Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Stem Cells. Nov 26, 2024; 16(11): 974-977
Published online Nov 26, 2024. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v16.i11.974
Resilience and challenges: Evaluating the impact of stress conditions on mesenchymal stem cells across different passages
Yue Ding, Department of Organ Transplantation, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200000, China
Fang Lin, Shanghai Heart Failure Research Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai 200000, China
Xiao-Ting Liang, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China
Xiao-Ting Liang, Shanghai Heart Failure Research Center, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200000, China
ORCID number: Xiao-Ting Liang (0000-0003-3262-1859).
Co-first authors: Yue Ding and Fang Lin.
Author contributions: Ding Y and Lin F contributed equally to the conceptualization and drafting of the manuscript, fulfilling the responsibilities of co-first authors; Liang XT provided review and edits to refine the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 81500207 to Xiao-Ting Liang; and the Pyramid Talent Project, No. YQ677 to Yue Ding.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Xiao-Ting Liang, MD, PhD, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, No. 150 Jimo Road, Shanghai 200120, China. liangxt@tongji.edu.cn
Received: April 30, 2024
Revised: September 26, 2024
Accepted: October 31, 2024
Published online: November 26, 2024
Processing time: 210 Days and 3.9 Hours

Abstract

This article discussed a study by Almahasneh et al, which investigated how high glucose and severe hypoxia affected mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) at different passages. This research provides insights into the resilience of higher-passage MSCs under stress conditions, challenging the common use of lower passage MSCs in clinical settings. While this study offers valuable perspectives on the adaptability of MSCs, it relies mainly on in vitro results from a single cell line, limiting broader applicability. It highlights the need for more comprehensive in vivo studies to validate these findings and better understand MSC behavior in clinical scenarios.

Key Words: Mesenchymal stem cells; High glucose; Hypoxia; Cellular senescence; Passages

Core Tip: This article discussed the research by Almahasneh et al on the resilience of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) under high glucose and severe hypoxia conditions at different passages. Highlighting the adaptability of higher passage MSCs, this study challenges traditional preferences for lower passage MSCs for use in clinical treatments, especially under conditions simulating diabetic or ischemic environments. While offering novel insights into MSC adaptability are offered, the research’s reliance on in vitro tests from a single cell line highlights the need for more in-depth in vivo studies to ascertain the clinical relevance of these findings and broaden their applicability.



TO THE EDITOR

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are widely applied in clinical contexts due to their strong potential for self-renewal, multipotency, and immunomodulation. However, as passage numbers increase, MSCs undergo phenotypic changes associated with aging, including reduced proliferative capacity, weakened immunomodulatory effects, and diminished paracrine and antioxidative abilities[1]. The senescence represents a significant challenge, limiting the therapeutic efficacy and clinical applications of MSCs[2]. Overcoming these age-related limitations is crucial for maximizing the regenerative potential of MSCs in clinical treatments. The article by Almahasneh et al[3], published in World Journal of Stem Cells, adds valuable insights to the field by examining how high glucose levels and severe hypoxia affect MSCs across various passages. This work significantly contributes to regenerative medicine by challenging the traditional preference for early-passage MSCs, showing that later-passage MSCs maintain adaptability and functionality under stress, particularly in conditions mimicking diabetic or ischemic environments. This opens new possibilities for their use in therapeutic applications.

Strength and limitation

This study[3] underscores the adaptability of higher-passage MSCs under challenging conditions, questioning the common clinical preference for lower-passage cells. However, expanding the discussion to highlight the significance of the cellular microenvironment in determining the therapeutic efficacy of MSCs could further enhance the insights. Emerging evidence suggests that beyond passage number, microenvironmental factors such as oxygen tension, mechanical forces, soluble signaling molecules, and the extracellular matrix provide essential cues that influence MSC behavior post transplantation. Preconditioning involves exposing MSCs to various external stimuli that mimic the harsh conditions they face in their therapeutic environment, such as acidic pH, oxidative stress, or hypoxia[4,5]. These stimuli simulate key aspects of the microenvironment within injured or diseased tissues, helping MSCs adapt to stressful conditions before they are transplanted. By replicating elements of the microenvironment in vitro, preconditioning enhances the resilience of MSCs, ensuring that they are better equipped to survive, migrate, and function in challenging environments post-transplantation. Strategies such as preconditioning MSCs under hypoxic conditions[6] or utilizing biomaterials that mimic the natural extracellular matrix[7] can significantly improve MSC performance post-transplantation. Preconditioning by treating with proinflammatory cytokines can activate the immunosuppressive capabilities of MSCs, allowing them to modulate immune responses more effectively in inflammatory disease settings[8]. Therefore, incorporating strategies to modulate the microenvironment may significantly improve the practical application of MSCs in regenerative therapies. Nevertheless, the study has certain limitations that should be addressed in future research.

The current study[3] primarily focuses on observational data, leaving room for further in-depth mechanistic insights. In the discussion section, the authors proposed that specific pathways might be involved in stress responses, such as the protein kinase B/mammalian target of the rapamycin and p53 signaling pathways. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying MSC responses to specific stressors indicated in the current study remain unexplored. A more comprehensive investigation into how MSCs adjust their gene expression profiles and undergo epigenetic modifications in response to stress conditions would provide valuable insights. For example, Zielniok et al[9] used RNA sequencing to compare the gene expression profiles of bone marrow-derived MSCs after 6 hours of either exposure to hypoxia (2% O2) or treatment with 40 μM vadadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase 2 inhibitor. Their findings revealed 1770 differentially expressed genes between the vadadustat and hypoxia-treated groups. Among these, genes related to autophagy, phospholipid metabolism, and the toll-like receptor signaling cascade were upregulated, while those involved in the cytoskeleton and global genomic nucleotide excision repair pathways were downregulated. Isik et al[10] reported that hypoxia preconditioning amediated DNA hydroxymethylation in adipose-derived MSCs from a swine model of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. The synergistic induction of hypomethylation and hypoxia significantly enhanced the therapeutic efficacy of extracellular vesicles derived from human bone marrow MSCs, as evidenced by improved osteogenic differentiation and proangiogenic effects[11]. Therefore, the authors should consider conducting in-depth research into gene expression and epigenetic modifications, which could offer valuable insights into the observed phenomena.

This study[3] used human adipose-derived stem cells sourced from Lonza, with all findings based on a single cell line, which may limit the broader applicability of the results to other cell types. Furthermore, the authors did not specify key details about the donor characteristics, such as age or sex, both of which can significantly affect cellular properties. For instance, MSCs from older donors may exhibit signs of senescence as early as passage three[12], making such information crucial for evaluating their behavior and functionality.

This study[3] focused primarily on investigating the effects of single concentrations of high glucose and hypoxia on MSCs rather than systematically exploring the full range of concentration gradients that could more accurately reflect the variety of stress conditions MSCs may encounter. By examining only isolated concentrations, this approach may overlook critical subtleties in how MSCs respond to varying intensities of stress. For example, the cellular response to stress often involves time- and dose-dependent effects, where lower levels of stress may induce adaptive or protective mechanisms, while higher levels may trigger apoptosis or senescence[13,14]. While oxygen levels of approximately 5% enhance MSC proliferation, activate biosynthetic pathways, and support an overall hypermetabolic state, exposure to oxygen levels below 1% shifts MSCs toward a more quiescent state, where cellular metabolism depends predominantly on anaerobic glycolysis for energy production[15]. In the methodology section, the author describes using CoCl2 to mimic a hypoxic condition and refers to this treatment as “severe hypoxia” throughout the manuscript. When CoCl2 is used to simulate hypoxia, it’s important to recognize that this chemical agent stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, which then triggers a series of hypoxia-related cellular pathways[16]. Notably, CoCl2-induced hypoxia is not an exact replication of true oxygen deprivation, as it mimics only part of the hypoxic response, with a primary focus on hypoxia-inducible factor-1α stabilization. To validate the effectiveness and severity of CoCl2 treatment in inducing hypoxia, the manuscript should include data on the expression levels of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α together with other downstream hypoxia-responsive genes, providing a clearer picture of the extent to which the cells are experiencing true hypoxia.

While the focus on apoptosis and cellular senescence is valuable, the study[3] does not adequately explore other important factors such as the differentiation capacity and paracrine signaling. Furthermore, the reliance on in vitro models limits the applicability of the findings, as these controlled environments may not accurately reflect the complexity of in vivo interactions. This underscores the necessity for additional research using in vivo models to assess the clinical relevance of these results. Since MSCs exert their therapeutic effects largely through paracrine mechanisms - such as secreting growth factors, chemokines, and extracellular vesicles[17,18] - it is noteworthy that these aspects were not assessed in the study. Relying exclusively on in vitro data from one cell line may restrict the scope of conclusions, thereby constraining the broader applicability of the contexts. Moreover, there are some concerns with the presentation of data. For example, in Figure 4 of Almahasneh et al[3], the annexin V staining images do not include a total cell count, making it challenging to fully interpret the extent of apoptosis in the cell population. Improving data clarity would significantly enhance the robustness of the conclusions.

Future directions

The author of the study[3] proposed an innovative concept of ‘passage-stress matching’. While low-passage MSCs are generally believed to possess greater therapeutic potential than high-passage MSCs because of their baseline fitness and regenerative capacity, this concept suggests that high-passage MSCs might outperform low-passage-MSCs under specific stress conditions. To validate this concept, future research should focus on systematically testing higher-passage MSCs across a range of in vitro and in vivo stress conditions that reflect clinical conditions, such as ischemia, inflammation, and oxidative stress. It would be essential to design experiments that not only compare MSCs at different passages but also map how they perform under varying degrees of stress, assessing key therapeutic attributes such as cell survival, immunomodulation, and paracrine signaling. Additionally, studies should explore the molecular and epigenetic changes that occur in higher-passage MSCs, as this will provide insights into how stress conditions influence their therapeutic effectiveness over time.

Moreover, the application of “omics” technologies (e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) could help identify specific markers of passage-related stress resilience, offering a more detailed understanding of how different passages respond at the molecular level. These insights could guide the development of tailored preconditioning strategies that optimize MSC fitness for the microenvironments they may encounter post transplantation. Longitudinal studies following MSC transplantation, particularly in animal models that mimic human disease conditions, would further clarify how passage-stress matching can be harnessed to maximize therapeutic outcomes.

Conclusion

In summary, the study by Almahasneh et al[3] provides valuable insights into the selection of MSC passages for clinical applications. However, to improve its clinical applicability, the limitations of the study should be addressed. While the research offers foundational data, it lacks depth in exploring the complex in vivo interactions. The reliance on just one commercial cell line restricts the generalizability of the findings to MSCs from other sources. Additionally, the focus on in vitro findings does not adequately simulate the in vivo conditions. Moving forward, future research should incorporate a wider range of cell models and in vivo experiments to thoroughly validate the results. This would contribute to a deeper understanding of how to optimize MSCs for therapeutic applications across various disease conditions.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Cell and tissue engineering

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade A

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Wen RM S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Yuan YY

References
1.  Margiana R, Markov A, Zekiy AO, Hamza MU, Al-Dabbagh KA, Al-Zubaidi SH, Hameed NM, Ahmad I, Sivaraman R, Kzar HH, Al-Gazally ME, Mustafa YF, Siahmansouri H. Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cell in regenerative medicine: a narrative review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2022;13:366.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125]  [Article Influence: 62.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Liu J, Ding Y, Liu Z, Liang X. Senescence in Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Functional Alterations, Molecular Mechanisms, and Rejuvenation Strategies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 72]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 140]  [Article Influence: 35.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Almahasneh F, Abu-El-Rub E, Khasawneh RR, Almazari R. Effects of high glucose and severe hypoxia on the biological behavior of mesenchymal stem cells at various passages. World J Stem Cells. 2024;16:434-443.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (2)]
4.  Cehakova M, Ivanisova D, Strecanska M, Plava J, Varchulova Novakova Z, Nicodemou A, Harsanyi S, Culenova M, Bernatova S, Danisovic L. Rheumatoid Synovial Fluid and Acidic Extracellular pH Modulate the Immunomodulatory Activity of Urine-Derived Stem Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Hu C, Li L. Preconditioning influences mesenchymal stem cell properties in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22:1428-1442.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 304]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 270]  [Article Influence: 45.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Xu R, Sun Y, Chen Z, Yao Y, Ma G. Hypoxic Preconditioning Inhibits Hypoxia-induced Apoptosis of Cardiac Progenitor Cells via the PI3K/Akt-DNMT1-p53 Pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:30922.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Mogha P, Iyer S, Majumder A. Extracellular matrix protein gelatin provides higher expansion, reduces size heterogeneity, and maintains cell stiffness in a long-term culture of mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Cell. 2023;80:101969.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Ding Y, Liang X, Zhang Y, Yi L, Shum HC, Chen Q, Chan BP, Fan H, Liu Z, Tergaonkar V, Qi Z, Tse HF, Lian Q. Rap1 deficiency-provoked paracrine dysfunction impairs immunosuppressive potency of mesenchymal stem cells in allograft rejection of heart transplantation. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:386.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 10.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Zielniok K, Burdzinska A, Murcia Pienkowski V, Koppolu A, Rydzanicz M, Zagozdzon R, Paczek L. Gene Expression Profile of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Exposed to Hypoxic and Pseudohypoxic Preconditioning-An Analysis by RNA Sequencing. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Isik B, Thaler R, Goksu BB, Conley SM, Al-Khafaji H, Mohan A, Afarideh M, Abumoawad AM, Zhu XY, Krier JD, Saadiq IM, Tang H, Eirin A, Hickson LJ, van Wijnen AJ, Textor SC, Lerman LO, Herrmann SM. Hypoxic preconditioning induces epigenetic changes and modifies swine mesenchymal stem cell angiogenesis and senescence in experimental atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:240.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Man K, Brunet MY, Lees R, Peacock B, Cox SC. Epigenetic Reprogramming via Synergistic Hypomethylation and Hypoxia Enhances the Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Extracellular Vesicles for Bone Repair. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Alves-Paiva RM, do Nascimento S, De Oliveira D, Coa L, Alvarez K, Hamerschlak N, Okamoto OK, Marti LC, Kondo AT, Kutner JM, Bortolini MAT, Castro R, de Godoy JAP. Senescence State in Mesenchymal Stem Cells at Low Passages: Implications in Clinical Use. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:858996.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Galluzzi L, Bravo-San Pedro JM, Kepp O, Kroemer G. Regulated cell death and adaptive stress responses. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73:2405-2410.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 122]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 114]  [Article Influence: 14.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Garrido-Pascual P, Alonso-Varona A, Castro B, Burón M, Palomares T. H(2)O(2)-preconditioned human adipose-derived stem cells (HC016) increase their resistance to oxidative stress by overexpressing Nrf2 and bioenergetic adaptation. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11:335.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Moniz I, Ramalho-Santos J, Branco AF. Differential Oxygen Exposure Modulates Mesenchymal Stem Cell Metabolism and Proliferation through mTOR Signaling. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Nowak-Stępniowska A, Osuchowska PN, Fiedorowicz H, Trafny EA. Insight in Hypoxia-Mimetic Agents as Potential Tools for Mesenchymal Stem Cell Priming in Regenerative Medicine. Stem Cells Int. 2022;2022:8775591.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Zhou C, Zhang B, Yang Y, Jiang Q, Li T, Gong J, Tang H, Zhang Q. Stem cell-derived exosomes: emerging therapeutic opportunities for wound healing. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023;14:107.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Liang X, Ding Y, Zhang Y, Tse HF, Lian Q. Paracrine mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy: current status and perspectives. Cell Transplant. 2014;23:1045-1059.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 513]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 639]  [Article Influence: 71.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]