Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246 [PMID: 32476789 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Beom Su Kim, MD, PhD, Surgeon, Associate professor, Division of Stomach Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul 05505, South Korea. bskim0251@naver.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246 Published online May 14, 2020. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i18.2232
Table 1 The basic demographics and clinicopathologic characteristics of patients who underwent distal and total gastrectomy with curative intent for gastric adenocarcinoma, n (%)
Variables
Distal gastrectomy (n = 859)
Total gastrectomy (n = 659)
Age (yr; median) at operation
60 (23-87)
57 (22-86)
Sex
Male
603 (70.2)
441 (66.9)
Female
256 (29.8)
218 (33.1)
BMI (kg/m2, median)
23.2 (16.0-36.2)
23.4 (13.4-36.0)
ASA
1
246 (28.6)
213 (32.3)
2
571 (66.5)
427 (64.8)
3
39 (4.5)
17 (2.6)
4
3 (0.3)
2 (0.3)
Tumor location
Upper 1/3
8 (0.9)
266 (40.4)
Middle 1/3
225 (26.2)
320 (48.6)
Lower 1/3
626 (72.9)
73 (11.1)
Reconstruction
Billroth I
610 (71.0)
Billroth II
137 (15.9)
RYGJ
112 (13.0)
RY
659 (100.0)
Bormann classification
I
14 (1.6)
14 (2.1)
II
162 (18.9)
66 (10.0)
III
660 (76.8)
499 (75.7)
IV
23 (2.7)
80 (12.1)
Tumor size (cm, median)
5.0 (0.8-18)
6.0 (0.7-24)
CLN
27 (15-75)
30 (15-106)
PLN
2 (0-49)
3 (0-101)
T stage
T2
288 (33.5)
110 (16.7)
T3
370 (43.1)
310 (47.0)
T4a
195 (22.7)
226 (34.3)
T4b
6 (0.7)
13 (2.0)
N stage
N0
308 (35.9)
203 (30.8)
N1
181 (21.1)
110 (16.7)
N2
173 (20.1)
128 (19.4)
N3a
159 (18.5)
133 (20.2)
N3b
38 (4.4)
85 (12.9)
AJCC stage
Stage I
155 (18.0)
66 (10.0)
Stage II
336 (39.1)
235 (35.7)
Stage III
368 (42.8)
358 (54.3)
PRM (cm; median)
4.8 (0.3-17)
3.5 (0.1-18.5)
DRM (cm; median)
3.2 (0.2-19)
9.4 (0.3-27)
Histology
Differentiated
351 (40.9)
192 (29.1)
Undifferentiated
508 (59.1)
467 (70.9)
Lymphovascular invasion
413 (48.1)
360 (54.6)
Perineural invasion
368 (42.8)
344 (52.2)
Recurrence
220 (25.6)
251 (38.1)
Locoregional recurrence
60
41
Hematogenous metastasis
74
83
Extra-abdominal LN metastasis
2
1
Peritoneal metastasis
74
1
Mixed
10
17
Table 2 Clinicopathologic factors depending on the distance from the proximal resection margin in patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy, n (%)
Table 3 Clinicopathologic factors depending on the distance from the proximal resection margin in patients who underwent curative total gastrectomy, n (%)
Table 4 Analysis of the risk factors associated with overall survival in patients who underwent distal gastrectomy using the Cox proportional hazard model
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age
1.04 (1.03-1.05)
< 0.001
1.04 (1.03-1.05)
< 0.001
Female sex
0.89 (0.69-1.15)
0.367
BMI
0.94 (0.90-0.98)
0.002
Tumor location
Upper 1/3
Ref.
Mid 1/3
3.11 (0.43-22.4)
0.260
Lower 1/3
3.54 (0.50-25.2)
0.208
Reconstruction
Billroth I
Ref.
Ref.
Billroth II
1.66 (1.26-2.20)
< 0.001
1.40 (1.04-1.87)
0.025
RYGJ
1.34 (0.96-1.86)
0.083
1.45 (1.04-2.03)
0.030
Tumor size
1.11 (1.06-1.16)
< 0.001
Borrmann type IV
0.96 (0.48-1.94)
0.914
CLN
0.99 (0.98-1.00)
0.045
0.99 (0.98-1.00)
0.034
T stage
T2
Ref.
Ref.
T3
1.36 (1.01-1.83)
0.044
1.08 (0.79-1.48)
0.612
T4
3.02 (2.24-4.06)
< 0.001
1.90 (1.38-2.62)
< 0.001
N stage
N0
Ref.
Ref.
N1
1.07 (0.73-1.56)
0.739
0.92 (0.63-1.36)
0.686
N2
2.33 (1.67-3.25)
< 0.001
2.06 (1.46-2.90)
< 0.001
N3
3.74 (2.77-5.05)
< 0.001
3.10 (2.25-4.28)
< 0.001
Diffuse type histology
1.00 (0.79-1.25)
0.967
LVi
1.82 (1.44-2.29)
< 0.001
PNi
1.32 (1.06-1.66)
0.015
PRM (cm)
0-1.0
Ref.
1.1-3.0
0.57 (0.27-1.19)
0.134
3.1-5.0
0.59 (0.29-1.23)
0.162
> 5.0
0.61 (0.30-1.25)
0.175
Table 5 Analysis of the risk factors associated with overall survival in patients who underwent total gastrectomy using the Cox proportional hazard model
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age
1.02 (1.01-1.03)
< 0.001
1.03 (1.02-1.04)
< 0.001
Female sex
1.03 (0.81-1.30)
0.834
BMI
0.95 (0.92-0.99)
0.009
Tumor location
Upper 1/3
Ref.
Mid 1/3
0.76 (0.60-0.95)
0.018
Lower 1/3
0.94 (0.65-1.35)
0.723
Tumor size
1.09 (1.07-1.12)
< 0.001
Borrmann type IV
2.21 (1.66-2.94)
< 0.001
1.93 (1.43-2.60)
< 0.001
CLN
1.00 (0.99-1.01)
0.548
0.99 (0.98-1.00)
0.035
T stage
T2
Ref.
Ref.
T3
1.67 (1.14-2.45)
0.008
1.21 (0.81-1.81)
0.352
T4
3.24 (2.22-4.72)
< 0.001
1.85 (1.22-2.79)
0.004
N stage
N0
Ref.
Ref.
N1
1.11 (0.74-1.68)
0.617
1.03 (0.67-1.57)
0.900
N2
1.73 (1.21-2.46)
0.003
1.48 (1.01-2.18)
0.045
N3
3.87 (2.88-5.19)
< 0.001
2.81 (1.98-3.98)
< 0.001
Diffuse type histology
1.23 (0.96-1.58)
0.103
LVi
2.09 (1.65-2.64)
< 0.001
1.43 (1.10-1.86)
0.008
PNi
1.60 (1.27-2.00)
< 0.001
PRM (cm)
0-1.0
Ref.
1.1-3.0
0.80 (0.57-1.10)
0.164
3.1-5.0
0.65 (0.45-0.93)
0.019
> 5.0
0.81 (0.58-1.12)
0.202
Table 6 Analysis of the risk factors associated with recurrence-free survival in patients who underwent distal gastrectomy using the Cox proportional hazard model
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age
1.02 (1.00-1.03)
0.011
1.02 (1.00-1.03)
0.012
Female sex
0.93 (0.69-1.25)
0.636
BMI
0.96 (0.92-1.00)
0.068
Tumor location
Upper 1/3
Ref.
Mid 1/3
2.32 (0.32-16.77)
0.403
Lower 1/3
2.35 (0.33-16.76)
0.395
Reconstruction
Billroth I
Ref.
Ref.
Billroth II
1.90 (1.37-2.64)
< 0.001
1.50 (1.08-2.10)
0.016
RYGJ
1.87 (1.31-2.67)
0.001
1.72 (1.20-2.47)
0.003
Tumor size
1.16 (1.10-1.21)
< 0.001
Borrmann type IV
1.04 (0.46-2.33)
0.931
CLN
1.00 (0.99-1.01)
0.91
T stage
T2
Ref.
Ref.
T3
2.61 (1.72-3.96)
< 0.001
1.92 (1.25-2.95)
0.003
T4
6.17 (4.08-9.34)
< 0.001
3.42 (2.21-5.31)
< 0.001
N stage
N0
Ref.
Ref.
N1
1.23 (0.75-2.03)
0.415
1.03 (0.62-1.70)
0.92
N2
3.42 (2.26-5.19)
< 0.001
2.55 (1.67-3.89)
< 0.001
N3
5.75 (3.92-8.42)
< 0.001
3.88 (2.59-5.80)
< 0.001
Diffuse type histology
1.19 (0.91-1.57)
0.206
1.05 (0.79-1.39)
0.758
LVi
2.29 (1.73-3.02)
< 0.001
PNi
1.63 (1.25-2.12)
< 0.001
PRM (cm)
0-1.0
Ref.
1.1-3.0
1.03 (0.37-2.86)
0.949
3.1-5.0
0.78 (0.29-2.15)
0.633
> 5.0
0.84 (0.31-2.29)
0.734
Table 7 Analysis of the risk factors associated with recurrence-free survival in patients who underwent total gastrectomy using the Cox proportional hazard model
Univariate
Multivariate
HR (95%CI)
P value
HR (95%CI)
P value
Age
1.01 (1.00-1.02)
0.071
1.01 (1.00-1.02)
0.032
Female sex
1.23 (0.95-1.56)
0.118
BMI
0.96 (0.92-1.00)
0.067
Tumor location
Upper 1/3
Ref.
Mid 1/3
0.67 (0.51-0.87)
0.002
Lower 1/3
0.86 (0.57-1.30)
0.859
Tumor size
1.11 (1.08-1.14)
< 0.001
1.03 (1.00-1.07)
0.075
Borrmann type IV
2.84 (2.10-3.83)
< 0.001
1.91 (1.32-2.76)
0.001
CLN
1.00 (0.99-1.01)
0.612
T stage
T2
Ref.
Ref.
T3
2.20 (1.36-3.54)
0.001
1.31 (0.90-2.16)
0.289
T4
4.18 (2.60-6.72)
< 0.001
1.90 (1.14-3.18)
0.014
N stage
N0
Ref.
Ref.
N1
1.43 (0.89-2.31)
0.139
1.27 (0.77-2.07)
0.348
N2
2.35 (1.55-3.56)
< 0.001
1.68 (1.06-2.65)
0.026
N3
4.90 (3.43-6.99)
< 0.001
2.84 (1.87-4.32)
< 0.001
Diffuse type histology
1.14 (0.86-1.50)
0.357
LVi
2.41 (1.84-3.15)
< 0.001
1.44 (1.08-1.91)
0.013
PNi
1.71 (1.33-2.21)
< 0.001
PRM (cm)
0-1.0
Ref.
1.1-3.0
0.80 (0.55-1.15)
0.225
3.1-5.0
0.63 (0.42-0.95)
0.028
> 5.0
0.74 (0.51-1.07)
0.104
Citation: Kim A, Kim BS, Yook JH, Kim BS. Optimal proximal resection margin distance for gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26(18): 2232-2246