Copyright
©The Author(s) 2003.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 15, 2003; 9(7): 1580-1583
Published online Jul 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i7.1580
Published online Jul 15, 2003. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i7.1580
Table 1 Distribution of endoscopic findings according to CagA and VacA status
| CagA+ | VacA+ | CagA+VacA+(Phenotype 1) | CagA+VacA- | CagA-VacA+ | CagA-VacA-(Phenotype 2) | |
| DU(35) | 28 (80%) | 29 (82.8%) | 25 (71.4%) | 3 (8.6%) | 4 (11.4%) | 3 (8.6%) |
| GU(24) | 20 (83.3%) | 21 (87.5%) | 19 (79.2%) | 1 (4.2%) | 2 (8.3%) | 2 (8.3%) |
| NUD(48) | 18 (37.5%) | 32 (66.6%) | 18 (37.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | 14 (29.2%) | 16 (33.3%) |
| Total(107) | 66 (61.6%) | 82 (76.6%) | 62 (57.9%) | 4 (3.7%) | 20 (18.6%) | 21 (19.6%) |
-
Citation: Bulent K, Murat A, Esin A, Fatih K, MMMurat H, Hakan H, Melih K, Mehmet A, Bulent Y, Fatih H. Association of
CagA andVacA presence with ulcer and non-ulcer dyspepsia in a Turkish population. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(7): 1580-1583 - URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v9/i7/1580.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v9.i7.1580