Published online Mar 14, 2022. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i10.1055
Peer-review started: September 14, 2021
First decision: November 16, 2021
Revised: November 29, 2021
Accepted: January 29, 2022
Article in press: January 29, 2022
Published online: March 14, 2022
Processing time: 177 Days and 23.7 Hours
It is unclear whether the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification and pit pattern classification are applicable for diagnosing neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).
To clarify the diagnostic performance of these classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with UC.
This study was conducted as a single-center, retrospective case-control study. Twenty-one lesions in 19 patients with UC-associated neoplasms (UCAN) and 23 lesions in 22 UC patients with sporadic neoplasms (SN), evaluated by magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy, were retrospectively and separately assessed by six endoscopists (three experts, three non-experts), using the JNET and pit pattern classifications. The results were compared with the pathological diagnoses to evaluate the diagnostic performance. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated.
In this study, JNET type 2A and pit pattern type III/IV were used as indicators of low-grade dysplasia, JNET type 2B and pit pattern type VI low irregularity were used as indicators of high-grade dysplasia to shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma, JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VI high irregularity/VN were used as indicators of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma. In the UCAN group, JNET type 2A and pit pattern type III/IV had a low positive predictive value (PPV; 50.0% and 40.0%, respectively); however, they had a high negative predictive value (NPV; 94.7% and 100%, respectively). Conversely, in the SN group, JNET type 2A and pit pattern type III/IV had a high PPV (100% for both) but a low NPV (63.6% and 77.8%, respectively). In both groups, JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VI-high irregularity/VN showed high specificity. The inter-observer agreement of JNET classification and pit pattern classification for UCAN among experts were 0.401 and 0.364, in the same manner for SN, 0.666 and 0.597, respectively. The intra-observer agreements of JNET classification and pit pattern classification for UCAN among experts were 0.387, 0.454, for SN, 0.803 and 0.567, respectively.
The accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis using both classifications was lower for UCAN than for SN. Endoscopic diagnosis of UCAN tended to be underestimated compared with the pathological results.
Core Tip: This retrospective case-control study evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team (JNET) and pit pattern classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). The JNET and pit pattern classifications did not show high accuracy in diagnosing the pathology and invasion depth of neoplastic lesions in patients with UC. Endoscopic diagnosis of UC-associated neoplasms tended to be underestimated when compared with pathological results. Endoscopic diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in patients with UC is still difficult, and treatment strategies need to be carefully determined.