Review
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2022; 28(30): 4019-4043
Published online Aug 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4019
Table 1 Characteristics of one-step nucleic acid amplification studies in colorectal cancer patients
Ref.
Nation
Type of study
Patients number (sample number)
Tumor type
Purpose of the OSNA analysis
Croner et al[11], 2010GermanyProspective study184 (184)ColorectalDiagnosis of LN metastasis
Yamamoto et al[16], 2011JapanProspective multicenter study85 (385)ColorectalDiagnosis of LN metastasis
Güller et al[12], 2012SwitzerlandProspective study22 (313)ColonDiagnosis of LN metastasis
Yamamoto et al[13], 2013JapanNot shown30 (66)ColorectalIdentification of CK19
Croner et al[14], 2014GermanyProspective multicenter study103 (1594)ColonPathologically nodenegative CC
Vogelaar et al[15], 2014SwitzerlandProspective multicenter study128 (325)ColonDiagnosis of SLN metastasis
Yamamoto et al[17], 2016JapanProspective multicenter study204 (1925)ColorectalDiagnosis of LN metastasis
Aldecoa et al[133], 2016SpainProspective multicenter study149 (1940)ColorectalCorrelation between TTL and tumor’s characteristics
Rakislova et al[125], 2017SpainObservational study188 (3206)ColonDiagnosis of pooled LN metastasis
Miyake et al[193], 2017JapanProspective study 25 (306)RectumIndication of LPLN dissection
Marhic et al[184], 2017FranceProspective study17ColonDiagnosis of SLN metastasis
Colling et al[129], 2-17United KingdomProspective study19 (82)ColorectalDiagnosis of LN metastasis
Aldecoa et al[124], 2017SpainProspective study71 (936)ColonOSNA with endoscopic tattooing
Yeung et al[130], 2018United KingdomProspective study16 (78)ColorectalOSNA with ICG detection
Brito et al[126], 2018PortugalProspective multicenter study59 (753)ColonPathologically node negative CRC
Esposito et al[127], 2019ItalyProspective study34 (51)ColorectalDiagnosis of SLN metastasis
Diaz-Mercedes et al[109], 2019SpainProspective study17 (980)ColorectalBudget impact analysis
Itabashi et al[18], 2020JapanProspective multicenter study195ColorectalPrognostic value of the OSNA assay for pStage IICRC patients
Archilla et al[145], 2021SpainRetrospective multicenter study342 (5931)ColorectalCorrelation between the TTL with patient outcome
Weixler et al[147], 2021Netherlands, Germany, SwitzerlandRetrospective multicenter study87ColonPrognostic value of OSNA
Tani et al[33], 2021JapanProspective multicenter study92ColonDiagnosis of pooled LN metastasis
Numata et al[188], 2021JapanProspective study34RectumIndication of LPLN dissection
Table 2 A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of the one-step nucleic acid amplification assay in colorectal cancer patients
Ref.
Pathological evaluation
IHC
LN number inspected by OSNA, mean
Sensitivity, %
Specificity, %
Concordance, %
PPV, %
NPV, %
Croner et al[11]Multi-sliceCK191.092.596.593.688.197.9
Yamamoto et al[16]Multi-sliceCK194.595.297.797.191.998.7
Güller et al[12]Multi-sliceCK1914.294.597.697.189.798.8
Yamamoto et al[17]Single-sliceNone9.486.296.595.766.598.8
Colling et al[129]Single-sliceNone4.392.997.196.386.798.5
Yeung et al[130] Single-sliceNone4.910098.498.794.1100
Esposito et al[127]Multi-sliceNone1.569.210088.210084.0
Rakislova et al[125]Not shownNone20.5 (pOSNA)88.979.280.233.398.4
Vogelaar et al[15]Multi-sliceAnti pan-cytokeratin15.351.684.167.776.763.1
Miyake et al[193] Single-sliceCEA11100868857100
Marhic et al[184]Not shownNoneNot shown5010070.610058
Numata et al[188] (predictive value for pathological LatLNM testing OSNA-MesLNM)Not shownNone171005561.828100
Tani et al[33]Not shownCK196.9 (pOSNA)84.690.989.1%78.693.7
Table 3 Differences in lymph node processing methods and upstage rates of previous reports
Ref.
Subject (patients)
OSNA method
Harvested LN, n
Harvested LN, median
Dividing method of LN
Pathological staining
Measured LN by OSNA, n
Measured LN by OSNA, median
Upstage rate (pStage I and II)
Yamamoto et al[16]Stage 0, I (85)cOSNA434N/AaFourb; 4 mm over diameter of LNHE and IHC3854.516.5% (2/16)
Güller et al[12]Stage I, II, III (22)cOSNA31330 (16–60)Fourb; 3 mm over diameter of LNHE and IHC 5613 (6–24)15.3% (2/13)
Croner et al[14]Stage I, II (103)cOSNAN/AaN/AaCenterc; 6 mm over halfd; 4 mm to 6 mm diameter of LNHE159414 (1–46)25.2% (26/103)
Vogelaar et al[15]Stage I, II (128)cOSNAN/AaN/AaFourb; 10 mm over halfd; 10 or less than 10 mm diameter of LNHE and IHC317Mean 15.3 (4–40)20.2% (20/90)
Yamamoto et al[17]Stage I, II, III (204)cOSNA432419 (3–25)Halfd HE19258 (2–25)17.6% (13/74)
Aldecoa et al[133]Stage I, II (149) cOSNA248315CentercHE19401251% (76/149)
Rakislova et al[125] Stage I, II, III (188)cOSNA, pOSNAcOSNA 1828, pOSNA 1992cOSNA 17 (13-22), pOSNA 20.5 (17-27)CentercHEcOSNA 1757, pOSNA 1449cOSNA 13 (10-18), pOSNA 18 (13-25)cOSNA 55.4% (51/92), pOSNA 20.7% (16/77)
Brito et al[126] Stage I, II (59)cOSNA104613 (9-19)Centerc; 5 mm over halfd; 4 or less diameter of LNHE75312 (7-16)28.8% (17/59)
Itabashi et al[18]Stage I, II, III (195)cOSNANot shown19 (1-75)Halfd; 4 mm over diameter of LNHENot shown8 (2-25)15.7% (11/70) in stage II patients
Tani et al[33]Stage II, IIIA (92)pOSNA223624.3 (5–66)Halfd; 4 mm over diameter of LNHE6366.9 (1–35)9.1% (6/66)
Table 4 Studies analyzing colorectal cancer metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes with one-step nucleic acid amplification
Author
Patients (samples), n
Injected dye
Intraoperative OSNA assay
Examined SLNs, n
Vogelaar et al[15]128 (325)Patent blue dye V or indocyanine greenNo3.0 (median)
Marhic et al[184] 17Blue dyeYesNot shown
Yeung et al[130] 16 (78)Indocyanine greenNo4.9 (mean)
Esposito et al[127]34 (51)Indocyanine greenYes1.0 (median)