Copyright
©The Author(s) 1999.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 15, 1999; 5(6): 511-514
Published online Dec 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i6.511
Published online Dec 15, 1999. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v5.i6.511
Table 1 Weight (g) of tumor taken from four different groups
Group | Liver tumor | Armpit tumor |
DHAQ-PBCA-NP | ||
1 | 0.000 | 0.215 |
2 | 0.000 | 0.060 |
3 | 0.000 | 0.005 |
4 | 0.000 | 0.015 |
5 | 0.030 | 0.015 |
ADR | ||
1 | 0.820 | 0.100 |
2 | 0.000 | 0.050 |
3 | 0.675 | 0.137 |
4 | 0.210 | 0.410 |
DHAQ | ||
1 | 0.585 | 0.270 |
2 | 0.650 | 0.120 |
3 | 0.000 | 0.065 |
4 | 0.000 | 0.082 |
5 | 0.500 | 0.066 |
0.9% NS | ||
1 | 1.320 | 1.160 |
2 | 1.530 | 1.026 |
3 | 1.000 | 0.635 |
4 | 0.420 | 0.670 |
Table 2 Rate of tumor inhibition (RTI, %) of each group of nude mice
Drug | RTI (orthotopic) | RTI (heterotopic) |
DHAQ | 67.49a | 86.18d |
ADR | 60.07b | 80.03e |
DHAQ-PBCA-0.9%NS | 99.44c | 92.90f |
Table 3 The cell proliferative activity of tumor of each nude mice
DHAQ-PBCA-NP | DHAQ | ADR | 0.9%NS | |||||||||||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
PCNA(%) | 7 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 82 | 10 | 95 | 10 | 90 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
-x±s (%) | 31.0 ± 23.0 a | 76 ± 13.4b | 85.5 ± 12.7c | 96.3 ± 4.8 |
Table 4 The LD50 of DHAQ-PBCA-NP, DHAQ and PBCA-NP i.v. in mice
Group | n | LD50(mg/kg, P = 0.95)* | ||
7 d | 14 d | 21 d | ||
DHAQ | 60 | 12.8 ± 1.9 | 8.2 ± 1.7 | 6.1 ± 1.0 |
DHAQ-NP | 60 | 309.9 ± 26.2 | 301.0 ± 28.3 | 299.0 ± 24.2 |
DHAQ-PBCA-NP | 60 | 16.9 ± 3.9 | 12.3 ± 2.7 | 10.1 ± 1.9 |
- Citation: Zhang ZR, He Q, Liao GT, Bai SH. Study on the anticarcinogenic effect and acute toxicity of liver-targeting mitoxantrone nanoparticles. World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5(6): 511-514
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v5/i6/511.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v5.i6.511