Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Gastroenterol. Mar 28, 2023; 29(12): 1863-1874
Published online Mar 28, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i12.1863
Published online Mar 28, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i12.1863
Table 1 The respective characteristics of fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy
EUS-FNA | EUS-FNB | |
Recommended needle caliber | 22-25G | 22G or thicker |
Recommended negative pressure | Suction or wet suction | Stylet retraction |
Recommended puncture technique | Fanning or DKM | Fanning or torque |
Recommended number of needle passes | 1-3 times for histological diagnosis, depending on site and size | Three times for NGS |
Diagnostic accuracy | FNB ≥ FNA | |
Tissue volume | FNB ≥ FNA | |
Suitability for NGS | FNB ≥ FNA | |
MOSE | Recommended for use in combination | Recommended for use in combination |
Complications | Rare | Rare |
Cost-effectiveness | FNB ≥ FNA |
Table 2 Recommended negative pressure procedural technique for each endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition needle to achieve optimal outcomes[61]
Needle type | Best cellularity | Best diagnostic accuracy | Best overall outcome (specimen) |
Menghini | Stylet retraction = suction = no suction | Suction | Suction |
Reverse-bevel | Stylet retraction = suction | Suction | Suction |
Franseen | Stylet retraction | Stylet retraction = suction | Stylet retraction |
Fork-tip | Stylet retraction = no suction | Stylet retraction = suction | Stylet retraction |
- Citation: Masuda S, Koizumi K, Shionoya K, Jinushi R, Makazu M, Nishino T, Kimura K, Sumida C, Kubota J, Ichita C, Sasaki A, Kobayashi M, Kako M, Haruki U. Comprehensive review on endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition techniques for solid pancreatic tumor. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(12): 1863-1874
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v29/i12/1863.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i12.1863