Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2021; 27(19): 2325-2340
Published online May 21, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i19.2325
Table 1 Studies assessing the predictive values of risk assessment models in pancreatic cancer patients
Ref.
Study design
Country
Patients analyzed/included
VTE screening at study entry
RAMs
Number of patients in each group
Study or median observation period
Patients with VTE during the overall follow-up, n (%)
Rates of VTE
Pelzer et al[45], 2013Retrospective analysis of theCONKO-004 RCTGermany144/312, APC included in the CONKO-004 trial (control arm)NoKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 55/144 (38.2%); High risk: 89/144 (61.8%)12 mo21/144 (14.6%)At 6 mo: Intermediate risk: 4/55 (7.2%); High risk: 17/89 (19.1%)
Muñoz Martín et al[25], 2014RetrospectiveSpain73/84, ambulatory PC patientsreceiving chemotherapyNoKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 36/84 (43%); High risk: 48/84 (57%)2008-201130/84 (35.7%)At 6 mo: Intermediate risk: 4/37 (10.8%); High risk: 10/36 (27.8%)
van Es et al[29], 2017RetrospectiveNetherlands147/178, ambulatory PC patientsstarting chemotherapyNoKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 101/147 (69%); High risk: 46/147 (31%)2003-201420/147(13.6%)At 6 mo: Intermediate risk: 9/101 (8.9%); High risk: 4/46 (8.7%)
Kruger et al[28], 2017RetrospectiveGermany111/172, APC patients undergoing palliative chemotherapyNoKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 69/111 (38%); High risk: 42/111 (62%)2002-201216/111 (14.4%)At 6 mo: Intermediate risk: 6/69 (8.6%)High risk: 5/42 (11.9%); During the overall observation period; Intermediate risk: 8/69 (11.6%); High risk: 8/42 (19.0%); P = 0.4
Berger et al[30], 2017RetrospectiveGermany150, PC patients receiving chemotherapyNoKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 87/150 (58%); High risk: 63/150 (42%)2010-201437/150 (24.7%)Unspecified; During the overall observation period: no difference between groups (P = 0.44)
Godinho et al[39], 2020RetrospectivePortugal165 newly diagnosed PC patientsNoKhorana score; Onkotev scoreKhorana score: Intermediate risk: 106/165 (64%); High risk: 59/165 (36%). Onkotev score: Score 0: 30/165 (18.2%); Score 1: 63/165 (38.2%); Score 2: 55/165 (33.3%); Score ≥ 3: 17/165 (10.3%)6.3 mo51/165 (31%)During the overall observation period: Khorana score: Intermediate risk: 28/106 (26.4%); High risk: 23/59 (38.9%). Onkotev score: Score 0: 1/30 (< 10%); Score 1: 8/63 (< 10%); Score 2: 28/55 (41.8%); Score ≥ 3: 14/17 (70.6%)
Kim et al[32], 2018RetrospectiveKorea216 metastatic PC patients receiving palliative chemotherapyNoKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 135/216 (62.5%); High risk: 81/21 (37.5%)2005-201550/216 (23.1%)During the overall observation period: Intermediate risk: 30/135 (22.2%); High risk: 20/81 (24.7%); P = 0.677
Frere et al[34], 2020ProspectiveFrance675 newly diagnosed PC patientsYes, patients excluded if VTE at diagnosisKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 492/675 (73%); High risk: 183/675 (27%)2014-2019; 19.3 mo141/675 (20.8%)During the total follow-up: Intermediate risk: 108/492 (22%); High risk: 33/183 (18%); P = 0.26
Vadhan-Raj et al[41], 2020Retrospective subgroup analysis of the CASSINI RCTInternational138 PC patients undergoing chemotherapy included in the CASSINI trial (control arm)Yes, patients excluded if VTE at diagnosisKhorana scoreIntermediate risk: 100/138 (72.5%); High risk: 38/138 (27.5%)6 mo18/138 (13.0%)At 6 mo: Intermediate risk: 14/100 (14.0%); High risk: 4/38 (10.5%)
Table 2 Studies assessing the clinical benefit of anticoagulants for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in ambulatory pancreatic cancer patients

PROTECHT
SAVE ONCO
FRAGEM
CONKO-0004
CASSINI
Agnelli et al[58], 2009Agnelli et al[59], 2012Maraveyas et al[54], 2012Pelzer et al[55], 2015Khorana et al[61], 2019 and Vadhan-Raj et al[41], 2020
PopulationAmbulatory patients > 18 yr on chemotherapy with metastatic or locally advanced lung, gastrointestinal, breast, ovarian, or head and neck cancerPatients with metastatic or locally advanced lung, pancreatic, gastric, colorectal, bladder, and ovarian cancer beginning to receive a course of chemotherapyPatients aged 18 yr or older; Histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer; KPS: 60-100Patients with histologically proven advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to ambulant first-line chemotherapyAdult ambulatory patients with various cancers initiating a new systemic regimen and at increased risk for VTE (defined as Khorana score ≥ 2)
Study designRandomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter studyRandomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter studyRandomized, controlled Phase 2b studyProspective, open label, randomized, multicenter and group-sequential 2b trialDouble-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study
InterventionArm A: nadroparin 3800 IU/d; Arm B: placebo; For duration of chemotherapy (up to 4 mo maximum)Arm A: Semuloparin, 20 mg/d; Arm B: placebo; For duration of chemotherapy (median: 3.5 mo)Arm A: Gemcitabine + Dalteparin 200 IU/kg s.c., o.d., for 4 wk, followed by a step-down regimen to 150 IU/kg for a further 8 wk); Arm B: Gemcitabine alone; For up to 12 wkArm A: Enoxaparin 1 mg/kg per day; Arm B: No enoxaparinArm A: rivaroxaban 10 mg o.d. up to day 180; Arm B: placebo up to day 180
Number of patients analyzedOverall population: Arm A: 769 patients; Arm B: 381 patients. PC subgroup: Arm A: 36 patients; Arm B: 17 patientsOverall population: Arm A: 1608 patients; Arm B: 1604 patients. PC subgroup: Arm A: 126 patients; Arm B: 128 patientsArm A: 59 patients; Arm B: 62 patientsArm A: 160 patients; Arm B: 152 patientsOverall population: Arm A: 420 patients; Arm B: 404 patients. PC patients: Arm A: 135 patients; Arm B: 138 patients
Follow-up120 d3 mo3 mo3 mo6 mo
Thromboembolic endpoint eventsOverall population: Arm A: 11/769 (1.4%); Arm B: 11/381 (2.9%); P = 0.02. PC subgroup: Arm A: 3/36 (8.3%); Arm B: 1/17 (5.9%); P = 0.755Overall population: Arm A:20/1608 (1.2%); Arm B: 55/1064 (1.2%); HR 0.36 (95%CI: 0.21-0.60); P < 0.001. PC subgroup: Arm A: 3/126 (2.4%); Arm B: 14/128 (10.9%); HR 0.22 (95%CI: 0.06-0.76); P = 0.015. At 3 mo: Arm A: 2/59 (3%); Arm B: 14/62 (23%); RR 0.145 (95%CI: 0.035-0.612); P = 0.002At 3 mo: Arm A: 2/160 (1.25%); Arm B: 15/152 (9.8%); HR 0.12 (95%CI: 0.03-0.52); P = 0.001. Entire study: Arm A: 7/59 (12%); Arm B: 17/62 (28%); RR 0.419 (95%CI: 0.187-0.935); P = 0.039Cumulative incidence rates: Arm A: 6.4%; Arm B: 15.1%; HR 0.40 (95%CI: 0.19-0.83); P = 0.01Overall population: Up-to-day-180 observation period: Arm A: 25/420 (5.95%); Arm B: 37/421 (8.79%); HR 0.66 (95%CI: 0.40-1.09); P = 0.101; NNT =3 5. Intervention period: Arm A: 11/420 (2.62%); Arm B: 27/421 (6.41%); HR 0.40 (95%CI: 0.20-0.80); P = 0.007; NNT = 26. PC subgroup: Up-to-day-180 observation period: Arm A: 13/135 (9.6%); Arm B: 18/138 (13.0%); HR 0.70 (95%CI: 0.34-1.43); P = 0.329. Intervention period: Arm A: 5/135 (3.7%); Arm B: 14/138 (10.1%); HR 0.35 (95%CI: 0.130-0.96); P = 0.043; NNT = 16
Bleeding Overall population: Major bleeding: Arm A: 5/769 (0.7%); Arm B: 0/381; P = 0.18. Minor bleeding: Arm A: 57/769 (7.4%); Arm B: 30/381 (7.9%); P = not significant. PC subgroup: P = not significantOverall population: Major bleeding: Arm A: 19/1589 (1.2%); Arm B: 18/1583 (1.1%); OR 1.05 (95%CI: 0.55-2.04). CRNMB: Arm A: 26/1589 (2.8%); Arm B: 14/1583 (0.9%); OR 1.86 (95%CI: 0.98-3.68). PC subgroup: P = not significantISTH severe: Arm A: 2/59 (3%); Arm B: 2/62 (3%). ISTH non severe: Arm A: 5/59 (9%); Arm B: 2/62 (3%)Major bleeding: Arm A: 8.3%; Arm B: 6.9%; HR 1.23 (95%CI: 0.54-2.79); P = 0.63Overall population: Major bleeding: Arm A: 8/405 (1.98%); Arm B: 4/404 (0.99%); HR 1.96 (95%CI: 0.59-6.49) P = 0.265; NNH = 101. CRNMB: Arm A: 2.72%; Arm B: 1.98%; HR 1.96 (95%CI: 0.59-6.49); P = 0.265; NNH = 101. PC subgroup: Major bleeding: Arm A: 2/130 (1.5%); Arm B: 3/131(2.3%); HR 0.67 (95%CI: 0.11-3.99); P = 0.654. CRNMB: Arm A: 3/131(2.3%); Arm B: 2/130 (1.5%); HR 2.47 (95%CI: 0.48-12.72); P = 0.264
SurvivalOverall population: Arm A: 33/769 (4∙3%); Arm B: 16/381 (4.2%); P = not significant. PC subgroup: not significantNot significantArm A: 8.7 mo; Arm B: 9.7 moArm A: 8.2 mo; Arm B: 8.51 mo; HR 1.01 (95%CI: 0.87-1.38); P = 0.44Overall population: All-cause mortality: Arm A: 20.0%; Arm B: 23.8%; HR 0.83 (95%CI 0.62-1.11); P = 0.213. PC subgroup: Arm A: 34/135 (25.2%); Arm B: 33/138 (23.9%)
Table 3 Randomized trials assessing the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants in cancer patients with venous thromboembolism

HOKUSAI-CANCER VTE[68] (n = 1050)
SELECT-D[69] (n = 406)
ADAM-VTE[70] (n = 300)
CARAVAGGIO[71] (n = 1155)
EdoxabanDalteparinRivaroxabanDalteparinApixabanDalteparinApixabanDalteparin
DoseLMWH × 5 d, then 60 mg OD200 IU/kg × 1 mo, then 150 U/kg daily15 mg BID × 3 wk, then 20 mg OD × 6mo200 IU/kg × 1 mo, then 150 U/kg daily10 mg BID × 7 d, then 5 mg BID × 6 mo200 IU/kg × 1 mo, then 150 U/kg daily10 mg BID × 7 d, then 5 mg BID × 6 mo200 IU/kg × 1 mo, then 150 U/kg daily
PatientsPatients with active cancer and symptomatic or incidental popliteal, femoral or iliac or IVC DVT, symptomatic or incidental PEPatients with active cancer and symptomatic DVT, symptomatic PE, or incidental PEActive cancer patients with acute DVT (including upper extremity), PE, splanchnic or cerebral vein thrombosisPatients with active or recent cancer and acute DVT or PE
PrimaryEndpointComposite of recurrent VTE/major bleeding at 12 moVTE recurrence over 6 moPrimary safety: Major bleeding at 6mo; secondary efficacy: VTE at 6 moEfficacy: Recurrent VTE at 6 mo; Safety: Major bleeding at 6 mo
Follow-up12 mo6 mo6 mo6 mo
Recurrent VTE (%)41/525 (7.9)59/525 (11.3)8/203 (4)18/203 (11)1/145 (0.7)9/142 (6.3)32/576 (5.6)46/579 (7.9)
HR (95%CI) for recurrent VTE0.71 (0.48-1.06), P = 0.0060.43 (0.19-0.99)0.099 (0.013-0.780), P = 0.030.63 (0.37-1.07, P < 0.001)
Major bleeding (%)36/525 (6.9)21/525 (4.0)11/203 (4)6/203 (6)0/145 (0)2/142 (1.4)22/576 (3.8)23/579 (4)
HR (CI) for major bleeding1.77 (1.03-3.04)1.83 (0.68-4.96)Not estimable0.82 (0.40-1.69, P = 0.6)
CRNMB (%)76/525 (14.6)58/525 (11.1)25/203 (12.3)7/203 (3.4)9/145 (6.2)7/142 (4.9)52/576 (9)35/579 (6.0)
HR (95%CI) for CRNMB1.38 (0.98-1.94)3.76 (1.63-8.69)0.931 (0.43-2.02), P = 0.881.42 (0.88-2.30)