Kida Y, Yamamura T, Maeda K, Sawada T, Ishikawa E, Mizutani Y, Kakushima N, Furukawa K, Ishikawa T, Ohno E, Kawashima H, Nakamura M, Ishigami M, Fujishiro M. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(10): 1055-1066 [PMID: 35431498 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1055]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Takeshi Yamamura, MD, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, 65 Tsuruma-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Aichi, Japan. tyamamu@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 3 Diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) for each type in the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification
Sensitivity (%)
Specificity (%)
PPV (%)
NPV (%)
Accuracy (%)
UCAN JNET type 2A
Experts
50.0 (10.2–85.6)
94.7 (90.5–98.5)
50.0 (10.2–85.6)
94.7 (90.5–98.5)
90.5 (82.9–97.3)
Non-experts
100 (36.9–100)
78.9 (72.3–78.9)
33.3 (12.3–33.3)
100 (91.6–100)
81.0 (68.9–81.0)
UCAN JNET type 2B
Experts
78.6 (64.6–89.5)
57.1 (29.2–79.1)
78.6 (64.6–89.5)
57.1 (29.2–79.1)
71.4 (52.8–86.1)
Non-experts
78.6 (63.8–87.9)
71.4 (41.9–90.0)
84.6 (68.7–94.6)
62.5 (36.6–78.8)
76.2 (56.5–88.6)
UCAN JNET type 3
Experts
60.0 (27.5–75.9)
93.8 (83.6–98.7)
75.0 (34.4–94.9)
88.2 (78.7–92.9)
85.7 (70.3–93.3)
Non-experts
40.0 (14.9–40.0)
100 (92.2–100)
100 (37.3–100)
84.2 (77.6–84.2)
85.7 (73.8–85.7)
SN JNET type 2A
Experts
75.0 (62.6–75.0)
100 (71.6–100)
100 (83.4–100)
63.6 (45.5–63.6)
82.6 (65.3–82.6)
Non-experts
87.5 (74.7–92.5)
85.7 (56.4–97.1)
93.3 (79.6–98.7)
75.0 (49.3–85.0)
87.0 (69.1–93.9)
SN JNET type 2B
Experts
100 (63.4–100)
83.3 (73.2–83.3)
62.5 (39.6–62.5)
100 (87.8–100)
87.0 (71.0–87.0)
Non-experts
80.0 (42.6–96.1)
83.3 (72.9–87.8)
57.1 (30.4–68.7)
93.8 (82.1–98.8)
82.6 (66.4–89.6)
SN JNET type 3
Experts
50.0 (11.2–50.0)
100 (96.3–100)
100 (22.4–100)
95.5 (91.9–95.5)
95.7 (88.9–95.7)
Non-experts
50.0 (11.2–50.0)
100 (96.3–100)
100 (22.4–100)
95.5 (91.9–95.5)
95.7 (88.9–95.7)
Table 4 Diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval) for each type in the pit pattern classification
Sensitivity, (%)
Specificity, (%)
PPV, (%)
NPV, (%)
Accuracy, (%)
UCAN pit pattern type III/IV
Experts
100 (37.3–100)
84.2 (77.6–84.2)
40.0 (14.9–40.0)
100 (92.2–100)
85.7 (73.8–85.7)
Non-experts
100 (36.4–100)
57.9 (51.2–57.9)
20.0 (7.3–20.0)
100 (88.4–100)
61.9 (49.8–61.9)
UCAN pit pattern type VI low irregularity
Experts
50.0 (35.2–59.8)
71.4 (41.9–91.0)
77.8 (54.8–93.0)
41.7 (24.4–53.1)
57.1 (37.5–70.2)
Non-experts
42.9 (28.4–48.7)
85.7 (56.7–97.3)
85.7 (56.7–97.3)
42.9 (28.4–48.7)
57.1 (37.8–64.9)
UCAN pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN
Experts
60.0 (26.1–85.8)
81.3 (70.7–89.3)
50.0 (21.8–71.5)
86.7 (75.4–95.3)
76.2 (60.1–88.5)
Non-experts
60.0 (27.5–75.9)
93.8 (83.6–98.7)
75.0 (34.4–94.9)
88.2 (78.7–92.9)
85.7 (70.3–93.3)
SN pit pattern type III/IV
Experts
87.5 (75.6–87.5)
100 (72.8–100)
100 (86.4–100)
77.8 (56.6–77.8)
91.3 (74.8–91.3)
Non-experts
81.3 (68.1–86.3)
85.7 (55.6–97.3)
92.9 (77.8–98.6)
66.7 (43.3–75.6)
82.6 (64.3–89.6)
SN pit pattern type VI low irregularity
Experts
100 (63.4–100)
83.3 (73.2–83.3)
62.5 (39.6–62.5)
100 (87.8–100)
87.0 (71.0–87.0)
Non-experts
60.0 (26.0–85.9)
83.3 (73.9–90.5)
50.0 (21.7–71.6)
88.2 (78.2–95.8)
78.3 (63.5–89.5)
SN pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN
Experts
50.0 (11.2–50.0)
100 (96.3–100)
100 (22.4–100)
95.5 (91.9–95.5)
95.7 (88.9–95.7)
Non-experts
50.0 (10.2–85.6)
95.2 (91.4–98.6)
50.0 (10.2–85.6)
95.2 (91.4–98.6)
91.3 (84.4–97.5)
Table 5 Intra-observer agreement
Experts
Non-experts
UCAN
JNET classification
0.387 (0.369–0.521)
0.640 (0.566–0.708)
Pit pattern classification
0.454 (0.391–0.509)
0.569 (0.422–0.599)
SN
JNET classification
0.803 (0.581–0.832)
0.828 (0.686–0.849)
Pit pattern classification
0.567 (0.477–0.595)
0.628 (0.422–0.766)
Table 6 Inter-observer agreement
Experts
Non-experts
UCAN
JNET classification
0.401
0.237
Pit pattern classification
0.364
0.378
SN
JNET classification
0.666
0.503
Pit-pattern classification
0.597
0.437
Table 7 Diagnostic results of Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification type 2A and pit pattern classification type III/IV in ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms
Number
Pathological result
LGD (n = 2)
HGD-sSM (n = 14)
dSM (n = 5)
Endoscopist 1
JNET type 2A
8
1
7
0
Pit type III/IV
7
2
3
2
Endoscopist 2
JNET type 2A
2
1
1
0
Pit type III/IV
5
2
3
0
Endoscopist 3
JNET type 2A
2
0
1
1
Pit type III/IV
7
2
5
0
Endoscopist 4
JNET type 2A
9
2
6
1
Pit type III/IV
8
2
5
1
Endoscopist 5
JNET type 2A
5
2
2
1
Pit type III/IV
8
2
6
0
Endoscopist 6
JNET type 2A
7
2
5
0
Pit type III/IV
9
2
6
1
Citation: Kida Y, Yamamura T, Maeda K, Sawada T, Ishikawa E, Mizutani Y, Kakushima N, Furukawa K, Ishikawa T, Ohno E, Kawashima H, Nakamura M, Ishigami M, Fujishiro M. Diagnostic performance of endoscopic classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis: A retrospective case-control study. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28(10): 1055-1066