Li SY, Yang MQ, Liu YM, Sun MJ, Zhang HJ. Endoscopic and pathological characteristics of de novo colorectal cancer: Retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(18): 2836-2849 [PMID: 37274065 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2836]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hui-Jing Zhang, MD, Professor, Department of Endoscopy, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, No. 155 Nanjing North Street, Heping District, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China. hjzhang@cmu.edu.cn
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2023; 29(18): 2836-2849 Published online May 14, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i18.2836
Table 1 The clinical information of de novo and carcinoma in adenoma colorectal cancers
De novo (n = 33)
CIA (n = 30)
χ2
P value
Clinical information
Age (%)
> 55
30 (90.9)
25 (83.3)
0.814
> 0.05
< 55
3 (9.1)
5 (16.7)
Gender (%)
Male
16 (48.5)
16 (53.3)
0.148
> 0.05
Female
17 (51.5)
14 (46.7)
Smoking history (%)
Yes
27 (81.8)
19 (63.3)
2.725
> 0.05
No
6 (18.2)
11 (36.7)
Location (%)
Proximal
7 (21.2)
21 (70.0)
15.149
< 0.05
Distal
26 (78.8)
9 (30.0)
Depth of invasion
M
8 (24.2)
9 (30.0)
1.504
> 0.05
SMp
9 (27.3)
11 (36.7)
SMd
16 (48.5)
10 (33.3)
Treatment (%)
Surgery
21 (63.6)
16 (53.3)
0.688
> 0.05
Endoscopy
12 (36.4)
14 (46.7)
Supplement chemotherapy (%)
Yes
21 (63.6)
12 (40.0)
3.520
> 0.05
No
12 (36.4)
18 (60.0)
Distal metastasis (%)
Yes
5 (15.2)
2 (6.7)
1.145
> 0.05
No
28 (84.8)
28 (93.3)
Overall survival (%)
1 yr
33 (100.0)
30 (100.0)
3 yr
30 (90.9)
28 (93.3)
5 yr
23 (69.7)
28 (93.3)
DSS
Yes
26 (78.8)
28 (93.3)
2.715
> 0.05
No
7 (21.2)
2 (6.7)
Endoscopic gross characteristics
Size%
1 cm < S ≤ 2 cm
14 (42.4)
9 (30.0)
30.514
< 0.05
≤ 1 cm
16 (48.5)
0 (0.0)
> 2 cm
3 (9.1)
21 (70.0)
Macroscopic type%
Is
5 (15.2)
6 (20.0)
35.187
< 0.05
IIa + IIc
11 (33.3)
1 (3.3)
IIc
17 (51.5)
4 (13.3)
Is + IIc
0 (0.0)
19 (63.3)
Surface change
Erosion
24 (72.7)
13 (43.3)
9.457
< 0.05
Ulceration
2 (6.1)
11 (36.7)
None
7 (21.2)
6 (20.0)
Color change
Reddened mucosa
26 (78.8)
2 (6.7)
33.104
< 0.05
None
7 (21.2)
28 (93.3)
NICE
Type 1
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
> 0.05
Type 2
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Type 3
33 (100.0)
30 (100.0)
Sano
I
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
5.292
< 0.05
II
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
IIIA
17 (51.5)
7 (23.3)
IIIB
16 (48.5)
23 (76.7)
JNET
1
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
3.094
> 0.05
2A
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2B
12 (36.4)
5 (16.7)
3
21 (63.6)
25 (83.3)
Chemical staining (crystal violet)
Pit pattern
Vi
1 (3.0)
6 (20.0)
15.774
< 0.05
Vn
13 (39.4)
15 (50.0)
Vi + Vn
19 (57.6)
5 (16.7)
IV + Vi
0 (0.0)
4 (13.3)
Pit pattern at the edge of the tumors
I
33 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
63.000
< 0.05
III + VI
0 (0.0)
30 (100.0)
Surrounding mucosa
Pulling
Yes
9 (27.3)
21 (70.0)
11.501
< 0.05
No
24 (72.7)
9 (30.0)
Converging folds
Yes
27 (81.8)
15 (50.0)
7.159
< 0.05
No
6 (18.2)
15 (50.0)
CSM
CSM1
11 (33.3)
4 (13.3)
3.553
> 0.05
CSM2
17 (51.5)
21 (70.0)
CSM3
5 (15.2)
5 (16.7)
Table 2 The endoscopic characteristics in de novo and carcinoma in adenoma groups
De novo (n = 22)
CIA (n = 20)
χ2
P value
Budding
BD1
8 (24.2)
4 (13.3)
6.161
> 0.05
BD2
8 (24.2)
6 (20.0)
BD3
11 (33.3)
6 (20.0)
None
5 (18.2)
14 (46.7)
Grading
G1
6 (18.2)
13 (43.3)
8.878
> 0.05
G2
11 (33.3)
9 (30.0)
G1-2
10 (30.3)
8 (26.7)
G3-2
6 (18.2)
0 (0.0)
TIL
Yes
27 (81.8)
19 (63.3)
2.725
> 0.05
No
6 (18.2)
11 (36.7)
Perineural infiltration
Yes
16 (48.5)
3 (10.0)
11.050
< 0.05
No
17 (51.5)
27 (90.0)
Lymphovascular invasion
Yes
16 (48.5)
7 (23.3)
4.289
< 0.05
No
17 (51.5)
23 (76.7)
Growth pattern
INFa
0 (0.0)
27 (90.0)
63.000
< 0.05
INFb
0 (0.0)
3 (10.0)
INFc
33 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
Lymph node metastasis
Yes
10 (30.3)
1 (3.3)
7.931
> 0.05
No
23 (69.7)
29 (96.7)
Adjacent lesions
Inflammation
33 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
63.000
< 0.05
Adenoma
0 (0.0)
17 (56.7)
Hyperplasia
0 (0.0)
13 (43.3)
IHC-E-cadherin
No staining
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
22.609
< 0.05
Weak
17 (51.5)
2 (6.7)
Moderate
15 (48.5)
19 (63.3)
Strong
0 (0.0)
9 (30.0)
IHC-Vimentin
No staining
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
23.182
< 0.05
Weak
13 (39.4)
18 (60.0)
Moderate
1 (3.0)
10 (33.3)
Strong
19 (57.6)
2 (6.7)
Table 3 The risk factors are related to the depth of invasion
Depth of invasion
M
SM-S
SM-d and deeper
r
P value
Size, %
-0.002
> 0.05
1 cm < S ≤ 2 cm
1 (12.5)
0 (0.0)
13 (81.3)
≤ 1 cm
7 (87.5)
9 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
> 2 cm
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
3 (18.8)
Growth pattern
> 0.05
IFNa
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
IFNb
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
IFNc
8 (100.0)
9 (100.0)
16 (100.0)
Differential degree
0.904
< 0.001
G1
5 (62.5)
1 (11.1)
0 (0.0)
G2
3 (37.5)
8 (88.9)
0 (0.0)
G1-2
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
10 (62.5)
G3-2
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
6 (37.5)
Macroscopic type
-0.093
> 0.05
Is
2 (25.0)
0 (0.0)
13 (81.3)
IIa + IIc
6 (75.0)
9 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
IIc
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
3 (18.8)
Is + IIc
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
NICE
> 0.05
Type 1
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Type 2
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Type 3
8 (100.0)
9 (100.0)
16 (100.0)
Sano
0.938
< 0.001
I
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
II
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
IIIA
8 (100.0)
9 (100.0)
0 (0.0)
IIIB
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
16 (100.0)
JNET
0.649
< 0.001
1
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2A
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
2B
5 (62.5)
7 (77.8)
0 (0.0)
3
3 (37.5)
2 (22.2)
16 (100.0)
Pit pattern
-0.491
< 0.001
Vi
1 (12.5)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Vn
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
13 (81.3)
Vi + Vn
7 (87.5)
9 (100.0)
3 (18.8)
IV + Vi
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Pit pattern at the edge of the tumors
> 0.05
I
8 (100.0)
9 (100.0)
16 (100.0)
III + VI
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Surrounding mucosa
Pulling
-0.567
< 0.001
Yes
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
9 (56.3)
No
8 (100.0)
9 (100.0)
7 (43.8)
Converging folds
-0.62
< 0.001
Yes
3 (37.5)
8 (88.9)
16 (100.0)
No
5 (62.5)
1 (11.1)
0 (0.0)
CSM
-0.796
< 0.001
CSM1
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
11 (68.8)
CSM2
3 (37.5)
9 (100.0)
5 (31.3)
CSM3
5 (62.5)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
Table 4 The risk factors are related to tumor budding
BD1
BD2
BD3
No budding
r
P value
Infiltrative depth, %
0.669
< 0.001
M
0 (0.0)
3 (21.4)
0 (0.0)
14 (70.0)
SMp
10 (83.3)
1 (7.1)
3 (17.6)
SMd
2 (16.7)
10 (71.4)
14 (82.4)
Lymphovascular invasion
0.663
< 0.001
Yes
2 (28.6)
4 (21.1)
16 (94.1)
1 (5.0)
No
5 (71.4)
15 (78.9)
1 (5.9)
19 (95.0)
Lymph node metastasis
0.489
< -0.001
Yes
1 (14.3)
1 (5.3)
9 (52.9)
0 (0.0)
No
6 (85.7)
18 (94.7)
8 (41.7)
20 (100.0)
Perineural infiltration
0.601
< 0.001
Yes
2 (28.6)
4 (21.1)
13 (76.5)
0 (0.0)
No
5 (71.4)
15 (78.9)
4 (23.5)
20 (100.0)
Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes
0.476
< 0.001
Yes
7 (100.0)
19 (100.0)
14 (82.4)
6 (30.0)
No
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
3 (17.6)
14 (70.0)
Differential degree
0.706
< 0.001
G1
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
19 (95.0)
G1-2
2 (28.6)
9 (47.4)
7 (41.2)
0 (0.0)
G2
5 (71.4)
10 (52.6)
4 (23.5)
1 (5.0)
G3-2
0 (0.0)
0 (0.0)
6 (35.3)
0 (0.0)
Citation: Li SY, Yang MQ, Liu YM, Sun MJ, Zhang HJ. Endoscopic and pathological characteristics of de novo colorectal cancer: Retrospective cohort study. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(18): 2836-2849