Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 7, 2021; 27(1): 1-18
Published online Jan 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i1.1
Published online Jan 7, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i1.1
Ref. | Experimental model details | Biochemistry | Anatomy and histology | mRNA and protein expression | |
Alwahsh et al[84] | (1) Animal: 10 wk male Sprague- Dawley rat; (2) Initial weight: 270-310 g; (3) Diet: LD control, LD with 30% kcal from fructose, 30% kcal from EtOH, or LD with both fructose and EtOH; and (4) Duration: 28 d | (1) ↑ ALT; (2) ↑ liver and plasma TG; (3) ↑ plasma leptin; (4) ↓ plasma HDL; (5) ↓ plasma albumin; and (6) No dif. in leptin or hepatic TG between LD-EtOH and LD- fructose-EtOH | (1) Portal inflammatory infiltration and stage 1 fibrosis (LD-EtOH); (2) Periportal macrosteatosis (LD- fructose); and (3) Portal inflammation, periportal macrosteatosis, fibrosis (LD- fructose-EtOH) | (1) ↑ leptin; (2) ↑ ACC-2; (3) ↑ lipase in LD-EtOH, but ↓ in LD-fructose and LD-fructose-EtOH; (4) ↓ IRS-1, IRS-2 (fructose groups); and (5) ↑ CD36, CPT-1α, PPARα in LD- EtOH and LD-fructose, but no change in LD-fructose-EtOH | |
Bucher et al[112] | (1) Animal: 7 wk male C57BL/6J Mouse; (2) Initial weight: 20-23 g; (3) Diet: Control (3 kcal/g food; 16% kcal protein) or HFD (5.5 kcal/g; 60% kcal SFA); 10 g/kg/d EtOH in drinking water; and (4) Duration: 4 mo | (1) ↑ ALT, but ↓ ALT compared to EtOH-naïve HFD; (2) ↑ cholesterol, but ↓ cholesterol compared to EtOH-naïve HFD; (3) ↑ TG↑ serum glucose; (4) ↑ serum insulin; and (5) ↑ MUFA and ↓ SFA (compared to HFD) | (1) Mediovesicular and macrovacular steatosis and (2) No dif. in necroinflammation or perisinusoidal fibrosis between HFD and HFD-EtOH | (1) ↑ genes for apoptosis inhibition, acetyl-CoA synthesis, lipogenesis, mitochondrial functions (NADH dehydrogenase, COX, ATP synthase), and proteolysis; (2) ↓ genes for apoptosis (BCL-2 homologs), fibrosis (collagen), chemotaxis, oxidative stress (GPx, HMOX-1, SOD); and (3) ↓ CYP2E1 protein levels | |
Carmiel-Haggai et al[94] | (1) Animal: 15 wk male fa/fa Zucker Rat; (2) Initial weight: 595 ± 35 g (obese), 316 ± 32 g (lean controls); and (3) Diet: 35% v/v EtOH in saline every 12 h for 3 d; final dose was 4 g/kg EtOH | (1) ↑ ALT; (2) ↑ NEFA; (3) ↑ LPO by-products (4-HNE, MDA); and (4) ↓ CYP2E1 activity | (1) Macrovesicular steatosis (EtOH- naïve fa/fa) and (2) Lobular microvesicular, central macrosteatosis, inflammation (EtOH-fed fa/fa) | (1) ↓ GSH, GPx, GR; (2) ↓ GSSG (EtOH-fed and EtOH-naïve fa/fa); (3) ↓ catalase, SOD; (4) ↑ iNOS; (5) ↑ caspase 3, caspase 8; (6) ↑ BCL-XL, FAS ligand; and (7) ↑ BCL-2, BAX (EtOH-fed and EtOH-naïve fa/fa) | |
Duly et al[80] | (1) Animal: 6-8 wk male C57BL/6 Mouse; (2) Initial weight: 20 g; (3) Diet: chow (12% kcal fat) or HFD (45% kcal fat, 0.25% cholesterol); 2 g/kg EtOH in saline twice per wk; and (4) Duration: 12 wk | (1) ↑ TG (chow-EtOH, but not HFD or HFD-EtOH); (2) ↑ cholesterol, HDL, LDL (but no difference between HFD and HFD- EtOH); and (3) ↑ serum insulin | (1) Steatosis and lipid accumulation; (2) Collagen deposition; (3) ↑ cellular infiltration; (4) ↑ CD45+ leukocytes; (5) ↑ F4/80+ Kupffer cells; and (6) ↑ vimentin+ HSCs | (1) ↑ SREBP-1; (2) ↑ SCD-1; (3) ↑ PPARα; (4) ↓ ACOX-1; (5) No dif. in TGFβ or HSP90; and (6) ↑ collagen I, PAI-1 (EtOH-naïve HFD) | |
Everitt et al[87] | (1) Animal: 12 wk male ob/ob C57BL/6-J/Rj-ob mouse; (2) Diet: PUFA-enriched LD with 27.5% EtOH or isocaloric maltodextrin; and (3) Duration: 4 wk | (1) ↑ ALT/AST; (2) ↑ hepatic TG; (3) ↑ hepatic cholesterol; (4) ↑ hepatic lactate; (5) ↓ hepatic pyruvate; (6) No dif. in BAL between EtOH-fed; and (7) ob/ob and EtOH-fed lean mice | Steatosis in EtOH-fed ob/ob | (1) ↑ mTOR, PPARγ, FGF-21, FSP-27; (2) ↑ SIRT-1, pAMPKα, AMPKα, pACC (ob compared to lean; EtOH did not have an effect); (3) ↑ adipose TNFα, ↓ hepatic TNFα; (4) ↑ cytosolic lipin-1 protein levels; (5) ↓ nuclear lipin-1 protein levels; (6) ↓ PGC-1α; and (7) ↓ ACOX-1 | |
Gäbele et al[77] | (1) Animal: 12 wk female Balb/c mouse; (2) Diet: Chow or HFD [17% fat (50% lard, 50% cacao-butter), 1.25% cholesterol, 0.5% cholate]; 5% EtOH in ad libitum; and (3) Duration: 6 wk | (1) ↑ hepatic TG; (2) ↑ portal blood LPS; and (3) ↓ BAL (not statistically significant) | (1) Steatosis in HFD-fed mice; (2) ↑ 4-HNE; (3) ↑ αSMA+ cells; (4) ↑ collagen I; and (5) ↑ ECM deposition | (1) ↑ p47phox, TNF, TGFβ, collagen I; (2) ↑ TLR-4 in HFD mice, with no effect by EtOH; (3) ↑ αSMA protein levels; and (4) ↓ CYP2E1 protein levels in HFD | |
Gopal et al[79] | (1) Animal: 6-8 wk male C57BL/6 mouse; (2) Diet: Chow or HFD (45% kcal fat) for 10 wk, then LD control or 5% v/v EtOH LD for 4 wk additionally; and (3) Drug: HFD mice also given 1000 U/kg Cu/Zn SOD-1 with polylysine- PEG copolymer in 10 mM HEPES every 2 d for 2 wk | (1) ↑ ALT; (2) ↑ FFA; (3) ↓ leptin; (4) nanoSOD treatment counteracted the above effects; and (5) No dif. in MDA between groups | (1) ↑ adipose mass by HFD, but ↓ fat/body weight ratio by HFD- EtOH; (2) ↑ microvesicular steatosis (in all mice); (3) ↑ macrovesicular steatosis; (4) ↑ inflammatory nodules; (5) ↑ hepatocyte ballooning; and (6) ↑ MCP-1 protein levels, ↓ MCP-1 in HFD-EtOH mice treated with nanoSOD | (1) ↑ adipose CYP2E1 protein levels, ↓ CYP2E1 by nanoSOD; (2) ↑ hepatic CYP2E1, ADH, catalase, ↓ CYP2E1 and ADH, but ↑ catalase by nanoSOD; (3) ↑ PPARα, ACOX-1 in HFD, further ↑ ACOX-1 by EtOH, further ↑ for both by nanoSOD; and (4) ↑ CCL-2, MMP-12; ↓ by nanoSOD | |
Jung et al[108] | (1) Animal: Female C57BL/6J mouse; (2) Diet: Control (69% carbohydrates, 12% fat, 19% protein) or FFC (60% carbohydrates, 25% fat, 15% protein, 50% wt/wt fructose, 0.16% wt/wt cholesterol); Diets enriched with 2.5 g/kg EtOH, isocaloric beer (4.9% v/v EtOH), or isocaloric diet; and (3) Duration: 7 wk | (1) ↑ TG; ↓ in beer-treated FFC compared to EtOH-treated or naïve and (2) ↓ glucose tolerance in all FFC-fed groups | (1) ↑ neutrophil granulocytes; ↓ by beer in FFC-fed mice; (2) ↑ NAS; ↓ by beer in FFC-fed mice; (3) ↑ iNOS protein levels; ↓ by beer and EtOH in FFC-fed mice; and (4) ↑ 4-HNE; ↓ by beer and EtOH in FFC-fed mice | (1) ↑ IR, IRS-2 in FFC-EtOH and FFC- beer compared to naïve; no dif. in IRS-1; (2) ↓ adiponectin in FFC and FFC- EtOH, but ↑ in FFC-beer; (3) ↑ hepatic AdipoR1 and SIRT-1 in FFC-beer; and (4) No dif. in PPARγ, AdipoR2, FASN, SREBP-1c, ACOX-1 between groups | |
Kanuri et al[106] | (1) Animal: 6 wk male ob/ob C57BL/6 mouse; (2) Diet: 2.5 g/kg/d EtOH in drinking water; and (3) Duration: 6 wk | (1) ↑ ALT/AST in ob/ob, but ↓ slightly by EtOH in ob/ob; (2) ↑ TG, cholesterol, HDL, LDL in ob/ob, but no effect by EtOH; and (3) No dif. in FFA | (1) Steatosis, hepatomegaly in ob/ob; (2) Macrovesicular steatosis in EtOH- naïve ob/ob; (3) Microvesicular steatosis in EtOH- fed ob/ob; and (4) ↓ hepatic neutrophils | (1) ↑ PLIN-2, PLIN-3, TNFα, PAI-1 in ob/ob, ↓ PAI-1, PLIN-2, PLIN-3 by EtOH; (2) ↓ IRS-1, IRS-2, adiponectin, SIRT- 1 in ob/ob; ↑ adiponectin, SIRT-1 by EtOH; (3) No effect by EtOH on PPARγ, ACOX-1, SREBP-1c, IRS-1, IRS02, GLUT-4, glucokinase, PEPCK; and (4) No dif. in hepatic ACOX-1, PPARγ | |
Kitagawa et al[93] | (1) Animal: 8 wk female KK-Ay mouse; (2) Diet: LD with 5% EtOH or isocaloric maltodextrin; Single gavage of 4 g/kg EtOH or gavage on after 11 d; (3) Drug: 0.1 g/L rifaximin (RFX); and (4) Duration: 10 d | (1) ↑ ALT; (2) ↑ serum and hepatic TG; (3) ↑ portal blood LPS; (4) ↑ CYP2E1 activity; and (5) ↓ ALT, TG, LPS (but not to basal levels) in EtOH-fed treated with RFX | (1) Lipid droplet accumulation in hepatic lobule; (2) Hepatomegaly; (3) ↑ 4-HNE; and (4) RFX counteractedthe aboveeffects | (1) ↑ ACCα, FASN; TNFα, IL-6, ILNγ; CCL-2; CD14, TLR-4, TLR-2; HMOX- 1, NOX-1; (2) ↓ CPT-1α; (3) ↑ CYP2E1 protein levels; no effect by RFX; and (4) RFX counteracted effects of EtOH on ACCα, FASN, TNFα, IFNγ, TLR-4, HMOX-1, and NOX-2, CPT-1α | |
Lazaro et al[81] | (1) Animal: Male WT and OPN- knockout C57BL/6 mice and (2) Diet: High-fat, high-cholesterol diet for 2 wk, then iG liquid HFD-EtOH (36% kcal from corn oil; 27 g/kg/d EtOH) or isocaloric HFD for 8 wk; Some HFD-EtOH given 4-5 g/kg/wk EtOH by gavage | (1) ↑ ALT, but ↓ with binge EtOH; ↓ ALT in binge-treated OPN KO compared to binge-treated WT; (2) ↑ bilirubin, ↓ albumin; (3) ↑ TG; and (4) No dif. in BAL | (1) Steatosis, hepatomegaly, mononuclear cell inflammation, neutrophil infiltration, perisinusoidal and percellular fibrosis in HFD-EtOH and (2) Splenomegaly, ↑ TLR-4 in binge-treated mice; effect of binge greater in OPN KO | (1) ↑ collagen I, αSMA, TIMP-1 by EtOH; further ↑ by EtOH binge; (2) ↑ myeloperoxidase, CXCL-1, OPN in binge-treated; and (3) ↑ myeloperoxidase, IL-17α in binge-treated OPN KO | |
Minato et al[96] | (1) Animal: 30 wk male OLET and OLETF rat; (2) Initial weight: 620 ± 15 g (OLETF), 460 ± 10 g (OLET); (3) Diet: 10 mL 10% EtOH by gavage for 1-5 d/wk; and (4) Duration: 3 wk | (1) ↑ ALT/AST; (2) ↑ serum and hepatic TG; (3) ↑ serum glucose; (4) ↑ serum insulin in OLETF, with no effect from EtOH; and (5) ↑ serum adiponectin in OLETF, ↓ by EtOH in OLETF | (1) Mild pericentral microvesicular steatosis in EtOH-naïve OLETF; (2) Steatohepatitis, focal hepatic necrosis, and hepatocyte ballooning in EtOH-treated OLETF; (3) ↑ hepatic CYP2E1; and (4) ↑ 4-ΗΝΕ | (1) ↑ PPARγ in OLETF, with no effect from EtOH and (2) ↑ TNFα | |
Nieto et al[85] | (1) Animal: 12 wk male Lewis rat; (2) Initial weight: 100 g; (3) Diet: Choline deficient (CD) diet; (4) 15 mL/kg whiskey by gavage 3 times per wk; and (5) Duration: 3 mo | (1) ↑ ALT/AST; (2) ↑ TG; (3) ↑ NEFA; (4) ↑ MDA, protein carbonyls; (5) ↑ serum TNFα, but ↓ in CD- whiskey; (6) ↑ CYP2E1 activity; (7) ↑ caspase-3, caspase-8 activity | (1) Minimal steatosis in whiskey-naïve CD rats and (2) Periportal and percentral microvesicular steatosis in CD-whiskey rats | (1) ↑ collagen 1, αSMA, cytochrome c, HSP47, CYP2E1; (2) ↑ leptin, TIMP-1, and BAX protein levels by CD, with no effect by whiskey; and (3) ↓ MMP-2, MMP-9, MMP-13, BCL-2, BCL-XL by CD, with no effect by whiskey | |
Osaki et al[101] | (1) Animal: Male Sprague-Dawley rat; (2) Initial weight: 106 g; (3) Diet: HFD (30% beef tallow, 20% casein, 20% sucrose); 1%-2% v/v EtOH ad libitum; and (4) Duration: 12 wk | (1) ↓ ALT; no dif. in AST; (2) ↓ ammonia, urate; (3) No dif. in serum glucose, FFA, cholesterol, HDL, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase levels, urea, creatinine, lactate, acetate; (4) No dif. in hepatic TG, MDA; (5) No dif. in hepatic, renal, or pulmonary thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances | No dif. in hepatic TG, MDA No dif. in weight of liver, epididymal adipose tissue, perirenal adipose tissue, or gastrocnemius muscle | No dif. in TNFα, adiponectin, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1, hemoglobin | |
Robin et al[86] | (1) Animal: Male ob/ob C57BL/6J mouse; (2) Initial weight: 49-56 g (obese), 26- 30 g (lean); (3) Diet: 2.5 g/kg/d EtOH by gastric intubation; (4) Drug: 100 mg/kg/d pentoxifylline (PTX) by iP; and (5) Duration: 4 d | (1) ↑ ALT in ob/ob; no effect by EtOH; (2) ↑ caspase-3,CYP2E1, SOD activities; ↓ caspase 3 by PTX; (3) ↓ GPx, cytosolic GT activity in ob/ob, but no effect by EtOH; (4) ↓ mitochondrial GT activity by EtOH; and (5) No dif. in GR activity | (1) Steatosis, caspase-3 activation in ob/ob; (2) TUNEL+ hepatocytes; and (3) Necrosis, inflammation in EtOH-naïve ob/ob | (1) ↑ TNFα protein levels; ↓ by PTX; (2) ↑ IκBα protein levels, ↓ NF-κB p65; ↓ NF-κB activity; (3) ↓ iNOS, BCL-XL; (4) ↓ cytosolic GSH, mitochondrial GSSG; and (5) ↑ HSP70 | |
Song et al[124] | (1) Animal: 6 wk male C57BL/6J mouse; (2) Diet: high-fructose diet (20.2% kcal protein, 66.96% kcal carbohydrates, 12.9% kcal fat); 10% v/v EtOH for 2 d, 15% for 5 d, 20% for 17 wk; and (3) Duration: 18 wk | (1) ↑ ALT/AST; (2) ↑ plasma TG, NEFA, cholesterol by EtOH, but not fructose; (3) ↑ plasma glucose by fructose diet, ↓ glucose by EtOH; (4) ↑ insulin by fructose and EtOH, but not combined fructose-EtOH; (5) ↓ copper by fructose and EtOH, but not combined fructose-EtOH | (1) ↑ microvesicular steatosis and (2) ↑ macrovesicular steatosis in EtOH-naïve fructose; ↓ by fructose-EtOH diet | (1) ↑ hepatic CYP2E1 protein levels; (2) ↑ KHK in EtOH-naïve fructose; (3) ↑ F4/80, CD68, and TNFα, MyD88, IRF-3, and TRAF-6; (4) ↑ CCL-2, TLR-4, and IRF-7 only in fructose-EtOH; (5) ↑ CD163, IL-1β, or ARG-1 by EtOH, but no effect by fructose; and (6) No dif. in IL-6, IL-10 | |
Sun et al[107] | (1) Animal: Male Sprague-Dawley rats; (2) Initial weight: 80-100 g; (3) Diet: HFD (38% fat, 2% cholesterol, 1% cholate) or control (38% kcal from fat); 4 g/kg/d EtOH by gavage beginning after 3 wk; and (4) Duration: 12 wk | No dif. in plasma LPS levels | (1) ↑ steatosis, fibrosis in HFD mice compared to HFD-EtOH and (2) ↑ Kupffer cell and HSC activation in HFD mice compared to HFD- EtOH | ↑ inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, CXCL-1, CXCL-2, IL-1β, IL-6), pro- fibrotic markers (αSMA, collagen, TGF-β, TIMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-9) in HFD compared to HFD-EtOH | |
Suzuki et al[92] | (1) Animal: 8 wk male KK-Ay mouse; (2) Diet: LD containing 5% EtOH or isocaloric maltodextrin; 4 g/kg EtOH or isocaloric maltodextrin by gavage on day 11; (3) Drug: 120 mg/kg/d phenylbutyric acid (PBA); and (4) Duration: 10 d | (1) ↑ ALT/AST in chronic-binge mice; no dif. in ALT/AST between chronic-only and controls; (2) ↑ serum and hepatic TG; (3) No dif. in blood glucose; and (4) PBA ↓ ALT/AST, TG in EtOH-fed mice compared to PBA-naïve | (1) ↑ steatosis, PMN infiltration, ccCK18+ hepatocytes, 4-HNE+ cells in chronic-binge mice and (2) PBA alleviated liver injury, but did not decrease 4-HNE+ cell count | (1) ↑ inflammatory cytokines (TNFα, IL-6), ER stress markers (BiP, uXBP-1, sXBP-1, IP3R1, CHOP), and HMOX-1 by chronic-binge; PBA ↓ aforementioned genes; (2) ↑ BiP, uXBP-1 in chronic, but not sXBP-1, IP3R1, CHOP, HMOX-1; and (3) ↑ CYP2E1; PBA had no effect | |
Wang et al[78] | (1) Animal: 8 wk male Sprague-Dawley rat; (2) Diet: LD control (35% kcal from fat) or LD HFD (71% kcal from fat) for 6 wk; then LD HFD were given either solid HFD (55% kcal fat) or HF-EtOH diet (55% kcal fat, 16% kcal EtOH) for 4 wk; (3) Duration: 10 wk | (1) ↑ TUNEL+ hepatocytes; (2) ↑ cleaved caspase-3 levels; and (3) No dif. in 4-HNE or MDA levels between HFD and HFD-EtOH, but ↑ compared to controls | (1) Lipid droplet accumulation; (2) ↑ steatosis; and (3) ↑ number of inflammatory foci | (1) ↑ Fas death receptor and ligand; (2) No dif. in caspase-3 expression; (3) No dif. in CYP2E1, TNFα, TNFR-1, IL-1β, IL-12 between HFD and HFD-EtOH, but ↑ compared to controls | |
Xu et al[83] | (1) Animal: 8 wk male C57BL/6J mouse; (2) Diet: 580 kcal/kg/d (control) or 986 kcal/kg/d (overfed) of liquid HFD (37% kcal corn oil) by iG infusion for 45 d; 23 g/kg/d (low dose) or 32 g/kg/d (high dose) via iG infusion added to diet after 45; controls received isocaloric amount of diet; and (3) Duration: 10 wk | (1) ↑ hepatic TG, hepatic MDA, BAL in EtOH-treated overfed mice and (2) ↑ ALT in overfed mice; dose- dependent ↑ ALT by EtOH | (1) Steatosis, mononuclear cell infiltration in EtOH-treated (high dose) control mice; (2) Steatohepatitis and pericellular fibrosis in EtOH-treated (high dose) overfed mice; (3) ↑ macrophage infiltration in WAT in EtOH-treated overfed mice; and (4) No dif. in liver histology between EtOH-naïve overfed mice and controls | (1) ↑ M1 polarization markers (iNOS, TNFα) in liver and WAT for overfed-EtOH mice; (2) ↑ M2 markers (IL-10, ARG-1) in WAT, but ↓in liver for overfed- EtOH mice; (3) ↓ AdipoR, mitochondrial function genes (PGC-1α, PPARα, COX, cytochrome c, ACOX-1), in overfed-EtOH; (4) ↑ SREBP-1, ↓ pACC in EtOH; and (5) No effect on AMPK, PPARδ by overfeeding or EtOH |
- Citation: Buyco DG, Martin J, Jeon S, Hooks R, Lin C, Carr R. Experimental models of metabolic and alcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27(1): 1-18
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v27/i1/1.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i1.1