Chai NL, Li HK, Linghu EQ, Li ZS, Zhang ST, Bao Y, Chen WG, Chiu PW, Dang T, Gong W, Han ST, Hao JY, He SX, Hu B, Hu B, Huang XJ, Huang YH, Jin ZD, Khashab MA, Lau J, Li P, Li R, Liu DL, Liu HF, Liu J, Liu XG, Liu ZG, Ma YC, Peng GY, Rong L, Sha WH, Sharma P, Sheng JQ, Shi SS, Seo DW, Sun SY, Wang GQ, Wang W, Wu Q, Xu H, Xu MD, Yang AM, Yao F, Yu HG, Zhou PH, Zhang B, Zhang XF, Zhai YQ. Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(7): 744-776 [PMID: 30809078 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.744]
Corresponding Author of This Article
En-Qiang Linghu, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, No. 28, Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing 100853, China. linghuenqiang@vip.sina.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Guidelines
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 21, 2019; 25(7): 744-776 Published online Feb 21, 2019. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i7.744
Table 1 Evidence-level classification
Level
Content
I
Based on a systematic review/meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
II
Based on at least one RCT
III
Based on a non-RCT
IVa
Based on an analytical epidemiological study (cohort study)
IVb
Based on an analytical epidemiological study (case-control study, cross-sectional study)
V
Based on case series and case reports
VI
Based on opinions from a specialist committee or individual specialists without patient data
Table 2 Recommendation level
Strength of recommendation
Content
A
With strong scientific evidence, strongly recommended
B
With scientific evidence, recommended
C1
Without scientific evidence, but recommended
C2
Without scientific evidence, not recommended
D
With scientific evidence of ineffective or harmful results, not recommended
Table 3 Endoscopic morphological classification of achalasia cardia
Classification
Endoscopic observations
Ling I
Cavity of the oesophagus dilates, wall of the oesophagus is straight (without tortuosity) and smooth
Ling II
Cavity of the oesophagus dilates tortuously, with a circular or semi-circular structure occurring in the oesophagus after adequate gas injection
Ling IIa
Oesophageal cavity dilates, with a thin circular structure (no semi-circular structure) occurring in the oesophagus after adequate gas injection
Ling IIb
Oesophageal cavity dilates, with a semi-circular structure occurring (midpoint within 1/3 of the cavity)
Ling IIc
Oesophageal cavity dilates, with a semi-circular structure occurring (midpoint beyond 1/3 of the cavity)
Ling III
Oesophageal cavity dilates, with a diverticular structure
Ling IIIl
Diverticular structure mainly in the left wall of the oesophagus
Ling IIIr
Diverticular structure mainly in the right wall of the oesophagus
Ling IIIlr
Diverticular structure in both the left and right walls of the oesophagus
Table 4 Degree of inflammation of the oesophageal mucosa in achalasia cardia
Grade
Endoscopic observations
Grade A
Normal mucosa, with a clear vascular texture
Grade B
Rough mucosa with a vague vascular texture
Grade C
White granular mucosa without an obvious vascular texture
Grade D
Pachyntic, striated, or sulcus-shaped mucosa without an obvious vascular texture
Grade E
Ulcer in the mucosa
Grade E1
Involvement of the oesophageal lumen ≤ 1/4
Grade E2
1/4 < involvement of the oesophageal lumen ≤ 1/2
Grade E3
1/2 < involvement of the oesophageal lumen ≤ 3/4
Grade E4
Involvement of the oesophageal lumen > 3/4
Grade F
Scar in the mucosa
Grade F1
Involvement of the oesophageal lumen ≤ 1/4
Grade F2
1/4 < involvement of the oesophageal lumen ≤ 1/2
Grade F3
1/2 < involvement of the oesophageal lumen ≤ 3/4
Grade F4
Involvement of the oesophageal lumen > 3/4
Citation: Chai NL, Li HK, Linghu EQ, Li ZS, Zhang ST, Bao Y, Chen WG, Chiu PW, Dang T, Gong W, Han ST, Hao JY, He SX, Hu B, Hu B, Huang XJ, Huang YH, Jin ZD, Khashab MA, Lau J, Li P, Li R, Liu DL, Liu HF, Liu J, Liu XG, Liu ZG, Ma YC, Peng GY, Rong L, Sha WH, Sharma P, Sheng JQ, Shi SS, Seo DW, Sun SY, Wang GQ, Wang W, Wu Q, Xu H, Xu MD, Yang AM, Yao F, Yu HG, Zhou PH, Zhang B, Zhang XF, Zhai YQ. Consensus on the digestive endoscopic tunnel technique. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25(7): 744-776