Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 21, 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488
Published online Jul 21, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488
Table 1 Characteristics of patients and hepatic nodules
Item | Number or range |
Nodules, n | 511 |
Patients, n | 269 |
Males, n (%) | 219 (81.4) |
Females, n (%) | 50 (18.6) |
Median age at first nodule (IQR; range) | 69 years (61-75; 43-88) |
Males (IQR; range) | 67 years (59-74; 43-88) |
Females (IQR; range) | 74.5 years (71-78; 59-85) |
Hepatic cirrhosis aetiology (n) | |
Chronic HCV infection, n (%) | 129 (48) |
Alcohol abuse, n (%) | 45 (16.7) |
Chronic HBV infection, n (%) | 24 (8.9) |
Chronic HCV infection + alcohol abuse, n (%) | 21 (7.8) |
Chronic HBV + HCV infection, n (%) | 8 (3) |
NASH, n (%) | 6 (2.2) |
ChronicHBV infection + alcohol abuse, n (%) | 5 (1.9) |
Other aetiologies, n (%) | 6 (2.2) |
Unknown aetiology, n (%) | 25 (9.3) |
Median diameter of nodules (IQR; range) | 24 mm (16-36; 5-200) |
Table 2 Rates of different conclusive diagnoses for each Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System class
Conclusive diagnosis | % | |||||||
HCC | ICC | Metastasis | Other malignancy | Benign lesion | Total | |||
CEUS LI-RADS class | CEUS LR-M | 11 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 37 | 7.2 |
CEUS LR-5 | 286 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 288 | 56.4 | |
CEUS LR-4 | 111 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 114 | 22.3 | |
CEUS LR-3 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 47 | 66 | 12.9 | |
CEUS LR-2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 1.0 | |
CEUS LR-1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.2 | |
Total | 423 | 23 | 3 | 3 | 59 | 511 | 100.0 | |
% | 82.8 | 4.5 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 11.5 | 100.0 |
Table 3 Rates of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in different Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classes
CEUS LI-RADS class | HCC | ICC |
LR-3 | 15/66 (22.7%) | 2/66 (3%) |
LR-4 | 111/114 (97.4%) | 0/114 (0%) |
LR-5 | 286/288 (99.3%) | 0/288 (0%) |
LR-M | 11/37 (29.7%) | 21/37 (56.8%) |
Table 4 Rates of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound patterns in arterial phase
Arterial phase CEUS pattern | Nodules, n (%) |
Homogeneous hyperenhancement | 404 (79.1) |
Rim hyperenhancement | 23 (4.5) |
Globular hyperenhancement | 1 (0.2) |
Isoenhancement | 65 (12.7) |
Hypoenhancement | 18 (3.5) |
Table 5 Rate of different portal and late phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound patterns
Portal and late phase CEUS pattern | Nodules, n (%) |
Late and mild washout | 310 (60.7%) |
Early/marked washout | 27 (5.3%) |
Isoenhancement | 157 (30.7%) |
Hypoenhancement | 15 (2.9%) |
Hyperenhancement | 2 (0.4%) |
Table 6 Diagnostic statistics of different contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System classes for different diagnosis
Tested association | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | Diagnostic accuracy (%) | Youden’s index | Odds Ratio | P value |
CEUS LR M-ICC | 91.3 (72.0-98.9) | 96.7 (94.7-98.1) | 56.8 (39.5-72.9) | 99.6 (98.5-99.9) | 96.5 (94.5-97.9) | 0.880 | 309.75 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR 5-HCC | 67.6 (62.9-72.1) | 97.7 (92.0-99.7) | 99.3 (97.5-99.9) | 38.6 (32.1-45.3) | 72.8 (68.7-76.6) | 0.653 | 89.80 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR 4-HCC | 26.2 (22.1-30.7) | 96.6 (90.4-99.3) | 97.4 (92.5-99.5) | 21.4 (17.5-25.8) | 38.4 (34.1-42.7) | 0.228 | 10.10 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR 4/5-HCC | 93.9 (91.1-95.9) | 94.3 (87.2-98.1) | 98.8 (97.1-99.6) | 76.1 (67.0-83.8) | 93.9 (91.5-95.8) | 0.882 | 253.50 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR 3-benign lesion | 79.7 (67.2-89.0) | 95.8 (93.5-97.5) | 71.2 (58.7-81.7) | 97.3 (95.3-98.6) | 93.9 (91.5-95.8) | 0.755 | 89.26 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR-3-malignancy | 4.2 (2.5-6.5) | 20.3 (11.0-32.8) | 28.8 (18.3-41.3) | 2.7 (1.4-4.7) | 6.0 (4.2-8.5) | -0.755 | 0.01 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR-3-iso-iso-malignancy | 5.3 (0.1-26.0) | 19.1 (9.1-33.3) | 2.6 (0.1-13.5) | 33.3 (16.5-54.0) | 15.2 (7.5-26.1) | -0.756 | 0.01 | < 0.001 |
CEUS LR-3-hypo-hypo-malignancy | 57.9 (33.5-79.7) | 91.5 (79.6-97.6) | 73.3 (44.9-92.2) | 84.3 (71.4-93.0) | 81.8 (70.4-90.2) | 0.494 | 14.78 | < 0.001 |
Table 7 Classification of nodules for LR-3, LR-4, and LR-5 classes, reported in yellow, orange, and red, respectively
- Citation: Vidili G, Arru M, Solinas G, Calvisi DF, Meloni P, Sauchella A, Turilli D, Fabio C, Cossu A, Madeddu G, Babudieri S, Zocco MA, Iannetti G, Di Lembo E, Delitala AP, Manetti R. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(27): 3488-3502
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v28/i27/3488.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v28.i27.3488