20/200. A slight growth of extrafoveal geographic atrophy in both eyes of both patients was detected by fluorescein angiography. The results of electroretinography showed a slight worsening of the macular function of both eyes that could be attributed to the disease progression. In analysis by OCT hyperdense deposits were evident within the retinal layers after a month of therapy that correspond in size with CD34+ cells, however, more studies are needed to prove whether it corresponds to intraretinal incorporation of CD34+ cells. The results suggest that this cell therapy in patients with the AMD, especially in advanced stages, would not stop the progression[30].

Clinical trials of MSCs for optic neuropathies

Optic neuropathies are characterized by damage to the optic nerve and they can be due to various causes, such as glaucoma, autoimmune diseases, inflammation, infections, traumas, ischemia or compression. Glaucoma is the most common cause of optic nerve-related visual loss in adults, followed by nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy (NAION)[31]. The treatment for glaucoma is based on drugs and surgery that reduce intraocular pressure, whereas there is no treatment for NAION, nor to reverse the process nor for its recurrence[32]. Traumatic optic neuropathy is a cause of severe visual loss and it has no reliable treatment[33]. Neuromyelitis optica, also known as Devic’s disease, is an autoimmune, demylienating disorder which causes optic neuritis. Its prevalence is about 1-3/100000[34]. Nowadays neuromyelitis optica treatment is based in corticosteroids and plasma exchange for the acute attacks and immunosuppressant drugs for the maintenance therapy[35].

Currently, there are two clinical trials at phase I using MSCs to treat glaucoma (NCT02330978 and NCT021 44103), both of them are recruiting patients at the moment. One of them is being held at Medical School Ribeirao Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil (NCT023 30978), and the other one in Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Russia (NCT02144103). The Brazilian one uses an intravitreal injection of 106 autologous bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMMSCs) to assess the safety of the procedure and how it improves visual field and visual acuity. The Russian one uses a sub Tenon administration of autologous adipose-derived regenerative cells that have been extracted from the patient’s front abdominal wall. There are still no published results of these studies.

In the SCOTS clinical trial (NCT01920867), held at the Johns Hopkins Hospital, United States, there is one case reported of autoimmune optic neuropathy[36]. They made a vitrectomy and intra-optic injection of autologous bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) in one patient’s eye and retrobulbar, sub Tenon and intravitreal injection in the other eye, improving the visual acuity, macular thickness and fast retinal nerve fiber layer thickness. In this clinical trial there is also a case reported of idiopathic bilateral optic neuritis[37]. The patient received a retrobulbar injection, sub Tenon injection and intravitreal injection of autologous BMSCs for the right eye (OD), and vitrectomy and direct intra-optic nerve injection of autologous BMSCs for the left eye (OS), followed by intravenous infusion. After this procedure, there was an improvement in visual acuity in both eyes and remained stable at the 12 mo post-operative[37].

For neuromyelitis optica there is one active clinical trial at Foothills Medical Centre, University of Calgary, Canada (NCT01339455), two recruiting patients at Northwestern University, United States (NCT00787722), one ongoing clinical trial in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, China (NCT02249676), and one with unknown status at Nanjing University Medical College Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, China (NCT01364246). Most of them, active and recruiting clinical trials, use immunosuppressive treatment followed by an autologous hematopoietic stem cells transplantation. While the Nanjing University uses human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells transplantation. In this clinical trial (NCT01364246), 5 patients were followed for 18 mo including evaluation of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) levels, clinical course, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics and adverse events. and they reported an improvement in the symptoms and signs of neuromyelitis optica in four out of five patients treated[38]. There is another clinical trial for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with evidence of optic nerve involvement (NCT00395200), in which patients were treated with autologous bone marrow stem cells transplantation and that resulted in an increase in visual acuity, visual evoked response latency, and optic nerve area[39]. Some individual cases with neuromyelitis optica treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells have been reported[40].

Traumatic optic neuropathy is being studied in a clinical trial in China, by the Cell Biotherapy Center, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University (ChiCTR-TRC-14005093). Currently, they are recruiting patients and will use human umbilical cord derived mesenchymal stem cells transplantation. There are still no results.

There are also clinical trials for optic neuropathies, without considering what caused it. One of them is currently active (NCT02638714) and is held by Stem Cells of Arabia, Jordan. The patients will be treated with a transplantation of purified adult autologous bone marrow derived CD34+, CD133+, and CD271+ stem cells due to their diverse potentialities to differentiate into specific functional cell types to regenerate damaged optic nerves, supporting tissues and vasculature. They will use clinical-grade purification system (CliniMACS) and Microbeads to purify the target cell populations. There is another clinical trial on optic atrophy, currently recruiting patients (NCT01834079) in Chaitanya Hospital in Pune, India. Patients will receive three intrathecal injections of 100 million autologous bone marrow derived mononuclear cells per dose at intervals of 7 d. There are no results posted yet of these studies.


Advances in the knowledge of neuroprotective, immunomodulative and regenerative properties of MSCs are continuously generated by several preclinical studies in vitro and in vivo in animal models of various neurodegenerative diseases, including optic nerve and retinal diseases. It has given the opportunity to perform the translation of treatment approaches to the clinical practice. Since 2008, several first steps, projecting new treatment approaches, have been taken regarding the use of cell therapy in patients with neurodegenerative pathologies of optic nerve and retina. It is about Phase I or I/II clinical trials, which have as main objective the safety assessment of MSCs using various routes of administration, where the main route used is the intravitreal injection.

Nevertheless, of the 24 clinical trials registered on, there are only 2 clinical trials finished, 3 are ongoing, 15 are in recruiting patients phase, 3 are in unknown state and 1 clinical trial has been withdrawn without knowing the reasons for this decision. Most of the results published to date, are reduced to 6 cases reported in various retinal/optic nerve pathologies, their number of patients is very low, and these are exceptional cases, so, there is not enough evidence to get any valid and scientific conclusion.

Furthermore, most of these clinical trials use autologous cells, obtaining by bone marrow aspirates, so the final content to be administered is a concentrate of mononuclear cells, containing a very small percentage of MSCs (0.1%)[15], only four clinical trials use a specific concentration of MSCs without added another cell type. It is surprising that, although MSCs derived from adipose tissue are easier to obtain and in a higher concentration[17], there are only 2 clinical trials using this cell type, and one of them has been withdrawn without explanation. Regarding the use of allogenic MSCs, is limited to 2 clinical trials, which use MSCs derived from umbilical cord, however, it is not known whether their patients will receive immunosuppressive therapy.

Regarding to cell dose used in various clinical trials, there is a great variation from one to another. There is no consensus regarding the calculation of cell dose for the use of these cells through intravitreal injection. The clinical trials which use mononuclear cells aspirate, the doses are usually high (between 3 × 106 cells/0.1 mL and 30 × 106 cells/0.1 mL), whereas clinical trials using a concentrated purified of MSCs, doses are lower (1 × 106 cells/0.1 mL). However, the information collected by clinical and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform not specify the cell dose calculation or the cell production process.


It is important to know the development of cell therapy in relation to its use in the clinical practice. However, it is also important to recognize that, there is still a long way to go to reach clinical trials phase III-IV. One of the factors necessary to move forward is to establish unified criteria for the dose to be used, another important factor is the use of only MSCs without another cells added, because MSCs are immunoprivileged cells, and do not produce rejection. It is also important to use more frequently allogeneic MSC associated with cryopreservation processes. It can be the key to a better bioavailability of these cells, getting greater advantages of MSCs derived from adipose tissue, which are easier in obtaining and production. Therefore, it is necessary to continue preclinical and clinical studies to improve this new therapeutic tool.


Most of the clinical trials using MSCs are in I/II phase, recruiting patients or ongoing. The information available in about the procedure obtaining cells or the dose used in each clinical trial is not described in all cases. Hence, there are not enough published results to have scientific evidence about the use of these cells in retinal and optic nerve diseases.


Manuscript source: Invited manuscript

Specialty type: Cell and tissue engineering

Country of origin: Spain

Peer-review report classification

Grade A (Excellent): A

Grade B (Very good): B, B, B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P- Reviewer: Hong YJ, Nowak MS, Peng SM, Shih YF S- Editor: Qiu S L- Editor: A E- Editor: Lu YJ

1.  Bunce C, Wormald R. Leading causes of certification for blindness and partial sight in England & amp; Wales. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:58.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 159]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 148]  [Article Influence: 8.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Lamba DA, Karl MO, Reh TA. Strategies for retinal repair: cell replacement and regeneration. Prog Brain Res. 2009;175:23-31.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 63]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 4.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Bahat-Stroomza M, Barhum Y, Levy YS, Karpov O, Bulvik S, Melamed E, Offen D. Induction of adult human bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells into functional astrocyte-like cells: potential for restorative treatment in Parkinson’s disease. J Mol Neurosci. 2009;39:199-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Phinney DG, Isakova I. Plasticity and therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells in the nervous system. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11:1255-1265.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Xu W, Xu GX. Mesenchymal stem cells for retinal diseases. Int J Ophthalmol. 2011;4:413-21.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  McLaren A. Ethical and social considerations of stem cell research. Nature. 2001;414:129-131.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 128]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 6.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood. 2007;110:3499-3506.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1289]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1359]  [Article Influence: 84.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
8.  Vega A, Martín-Ferrero MA, Del Canto F, Alberca M, García V, Munar A, Orozco L, Soler R, Fuertes JJ, Huguet M. Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis With Allogeneic Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Transplantation. 2015;99:1681-1690.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 373]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 392]  [Article Influence: 49.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Ng TK, Fortino VR, Pelaez D, Cheung HS. Progress of mesenchymal stem cell therapy for neural and retinal diseases. World J Stem Cells. 2014;6:111-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87]  [Article Influence: 9.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Johnson TV, Bull ND, Hunt DP, Marina N, Tomarev SI, Martin KR. Neuroprotective effects of intravitreal mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:2051-2059.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 225]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 255]  [Article Influence: 18.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Li N, Li XR, Yuan JQ. Effects of bone-marrow mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into vitreous cavity of rat injured by ischemia/reperfusion. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:503-514.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 94]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 7.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Otani A, Dorrell MI, Kinder K, Moreno SK, Nusinowitz S, Banin E, Heckenlively J, Friedlander M. Rescue of retinal degeneration by intravitreally injected adult bone marrow-derived lineage-negative hematopoietic stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2004;114:765-774.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Zhang Y, Wang W. Effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on light-damaged retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:3742-3748.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 70]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Huang JH, Su QM, Yang J, Lv YH, He YC, Chen JC, Xu L, Wang K, Zheng QS. Sample sizes in dosage investigational clinical trials: a systematic evaluation. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2015;9:305-312.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Wexler SA, Donaldson C, Denning-Kendall P, Rice C, Bradley B, Hows JM. Adult bone marrow is a rich source of human mesenchymal ‘stem’ cells but umbilical cord and mobilized adult blood are not. Br J Haematol. 2003;121:368-74.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
16.  Bieback K, Kern S, Klüter H, Eichler H. Critical parameters for the isolation of mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood. Stem Cells. 2004;22:625-634.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 666]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 697]  [Article Influence: 38.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Klüter H, Bieback K. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006;24:1294-1301.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2248]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2374]  [Article Influence: 139.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Woods EJ, Perry BC, Hockema JJ, Larson L, Zhou D, Goebel WS. Optimized cryopreservation method for human dental pulp-derived stem cells and their tissues of origin for banking and clinical use. Cryobiology. 2009;59:150-157.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 106]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 92]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Marquez-Curtis LA, Janowska-Wieczorek A, McGann LE, Elliott JA. Mesenchymal stromal cells derived from various tissues: Biological, clinical and cryopreservation aspects. Cryobiology. 2015;71:181-197.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 219]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 227]  [Article Influence: 28.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Hartong DT, Berson EL, Dryja TP. Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006;368:1795-1809.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Bither PP, Berns LA. Stargardt’s disease: a review of the literature. J Am Optom Assoc. 1988;59:106-111.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Siqueira RC, Messias A, Voltarelli JC, Messias K, Arcieri RS, Jorge R. Resolution of macular oedema associated with retinitis pigmentosa after intravitreal use of autologous BM-derived hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:612-613.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Siqueira RC, Messias A, Messias K, Arcieri RS, Ruiz MA, Souza NF, Martins LC, Jorge R. Quality of life in patients with retinitis pigmentosa submitted to intravitreal use of bone marrow-derived stem cells (Reticell-clinical trial). Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015;6:29.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 64]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 74]  [Article Influence: 9.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Collaboration NCDRF. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet. 2016;387:1513-1530.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2146]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2207]  [Article Influence: 315.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Saaddine JB, Honeycutt AA, Narayan KM, Zhang X, Klein R, Boyle JP. Projection of diabetic retinopathy and other major eye diseases among people with diabetes mellitus: United States, 2005-2050. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1740-1747.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 228]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 253]  [Article Influence: 16.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CM, Klein R, Cheng CY, Wong TY. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2:e106-e116.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2195]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1860]  [Article Influence: 206.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Wong TY, Liew G, Mitchell P. Clinical update: new treatments for age-related macular degeneration. Lancet. 2007;370:204-206.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 95]  [Article Influence: 5.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Jonas JB, Witzens-Harig M, Arseniev L, Ho AD. Intravitreal autologous bone marrow-derived mononuclear cell transplantation: a feasibility report. Acta Ophthalmol. 2008;86:225-226.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Siqueira RC, Messias A, Gurgel VP, Simões BP, Scott IU, Jorge R. Improvement of ischaemic macular oedema after intravitreal injection of autologous bone marrow-derived haematopoietic stem cells. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:e174-e176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Park SS, Bauer G, Abedi M, Pontow S, Panorgias A, Jonnal R, Zawadzki RJ, Werner JS, Nolta J. Intravitreal autologous bone marrow CD34+ cell therapy for ischemic and degenerative retinal disorders: preliminary phase 1 clinical trial findings. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:81-89.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 118]  [Article Influence: 13.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Miller NR, Arnold AC. Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis and management of nonarteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy. Eye (Lond). 2015;29:65-79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 120]  [Article Influence: 13.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Katz DM, Trobe JD. Is there treatment for nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:458-463.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Chaon BC, Lee MS. Is there treatment for traumatic optic neuropathy? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:445-449.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Wingerchuk DM. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders. Continuum (Minneap Minn). 2010;16:105-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Jasiak-Zatonska M, Kalinowska-Lyszczarz A, Michalak S, Kozubski W. The Immunology of Neuromyelitis Optica-Current Knowledge, Clinical Implications, Controversies and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:273.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 81]  [Article Influence: 11.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Weiss JN, Levy S, Benes SC. Stem Cell Ophthalmology Treatment Study (SCOTS) for retinal and optic nerve diseases: a case report of improvement in relapsing auto-immune optic neuropathy. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10:1507-1515.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Weiss JN, Levy S, Malkin A. Stem Cell Ophthalmology Treatment Study (SCOTS) for retinal and optic nerve diseases: a preliminary report. Neural Regen Res. 2015;10:982-988.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Lu Z, Ye D, Qian L, Zhu L, Wang C, Guan D, Zhang X, Xu Y. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell therapy on neuromyelitis optica. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2012;9:250-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
39.  Connick P, Kolappan M, Crawley C, Webber DJ, Patani R, Michell AW, Du MQ, Luan SL, Altmann DR, Thompson AJ. Autologous mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: an open-label phase 2a proof-of-concept study. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11:150-156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 440]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 475]  [Article Influence: 43.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Greco R, Bondanza A, Vago L, Moiola L, Rossi P, Furlan R, Martino G, Radaelli M, Martinelli V, Carbone MR. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for neuromyelitis optica. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:447-453.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]