Review
Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2022; 28(30): 4019-4043
Published online Aug 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019
Table 1 Characteristics of one-step nucleic acid amplification studies in colorectal cancer patients
Ref. Nation Type of study Patients number (sample number) Tumor type Purpose of the OSNA analysis Croner et al [11 ], 2010 Germany Prospective study 184 (184) Colorectal Diagnosis of LN metastasis Yamamoto et al [16 ], 2011 Japan Prospective multicenter study 85 (385) Colorectal Diagnosis of LN metastasis Güller et al [12 ], 2012 Switzerland Prospective study 22 (313) Colon Diagnosis of LN metastasis Yamamoto et al [13 ], 2013 Japan Not shown 30 (66) Colorectal Identification of CK19 Croner et al [14 ], 2014 Germany Prospective multicenter study 103 (1594) Colon Pathologically nodenegative CC Vogelaar et al [15 ], 2014 Switzerland Prospective multicenter study 128 (325) Colon Diagnosis of SLN metastasis Yamamoto et al [17 ], 2016 Japan Prospective multicenter study 204 (1925) Colorectal Diagnosis of LN metastasis Aldecoa et al [133 ], 2016 Spain Prospective multicenter study 149 (1940) Colorectal Correlation between TTL and tumor’s characteristics Rakislova et al [125 ], 2017 Spain Observational study 188 (3206) Colon Diagnosis of pooled LN metastasis Miyake et al [193 ], 2017 Japan Prospective study 25 (306) Rectum Indication of LPLN dissection Marhic et al [184 ], 2017 France Prospective study 17 Colon Diagnosis of SLN metastasis Colling et al [129 ], 2-17 United Kingdom Prospective study 19 (82) Colorectal Diagnosis of LN metastasis Aldecoa et al [124 ], 2017 Spain Prospective study 71 (936) Colon OSNA with endoscopic tattooing Yeung et al [130 ], 2018 United Kingdom Prospective study 16 (78) Colorectal OSNA with ICG detection Brito et al [126 ], 2018 Portugal Prospective multicenter study 59 (753) Colon Pathologically node negative CRC Esposito et al [127 ], 2019 Italy Prospective study 34 (51) Colorectal Diagnosis of SLN metastasis Diaz-Mercedes et al [109 ], 2019 Spain Prospective study 17 (980) Colorectal Budget impact analysis Itabashi et al [18 ], 2020 Japan Prospective multicenter study 195 Colorectal Prognostic value of the OSNA assay for pStage IICRC patients Archilla et al [145 ], 2021 Spain Retrospective multicenter study 342 (5931) Colorectal Correlation between the TTL with patient outcome Weixler et al [147 ], 2021 Netherlands, Germany, Switzerland Retrospective multicenter study 87 Colon Prognostic value of OSNA Tani et al [33 ], 2021 Japan Prospective multicenter study 92 Colon Diagnosis of pooled LN metastasis Numata et al [188 ], 2021 Japan Prospective study 34 Rectum Indication of LPLN dissection
Table 2 A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay in colorectal cancer patients
Ref. Pathological evaluation IHC LN number inspected by OSNA, mean Sensitivity, % Specificity, % Concordance, % PPV, % NPV, % Croner et al [11 ] Multi-slice CK19 1.0 92.5 96.5 93.6 88.1 97.9 Yamamoto et al [16 ] Multi-slice CK19 4.5 95.2 97.7 97.1 91.9 98.7 Güller et al [12 ] Multi-slice CK19 14.2 94.5 97.6 97.1 89.7 98.8 Yamamoto et al [17 ] Single-slice None 9.4 86.2 96.5 95.7 66.5 98.8 Colling et al [129 ] Single-slice None 4.3 92.9 97.1 96.3 86.7 98.5 Yeung et al [130 ] Single-slice None 4.9 100 98.4 98.7 94.1 100 Esposito et al [127 ] Multi-slice None 1.5 69.2 100 88.2 100 84.0 Rakislova et al [125 ] Not shown None 20.5 (pOSNA) 88.9 79.2 80.2 33.3 98.4 Vogelaar et al [15 ] Multi-slice Anti pan-cytokeratin 15.3 51.6 84.1 67.7 76.7 63.1 Miyake et al [193 ] Single-slice CEA 11 100 86 88 57 100 Marhic et al [184 ] Not shown None Not shown 50 100 70.6 100 58 Numata et al [188 ] (predictive value for pathological LatLNM testing OSNA-MesLNM) Not shown None 17 100 55 61.8 28 100 Tani et al [33 ] Not shown CK19 6.9 (pOSNA) 84.6 90.9 89.1% 78.6 93.7
Table 3 Differences in lymph node processing methods and upstage rates of previous reports
Ref. Subject (patients) OSNA method Harvested LN, n Harvested LN, median Dividing method of LN Pathological staining Measured LN by OSNA, n Measured LN by OSNA, median Upstage rate (pStage I and II) Yamamoto et al [16 ] Stage 0, I (85) cOSNA 434 N/Aa Fourb ; 4 mm over diameter of LN HE and IHC 385 4.5 16.5% (2/16) Güller et al [12 ] Stage I, II, III (22) cOSNA 313 30 (16–60) Fourb ; 3 mm over diameter of LN HE and IHC 56 13 (6–24) 15.3% (2/13) Croner et al [14 ] Stage I, II (103) cOSNA N/Aa N/Aa Centerc ; 6 mm over halfd ; 4 mm to 6 mm diameter of LN HE 1594 14 (1–46) 25.2% (26/103) Vogelaar et al [15 ] Stage I, II (128) cOSNA N/Aa N/Aa Fourb ; 10 mm over halfd ; 10 or less than 10 mm diameter of LN HE and IHC 317 Mean 15.3 (4–40) 20.2% (20/90) Yamamoto et al [17 ] Stage I, II, III (204) cOSNA 4324 19 (3–25) Halfd HE 1925 8 (2–25) 17.6% (13/74) Aldecoa et al [133 ] Stage I, II (149) cOSNA 2483 15 Centerc HE 1940 12 51% (76/149) Rakislova et al [125 ] Stage I, II, III (188) cOSNA, pOSNA cOSNA 1828, pOSNA 1992 cOSNA 17 (13-22), pOSNA 20.5 (17-27) Centerc HE cOSNA 1757, pOSNA 1449 cOSNA 13 (10-18), pOSNA 18 (13-25) cOSNA 55.4% (51/92), pOSNA 20.7% (16/77) Brito et al [126 ] Stage I, II (59) cOSNA 1046 13 (9-19) Centerc ; 5 mm over halfd ; 4 or less diameter of LN HE 753 12 (7-16) 28.8% (17/59) Itabashi et al [18 ] Stage I, II, III (195) cOSNA Not shown 19 (1-75) Halfd ; 4 mm over diameter of LN HE Not shown 8 (2-25) 15.7% (11/70) in stage II patients Tani et al [33 ] Stage II, IIIA (92) pOSNA 2236 24.3 (5–66) Halfd ; 4 mm over diameter of LN HE 636 6.9 (1–35) 9.1% (6/66)
Table 4 Studies analyzing colorectal cancer metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes with one-step nucleic acid amplification
Author Patients (samples), n Injected dye Intraoperative OSNA assay Examined SLNs, n Vogelaar et al [15 ] 128 (325) Patent blue dye V or indocyanine green No 3.0 (median) Marhic et al [184 ] 17 Blue dye Yes Not shown Yeung et al [130 ] 16 (78) Indocyanine green No 4.9 (mean) Esposito et al [127 ] 34 (51) Indocyanine green Yes 1.0 (median)