Brief Reports
Copyright ©The Author(s) 1998.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 15, 1998; 4(2): 181-182
Published online Apr 15, 1998. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v4.i2.181
Table 1 The serum levels of AFP, AFU and SA among patients in the three groups (x ± s)
GroupsAFP (μg/L)AFU (nkat/L)SA (mg/L)
Control10.2 ± 9.8106.0 ± 36.5513.7 ± 57.8
Cirrhosis14.4 ± 9.0126.8 ± 52.1522.7 ± 70.5
HCC71.7 ± 38.8bd284.5 ± 102.6bd636.7 ± 76.6bd
Table 2 Positive rates of AFP, AFU and SA among the three groups
GroupsAFU
AFU
SA
n(%)n(%)n(%)
Controls1(3.3)1(3.3)2(6.7)
Cirrhosis2(6.7)4(13.3)5(16.7)
HCC21(70.0)23(76.7)21(70.0)
Table 3 Significance of AFP, AFU and SA (%)
AFPAFUSA
Sensitivity70.0 (21/30)76.7 (23/30)70.0 (21/30)
Specificity95.0 (57/60)91.7 (55/60)88.3 (53/60)
Positive predictive value87.5 (21/24)82.1 (23/28)75.0 (21/28)
Negative predictive value86.4 (57/66)88.7 (55/62)85.5 (53/62)
Accuracy86.7 (78/90)86.7 (78/90)82.2 (74/90)
Table 4 Results of combined measurement of serum AFP, AFU and SA in the three groups
GroupsPostivity
n%
Controls00.0
Cirrhosis13.3
HCC2686.7
Table 5 Comparison between AFP and AFU in patients with HCC
AFPAFU
PositiveNegativeTotal
Positive16521
Negative729
Total23730