Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Stem Cells. Apr 26, 2025; 17(4): 102788
Published online Apr 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i4.102788
Enhancing the clinical translation of stem cell models by focusing on standardization and international regulatory cooperation
Wei Wang, An-Ran Song, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Youyang People’s Hospital, Chongqing 409800, China
Hong-Wen Liu, Yi-Kai Li, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China
ORCID number: Yi-Kai Li (0000-0003-0766-6051).
Co-corresponding authors: Hong-Wen Liu and Yi-Kai Li.
Author contributions: Wang W and Son g AR participated in drafting the manuscript; Wang W and Liu HW wrote the original draft; Li YK contributed to conceptualization and writing, reviewing, and editing of this manuscript; Liu HW and Li YK made equal contributions to this work and are jointly designated as co-corresponding authors of this manuscript; All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Yi-Kai Li, MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Professor, School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, No. 1023 South Shatai Road, Baiyun District, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China. ortho@smu.edu.cn
Received: November 1, 2024
Revised: February 12, 2025
Accepted: March 10, 2025
Published online: April 26, 2025
Processing time: 176 Days and 14.3 Hours

Abstract

The article by Granjeiro et al provided a thorough review of the role of stem cell models in the development of advanced therapy medicinal products. It emphasized the potential of stem cell models to refine preclinical studies and align with regulatory requirements for clinical applications. This article introduced a new perspective on enhancing the transition of stem cell research into clinical practice, focusing on the importance of international regulatory harmonization and the need for standardization in stem cell-based therapies.

Key Words: Stem cell models; Advanced therapy medicinal products; Tissue engineering; Preclinical studies; Clinical translation

Core Tip: Granjeiro et al discussed the role of stem cells in advanced therapy medicinal products for tissue regeneration and drug screening. This article emphasized the importance of international regulatory harmonization and standardized protocols to address current challenges and enhance the global clinical translation, safety, and consistency of stem cell-based therapies.



TO THE EDITOR

We read with great interest the article titled “Bioengineering breakthroughs: The impact of stem cell models on advanced therapy medicinal product development” by Granjeiro et al[1], recently published in the World Journal of Stem Cells. The article provided a comprehensive review of the critical role that stem cell models play in advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), particularly in providing alternatives to traditional preclinical testing methods. This discussion is timely and relevant, considering the increasing emphasis on reducing animal testing and improving the physiological relevance of preclinical models.

The freshness of this letter lies in its focus on two critical aspects that extend beyond the original review: The necessity of international regulatory harmonization and the urgent need for standardized protocols in the development of stem cell-based therapies. We believe that addressing these aspects is essential for facilitating the global clinical translation of stem cell models, which remains a significant challenge in the field[2,3]. To advance these goals, we propose the establishment of a global task force comprising regulatory agencies, research institutions, and industry stakeholders. This task force could develop unified guidelines for stem cell culture, differentiation, and quality control, leveraging existing frameworks such as the International Society for Stem Cell Research guidelines[4]. Such an initiative would harmonize regulatory approaches and foster international collaboration, ensuring that innovative therapies reach patients more efficiently and safely.

Firstly, while the original review acknowledged the role of regulatory frameworks in ensuring safety and efficacy, we propose that greater emphasis should be placed on the international harmonization of these regulations. Different regulatory approaches across regions currently create significant barriers to adopting ATMPs[5]. A more unified regulatory framework could streamline the approval process, making it easier for innovative stem cell therapies to reach patients worldwide[6]. For instance, efforts by the European Medicines Agency and the United States Food and Drug Administration to align their regulatory requirements for ATMPs have shown promising results[7]. Building on these achievements, we recommend expanding such collaborations to include emerging markets with evolving regulatory frameworks. Such an alignment would ensure patient safety and foster greater collaboration among international research institutions and regulatory bodies[8].

Secondly, we underscore the need for standardization in the protocols used for stem cell cultivation and differentiation. Variability in cell characteristics and differences in isolation and culture techniques can lead to inconsistent therapeutic outcomes, posing challenges for clinical application[9]. Recent advancements in good manufacturing practice-compliant protocols and the use of artificial intelligence for optimizing stem cell differentiation have demonstrated the feasibility of achieving high levels of standardization. For example, studies have successfully implemented artificial intelligence-driven platforms to predict and control stem cell differentiation trajectories, resulting in more reproducible outcomes[10]. Standardized protocols across laboratories could help minimize these discrepancies, ensuring that stem cell therapies are reproducible and reliable[11]. This focus on standardization is critical in clinical trials, where consistent results are crucial for gaining regulatory approval and achieving widespread clinical adoption[12].

In summary, while Granjeiro et al[1] contributed significantly to understanding the role of stem cell models in ATMP development, we believe that prioritizing international regulatory harmonization and protocol standardization is crucial for realizing the full potential of these therapies. Addressing these aspects can help bridge the gap between experimental models and clinical practice, ultimately leading to more effective and accessible patient treatments. We urge the scientific community to take immediate action by forming international consortia to develop and implement standardized protocols. At the same time, regulatory bodies should prioritize harmonizing their frameworks to facilitate global access to stem cell therapies.

CONCLUSION

Stem cell models hold significant promise for advancing ATMPs, offering new possibilities for tissue regeneration and drug development. However, the full potential of these models can only be realized through a greater focus on international regulatory harmonization and the establishment of standardized protocols. Addressing these challenges will enhance the safety, reproducibility, and accessibility of stem cell therapies, facilitating their transition from research settings to clinical applications and ultimately benefiting patients worldwide.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the reviewers for their comments that helped to improve the manuscript.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Cell and tissue engineering

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade B

Novelty: Grade A, Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B, Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B, Grade B

P-Reviewer: de Sousa EB; Liu LK S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Zheng XM

References
1.  Granjeiro JM, Borchio PGM, Ribeiro IPB, Paiva KBS. Bioengineering breakthroughs: The impact of stem cell models on advanced therapy medicinal product development. World J Stem Cells. 2024;16:860-872.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
2.  Iglesias-Lopez C, Agustí A, Vallano A, Obach M. Current landscape of clinical development and approval of advanced therapies. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2021;23:606-618.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in RCA: 27]  [Article Influence: 6.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Goula A, Gkioka V, Michalopoulos E, Katsimpoulas M, Noutsias M, Sarri EF, Stavropoulos C, Kostakis A. Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products Challenges and Perspectives in Regenerative Medicine. J Clin Med Res. 2020;12:780-786.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in RCA: 20]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Lovell-Badge R, Anthony E, Barker RA, Bubela T, Brivanlou AH, Carpenter M, Charo RA, Clark A, Clayton E, Cong Y, Daley GQ, Fu J, Fujita M, Greenfield A, Goldman SA, Hill L, Hyun I, Isasi R, Kahn J, Kato K, Kim JS, Kimmelman J, Knoblich JA, Mathews D, Montserrat N, Mosher J, Munsie M, Nakauchi H, Naldini L, Naughton G, Niakan K, Ogbogu U, Pedersen R, Rivron N, Rooke H, Rossant J, Round J, Saitou M, Sipp D, Steffann J, Sugarman J, Surani A, Takahashi J, Tang F, Turner L, Zettler PJ, Zhai X. ISSCR Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Clinical Translation: The 2021 update. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16:1398-1408.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 42]  [Cited by in RCA: 161]  [Article Influence: 40.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Horgan D, Metspalu A, Ouillade MC, Athanasiou D, Pasi J, Adjali O, Harrison P, Hermans C, Codacci-Pisanelli G, Koeva J, Szucs T, Cursaru V, Belina I, Bernini C, Zhuang S, McMahon S, Toncheva D, Thum T. Propelling Healthcare with Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products: A Policy Discussion. Biomed Hub. 2020;5:130-152.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in RCA: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Gomes KLG, da Silva RE, da Silva JB Junior, Bosio CGP, Novaes MRCG. Post-marketing authorisation safety and efficacy surveillance of advanced therapy medicinal products in Brazil, the European Union, the United States and Japan. Cytotherapy. 2023;25:1113-1123.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Seoane-Vazquez E, Shukla V, Rodriguez-Monguio R. Innovation and competition in advanced therapy medicinal products. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11:e9992.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in RCA: 35]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Cuende N, Ciccocioppo R, Forte M, Galipeau J, Ikonomou L, Levine BL, Srivastava A, Zettler PJ. Patient access to and ethical considerations of the application of the European Union hospital exemption rule for advanced therapy medicinal products. Cytotherapy. 2022;24:686-690.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Subbiah V. The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nat Med. 2023;29:49-58.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in RCA: 203]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Li Z, Napolitano A, Fedele M, Gao X, Napolitano F. AI identifies potent inducers of breast cancer stem cell differentiation based on adversarial learning from gene expression data. Brief Bioinform. 2024;25:bbae207.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Simpson S, Kaufmann MC, Glozman V, Chakrabarti A. Disease X: accelerating the development of medical countermeasures for the next pandemic. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20:e108-e115.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in RCA: 80]  [Article Influence: 16.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Đorđević S, Gonzalez MM, Conejos-Sánchez I, Carreira B, Pozzi S, Acúrcio RC, Satchi-Fainaro R, Florindo HF, Vicent MJ. Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12:500-525.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in RCA: 126]  [Article Influence: 42.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]