Huang YX, He HY, Chen K, Liu HD, Zu D, Liang C, Bao QM, Hu YC, Liu GX, Zhong YK, Zhang CK, Deng MC, He YH, Jing J, Shi Y, Xu SF, Teng YS, Ye Z, Cheng XD. Prognostic impact and reasons for variability by tumor location in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(44): 4709-4724 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i44.4709]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xiang-Dong Cheng, MD, Professor, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 East Banshan Road, Hangzhou 310022, Zhejiang Province, China. yezuqscx@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2024; 30(44): 4709-4724 Published online Nov 28, 2024. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v30.i44.4709
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer patient samples, n = 3287, n (%)
Characteristics
Number of cases
Gender
Male
2541 (77.3)
Female
746 (22.7)
Age
< 60
1191 (36.2)
≥ 60
2096 (63.8)
BMI
≤ 18
296 (9.0)
18-24
2090 (63.6)
≥ 24
901 (27.4)
Family history
No
2102 (63.9)
Yes
1185 (36.1)
Smoking history
No
1767 (53.8)
Yes
1520 (46.2)
Drinking history
No
2261 (68.8)
Yes
1026 (31.2)
Surgery methods
Open
2274 (84.4)
Laparoscopy
513 (15.6)
Range of resection
Proximal
187 (5.7)
Distal
1719 (52.3)
Total
1381 (42.0)
Tumor location
Middle
1007 (30.6)
Lower
507 (15.4)
Upper
1721 (52.4)
Total
52 (1.6)
Differentiation
Well
22 (0.7)
Well-moderate
61 (1.9)
Moderate
771 (23.5)
Moderate-poor
1300 (39.5)
Poor
1133 (34.5)
Pathological type
Adenocarcinoma
2283 (87.7)
PMGC
206 (6.3)
MGC
198 (6.0)
Vascular tumor thrombus
No
1720 (52.3)
Yes
1567 (47.7)
Nerve invasion
No
1718 (52.3)
Yes
1569 (47.7)
Maximum tumor diameter (cm)
< 5
1982 (60.3)
≥ 5
1305 (39.7)
Tumor depth
T1
622 (18.9)
T2
447 (13.6)
T3
203 (6.2)
T4
2015 (61.3)
Lymph node metastasis
N0
1142 (34.7)
N1
622 (18.9)
N2
703 (21.4)
N3
820 (24.9)
pTNM
I
788 (24.0)
II
733 (22.3)
III
1766 (53.7)
CEA
< 5
2578 (78.4)
≥ 5
709 (21.6)
CA19-9
< 37
2573 (78.3)
≥ 37
714 (21.7)
CA125
< 35
3101 (94.3)
≥ 35
186 (5.7)
AFP
< 10
3110 (94.6)
≥ 10
177 (5.4)
CA242
< 15
2735 (83.2)
≥ 15
552 (16.8)
CA72-4
< 6.9
2661 (81.0)
≥ 6.9
626 (19.0)
Table 2 Five-year overall survival of patients with different tumor locations, %
Tumor location
OS
1-year
2-year
3-year
4-year
5-year
Upper
89.7
73.3
52.3
40.6
32.2
Middle
93.5
78.1
53.6
41.8
30.4
Lower
91.2
77.9
57.8
44.4
33.5
Total
78.8
53.8
36.5
26.9
25.0
Table 3 Correlations between tumor location and clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer patients
Characteristics
Tumor location
Middle
Lower
Upper
Total
P value
Gender
Male
390
1285
826
40
< 0.001
Female
117
436
181
12
Age
< 60
228
692
248
23
< 0.001
≥ 60
279
1029
759
29
BMI
≤ 18
40
161
89
6
0.354
18-24
306
1107
645
32
≥ 24
161
453
273
14
Family history
No
320
1125
629
28
0.177
Yes
187
596
378
24
Smoking history
No
290
935
515
27
0.140
Yes
217
786
492
25
Drinking history
No
364
1178
682
37
0.409
Yes
143
543
325
15
Range of resection
Proximal
9
1
177
0
< 0.001
Distal
197
1515
5
2
Total
301
205
825
50
Differentiation
Well
2
15
5
0
< 0.001
Well-moderate
4
37
19
1
Moderate
101
363
300
7
Moderate-poor
193
693
397
17
Poor
207
613
286
27
Pathological type
Adenocarcinoma
460
1509
871
43
0.131
PMGC
20
111
72
3
MGC
27
101
64
6
Vascular tumor thrombus
No
281
923
501
15
0.001
Yes
226
798
506
37
Nerve invasion
No
266
1023
421
8
< 0.001
Yes
241
698
586
44
Maximum tumor diameter
< 5 cm
344
1129
505
4
< 0.001
≥ 5 cm
163
592
502
48
Tumor depth
T1
103
433
86
0
< 0.001
T2
80
265
100
2
T3
40
96
64
3
T4
284
927
757
47
Lymph node metastasis
N0
196
624
318
4
< 0.001
N1
101
331
186
4
N2
95
350
244
14
N3
115
416
259
30
pTNM
I
135
501
150
2
< 0.001
II
136
377
218
2
III
236
843
639
48
CEA
< 5
424
1369
753
32
< 0.001
≥ 5
83
352
254
20
CA19-9
< 37
423
1365
752
33
< 0.001
≥ 37
84
356
255
19
CA125
< 35
474
1635
950
42
< 0.001
≥ 35
33
86
57
10
AFP
< 10
484
1626
954
46
0.197
≥ 10
23
95
53
6
CA242
< 15
439
1448
812
36
0.001
≥ 15
68
273
195
16
CA72-4
< 6.9
432
1391
802
36
0.008
≥ 6.9
75
330
205
16
Table 4 Spearman analysis of the correlation between tumor location and clinicopathological data
Characteristics
Tumor location
Spearman correlation
P value
Gender
-0.056
0.001
Age
0.148
< 0.001
BMI
-0.022
0.197
Family history
0.019
0.279
Smoking history
0.040
0.020
Drinking history
0.022
0.202
Range of resection
0.256
< 0.001
Differentiation
-0.092
< 0.001
Pathological type
0.041
0.019
Vascular tumor thrombus
0.054
0.002
Nerve invasion
0.128
< 0.001
Maximum tumor diameter
0.169
< 0.001
Tumor depth
0.190
< 0.001
Lymph node metastasis
0.077
< 0.001
pTNM
0.159
< 0.001
CEA
0.083
< 0.001
CA19-9
0.080
< 0.001
CA125
0.013
0.452
AFP
0.014
0.410
CA242
0.064
< 0.001
CA72-4
0.048
0.006
Table 5 Tumor markers characteristics of gastric cancer patient samples (male and female, n = 3287), n (%)
Characteristics
Male
Female
Age
< 60
852 (33.5)
339 (45.4)
≥ 60
1689 (66.5)
407 (54.6)
CEA
< 5
1949 (76.7)
629 (84.3)
≥ 5
592 (23.3)
117 (15.7)
CA19-9
< 37
1988 (78.2)
585 (78.4)
≥ 37
553 (21.8)
161 (21.6)
CA242
< 15
2125 (83.6)
610 (81.8)
≥ 15
416 (16.4)
136 (18.2)
CA72-4
< 6.9
2051 (80.7)
610 (81.8)
≥ 6.9
490 (19.3)
136 (18.2)
Table 6 Logistic regression analysis of multiple clinicopathological characteristic variables related to the location of gastric cancer (female)
P value
OR
Middle
CA19-9
0.041
2.339
CA72-4
< 0.001
7.052
Lower
Age
0.003
0.387
CEA
0.034
0.312
CA72-4
< 0.001
7.104
Upper
Age
< 0.001
0.150
CEA
0.010
0.241
CA72-4
< 0.001
8.152
Table 7 Logistic regression analysis of multiple clinicopathological characteristic variables related to the location of gastric cancer (male)
P value
OR
Middle
CEA
< 0.001
3.545
CA19-9
< 0.001
2.246
Lower
CEA
< 0.001
2.869
CA19-9
< 0.001
1.932
Upper
Age
< 0.001
0.501
CEA
< 0.001
2.473
CA19-9
0.015
1.539
Citation: Huang YX, He HY, Chen K, Liu HD, Zu D, Liang C, Bao QM, Hu YC, Liu GX, Zhong YK, Zhang CK, Deng MC, He YH, Jing J, Shi Y, Xu SF, Teng YS, Ye Z, Cheng XD. Prognostic impact and reasons for variability by tumor location in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2024; 30(44): 4709-4724