Teng GJ, Bettmann MA, Hoopes PJ, Yang L. Comparison of a new stent and Wallstent for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a porcine model. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7(1): 74-79 [PMID: 11819736 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i1.74]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Gao Jun Teng, M.D., Department of Radiology, Zhong-Da Hospital, Southeast University, 87 Dingjiaqiao Road, Nanjing 210009, China. gjteng@public1.ptt.js.cn
Article-Type of This Article
Original Articles
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 15, 2001; 7(1): 74-79 Published online Feb 15, 2001. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v7.i1.74
Table 1 Scores of deployment factors
Stent types
Insert thru sheath
Tool function
Stent tracking
Balloon in/de flation
Stent expansion
Position
Catheter removal
Architecture & visibility
Cordis
1 ± 0.0
1 ± 0.0
1.07 ± 0.27
1 ± 0.0
1.14 ± 0.53
1.29 ± 0.61
1 ± 0.0
1.86 ± 0.54
Wallstent
1 ± 0.0
*
2.17 ± 0.84
*
1.00 ± 0.00
*
1.75 ± 0.87
2.42 ± 0.52
Table 2 Recoil data in Cordis stent
Interval
Diameter (mm)
Length (CM)
Proximal
Middle
Distal
Overall
Imm post-TIPS
7.46 ± 0.80
7.32 ± 0.70
7.43 ± 0.73
7.40 ± 0.73
4.35 ± 0.33
2 weeks
7.51 ± 0.79
7.25 ± 0.73
7.50 ± 0.74
7.42 ± 0.74
4.32 ± 0.32
Change (%)
+0.67
-0.96
+0.94
+0.27
-0.69
Table 3 Recoil data in Wallstent
Interval
Diameter (mm)
Length (CM)
Proximal
Middle
Distal
Overall
Imm post-TIPS
9.17 ± 0.94
7.42 ± 0.60
7.72 ± 0.71
7.98 ± 1.05
4.83 ± 0.42
2 weeks
9.28 ± 0.83
7.67 ± 0.53
7.94 ± 0.52
8.22 ± 0.90
4.58 ± 0.48
Change (%)
+1.2
+3.37
+2.77
+3.01
-5.18
Table 4 Quantified histological proliferation in specimens with Cordis stent vs. Wallstent
Region
Thickness (mm)
Proliferation area/total area (%)
Cordis stent
Wallstent
P value*
Cordis stent
Wallstent
P value*
Hepatic
2.04 ± 1.28
1.85 ± 0.96
0.66
57.49 ± 23.60
51.43 ± 24.61
0.74
Middle
1.42 ± 0.82
1.31 ± 0.87
0.63
49.89 ± 17.31
47.91 ± 20.12
0.60
Portal
2.46 ± 0.98
2.38 ± 0.23
0.61
71.88 ± 21.18
69.97 ± 29.45
0.57
Average
2.18 ± 1.07
2.00 ± 0.02
0.73
59.18 ± 23.06
51.66 ± 25.11
0.78
Citation: Teng GJ, Bettmann MA, Hoopes PJ, Yang L. Comparison of a new stent and Wallstent for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in a porcine model. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7(1): 74-79