Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2021; 27(25): 3925-3939
Published online Jul 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3925
Table 1 Pooled proportions and comparative meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection

Total papers
Sample size (ESD)
Pooled proportions
Sample size (EMR)
Pooled proportions
RR (CI)
P value
Publication bias
En bloc resection11164189% (0.83-0.94)141147% (0.36-0.59)1.837 (1.464-2.305)< 0.0010.0025
Positive lateral margin 21233% (0.01-0.06)18714% (0.09-0.19)0.292 (0.089-0.995)0.042-
Positive vertical margin 1385% (0.00-0.17)831% (0.00-0.07)4.368 (0.409-46.710)0.223-
Complete resection891882% (0.74-0.88)101256% (0.34-0.77)1.504 (1.041-2.174)0.03-
Lymphovsacular invasion1546% (0.03-0.13)230% (0.00-0.04)4.352 (0.248-76.483)0.315-
Mean procedural time 81087-838-72.709 (54.487-90.931)< 0.001-
Additional surgery29913% (0.07-0.21)1535% (0.02-0.09)3.139 (1.360-7.243)0.007-
Perforation 18194705% (0.03-0.09)2609010% (0.00-0.01)7.597 (4.281-13.479)< 0.0010.301
Bleeding 14200483% (0.02-0.05)2570653% (0.02-0.04)1.277 (0.896-1.820)0.1750.139
Recurrences1218222% (0.01-0.03)3772110% (0.04-0.17)0.269 (0.112-0.648)0.0030.725
Table 2 Meta-regression
En bloc resection
Complete resection
Perforation
Bleeding
Recurrence

n
Beta (CI)
P value
n
Beta (CI)
P value
n
Beta (CI)
P value
n
Beta (CI)
P value
n
Beta (CI)
P value
Age8-0.017 (-0.168-0.133)0.7855-0.010 (-0.426-0.406)0.94490.073 (-0.191-0.336)0.5358-0.201 (-0.540-0.138)0.19780.254 (-0.039-0.547)0.078
Gender6-6.023 (-23.152-11.106)0.3844-20.662 (-108.758-67.434)0.4198-7.868 (-22.078–6.342)0.2247-4.446 (-27.915-19.022)0.6476-9.096 (-62.174-43.982)0.659
Polyp size 100.242 (-0.037-0.086)0.3906-0.034 (-0.098-0.030)0.21710-0.034 (-0.117-0.049)0.3789-0.041 (-0.177-0.095)0.49880.077 (-0.118-0.272)0.369
Lateral spreading tumor101.262 (-1.072-3.596)0.2487-0.481 (-4.655-3.693)0.77911-2.324 (-5.536-0.888)0.1369-0.680 (-5.586-4.226)0.75393.827 (-2.323-9.977)0.185
Right colon 81.247 (-2.024-4.517)0.38752.373 (-0.881-5.626)0.10387.731 (4.965-10.497)< 0.00171.688 (-12.442-15.817)0.7716-8.739 (-26.616-9.139)0.246
Colon7-1.803 (-4.486-0.880)0.1454-1.914 (-7.213-3.385)0.2680.759 (-3.184-4.701)0.65466.649 (-5.182-18.480)0.1947-1.102 (-4.754-2.551)0.473
Rectum 71.803 (-0.880-4.486)0.14541.914 (-3.385-7.213)0.268-0.759 (-4.701-3.184)0.6546-6.649 (-18.480-5.182)0.19471.102 (-2.551-4.754)0.473
Submucosal invasion8-0.004 (-0.014-0.007)0.4315-0.006 (-0.020-0.008)0.25390.001 (-0.049-0.051)0.9568-0.016 (-0.033-0.001)0.0617-6.508 (-27.976-14.960)0.471
Muscularis propria invasion 8-5.870 (-17.738-5.998)0.2725-0.157 (-21.715-21.401)0.98396.731 (-33.772-47.234)0.7068-109.836 (-1040.943-821.272)0.783---
Table 3 Subgroup analysis (Japan and rest of the world) of pooled proportions and comparative meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection

Japan papers
Pooled proportions (ESD)
Pooled proportions (EMR)
RR (CI)
P value
Rest of the world papers
Pooled proportions (ESD)
Pooled proportions (EMR)
RR (CI)
P value
Overall results
En bloc resection689% (0.77-0.97)53% (0.38-0.67) 1.658 (1.270-2.165)< 0.001590% (0.85-0.94)41% (0.22-0.61)2.201 (1.411-3.433)0.001
Positive lateral margin 23% (0.00-0.06)14% (0.09-0.19)0.292 (0.089-0.955)0.042-----
Positive vertical margin 15% (0.01-0.17)1% (0.00-0.05) 4.368 (0.409-46.710)0.223-----
Complete resection279% (0.73-0.84) 53% (0.48-0.58) 1.452 (1.303-1.618)< 0.001685% (0.78-0.91)59% (0.27-0.88)1.562 (0.921-2.650)0.098
Lymphovsacular invasion16% (0.03-0.13)0% (0.00-0.04)4.352 (0.248-76.483)0.315-----
Mean procedural time 4--72.106 (48.831-95.382)< 0.0014--73.916 (36.075-111.757)< 0.001
Additional surgery213% (0.07-0.21) 5% (0.02-0.09)3.139 (1.360-7.243)0.007-----
Perforation 114% (0.01-0.07)0.0002% (0.00-0.00081)9.586 (4.425-20.768)< 0.00178% (0.05-0.12)1% (0.00-0.02) 4.602 (2.729-7.759)< 0.001
Bleeding 82.4% (0.01-0.04)2.1% (0.01-0.03)1.267 (1.174-1.367)< 0.00165% (0.02- 0.11) 3% (0.01-0.06) 1.986 (0.716-5.508)0.188
Recurrences71% (0.01-0.02)7% (0.02-0.15)0.274 (0.071-1.054)0.0653% (0.00-0.08) 16% (0.04-0.32) 0.245 (0.073-0.819)0.022
Sensitivity analysis (≥ 20 mm only)
En bloc resection 482% (0.72-0.91)50% (0.33-0.67) 1.645 (1.174-2.306)0.004291% (0.88-0.93) 33% (0.28-0.37) 2.668 (1.752-4.063)< 0.001
Positive lateral margin 23% (0.00-0.06)14% (0.09-0.19)0.292 (0.089-0.955)0.042-----
Positive vertical margin 15% (0.01-0.17)1% (0.00-0.07) 4.368 (0.409-46.710)0.223-----
Complete resection279% (0.73-0.84)53% (0.48-0.58) 1.452 (1.303-1.618)< 0.001290% (0.87-0.93)77% (0.73-0.82) 1.613 (0.209-12.452)0.647
Lymphovsacular invasion26% (0.03-0.13)0% (0.00-0.04)4.352 (0.248-76.483)0.315-----
Mean procedural time 2--69.167 (48.446-89.888)< 0.0011--82.700 (67.578-97.822)< 0.001
Additional surgery213% (0.07-0.21)5% (0.02-0.09)3.139 (1.360-7.243)0.007-----
Perforation 54% (0.01-0.07)0% (0.00-0.01)5.235 (2.123-12.910)< 0.00137% (0.05-0.10)1% (0.00-0.03)4.546 (1.674-12.346)0.003
Bleeding 43% (0.00-0.07)3% (0.01-0.05)0.895 (0.438-1.829)0.76233% (0.00-0.08) 1% (0.00-0.04)2.233 (0.489-10.197)0.300
Recurrences51% (0.00-0.02)7% (0.02-0.15)0.204 (0.097-0.429)< 0.00133% (0.00-0.10) 27% (0.10-0.20)0.179 (0.032-0.990)0.049