Ippolito D, Drago SG, Pecorelli A, Maino C, Querques G, Mariani I, Franzesi CT, Sironi S. Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(20): 2657-2668 [PMID: 32523318 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2657]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Davide Ippolito, MD, Adjunct Professor, Staff Physician, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, H. S. Gerardo Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via Pergolesi 33, Monza 20900, Italy. davide.atena@tiscalinet.it
Research Domain of This Article
Oncology
Article-Type of This Article
Prospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 28, 2020; 26(20): 2657-2668 Published online May 28, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i20.2657
Table 1 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters in the healthy rectal wall and the tumor tissue, determines through the dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study for staging rectal cancer (MR1)
DCE-MRI parameters
Healthy rectal wall
Rectal tumor
P value
RAE (mean ± SD)
57.5 ± 41.5
100 ± 38
0.005
RVE (mean ± SD)
75.5 ± 43
119.5 ± 26.5
0.005
RLE (mean ± SD)
82 ± 38.5
114 ± 22.5
0.005
ME (mean ± SD)
807 ± 227.5
1143.5 ± 348
0.004
TTP (mean ± SD)
217 ± 79
185 ± 41
0.040
AUC (mean ± SD)
114388.5 ± 46237.5
186197 ± 41042.5
0.005
Table 2 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters between responders and non-responders, in the healthy rectal wall, determines through a dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study during staging (MR1) and restaging (MR2) of rectal cancer after chemo-radiotherapy
DCE-MRI parameters
Responders
Non-responders
MR1
MR2
P value
MR1
MR2
P value
RAE (mean ± SD)
62 ± 33
51 ± 8
0.77
53 ± 50
63 ± 33
0.47
RVE (mean ± SD)
70 ± 40
60 ± 14
0.73
81 ± 46
69 ± 42
0.68
RLE (mean ± SD)
72 ± 35
76 ± 10
0.49
92 ± 42
63 ± 52
0.61
ME (mean ± SD)
662 ± 98
882 ± 251
0.11
952 ± 357
847 ± 358
0.87
TTP (mean ± SD)
230 ± 61
223 ± 32
0.64
204 ± 97
151 ± 56
0.05
AUC (mean ± SD)
120261 ± 46709
114347 ± 32930
0.74
108516 ± 45766
114187 ± 28584
0.99
Table 3 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters between responders and non-responders, in the tumor tissue, determines through a dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study for staging rectal cancer (MR1)
DCE-MRI Parameters
Responders
Non-responders
P value
RAE (mean ± SD)
115 ± 21
85 ± 55
0.27
RVE (mean ± SD)
119 ± 21
120 ± 32
0.94
RLE (mean ± SD)
111 ± 14
117 ± 31
0.72
ME (mean ± SD)
1060 ± 325
1227 ± 371
0.52
TTP (mean ± SD)
196 ± 12
175 ± 70
0.51
AUC (mean ± SD)
203361 ± 14347
169033 ± 67738
0.28
Table 4 Differences in terms of perfusion parameters between responders and non-responders in the tumor tissue, determines through a dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study for rectal cancer restaging (MR2) after chemo-radiotherapy
DCE-MRI parameters
Responders
Non-responders
P value
RAE (mean ± SD)
54 ± 20
129 ± 45
0.02
RVE (mean ± SD)
73 ± 24
154 ± 39
< 0.05
RLE (mean ± SD)
82 ± 29
164 ± 35
< 0.05
ME (mean ± SD)
904 ± 429
1714 ± 427
0.03
TTP (mean ± SD)
218 ± 18
196 ± 23
0.15
AUC (mean ± SD)
120894 ± 50495
258022 ± 86469
0.02
Citation: Ippolito D, Drago SG, Pecorelli A, Maino C, Querques G, Mariani I, Franzesi CT, Sironi S. Role of dynamic perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in patients with local advanced rectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(20): 2657-2668