Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 21, 2023; 29(47): 6138-6147
Published online Dec 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i47.6138
Table 1 Patient clinicopathologic characteristics
Characteristics
No. of patients, n (%)
Gender
                Male367 (77.4)
                Female107 (22.6)
Age (yr), median (range)60 (38-84)
Tumor size (mm), median (range)23 (3-73)
Tumor location
                Upper third28 (5.9)
                Middle third303 (63.9)
                Lower third143 (30.2)
Paris classification
                  0-I95 (20.0)
                  0-II309 (65.2)
                  0-III70 (14.8)
Depth of invasion
                MM152 (32.1)
                SM180 (16.9)
                SM2106 (22.3)
                SM3136 (28.7)
Differentiation
                Well103 (21.7)
                Moderate279 (58.9)
                Poor92 (19.4)
INF pattern
                INF-a196 (41.4)
                INF-b232 (48.9)
                INF-c46 (9.7)
Tumor budding64 (13.5)
LVI27 (5.7)
LNM
                Yes90 (19.0)
                No384 (81.0)
Dissected LN, median (range)18.0 (12-53)
Table 2 Comparisons of clinicopathological characteristics between lymph node metastasis positive and lymph node metastasis negative group
VariableTraining set (n = 332)
P valueValidation set (n = 142)
P value
LNM(-)LNM(+)LNM(-)LNM(+)
Gender0.2980.913
            Male201518420
            Female6812317
Age (yr), median (range)60 (42-80)60 (45-84)0.20460 (38-78)58 (47-76)0.522
Tumor size, (cm), mean ± SD2.23 ± 1.212.65 ± 0.990.0082.07 ± 0.972.61 ± 0.860.008
Tumor location, n (%)0.0950.702
            Upper third14671
            Middle third181476213
            Lower third74104613
Paris classification, n (%)0.2820.158
            0-I4614269
            0-II186377412
            0-III3712156
Depth of invasion, n (%)< 0.001< 0.001
            MM1003472
            SM1536192
            > SM1116544923
Differentiation, n (%)0.0150.029
            Well778153
            Moderate148388013
            Poor44172011
INF pattern, n (%)0.0010.014
            INF-a12513535
            INF-b123415216
            INF-c219106
Tumor budding, n (%)0.0090.009
            No2414810318
            Low19885
            High9744
LVI, n (%)0.0050.004
            Yes10845
            No2595511122
Table 3 Multivariate logistic analysis of risk factors for lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
FactorsTraining set
Validation set
OR
95%CI
P value
OR
95%CI
P value
Tumor size (cm)1.3651.081-1.7230.0091.7501.139-2.6880.011
Invasive depth
            MMReferenceReference
            SM13.7740.907-15.6960.0682.4740.325-18.8560.382
            > SM115.5174.707-51.1580.00111.0312.463-49.4010.002
Tumor differentiation
            Well or cisReferenceReference
            Moderate2.4230.807-9.4510.0720.7150.179-2.8560.635
            Poor3.6701.465-9.1980.0064.0780.977-17.0260.054
INF pattern
            INF-aReferenceReference
            INF-b3.2051.637-6.2740.0013.2621.114-9.5520.031
            INF-c4.1211.566-10.8430.0046.3601.623-24.9220.008
Tumor budding
            Low2.1140.875-5.1080.0963.8150.978-14.8130.054
            High3.9051.387-10.9950.0104.7691.315-17.2900.017
            NoReferenceReference
LVI
            NoReferenceReference
            Yes3.7671.422-9.9790.0084.4081.346-14.4380.014