Changes in the esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction manometric feature based on the Chicago Classification updates

doi:10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4163

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 28, Issue 30

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (3772)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, WORD series, HTML series, Figures (1-3) series, Tables (1-4) series.

Item

Count

PDF

215

WORD

HTML

1981

Figures (1-3)

326

Tables (1-4)

327

Sum=2932

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

225

Download

615

Sum=840

Aug 14, 2022 (publication date) through Jan 31, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (0)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Study

World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2022; 28(30): 4163-4173
Published online Aug 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4163

Table 1 Patient characteristics

	EGJOO (n = 24)	Isolated supine IRP elevated (n = 27)	Normal HRM (n = 46)	P value
Demographics
Age (yr)	62.7 ± 2.7^a	56.6 ± 11.1	50.2 ± 2.2	0.001
Female, n (%)	14 (58.3)	19 (70.4)	24 (52.2)	0.312
BMI (kg/m²)	23.29 ± 0.63	21.88 ± 2.50	23.17 ± 0.68	0.300
Dominant symptom
Dysphagia, n (%)	7 (29.2)	6 (22.2)	7 (15.2)	0.380
Retrosternal pain, n (%)	5 (20.8)	3 (11.1)	8 (17.4)	0.630
Regurgitation, n (%)	8 (33.3)	9 (33.3)	15 (32.6)	0.997

^aP < 0.05, compared with normal high-resolution manometry group.

BMI: Body mass index; EGJOO: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction; IRP: Integrated relaxation pressure; HRM: High-resolution manometry.

Table 2 High-resolution manometry parameters of the patients

HRM findings	EGJOO (n = 24)	Isolated supine IRP elevated (n = 27)	Normal HRM (n = 46)	P value
UES parameters
UESL (cm)	3.13 ± 0.18	3.01 ± 0.67	3.34 ± 0.12	0.206
UESP (mmHg)	53.35 ± 5.28	68.12 ± 6.35	57.77 ± 3.35	0.123
UESNP (mmHg)	3.00 ± 1.43^a	3.50 ± 6.57^a	-4.08 ± 0.84	< 0.001
PD-UESCI (mmHg∙s∙cm)	430.01 ± 32.90	527.41 ± 37.48	534.13 ± 34.40	0.118
Proximal esophageal parameters
PEL (cm)	4.89 ± 0.27^a	5.89 ± 0.32^b	6.08 ± 0.14	0.001
PL (s)	1.99 ± 0.08	2.05 ± 0.08	2.04 ± 0.07	0.872
PECI (mmHg∙s∙cm)	238.34 ± 35.18^a	328.00 ± 35.15	367.99 ± 37.88	0.048
Esophageal body parameters
DL (s)	6.14 ± 0.25	6.85 ± 0.32	6.25 ± 0.14	0.078
DCI (mmHg∙s∙cm)	1581.21 ± 276.20	1655.80 ± 170.33	1705.41 ± 144.27	0.897
ES-RDC (%)	37.5% (9)	18.5% (5)	13.0% (6)	0.053
EGJ parameters
LESP (mmHg)	47.91 ± 4.05^a	35.68 ± 1.80^a^,^b	23.89 ± 1.34	< 0.001
IBP (mmHg)	12.29 ± 1.37^a	7.41 ± 0.84^b	5.45 ± 0.54	< 0.001
Median supine IRP (mmHg)	27.76 ± 2.39^a	18.74 ± 0.52^a^,^b	10.48 ± 0.60	< 0.001
Median upright IRP (mmHg)	23.69 ± 2.58^a	7.32 ± 0.53^b	5.41 ± 0.84	< 0.001
IRP on RDC (mmHg)	9.96 ± 1.78^a	3.00 ± 0.98^b	2.04 ± 0.58	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05, compared with normal high-resolution manometry group.

^bP < 0.05, compared with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction group.

IRP: Integrated relaxation pressure; EGJOO: Esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction; UES: Upper esophageal sphincter; UESL: Upper esophageal sphincter length; UESP: Upper esophageal sphincter resting pressure; UESNP: Upper esophageal sphincter nadir pressure; PD-UESCI: Postdeglutitive upper esophageal sphincter contractile integral; PEL: Proximal esophageal length; PECI: Proximal contractile integral; PL: Proximal latency; DL: Distal latency; DCI: Distal contraction integral; ES: Esophageal shortening; RDC: Rapid drink challenge; LESP: Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure; IBP: Intrabolus pressure; HRM: High-resolution manometry.

Table 3 Multivariate logistic regression analysis for factors associated with esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction

Effect variables	OR	95%CI	P value
PEL (cm)	0.543	0.30-0.99	0.044
LESP (mmHg)	1.106	1.05-1.17	0.001
IRP on RDC (mmHg)	1.197	1.02-1.41	0.028

PEL: Proximal esophageal length; LESP: Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure; IRP: Integrated relaxation pressure; RDC: Rapid drink challenge.

Table 4 Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction

	Cutoff	AUC	95%CI	Sensitivity (%)	Specificity (%)
UESNP (mmHg)	> 1.15	0.66	0.53-0.78	63.6	68.7
PEL (cm)	< 4.76	0.67	0.55-0.80	50.0	87.7
PECI (mmHg∙s∙cm)	< 312.35	0.67	0.55-0.80	83.3	46.6
LESP (mmHg)	> 40.20	0.85	0.75-0.94	68.2	85.1
IRP on RDC (mmHg)	> 10.75	0.81	0.70-0.91	50.0	98.5

UESNP: Upper esophageal sphincter nadir pressure; PEL: Proximal esophageal length; PECI: Proximal esophageal contractile integral; LESP: Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure; IRP: Integrated relaxation pressure; RDC: Rapid drink challenge; AUC: Area under the curve.

Citation: Li YY, Lu WT, Liu JX, Wu LH, Chen M, Jiao HM. Changes in the esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction manometric feature based on the Chicago Classification updates. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(30): 4163-4173
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i30/4163.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4163